GILANG FAJAR KUSUMAWARDANA INDONESIA ‘AN ARCHITECTURE PORTFOLIO OF SELECTED PROJECT BETWEEN 2015-2017EDUCATION 2013-2017 -:Bachelor Degree at Architecture Departement. Insitute Technology of Sepuluh Nopember (ITS) Surabaya, Indonesia, GPA:3.51 0f4.00, 2017-now Profesional Degree at Architecture Departement. Insitute Technology of Sepuluh Nopember (ITS) Surabaya, Indonesia, Current GPA:3.67 of 4.00 WORKEXPERIENCE 1. Surveyor in one of Architecture ITS project in Bojonegoro 2.Internship at Arkom (Arsitek Komunitas) Jogja (1 month) 3.lnternship atOrdes Arsitektur Surabaya (2month) Research Assistant of Griffon Project. (Griffon is Plug-in Program to manage architecture program, in Grasshopper Rhino Modeling Software). 5, Design Assistantin house design in Bintaro, Jakarta, 6.Head of Architecture Student Councilin 2015-2016 SKILLS Corel Draw. tk ke Photoshop ened ‘Sketchup 3D Modeling 1k Grasshopper 3D Modeling 1 Video Editing ok Microsoft Office a Lumion/Vray ax ‘Autocad 2D. aa GILANG FAJAR KUSUMAWARDANA |1was born in and raised in Malang, East Java, Indonesia. | work well alone as well as in team in architectural project and organization. My ability isto exploreany idea ofdesign and generating probability ofthe possible idea to excutein design. |am also good in thinking visually, modeling, and alsointechnical way. ‘Myconcernin architectureis exploring and generating any possible idea and also focus in process of design to make design beyond what we aim. | believe with the concern in process of design, do iteration and exploring every possibillty, can make design even better, in technical way andalso in architectural principle. NOVEMBER TH, 1994 INDONESIAN e:gilanglive@gmailcom (©+628563606563, ig@gilangmon design work: coroflot.com/gilangmon COMPETITION EXPERIENCE 1. 1st Place Archproject Architecture Departement of ITS Internal Competiton 2015 2.Big 15th WEX UGM National Competiton 2016 3. Ist Place 51 HOURS Architecture Departement of ITS Internal Competition 2016 4.Big 50 / Finalist of Non Architecture “Training” International Competition 2016 5. ig 15th Miniatur UNDIP National Architecture ‘Competition 2017 ‘TRAINING EXPERIENCE 1.KTA (Komptetisi Tugas Akhir Nasional) 2016 Workshop about "Context held by ITS 2. Future Researchers of Indonesia Program 2017 held by Australian National University in Bogor 3.Critical Context Workshop in Unit-1 Surabaya with ‘Tutor Master from Ordes Arsitektur, 2017. Held by David Hutama and team. LANGUAGE Bahasa Indonesia | Mother tongue English ‘can speak and writeINTRODUCTION This portfolio is aiming to show how if architecture doing iteration deeply with exploration from geometry, activity, theory and even from another knowledge beyond, architecture. ‘This exploration hope that architecture can beyond from ‘our point of view nowdays. TABLE OF CONTENT DESIGN ‘TYPE: NULL - ANTITYPES ARCHITECTURE PARASITE RESEARCH GRIFFON PROJECT BARRIER SHELTER COMPETITION ESCAPE HOUSE SPECTATOR PRISM CRACK THE PARKdesign scenario diagram of FEAR Project Architectural Design 4 of Bachelor Degree Architecture Departement ITSArchitecture is like a story. They tell something -Daniel Liebskin-DESIGN TYPE: NULL ANTITYPES ARCHITECTURE The increasing variety of human activities is a consequene of the increasing human needs. Human more complex and also. increasingly unpredictable in the activity in a space. Even in one space, three can be various activies. On the other hand, the order of space and space function in an architeture is still fixed ‘and designed to be rigid in one function. The main focus is on experiencing in the proccess of abducting and dissecting the architecture process that originally used a certain type/typology of architecture to use user activity. By using the parametric method. Also un the process of exploration will more foucs in what ifthe architectural soace are ‘melted or combine, and created. What if architecture without