Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SERSC
WHAT IMPACT CONSUMERS' NEGAT IVE EWOM PURCHASE INT ENT ION? EVIDENCE FROM MAL…
Sardar Md Humayun Kabir
WHAT IMPACT CONSUMERS' NEGAT IVE EWOM PURCHASE INT ENT ION? EVIDENCE FROM MALAYSIA
Sardar Md Humayun Kabir
Assessment of Impact of Technological Transformat ion on Consumer Sat isfact ion in Ret ail Indust ry
Ankit a Ochani
International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology
Vol. 29, No. 7, (2020), pp. 8861-8871
Abstract
The present study was aimed to explore the influence of brand equity, brand reputation, brand
trust, e-word of mouth on brand loyalty among female millennial cyber shoppers in Chennai city
of Tamil Nadu. The present study adopted survey method and non-probability judgment
sampling was employed to selected primary responses in the form of questionnaires. The result
proves that except brand equity, other factors such as brand reputation, brand trust, e-word of
mouth have significant and positive influence on brand loyalty among female millennial cyber
shoppers in the study area. In addition, the result proves that Whatapp, YouTube, FaceBook and
Instagram are the most preferred social media networking sites of female millennial cyber
shoppers to know information about different branded products. brand loyalty is the key factor to
survive and succeed in the e-commerce business in India. Hence, higher is the perception on
brand reputation and brand trust; higher is the brand loyalty among female millennial
consumers.
Keywords: Brand Loyalty, Brand Equity, Brand Reputation, Brand Trust, E-Word of Mouth and
Millennials
1. Introduction
The growth and emergence of electronic commerce has rapidly changed the business paradigm in
the global and local market. The change in business phenomenon has provided lot of
opportunities and chances to change the way in which business is being conducted today across
the globe (Lohani, 2009; McCarthy & Zakrajšek, 2007). The role of internet is very imperative
for today’s shopping methods for consumers and thus, leads to the more type of multi cultural
and cross cultural management problems for the e-retailers to attract and satisfy the consumers.
There many factors predicting the cyber shopping behavior of different types of consumers in
today’s competitive business environment (Brusch & Stüber, 2014; Foscht et.al, 2013; Anderson
et.al, 2009). Virtual store atmosphere, website design, service quality, customer delight, brand
loyalty and many other factors have significant influence on the performance of cyber shopping
business firms (Devia et.al, 2018; Vezir OĞUZ, 2018). On the other hand, growth of social
media has witnessed a rapid adoption among different types of consumers especially, millennial
consumers. Many studies have proved that millennials have higher usage of social media as
compared to other age groups (Hübner Barcelos, & Alberto Vargas Rossi, 2014; Moore, 2012).
consumer towards their product and brand in a continuous cycle (Jones and Kim, 2010; Chen-Yu
et.al, 2016; Arrora, 2017). The brand trust is always focused on idea and experience of the
customer to store the information in their minds (Kim and Jones, 2009; Balaji & Baskaran,
2018). Correspondingly, the attitude of the customer towards particular product or brand in the
form of trust is very important to be more positive for the growth of the corporate in a particular
nature of industry.
2.4 E-Word of Mouth
E-Word of Mouth (e-WOM) is informal communication between two or more parties using
electronic platform for the exchange of ideas, expressions, experience or information to
indoctrinate the others (Chen et.al, 2017; Heo, 2018). E-Word of Mouth is given much
importance among customers since, the communicator is not having a persuasion to sell the
particular product rather, and the individuals only recommends the product for usage or purchase
in online platform (Baber et.al, 2016; Ladhari & Michaud, 2015). It is very powerful tool for
customer engagement and customer commitment towards particular product or service offered
via online platform. This key term act as a advisor, motivator and antecedent to determine the
purchase behavior of the consumer towards particular branded product in e-commerce business.
2.5 Brand Loyalty
Consumer’s commitment and attitude towards particular brand act as a key driver to promote
particular brand in online business environment to facilitate the consumers. Most importantly,
loyal consumers will repeatedly purchase the product over a period of time, whenever, there is a
need or demand for the branded product (Van Doorn et.al, 2010; Ramaseshan, & Stein, 2014).
