Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives:
3
Overview of Indian Banking Industry
The history of Indian Banking shows that seeds of banking in India were
sown back in the 18th century when efforts were made to establish the
General Bank of India and Bank of Hindustan in 1786 and 1790
respectively. Later some more banks like Bank of Bengal, Bank of
Bombay and the Bank of Madras were established under the charter of
British East India Company. These three banks were merged in 1921 and
it formed the Imperial Bank of India, which later became the State Bank
of India. The period between 1906 and 1911 witnessed the establishment
of banks such as Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank,
Corporation Bank, Indian Bank and Central Bank of India; these banks
have survived to the present. The banking sector in India can be divided
into two eras i.e. pre-liberalization era and post-liberalization era since
1991. In the pre-liberalization era, the Government of India nationalized
the 14 largest commercial banks in 1969. A second dose of
nationalization of six more commercial banks followed in 1980. The
stated reason for the nationalization was to give the government more
control of credit delivery. Later, in the year 1993, the government merged
New Bank of India with Punjab National Bank. It was only the merger
between nationalized banks and resulted in the reduction of the number of
nationalized banks from 20 to 19.
The banking sector has seen a tremendous amount of change in the post
liberalization era i.e. in the early 1991; the then Narasimha Rao
government embarked the policy of liberalization. Licenses were given
to small number of private banks like Global Trust Bank, which later
amalgamated with Oriental Bank of Commerce, Axis Bank (earlier UTI
Bank), ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank. This move had augmented the
4
growth in Indian Banking. Along with the rapid growth in the economy
of India, followed by the growth with strong contribution from all the
three sectors of banks, viz. government banks, private banks and foreign
banks. The impact of globalization on Indian Banking has caused many
changes in terms of regulations and structural. With the changing
environment, many different strategies have been adopted by this sector
to remain efficient and to surge at the forefront in the global arena. One
such strategy is in the course of consolidation is merger and acquisition.
Conceptual Framework
5
Rationale behind Mergers of Banks
Here are some motives and rationales for mergers of banks:
1. Market Leadership
3. Synergy
Implies a situation where the combined firm is more valuable than the
sum of the individual combining firms. It refers to benefits other than
those related to economies of scale. Operating economies are one form of
synergy benefits.
4. Risk
6
merged entity. Obviously, mergers would also provide these benefits to
banks in India reducing their bankruptcy concerns.
5. Economies of Scale
With the help of mergers and acquisitions in the banking sector, the banks
can achieve significant growth in their operations and minimize their
expenses to a considerable extent. Another important advantage behind
this kind of merger is that in this process, competition is reduced because
merger eliminates competitors from the banking industry.
6. Economies of Scope
7. Strategic Integration
7
Benefits of Mergers to Indian Banks
Here are some important benefits of mergers of banks:
1. Competitive
2. Monitoring
With the number of PSBs coming down after the process of merger-
capital allocation, performance milestones, and monitoring would
become easier for the government.
3. Efficiency
4. Self-Sufficiency
Larger banks have better ability raised resources from the market rather
than relying on state exchequer.
5. Benefits to RBI
RBI is benefited due to improved and better monitoring over the banks. It
reduces the increased number of meetings due to a smaller number of
CEO’s and also easy implementation of its policies due to better and
upgraded technology.
8
PSBs consolidation building block of $5 trillion
economy
The government’s decision to consolidate 10 public sector banks (PSB)
into four mega state-owned lenders will act as a building block for
achieving $5 trillion economy target. To support next level of growth, the
country needed big banks. The mega merger announced on August 30,
2019 aims to achieve that objective. We will now have 6 mega banks
with enhanced capital base, size, scale and efficiency to support high
growth that the country requires to break into club of middle-income
nations. The road-map for the future will be “technology driven, clean,
responsible” and there will be no gaming of system by any of the stake
holder in the financial sector space be it auditors, rating agencies,
creditors or bankers. “All well capitalized well provisioned banks to
support $5 trillion economy.”
9
New banks After the Merger
S. No. Amalgamated Banks Anchor Banks
10
Emerging issues in merging and acquisition
1. Employees perception
2. Decision Making
The banks that are getting merged are expected to see a slowdown in
decision making the top level as senior officials of such banks would put
all the decisions on the back-burner and it will lead to a drop-in credit
delivery in the system.
3. Weak Banks
4. Other Issues
11
A case study on mega merger of SBI with its
associate banks and Bhartiya Mahila Bank
Bank in general terminology is referred to as a financial institute or a
corporation which is authorized by the state or central government to deal
with money by accepting deposits, giving out loan and investing in
securities. The main role of Banks is economic growth, expansion of the
economy and provide funds for investment. In the recent times banking
sector has been undergoing a lot of changes in terms of regulation and
effects of globalization. These changes have affected this sector both
structurally and strategically.
The first and the most successful example of merger is of New Bank of
India merging with the Punjab National Bank (PNB). This was the first
merger between nationalized banks. And then there were a lot of mergers
in banking industry which exemplified that mergers are beneficial for an
industry.
The merger of State Bank of India with its 5 associate banks namely State
Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur (SBBJ), State Bank of Hyderabad (SBH),
State Bank of Mysore (SBM), State Bank of Patiala (SBP), State Bank of
12
Travancore (SBT) and Bhartiya Mahila Bank. It was on 1st April 2017
that "the SBI opened as 'one bank' and will continue to operate in the
same manner as before, post-merger" -Bhattacharya told the media.