typlogy? Instructor: Endy Yudho Prasetyo, ST. MT. | Undergraduated Thesis: 2017 | Location: Surabaya, Indonesia% ae Theissue of designistalk about howif every space, program, activity, and form is blend into one. The argumentation of the design is disagreement of typologycal approach. Typologycal approach lead to just form-making design that can not take even further, just follow the standard of the rules dan just sclupturing the design. Second disagrement is typologycal approach isn't relevant to current condition. It is becaure typologycal stereotypes is one function one program. But nowdays, function isnt predictable. A program of space can contain ‘many function and also have many activity. This design believed in form-finding approach, that with critical thinking of issue, design find a new solution with Oblique of Function concept. Itisatheory thata curvy geometry can lead a space that have many possibilty activity depand on the user. The design itself is aa large curvy space that i free space. It means, the design can be perceived by user tolead anyactivity. The control of design is make early program that contain minimum enclosure and area of what program is actually needed, So the event on the design isn't far away fromwhatisneededand cango beyond.model 6 yang dpi) ‘The design using 3 super surface to be exploring to ondulated model that can fullflltheneed of thedesign, The design using hybridazation of possible activity, than combine with the similar enclosure, proxemics, and areaRefinement of design to elaborate form and programneeded. Ae QS in SS, Gartitiwa by paqe iVISUAL SCRIPT OF ONDULATED SUPER SURFACES. ‘SUPER POSITION BETWEEN REQUIRE PROGRAM (BOXES) AND SUPER. SURFACES. THE SURFACES FOLLOW THE REQUIREMENT PROGRAM SUPER SURFACES TRANSFORMATION BASED ON GEOMETRY POSSIBILITYBIRD EYES PERSPECTIVE VIEW (WEST VIEW) BIRD EYES PERSPECTIVE VIEW (EAST VIEW}‘SUPER SURFACES TRANSFORMATION BASED ON STRUCTURE REQUIREMENT SRE OETAPOTONGAN 1ILUSTRASI AREA MAKAN DAN ENTRANCE SAMPING ILUSTRAS! ENTRANCE UTAMADESIGN Pc a PARASITE TEMPORARY VANDALISM SHELTER Inessence, Smart Citys acity exalted concept has the effet that ‘oppress and take, or perhaps metaphorical language is depriving human rights, namely the right to be recognized and postion ina urban environment. The response here isnot really an idea to solve this problem, but an imagination would be likely to happen in the futuee Loser, or people who were knocked out earlier will continue ‘to evolt, and perhaps they will occupy remaining space in Surabaya, make theic homes like web ofthe spider that appears when theres unused space. They wil ive increasingly iregular, ‘combating the existing situation to get their rights and instead may be willing to do anything to stay alive inthe city of Surabaya, This response only asa message, tothe city of Surabaya need to consider the social and human ie, Instructor: Endy Yudho Prasetyo, ST, MT. | Architecture Design 5, Experimental Architecture: 2016 Location: Surabaya, IndonesiaBehind the utopian concept ofthe city’ future, Smart City made the strict city with competition infrastructure development ofthe city Competition is not only in terms of infastructure of course, the people wil also be affected to compete as well And consequently, many people with various interests, especially developer , go to Surabaya to compete with the building ofthe infrastructure of the city of Surabaya. Construction of municipal facilities that were presented at the Smart City wll certainly make the communities in Surabaya race to acquire it. Because when viewedobjectives Smart City, whichis wanted to facilitate the entire community of Surabaya, will not happen because of the gap in the range of concitions in society of Surabaya tel With the condition oftherich illgetricher, and the displaced willbe eliminated, Smart City development ‘towards ths will give a different effect for several