Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/powtec
Received 19 March 2004; received in revised form 19 May 2004; accepted 10 August 2004
Available online 29 September 2004
Abstract
The influence of microwave pre-treatment on mineral ore breakage has been investigated. Samples of lead–zinc ore were microwave pre-
treated prior to strength testing and change in strength with microwave exposure time determined. Comparisons of change in strength were
made between microwave-treated and -untreated material. Using a multimode microwave cavity, it was found that strength could be
significantly reduced in 0.5 s when using 15 kW of microwave power. Lower powers in this type of cavity were found to be less effective.
Drop weight tests were used to quantify the change in strength in terms of reduction in required comminution energy. Reductions of up to
40% were achieved for particles of mean size 14.53 mm. Preliminary tests in a single-mode microwave cavity gave strength reductions of
50% at 10 kW of microwave power with a residence time of only 0.1 s, indicating that high electric field strength is important in the failure of
ore. A preliminary energy balance indicating the benefits of single-mode heating is presented.
D 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
comminution energy (ECS kW h/t). To model the breakage 4. Results and discussion
process, a method of relating energy to geometric size
reduction was developed. The basic principle of the 4.1. Mineralogy
method is that, if a single particle is broken, the size
distribution of the daughter particles may be considered as Previous research [7] has demonstrated a close relation-
a M2 series and a cumulative size distribution graph ship between the effectiveness of microwave treatment and
plotted. The graph is then replotted after dividing the x- the mineralogy of the ore. It was shown that of particular
axis by the original particle size. A series of marker points importance was the degree of dissemination of the micro-
are then used to describe the size distribution. These are wave-absorbing minerals within the host rock and also the
defined as a percentage passing t, a fraction of the original size of the absorbing species. The purpose of the minera-
particle size. Thus, t 2 is the percentage passing half of the logical investigation was therefore to investigate these
original size, etc. The value of t 10, i.e. the amount passing factors qualitatively for the ore in question.
10% the original mean size, is used as the characteristic The mineralogy of the microwave-transparent gangue of
size reduction, and may be considered a fineness index. To this sample was found to vary. Discrete, transparent,
make use of this technique, the marker points t 2, t 4, t 25, t 50 gangue-rich bands were clearly evident and were found to
and t 75 are stored in matrix form against t 10. This be typically rich in biotite (K2 (Mg,Fe) 3AlSi 3O 10(O-
information is then used to calculate the values of A and H,O,F2)2) and K-feldspar (KAlSi3O8). Within the sphalerite
b by fitting Eq. (2) to the plotted data. A and b are defined ((Zn,Fe)S)- and galena (PbS)-rich portions of the ore, the
as the ore impact breakage parameters and are related to transparent gangue minerals were found to occur as rounded
specific comminution energy input (ECS) and t 10 by Eq. (2): and sub-rounded aggregates that consist predominantly of
quartz and K-feldspar. The major lead mineral present was
t10 ¼ A 1 eb:ECS ð2Þ found to be galena, which often occurred along the fractures
within the transparent gangue. The grain size of the
The fitting procedure generally yields a value of about 50 transparent gangue minerals was found to be highly
for A, while b is indicative of the softness of the ore, a larger variable. Generally, however, the transparent gangue min-
value indicating a softer ore. erals were medium grained in size, with the bulk of the
To determine the influence of microwave treatment on gangue minerals exhibiting a grain size of between 50 and
the breakage behaviour of the material, two drop-weight 150 Am in size. Sphalerite was found to be the dominant
tests were carried out. The first was on untreated, bas zinc mineral within the sample and generally it occurred as
receivedQ material, utilising the three different required granular aggregates that were intimately intergrown with
energy levels detailed in Table 1. The second was carried galena and the transparent gangue minerals. The relative
out on a sample of ore that had been microwave-treated in distribution of sphalerite in the sample was highly variable
the multimode cavity for 1 s at 15 kW. For the treated and in some cases was locally abundant or aggregated (i.e.
sample, the comminution energy input (ECS) was reduced not evenly distributed throughout the sample) occurring
by 40% for all breakage events in an attempt to produce within discrete sphalerite-rich bands that may exceed
similar breakage characteristics for the microwave-treated several millimetres in width. However, generally, the
material as for the untreated sample. These data were then sphalerite grains ranged in size from an effective lower
used to provide an estimate of the potential comminution limit of 10 Am to the largest grains that exceed 100 Am in
energy savings that may be achieved by microwave size. The bulk of the sphalerite however exhibited a more
treatment. In preliminary drop weight testing, Ecs was restricted grain size of between 20 and 75 Am. Typical
fixed at the values shown in Table 1 for both treated and images, obtained from the mineralogical analysis, are shown
untreated samples. Surprisingly, A and b were found to be in Fig. 1a and b.