The loyalty among consumer towards particular brand has been created with the help of many
factors such as, customer satisfaction, delight, good experience, attraction, sustainability in
quality, brand equity, brand reputation, brand trust and e-word of mouth promotional tool
(Kandampully, et.al, 2015). The today’s consumers are not afraid of technological adoption. So,
interestingly the consumer brand loyalty creation in online business environment is most difficult
and imperative aspect for the success of the brand architecture (Choi, et.al, 2016). The existing
literature proves that more number of studies have focused on brand equity, brand reputation,
brand trust, and e-word of mouth promotion etc., to determine and predict the consumer behavior
towards brand acceptance and brand engagement. There is a need and gap in the existing
literature to explore the relationship of brand equity, brand reputation, brand trust and e-word of
mouth on brand loyalty among cyber shoppers especially, among millennial generation cohorts
in India.
3. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The present study aims to solve the problems pertaining to the determinants of brand loyalty
among cyber shoppers in the e-commerce industry. The cyber shoppers are having higher
exposure to technology and better socio-economic conditions to make regular purchase in online
platform to satisfy their regular needs and wants. There is a need to understand the cyber
shopping phenomenon to attract the consumers towards particular branded product. The
attraction and engagement of consumer towards particular brand was determined by brand
loyalty. The present study aims to solve the problems faced by different stakeholders on cyber
shopping platform to enhance the brand loyalty among millennials to increase profitability and
brand performance in e-commerce business environment.
4. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY
Brand Equity
Brand Reputation
Brand Loyalty
Brand Trust
E-Word of Mouth
6. RESEARCH METHODLOGY
The present study was adopted empirical and exploratory research design to explore the
perception of female millennial cyber shoppers in Chennai city on significant factors influences
the brand loyalty in cyber shopping. The structured questionnaire was designed based on the
existing literature review and survey method were adopted to gather the primary data from
female millennial respondents those who uses different social media networking sites and
follows different brands in social media networking sites to know the information and ideas to
make their purchase decision on branded products. The non-probability judgment sampling
technique was adopted to select the respondents from the overall population of the study.
7. SAMPLE SIZE
The samples selected for the study consist of female cyber shoppers from the age group of
nineteen years to less than thirty years. The sample of study consist of only females hailing from
the occupational status of students, salaried employees, self-employed and house wife and those
who are residing in Chennai city. The total sample size of 614 was finalized for the present study
after the elimination of incomplete responses and responses having higher extreme values.
The primary data collected from 614 women cyber shoppers were subjected to test of
normality and reliability and results are presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Descriptive Statistics & Normality Test of Brand Equity, Brand Reputation,
Brand Trust, E-Word of Mouth and Brand Loyalty Variables
Table 1 indicates the result of test of normality and descriptive statistics of the brand equity,
brand reputation, brand trust, e-word of mouth and brand loyalty variables. The Kolmogorov-
Smirnov Test and Shapiro-Wilk Test of normality results prove that data is normality distributed
and fit for higher order analysis. Further, The Cronbach’s Alpha co-efficient test was adopted to
test the internal consistency and reliability of the structured questionnaire used for the study and
result proves that values of the all variables are above 0.600 hence, the scale is more consistent
and highly reliable in nature.
Table 2 shows that average age of the respondents is 21.75 years with standard deviation value
of 2.094 years and age of the respondent ranges from 19 years to 29 years. The average family
monthly income of the respondent is 15.456.03 rupees with standard deviation value of 4683.857
rupees and monthly family income of the respondent ranges from Rs.10,000 to Rs.22,000. The
time spent by the respondents in social media platforms are ranges from one hour to twelve hours
per day. The average time spent on social media is 3.850 hours with higher standard deviation
value of 3.097 hours. Frequency distribution reveals that majority of the respondents are
spending less than Rs.2,500 per month for online shopping on branded products.