communities in Surabaya, This competition will make some people victorious and ‘must also be a loser. Competition conditions become not as expectedagain (Other effects, Smart City is to make humanstike robots, forcing Continues to work with rapid, routine, proper machine. Because of the increasingly ferce competition and the competitions not good to.get the ful right to.be Smart City, no wonder in the next 20 years, the people of Surabaya willbe a very strong society with ‘competitiveness, so that it becomes an individual creature. In the fend, Smart City brings us towards the city with a full engine ‘competition for survival The Winner wil certainly calm life of peace ‘amid the progress ofthe city of Surabaya inthe year 2036, And once ‘gain, if there are a winner, surely there are also be a loser. What ‘bout the Loser? The indigenous people are left behind, informal ‘workers are still many, and perhaps the nevicomers who eventually left behind be part of ths Laser, How Surabaya city’s sustainability? How does the loser have persisted in 2036later?DESIGN PARAMETER 4.1 person unt person family, dominance for 3 and 4 person family 2. The activity minimum of marginal urer is fr ling. So the minimum activity i stan, i and sleep. The dimension should be the dimension (below) and volume dm unt 10m3 cach person TEA OF WMG (OCIMTY PARMETE) sueer Min to Max —_—_—ar APPLYING... VOLUME OF STE, VDE BY THE NIMGER OF THE CELL GENERATE THE VOR! CELLDESIGN PROCESS (GENERATE VOLUME OF THE SITE GENERATING POINT GENERATING STRUCTURE GENERATING UNITS . F visicrinmcconon sEconDorvow 3 SELULAR UNIT SHAPE (MORE ROUND) 3. SEMI ORTHOGONAL SHAPE (MORE BOXES)DESIGN REFINE PROCESS. 1 FIRST STEP IS GENERATING THE STRUCTURE OF VORONOI SHAPE. 2, SECOND STEP 1S GENERATING THE FLOOR PLATE {3 LAST IS COMBINE WITH CLOSED VORONOI| CDR TA ry = | NOP BL Sua. i iy”BULONG SECTON‘THE CONNECTOR BETWEEN EVERY VORONOI SPACES IS METAL PLATFORM, SPIRAL STAIR, AND ALSO LADDER. = STEEL TUBE FOR UNIT STRCTURE STEEL SLING FOR CONNECTOR EACH UNIT STEEL SLING FOR CONNECTOR MEMBRANE FOR UNIT'S COVER THE MAIN STRUCTURE 1S USING VORONOI IT SELF, IT IS LIKE A SPIDER \WEB THAT HANGING IN ANOTHER OBJECT. IN THIS CASE, THE VORONOI STRUCTURE HANGING INTO ANOTHER BUILDING. THIS PROJECT MAIN CONSTRUCTION IS USING STEEL BECAUSE TO MAKE THE OBJECT HANGING IS MORE FIT USING ‘THE STRUCTURE THAT HAVE PULL FORCES TYPES, SO STEEL IS FITTOTT.‘THE UNIT PULL BY STEEL SLING. ‘THE DESIGN OF THE STRUCTURE ‘AND UNIT IS GENERATED FROM GRASSHOPPER - PARAMETRIC. NOL OAM MODUL 1 = 1 VORONOI 1 SPACES ‘THE SECTION BECAUSE OF THE RANDOMNESS OF THE SHAPE, THERE ARE FEW UNIT WITH FLAT FLOOR. SO TO SOLVE ANOTHER UNIT'S FLOOR PROBLEM, ANOTHER UNIT THAT NOT HAS FLAT FLOOR ADDED BY METAL PLATE. THE WEAKNESS IS THE VOLUME BECOME SMALLER. [MEMBRANE WALL LZ STEELTUBE UNT DESGN ‘MODUL 2 = FEW VORONOI 1 SPACESFRONT ELEVATION SOE BEATINNNER PART DIAGRAN OF PARASITE$s 2? & @ GRIFFON PLUG-IN RESEARCH FOR GRASSHOPPER, Inthe present times, the workload of architect and designer is {growing but the time is stil. Architect and designer also need a tools to speed up their work to ful their goal. Many tools like Autocad, Sketchup, ete made because to make the work faster wth {900d result. But the tools mistakes s using additive process and forr- making approach, which snot helping the designer when the ‘design become more complex. The designe still depand their own brain to develop design. But in recent year, the development of scripting in computers increase. There are many software, that combine the brain of ‘designer and the ability ofthat software to make iteration to design ‘and make more assosiative design. Examples grasshopper revit, and many more [t's the need ofthe architect and designer to use _assosltive software to make design beyond what we expect. In this case, we wanted to use the ability to grasshoper to make an ‘architectural design