approximately the same despite the presence of significant
visible fracture and reduced values of point load strength. 4.2. Point load strength testing
Despite the treated and untreated materials having the
same mineral composition after treatment the material is Fig. 5 shows a plot of the median strength versus
essentially a different ore in terms of its comminution microwave exposure time for samples treated in the multi-
behaviour and therefore A and b will be different. mode microwave cavity, where the median has been used as
However, it is clear that a drop weight test performed at it is a good measure of the centre of a population in the
the high Ecs values shown in Table 1 is insufficiently presence of extreme values. It can be seen that the
sensitive to detect the presence of this significant fracture. microwave treatment has had a significant effect on the
Therefore, to assess the influence of microwave pre- strength of the ore samples particularly at the highest power.
treatment with sufficient sensitivity, Ecs values for the For samples treated at 15 kW, less than 55% of the original
treated material were reduced by 40% from those used for strength remains after only 1 s of exposure. For samples
the untreated material with the objective of producing the treated at 5 kW, a significant decrease in strength occurs
same degree of breakage. only after prolonged heating of the sample. There is some
S.W. Kingman et al. / Powder Technology 146 (2004) 176–184 181
evidence from the data that it is possible to induce only a Figs. 5 and 6 plot the median value of point load strength
certain amount of thermal damage for a certain applied versus microwave exposure time. Therefore, error bars
power level. Samples treated at 15 kW exhibit significant reporting standard deviation from the mean are not added to
reductions in strength after only 1 s of treatment but show the plots to visually indicate the degree of scatter in the data.
little further decrease in strength with an increase in It illustrate the spread in the data. Fig. 7 shows a histogram
exposure time. Table 2 shows the 95% confidence limit of actual point load strength versus sample number for
on the mean (assuming an approximately normal distribu- untreated material and material treated at 10 kW for 0.5 and
tion), sample standard deviation and sample mean. It can be 1 s within the single-mode cavity. It can be seen that the
seen that the microwave-treated material has a rather large untreated samples are clearly stronger than both the treated
confidence interval compared with the mean. This is due to sets but after treatment at 10 kW for 0.5 s quite a large
the few particles that were relatively unaffected by treatment variation in sample strength exists with sample 5 being
as a result of their mineralogy (i.e. the particle contained stronger than several of the untreated samples. For the
essentially only a single phase) or particles that were sample treated for 1 s at the same power level, the degree of
completely destroyed. In addition, as a result of the type scatter can be seen to be lower as the samples are all very
of microwave cavity used (TE10n ) the electric field is weak. Fig. 7 illustrates that a significant degree of scatter
necessarily zero at the edges of the cavity; therefore, there occurs in the data, particularly in the microwave-treated
will be an inherent unevenness in the treatment, i.e. some samples exposed for short times. The reason for this is
particles will receive optimum treatment and some will discussed above, i.e. variation in the magnitude of electric
receive very little [8]. field across the cavity giving rise to uneven field heating
rates. It is therefore clear that if ore samples are to be
significantly reduced in strength at economic microwave
Table 2
power levels then the electric field must be both large and
Statistical data for multimode point load tests evenly distributed.
Treatment Time I s(50) MPa106
4.3. Drop weight test
Mean Standard Median 95% Confidence
deviation interval on mean
Table 3 shows the calculated values of specific commi-
Untreated 0.00 5.26 1.91 4.40 1.67
15 kW 1.00 2.70 1.70 2.14 1.49 nution energy for different degrees of breakage for different
5.00 1.64 1.41 1.72 1.23 particle sizes for the untreated material. The calculations are
10.00 0.80 0.96 2.11 0.84 carried out by fixing the value of t 10 in Eq. (2), using the
Untreated 0.00 5.26 1.91 4.40 1.67 appropriate breakage parameters A, b and then calculating
10 kW 1.00 4.16 3.69 2.48 3.24
the value of Ecs. The breakage parameters used for the
5.00 2.31 0.67 2.43 0.59
10.00 1.59 0.73 1.68 0.64 calculation of the data in Table 3 were calculated by using
Untreated 0.00 5.26 1.91 4.40 1.67 the specific energy inputs detailed in Table 1. These are as in
5 kW 1.00 4.16 1.20 3.79 1.05 the recommended test method [11]. The values of the impact
5.00 2.20 1.51 1.94 1.32 breakage parameters for untreated ore were A=70.6 and
10.00 2.21 1.50 1.52 1.32
b=1.53.
182 S.W. Kingman et al. / Powder Technology 146 (2004) 176–184
Table 4 shows the calculated specific comminution A comparison of Tables 3 and 4, however, shows almost
energy for different degrees of breakage for different identical values of Ecs for the larger size fractions (41.08
particle sizes for material that was microwave-treated for 1 and 57.78 mm) but significantly smaller values for the
s at 15 kW. The data were calculated by using a similar treated material in the smaller factions. For example, to
method to that above. However, the breakage parameters produce a t 10 of 10% from particles with an average feed
were determined by using breakage events with the Ecs size of 14.53 mm would require a comminution energy
reduced by 40 % from the standard values as used above. input of 0.1 kW h/t for the untreated and 0.06 kW h/t for the
The value of 40% was used after consideration of the treated. For a t 10 of 20%, the untreated material would
change in strength shown by the point load tests. However, require 0.21 kW h/t and the microwave-treated material
even with the reduced input energy it was found that the would require 0.12 kW h/t.
values of the impact breakage parameters were A=61.2 and These results are significant as they show that similar
b=2.19 for the treated material, indicating that the material breakage behaviour can be achieved for the microwave-
is very different in terms of its comminution behaviour. It is treated material as for the untreated material in the smaller
particularly significant that parameter b, indicating the size fractions but with only 60% of the comminution energy
softness of the ore, is greatly increased in comparison with input.
the untreated material. The parameter b is an indication of The results obtained in the multimode applicator have
ore softness [11]. shown that microwave treatment can have a significant
Fig. 7. Histogram of point load strength for untreated material and material treated in single-mode cavity.