Tables 3 reveals the preference of the respondents towards different social media networking
sites in their day-to-day life based on their usage. The respondents most preferred social media
networking site is Whatsapp (Rank 1; Mean = 6.20) followed by Youtube (Rank 2; Mean =
5.73), FaceBook (Rank 3; Mean = 5.22), Instragram (Rank 4; Mean = 4.83), Twitter (Rank 5;
Mean = 3.53), TikTok (Rank 6; Mean = 3.12), ShareChat (Rank 1; Mean = 2.88) and Others
(Rank 1; Mean = 2.64) social media networking sites in their order of preference. Similar studies
(Balaji & Murthy, 2019; Sasikumar & Balaji, 2020; Archana & Balaji, 2019) also prove that
Whatapp, Youtube, FaceBook and Instragram are the most preferred social media networking
sites among the respondents.
Table 4: Multiple Linear Regression Results for Significant Predictors of Brand Loyalty of
Female Millennial Cyber Shoppers
Table 4 reveals that OLS Model has a goodness of fit for multiple regression analysis and the
linear combination of brand reputation, brand trust, time spending in social media platform (in
hrs), age (in years), e-word of mouth was significantly related to Brand Loyalty {F = 93.253,
p<0.001}. The multiple correlation coefficient is 0.475, indicating that 47.5% of the variance of
the respondents’ brand loyalty can be accounted for by brand reputation, brand trust, time
spending in social media platform (in hrs), age (in years), e-word of mouth. The significant
predictors such as, brand reputation, brand trust, time spending in social media platform (in hrs),
age (in years), e-word of mouth have significant and positive influence on brand loyalty of
respondents whereas, brand equity do not have significant influence on the brand loyalty of the
respondents. Higher is the brand reputation, brand trust, social media usage, age and e-word of
mouth higher is the brand loyalty and vice-versa.
present study since; the same was adopted for the data collection process. Owing to time and
cost constraint the study sample was restricted to only 614, may be higher sample will give more
accurate and generalized findings. The present study covers the study area of Chennai city of
Tamil Nadu alone. Hence, the findings may not be generalized to entire state or country as a
whole. This study may be extended to other gender to get more valuable insights to understand
male consumer behavior towards e-commerce industry. The other age groups such as, generation
Z or baby boomers can be exclusively focused to serve suggestions to the stakeholders of cyber
shopping industry in India. Further, this study can be extended to study the perception and
attitude of consumers towards brand on holistic approach to provide more valuable insights and
suggestions to the consumers, e-retailers, e-marketers etc., in near future.
References
1. Anderson, E. T., Hansen, K., & Simester, D. (2009). The Option Value of Returns:
Theory and Empirical Evidence. Marketing Science, 28(3), 405–423.
doi:10.1287/mksc.1080.0430
2. Archana, G. & Balaji, P, (2019). Psychological Dependence on Social Media Usage of
College Youth. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(4S4),
277–280. doi:10.35940/ijrte.D1073.1284S419
3. Arora, R. (2017). The Influence of Trust and Brand Image on Purchase Intention in
Online Shopping: A Comparative Study between Amazon and Flipkart. Adarsh Journal
of Management Research, 10(2), 1. doi:10.21095/ajmr/2017/v10/i2/141452
4. Baber, A., Thurasamy, R., Malik, M. I., Sadiq, B., Islam, S., & Sajjad, M. (2016). Online
word-of-mouth antecedents, attitude and intention-to-purchase electronic products in
Pakistan. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 388-400. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.09.004
5. Balaji, P., & Baskaran, E. (2018). Determinants of Personal Care Products
Advertisement Effectiveness–A Study with Special Reference to Male Consumers of
Chennai. SAMVAD, 15, 28-37. Retrieved from
http://samvad.sibmpune.edu.in/index.php/samvad/article/view/121989/89559
6. Balaji, P., & Murthy, S.S. (2019). Web 2.0 : An Evaluation of Social Media Networking
Sites. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8 (10),
pp. 752-759. doi:10.35940/ijitee.J8892.0881019
7. Bilgihan, A., Sukhu, A., & Kandampully, J. (2013). The role of website features in
creating loyalty: The mediating effect of commitment. International Journal of Service
Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 4(3), 37-50.