approach, not only make a form, but also to ‘arrange program requirement of building that s more complex ‘We try tomake own scripting model to become plug-in for ‘grasshopper. The goals sto make programming process in architecture take itl time and more iteration with this research, The research itself is still on going, Jobdesk: idea & Concept generator, visualization Research team: Endy Yudho Prasetyo (Head) , Fahmi Mukhlis, Gilang Fajar Kusumawardana, Wandy Witama Project year: 2017DECONSTRUCTION E-CONSTRUCTION OP AACHTECTURE _ SPATIOTEMPORAL TENPORAL PROGRAM BASED ON TIME ARCHITECTURE & DISJUNCTION (CROSSPROGRANNANG TRANSPROGRAMIING DIS-FROGRANIMING AUTOPOIESIS. SELF-PRODUCTION FORM- FUNCTION CORELATION ABILTY ‘The research focused on probability programming methods from {ew theoris about hybridazation of space. What it means is program ‘of space in current society is not fixed. A program can contain many ‘activities and function, So a space can have many possiblities of function depand on certain condition by perception ofthe user. We ‘uytobreakthe conditionisdepandon the enclouseandarea needed by a certain function. Than we make a grouping of some function with same characterisic/parameter and make a new space of program contain that few function. Ourprojectisto research vhat is the parameter needed, how the logic is working, and how the method to do some hybridazation of space. We hope this project become anew methodtoarchitectural design someday. a ve gk LT svat of use thatcan preea space depand on lusationof use that an peeve space depand on certain condition Ths aencampethat boundary oF certain condtion Tis isa excarpe tha table and char ‘pace goomeiy ofspace and enlosuecfthespace an ‘an pecevedsiting actvty Take few deren acyCROSS-PROGRAMMING TRANS-PROGRAMMING DIS-PROGRAMMING = [Se = (See , if en = al = Fle LD? @& Tikve 7 | Gives an old building/space a Places two programmes that The positioning of two functions ew function or programme ‘are not normally associated with together so that one can not intended for it ‘each other together potentially undo/induce the other The rn concep of development this pug. Using Crossprogramming theory f Bead Thur welean that afunction ano together with ths pape Ara sothiststhe main concept of hs plugin MAIN RESEARCH - THE LOGIC. PLUG-IN ICON AND COMMAND/NODE DIAGRAM ICON IN GRASSHOPPER, BAGS + sa ose GRIFFON gq Ge Se Pct Digam —aitleDgm rr DuranENCLOSURE LIST FOR THE USE OF GROUPING THE FUNCTION A B ROOF WALL FLOOR Trard-seape FLOOR soft scape Tard seape solseape hard-seape soft-scape SN MASSIVE MASSIVE HARDSCAPE 7 7 0 2 25 28 3 Ea 3 rm 3 46 WALL transparent 6 9 2 5 5 7 ROOF Derloated | _Wansparent rm 75 17 7 2 2 HOOF Derlorated | transparent 2a 2 20 a 36 Ey a2 5 48 MAIN ENCLOSURE \ / \, PERFORATED PERFORATED WW ‘SOFTSCAPE erorated Lronsperent erred transparent erated transparent ‘TRANSPARENT TRANSPARENT UNACCESSIBLE FLOORCONCEPTUAL DIAGRAM OF THE METHOD. Fist tep ofthe method is determine the function and set the requirement need (enclouse, area/volume/ the name) ‘Second step, is determince which space/zoneifunction that want tobe combine. and also determine the parameter ofthe function to combine. Like combine with function that has same volume, same fenclosure, same area, ete Last determine the connection ofthe hybrid zone/function with certain parameter like visual, comfort, standard, same level, gradient of enclosue et) In tis diagram, the colour (red.orange, and yellow) isto show the the different level. ame colour is means same levelVISUAL SCRIPT CONCEPT IN GRASSHOPPER ub Manual scripting to make grasshopper visual node diagram. Logic transform to computer scripting, Worked by Wandy WitamaEXAMPLE OF THE LOGIC (COMBINATION OF FEW ACTIVITY FROM FEW TYPOLOGY TO BECOME NEW ORDER OF DESIGN) ALL ACTIVITY ENTRY + MERGING SYSTEM 1) MAKAN DUDUK/SANTANGOBROL- UAL BEL — (Grouping Space based on architect decision fom hal