13
Apart from these facts, there are many perceived gains as well: the
government, as shareholder, feels that now it will have six less capital-
hungry banks to worry about. It was expected that a larger institution will
be better equipped to deal with sticky loans, thereby enabling fresh credit
outflows to productive sectors. Thus, Productivity and efficiency are also
among the expected benefits.
But these benefits were questionable due to SBI's legacy and ownership
structure. A former SBI chairman had once remarked that reforming SBI
was trying to make an elephant dance. Even discounting for exaggeration,
according to the statement, a larger and unmanageable bank is getting
even larger. The merger seems to overlook a critical, post-crisis concern -
the too-big-to-fail (TBTF) question. The TBTF theory posits that some
institution is so large and intricately interconnected with different parts of
the economy that failure can create a systematic shock. This forced many
governments to bail out large financial institutions with taxpayer money.
It might also be instructive to note that many countries have been
formulating preventive TBTF regulations.
India’s mega merger with its associate banks has been anything but
smooth for some of the latter’s employees. Whereas Officers and clerks
working for the erstwhile associate banks feel that they have been given a
raw deal with several instances of arbitrary transfers and many officers
losing out on their seniority post the transfer. A senior official of the
association said the employees are facing increased working hours as the
servers at SBI are unable to handle the traffic, and they (the staff) are still
adjusting to the new working conditions. There have been several
instances of arbitrary transfers with allegations that SBI has not been
following the rules governing transfers. Aggrieved SBI had filed a
counter petition arguing that it was strictly complying with all the
14
stipulations and safeguarding the interests of the employees of the
associate banks and denied all allegations.
"The merger will affect the seniority of top officials of Associate Banks
and will also result in redeployment or loss of jobs of some workmen and
closure of branches and finally, the banks might lose some of their
regular customers," said C.H. Venkatachalam, AIBEA general secretary.
The bigger question was the impact that the merger would have on the
health of SBI. Cumulative bad loans of the five associate banks were as
big as 35% of the bad loans of SBI. Their slippage ratio stands at 20%
and credit costs have deteriorated to 5.56%. Also, their Non-Performing
Asset (NPA) were around 4 times the NPAs of SBI alone. When these
banks having deteriorating conditions join SBI, they will have adverse
effect on SBI's health.
No doubt, the revenue will increase, but at what cost? What we need is
not big, but strong, efficient and vibrant banks. In order to understand the
current scenario and throw light on the impact of merger on SBI, A
comparison is drawn between pre-merger entities (before merger SBI and
associate banks) and post-merger entity (after merger - the consolidated
bank).
15
The quarter that was – the starting point
CASA Ratio: CASA ratio stands for current and savings account ratio.
CASA ratio of a bank is the ratio of deposits in current and saving
accounts to total deposits.
16
Rs. in Crores
17
SBI+ABs +BMB 31st March 2017 (Solo) 1st April 2017 (Merged)
CET 1 (%) 9.82 9.41
Tier 1 (%) 10.35 10.05
CAR (%) 13.11 12.85
GoI Shareholding 61.23 60.75
(%)
18
Q4FY17 Q4FY17
Q1 Q4 Q1 % %
Interest Inc. 54494 5896 54905 -6.89 0.76
8
Interest 36248 3790 37299 -1.59 2.90
Expenses 3
Net Interest Inc. 18246 2106 17606 -16.42 -3.51
5
Non-Interest 8761 1222 8006 -34.50 -8.62
Inc. 2
Operating Inc. 27007 3328 25612 -23.06 -5.17
7
Staff Expenses 7783 8914 7724 -13.34 -0.75
Overhead 5462 7064 6013 -14.88 10.08
Expenses
Operating 13245 1597 13738 -14.02 3.72
Expenses 8
Operating 13762 1730 11874 -31.40 -13.72
Profit 9
Provisions 13388 2075 9869 -52.44 -26.29
1
Net Profit 374 -3442 2006 435.88
19
create massive banks through mergers needs to be tempered with
skepticism.
20
Conclusion
Merger and amalgamation help the banks and the economy to function
more efficiently because it helps in the increase of the resources and thus
the profits. It is done to reduce the competition and for survival in the
market but it is good only when the economy does not get affected due to
competition issues. They have their own issues as well as disadvantages
accordingly. Merger and amalgamation increase the efficiency of the
banks but it leads to loss of their own identities. It also helps in
strengthening the base of the new unit and also helps in saving of taxes. It
also helps in expanding of the reach and also geographical operation.
21
References
1. https://m.ecomomictimes.com/wealth/personal-finance-news/psu-
bank-mergers-customers-of-which-banks-are-likely-to-be-impacted-
and-how/articleshow
2. Krishn A Goyal and Vijay Joshi, 2011, Mergers in Banking Industry
of India: Some Emerging Issues, Asian Journal of Business and
Management Sciences Vol. 1 No. 2 [157-165]
3. Ms. Jaspreet Kaur, 2017, A Case Study on Mega Merger of SBI with
its associate banks and Bhartiya Mahila Bank, Trinity Vol. No. 3(4)
4. Tables Source: SBI Press Release Q1FY18 Results
22