doi:10.4018/ijssmet.2013070103
8. Brusch, M., & Stüber, E. (2014). Developments and Classifications of Online Shopping
Behavior in Germany. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education, 7(2), 147-
156. doi: 10.7903/ijcse.1171
9. Chen, K., Luo, P., & Wang, H. (2017). An influence framework on product word-of-
mouth (WoM) measurement. Information & Management, 54(2), 228–240.
doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.06.010
10. Chen-Yu, J., Cho, S., & Kincade, D. (2016). Brand perception and brand repurchase
intent in online apparel shopping: An examination of brand experience, image
congruence, brand affect, and brand trust. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 7(1),
30–44. doi:10.1080/20932685.2015.1110042
11. Choi, N. H., Teng, Z., & Kim, M. J. (2016). Chinese Consumers’ Identity Relevance to
Foreign Brand Inducing Consumer-brand Identification and Their Brand Loyalty and
Advocacy. International Business Review, 20(3), 57. doi:10.21739/ibr.2016.09.20.3.57
12. Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, R. V., & Roper, S. (2004). A Corporate Character Scale
to Assess Employee and Customer Views of Organization Reputation. Corporate
Reputation Review, 7(2), 125–146. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540216
13. Devia, A. N., Aisjah, S., & Puspaningrum, A. (2018). The influence of brand experience
and service quality to customer loyalty mediated by customer satisfaction in Starbucks
coffee Malang. MEC-J (Management and Economics Journal), 2(2), 161-170.
doi:10.18860/mec-j.v0i1.5195
14. Foscht, T., Ernstreiter, K., Maloles, C., Sinha, I. and Swoboda, B. (2013), "Retaining or
returning? Some insights for a better understanding of return behaviour", International
Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 113-134.
doi:10.1108/09590551311304310
15. Ha, H. (2004). Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online. Journal of
Product & Brand Management, 13(5), 329–342. doi:10.1108/10610420410554412
16. Ha, H.-Y., & Perks, H. (2005). Effects of consumer perceptions of brand experience on
the web: brand familiarity, satisfaction and brand trust. Journal of Consumer Behaviour,
4(6), 438–452. doi:10.1002/cb.29
17. Heo, Y. U. (2018). The Influences of Restaurant Consumers Electronic Word-of-Mouth
(E-WOM) Information Communication on Product Perception Risk, Benefit and WOM
Effect. Journal of Economics, Marketing and Management, 6, 51-64.
doi:10.20482/jemm.2018.6.4.51
18. Hillenbrand, C., & Money, K. (2007). Corporate Responsibility and Corporate
Reputation: Two Separate Concepts or Two Sides of the Same Coin? Corporate
Reputation Review, 10(4), 261–277. doi:10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550057
19. Hübner Barcelos, R., & Alberto Vargas Rossi, C. (2014). Paradoxes and strategies of
social media consumption among adolescents. Young Consumers, 15(4), 275–295.
doi:10.1108/yc-10-2013-00408
20. Jagadeesan, P., & Balaji, P. (2017). Hair Care Product Usage Purposes and Brand
Predilection of Male Consumers. Indian Journal of Public Health Research &
Development, 8(4), 367-371. doi:10.5958/0976-5506.2017.00371.0
21. Jeong, M., Oh, H., & Gregoire, M. (2005). The role of website quality in online hotel
reservations. Information Technology in Hospitality, 4(1), 3-13.