patametar lth space should eombane 15 ISTIRAHAT/TIDURANIBERSANT 16 AREA JILIO OOKUMEN — ED 19. TEMPAT PRINT 20 MENGELOLA HASi 21 PACKAGING — Il 22 EDIT PRA PRINTING — 23.GUDANG - i me MM enclosure Types MMIMERGE INDEX IN AREA VISUALIZATION OF MERGE PROCESS TO BECOME NEW ZONE/SPACECONNECTION VISUALIZATION BASED ON ARCHITECT/DESINGNER WANT 2D Bubble Diagram FROM CONCEPT TO PLUG-IN, RECENT DEVELOPMENT FROM RESEARCH CONCEPT TO ACTUAL PLUG-IN Grasshopper-uanamed -o x GRIFFON menuin | ie Ed View Chey Skin Hp eset ‘oresshoppet frm Mah Set_Vec_Crv Sd Mah It Tine Dis ib Ath Kirgneo [Gls SE F Tap ZONE sa group of ‘command that contain input. ‘The input examples ike the zone, hybrid one ete Tap VISUALIZING isa group of ‘command that contain Visualization of process like” ‘grouping, merge ete ‘Tap MERGEIsa group of ‘command that contain processing command to grouping/hybrid process/merge etc. Depand ‘on what parameter we want tomerge Tap ARRAY isa group of command that contain ‘processing command to make.~ organization space/room from zone/hybrid zoneBARRIER-SHELTER ‘SHELTER TO REDUCES VISUAL DISTRACTION Can architecture control human mind? can architecture dive our visual perception, and make our eyes select what must to be seen? ‘This research begin with a context in Tunjungan street Surabaya, ‘Tunjugan street Surabaya sa one of roadin Surabaya tat always crowded and always be centre of destination in Surabaya heritage learning, In the middle year of 2017 this road was in renovation for the pedestrian way. So the concesequences ithe road was croded with construction material the worker, and another construction machine. But the interesting phenomena s almost people who get through the Tunjungan streets distracted by the construction process. People want to see it, and people so curious, and automaticly their {eyes glance at the construction process while they cross the road It smake the trafic more dangerous becose thelr focused is separated and cantt concentrated onthe driving. tcan make a street ancident, CCan architecture solve or maybe just hep to respond ths problem? Jobdesk: idea & Concept generator, visualization Research team: Gilang Fajar Kusumawardana, Linggar Surya Instructor: Defry Agatha & Endy Yudho Prasetyo (Ordes Arsitektur) Project year: 2017We tried to study of visual perception. in conclusion, when the eyes see something, lets say Isyana’s photo. In our research from few people, wil automaticly perceived the complex things frst that can Identify the whole picture. In thiscase, whatlsthefirst things we see Iseyes, nose, and lips. Then after seeing this three things, we can see the whole picture And tistrue that eyes, nose and lips isthe things In our face that can identify who we are tis ikea main characteristic thatslikeanidentityofourface, Then wetried to study of visual perception wth the help ofour hand and pencil We try to make dots and lines picture what point we see firs, second, thd etc until we se the whole picture. tislike make a road map. And the result is that eyes, nose, and lips is have more pointsandline.ttmeansthatour visual perceptionis ike tolook what Is more complex things in a picture and then determine the whol. We can associate that the more complex the elemnt ina picture, we willseeitfistto perceived,So with that conclusion, we tried to take the theory tothe context. We selected few spot that has element that distracted people in our survey. Then we try to analysis with dot and lines method before. Our asumption about the complexity, and'more dots and lines"is fa element in some picture has more texture, more colorful, more depth of ight and shadow, {and moving objec is make the element ‘more complex and more dats & lines. The consequences itisathing that made we perceived at first and itis what made the distraction for the people who cross the toad, So in the conclusion, it is right that the Construction isthe main things that