S.W. Kingman et al. / Powder Technology 146 (2004) 176–184 183
ogy. The review discussed earlier in this paper [1] stated in terms of throughput and circulating load. The importance
that, although the benefits of thermally assisted comminu- of electric field strength has also been demonstrated and it
tion were technically attractive, the economic were often has been shown that significant reductions in ore strength
poor. This study has shown that significant reductions in the can be achieved with cavity residence times of less than 0.5
required comminution energy may be achieved for low s by treating material in high electric field strength single-
microwave energy inputs. mode cavities. It is also shown that the strengths of
The microwave energy requirement for samples treated microwave-treated samples exhibit higher standard devia-
in the single-mode cavity can be compared to those in the tions relative to the mean than untreated samples. This is
multimode cavity. Assuming a 1-kg load in each case: suggested to be a function of uneven electric field
distribution within the cavity used for the test work. It is
Multimode cavity ð10 W for 5sÞ
clear from this test work that if microwave treatment of ores
0 1
is ever to be economic high values of electric field must be
5
B 3600 C used that are evenly distributed across the feed ore stream.
¼ 10B C
@ 1 A ¼ 13:88 kW h=t ð3Þ
1000
References
Single mode cavity ð10 kW for 0:5sÞ [1] T.J. Veasey, K.E. Fitzgibbon, Thermally assisted liberation of
0 1 minerals—a review, Minerals Engineering 3 (1/2) (1990) 181 – 185.
0:5 [2] T.T. Chen, J.E. Dutrizac, K.E. Haque, W. Wyslouzil, S. Kashyap, The
B 3600 C relative transparency of minerals to microwave radiation, Canadian
¼ 10B C
@ 1 A ¼ 1:38 kW h=t ð4Þ Metallurgical Quarterly 23 (1) (1984) 349 – 351.
[3] J.W. Walkiwicz, G. Kazonich, S.L. McGill, Microwave heating
1000 characteristics of selected minerals and compounds, Minerals and
Metallurgical Processing 5 (1) (1988) 39 – 42.
If the power level were to be increased to 15 kW and the [4] S.W. Kingman, N.A. Rowson, S. Blackburn, Chapter 24, applications
residence time reduced to 0.05 s, as suggested above, this of microwave radiation to enhance performance of mineral separation
would mean only 0.21 kW h/t of microwave energy would processes, innovation in physical separation technologies, Institution
be used. Typically, an ore may require a total of up to 20 kW of Mining and Metallurgy (1998) 339 – 349 (ISBN 1870706358).
h/t for the size reduction process or more if very fine [5] S.W. Kingman, G. Corfield, N.A. Rowson, Effect of microwave
radiation on the mineralogy and magnetic processing of ilmenite,
grinding is required. Therefore, microwave energy inputs of Magnetic and Electrical Separation 9 (1999) 131 – 148.
this magnitude may be attractive economically. [6] S.W. Kingman, N.A. Rowson, The effect of microwave radiation on
It should be stressed that the single-mode cavity used the magnetic properties of minerals, Journal of Microwave Power and
was not optimised. With further cavity development, higher Electromagnetic Energy 35 (2) (2000) 141 – 150.
powers and even shorter exposure times would become [7] S.W. Kingman, W. Vorster, N.A. Rowson, The influence of
mineralogy on microwave assisted grinding, Minerals Engineering
feasible and the microwave energy requirement reduced 13 (3) (2000) 313 – 327.
even further. [8] A.C. Metaxas, R.J. Meredith, Industrial Microwave Heating, Peter
Peregrinus, London, 1983.
[9] E. Broch, J.A. Franklin, The point load strength test, International
5. Conclusions Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 9 (1972) 669 – 697.
[10] E. Hoek, E.T. Brown, The Inst. Min. and Metall. London. (1980).
[11] T.J. Napier-Munn (Ed.), Mineral Comminution Circuits. Their
The change in strength of samples exposed to micro- Operation and Optimisation, JKMRC Monograph Series in Mining
waves in multimode cavities has been shown to be related to and Mineral Processing, vol. 2, University of Queensland, Australia,
applied microwave power level. By using comparative drop 1996.
weight tests, it has also been shown that material micro- [12] D.N. Whittles, S.W. Kingman, D.J. Reddish, Application of numerical
modelling for prediction of the influence of power density on
wave-treated for 1 s at 15 kW is significantly weaker in the microwave assisted breakage, International Journal of Mineral
smaller size fractions. This would clearly alter the commi- Processing 64 (1–4) (2003) 71 – 91.
nution behaviour in a continuous process plant particularly