doi:10.3727/154595305774865916
22. Jones, C., & Kim, S. (2010). Influences of retail brand trust, off-line patronage, clothing
involvement and website quality on online apparel shopping intention. International
Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(6), 627–637. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00871.x
23. Kandampully, J., Zhang, T. C., & Bilgihan, A. (2015). Customer loyalty: a review and
future directions with a special focus on the hospitality industry. International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management. 27(3), 379–414. doi:10.1108/ijchm-03-2014-
0151
24. Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand
equity. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 1-22. doi:10.2307/1252054
25. Kim, D., & Ammeter, A. P. (2008). Examining shifts in online purchasing behavior:
Decoding the ‘Net Generation’. Academy of Information and Management Sciences,
12(1), 7-12. Retrieved from Allied Academies International Conferece
26. Kim, S., & Jones, C. (2009). Online shopping and moderating role of offline brand trust.
Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3(4), 282–300.
doi:10.1108/17505930911000874
27. Ladhari, R., & Michaud, M. (2015). eWOM effects on hotel booking intentions, attitudes,
trust, and website perceptions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 36-
45. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.01.010
28. Lohani, B. N. (2009). Climate Change—Priority Agenda for Policy Makers and
Opportunities for Business in Emerging Markets in Asia. Global Journal of Emerging
Market Economies, 1(3), 339–350. doi:10.1177/097491010900100303
29. McCarthy, J., & Zakrajšek, E. (2007). Inventory Dynamics and Business Cycles: What
Has Changed? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(2-3), 591–613.
doi:10.1111/j.0022-2879.2007.00037.x
30. Moore, M. (2012). Interactive media usage among millennial consumers. Journal of
Consumer Marketing, 29(6), 436–444. doi:10.1108/07363761211259241
31. O’Donnell, J. (2006). Gen Y sits on top of consumer food chain; they’re savvy shoppers
with money and influence. USA Today, 11(2), 322-358.Retrieved from
https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/money/advertising/2006-10-11-retail-teens-usat_x.htm
32. Parment, A. (2013). Generation Y vs. Baby Boomers: Shopping behavior, buyer
involvement and implications for retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
20(2), 189-199. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.12.001
33. Ramaseshan, B., & Stein, A. (2014). Connecting the dots between brand experience and
brand loyalty: The mediating role of brand personality and brand relationships. Journal
of Brand Management, 21(7-8), 664-683. doi:10.1057/bm.2014.23
34. Riki Wijayajaya, H., & Tri Astuti, S. R. (2018). The Effect of Trust and Brand Image to
Repurchase Intention in Online Shopping. KnE Social Sciences, 3(10), 915.
doi:10.18502/kss.v3i10.3182
35. Sasikumar, S and Balaji, P. (2020). Smart Phone, Internet and Social Media Usage of
College Students: A Cyber Psychology Study. International Journal of Advanced Science
and Technology, 29(8s), 941 - 949. Retrieved from
http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/10861
36. Shamma, H. M., & Hassan, S. S. (2011). Integrating product and corporate brand equity
into total brand equity measurement. International Journal of marketing studies, 3(1), 11-
20. doi:10.5539/ijms.v3n1p11
37. Shamma, H. M., & Hassan, S. S. (2014). A Comprehensive Approach To Brand Equity:
Integrating Product And Corporate Brand Equity into Total Brand Equity Measurement.
Proceedings of the 2010 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference,
109–109. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11797-3_70
38. Simon, C. J., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The measurement and determinants of brand
equity: A financial approach. Marketing science, 12(1), 28-52. doi:10.1287/mksc.12.1.28
39. Suresh. M, Balaji, P & Rameshkumar. P.M. (2020). Dominant Groups and Differences
in Smart Phone and Internet Usage: A Discriminant Analysis Approach. International
Journal of Management. 11 (4). 305-311. doi:10.34218/IJM.11.4.2020.031. Retrieved
from
http://www.iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJM/VOLUME_11_ISSUE_4/IJ
M_11_04_031.pdf
40. Tamil Selvi, R and Balaji, P. (2019). The Key Determinants of Behavioural Intention
Towards Mobile Banking Adoption. (2019). International Journal of Innovative
Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(10), 1124–1130.
doi:10.35940/ijitee.j8891.0881019
41. Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C.
(2010). Customer Engagement Behavior: Theoretical Foundations and Research