made visual disctraction to the people in the toad, The main reason is simple, because the construction element is very different from the enviroment and make it more atractthe visual perception ofoureyes.Early respond of the issue is like in left coloum, Make another disctraction, vanishing the construction object, and made it invisible with video mapping, But we think itis made new distraction, So we try to make research again and made conclusion tha ight and shadow can dlstrupt visual distraction. we try to make object spoted withlight the consequenceis,thecontrast is being high and the object is more complex. But if we hide that thing in shadow, the dots and lines"is hidden the object is more simple and less attraction. So our respond isto make a barter andalsoa shelter The BARRIER-SHELTER made theroad isbeing proctected and also madeshadow that made the construction process has les visual attraction, and inthe end of the research, we iterated the probability ofthe BARRIER-SHELTER form so itcan useinthedlfferent spot‘The design of BARRIER-SHELTER is few metal sheets that can freely to make barrier, or shelter. The configuration of the metal Sheets like lke a big metal sheets that slice into few pleces. And for thelocksystem,therearehave along pipeinthe iddleto becomea porous and also locking sy nceptual product, so th Imageand the producti ik ptiontorespond the issues,COMPETITION ESCAPE HOUSE MOVING HOUSE FOR MOVING URBAN SOCIETY ‘Are we stil needa house? We work, we study, almost 8 hours a day, then going to eat fr one unt three hours, then going to hangout with family and friends for S unt 6 hours, then at last going home just for sleep for & hours. Look atthe calculation ofthe hours, we spent almost 16 hoursin outside of the house, and then ust sleep in the house. We live inthe outside ofthe world. We become. ‘moving person, So the need of the house is questioned. [Ahouse itself today is very expensive, we alvays buld larger and bigger, but nthe result, many spacesis nat being use properly Built house'sike built a wasted of space because ofthat reason. Inthis competion that questioned the exstence ofthe house in the future, we purposed the house that can be moved. The ‘program tselfis very compact and aso very exible. Our idea isa house from a container, that can expanded when it sneed. The result the house that has box shape, that can bebrought”to every place we need, and we called it Escape house, urban house to| fulfil the need of always" moving people. Jobdesk: idea & Concept generator, visualization Title: Top 15th of National Architecture Competition WEX UGM 2016 | Location: Anywhere lang Fajar Kusumawardana, M. Whibi Rhouzan Fikri, Wahyu Sanjaya Project year: 2016MATERIAL DIAGRAM TRANSFORMATION PROGRAMMATIC DIAGRAM TRANSFORMATION Main concept of the ESCAPE HOUSE is moving object. So ifwe talk about moving abject, it must be so compact, must so flexible to move and very appropriate, We decided to select 4 main spaces of, thehouse(toletsleeping spaces, comunal spaces, andkitchen).The ‘main conceptof exbiity'splayingtheflexiblity fomunal spaces and sleeping spaces that relatively just need empty spaces. In the need of moving houses, we decided to design it with Container material. Its because the structural ofthe container itself it already sturdy and the materials easy to modify. The form of the ‘objectisboxes The wall ofthe container canbe fold and can become. ‘a spaces (comunal spaces and sleeping spaces), This design has fold rmembraneroofifthe walltransform intonew spaces.EXPAND PLAN, ‘COMPRESS PLAN oem Go SECTION A-A ‘THE CONTAINER CAN BE BROUGHT BY CAR SECTION B-B an oe PROBABILITY TO BRINGING FROM LAND-SEA-AIR -~ SECTION C-CCOMPETITION ‘SPECTATOR PRISM ‘TRACING THE HISTORY OF SPORTS ‘So many years sports has been linked towards physical Activities. Sports itself started since the prehistoric age ofthe human civilization, where humankind use sports as their entertainment, assertively written on the cave ofthe wall, an ilustration of humankind wrestling, ‘The next stage of sports started inthe ancient Greece, when they were planning on creating army, they train their citizen through physical ‘gaming, which ater inviting alt of spectator. This activites slater known as sports What may seemingly unimportant was the idea that spectators have a very intimate connection with the sports itself the sense of belonging towards the sports actor which they support invites us to pull this issue tothe surface. For us the future sport faclty isthe future sports spectator facil. ‘The prism are made by lass, bind to the steel structure. The steel structure is attached tothe rotating gear box in orde forthe prism to shift it shape, the shape ofthe prism allow the LCD projectors Underneath it to project its mage tothe glass surface, the image wall ass through the convex lens and projected to the 4 sides ofthe prism ‘creating ahologram like image. Jobdesk: idea & Concept generator, prism modeling, technical image visualization Title: Top 50 of International Architecture Competition NON-ARCHITECTURE 2016 Competition team: Bayu Rizky Ramadhan, Ahndya Chita Sekar E, Irfan Andhika Putra, Gilang Fajar Kusumawardana, Sadida Aghnia Project year: 2016at —_ting. i reSK rey RG oman ) He CaanCOMPETITION CRACK THE PARK MOSQUE AS URBAN INTERVENTION IN JAKARTA PUBLIC SPACES Inthe year of 2050, 80% on global population will be in the urban area, leaving the rural Jakarta also the one predicted by national population census that will be has same phenomenon. In other side, the need of public spaces and many public facies will incresed too. We ago think, that mosque is also one of them that will be built and evole. ‘Are mosque in 2050 will stand alone ike nowdays? ort willbe a public realm together with other function? In the 2020 up to 2030, Plaza Indonesia mall pedestrian way willbe change and built into ‘new public space realm in Jakarta. In that condition, we try to make mosque that n-joint ‘with that public spaces. We think that mosque ist need to stand alone, mosque also a ‘public spaces that not only for prayer, but also to talk, educate, and inform to society ‘about Islamic activity. Our concept is make a Mosque that ‘cack the par’ it means that the plan ofthe mosque isthe intervention spaces inthe public spaces. The intervention ‘ake form ike cracking the earth, making @ hole and semi-underground spaces. The interupton itself is jut fold the land in the tiangle-tke shape and foldit up. So the activity ofthe mosque is still in the bottom, and the top of the crackis stil the part of public spaces. Te openness ofthe mosque make it can expand anytime. The position of the mosque also located inthe mile of Grand Indonesia and Plaza Indonesia because the itis the pace that willbe very crowded of pedestrian, and the mosque isbetween ‘them, located near ofthe prediction of human crossing path. Jobdesk: Idea & Concept generator, model exploration, diagram visualization, narration writer Title: Top 15th of National Architecture Competition MINIATUR UNDIP 2017 | Location: Jakarta, Indonesia Competition team: Gilang Fajar Kusumawardana, Sadida Aghnia, M. Agra Adhiprasasta, Ikvan Romadhani Project year: 2017DIAGRAMATIC OF ISSUE & RESPONSE yn AWDESIGN CONCEPT DESIGN METHOD Intervention between the pathPLAZA INDONESIA tr SITEPLAN® Floor drain for water outer area >t ¥ ¥ Wudhu area Maintance room Toilet “Trees fram the top that make spaces more dynamic Minaret for sign and also for the spaces of speaker A-ASECTIONfor more project check it at coroflot.com/gilangmon “a process is more important than outcome. When the outcome drives the process we willonly ever go to where we have already been. I process drives outcome we may not know where we are going, but we will now we want to be there” Bruce Mau (1998), Incomple Manifesto for Growth