Rent Vacancy rate Unemployment rate

21.70 3 8.2 Rent

16.42 11 11 30.00
14.84 17 6.6
24.90 2 7 25.00
16.62 7 8
20.00
11.75 18 9.6 f(x) = − 0.303797796500324 x + 20.639708360337
19.33 9 7.1
15.00
14.60 12 7.6
12.01 13 11.6 10.00
19.88 13 4.7
19.83 8 5.7 5.00
17.78 16 5.8
17.79 10 6.4 0.00
0 5 10 15 20
17.08 3 8.1
19.39 12 6.4
15.81 17 8.2 SUMMARY OUTPUT
21.15 3 9
12.33 11 11 Regression Statistics
15.58 16 7.2 Multiple R 0.539579
10.83 20 9.3 R Square 0.291146
17.38 20 8.4 Adjusted R Square 0.26583
15.09 14 10.4 Standard Error 2.873201
23.19 8 7.3 Observations 30
19.27 5 6.7
14.88 2 10.2 ANOVA
16.27 20 7.4 df SS
18.53 15 8.6 Regression 1 94.93883672499
14.25 19 7.9 Residual 28 231.1480299417
17.68 2 8.5 Total 29 326.0868666667
19.74 14 6.1
Coefficients Standard Error
Intercept 20.63971 1.142791520257
Vacancy rate -0.303798 0.089583649094

A) ŷ = 20.64 - 0.3038 Vacancy rate

B) For every one unit increase in vacancy rate the rent decreases by
37

20 25

MS F Significance F
94.938836725 11.500368093 0.002089
8.2552867836

t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 99.9%

Upper 99.9%
18.060781861 5.781029E-17 18.29881 22.98061 16.4412 24.83822
-3.3912192635 0.0020892928 -0.487302 -0.120294 -0.63292 0.025324

ate the rent decreases by 0.3

Test Nondefective
79 93 Test
81 93 100
79 94 90
79 91
80
76 94 f(x) = 0.643700787401574 x + 19.03031496063
70
81 94
60
79 94
50
79 92
40
82 93
86 93 30

83 92 20

78 95 10
77 92 0
90 91 92 93 94 95
77 93
80 95
73 95
87 95 SUMMARY OUTPUT
75 93
82 96 Regression Statistics
74 93 Multiple R 0.1818542754
81 95 R Square 0.0330709775
81 95 Adjusted R Square 0.010584256
82 94 Standard Error 3.9878075947
73 94 Observations 45
75 94
82 92 ANOVA
87 95 df SS MS
84 94 Regression 1 23.38779527559 23.387795276
86 94 Residual 43 683.8122047244 15.902609412
79 94 Total 44 707.2
82 95
70 92 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat
86 96 Intercept 19.030314961 49.83892776351 0.381836364
84 94 Nondefective (x) 0.6437007874 0.530791054116 1.2127197367
75 95
75 95
77 93 Regression line ŷ = 19.03 + 0.643x
78 95
76 95 Interpretation For one value increase in Non-defective product, the test score inc
84 94
76 94
78 94
81 94
79 94
78 94
est

63

94 95 96 97

F Significance F
1.470689 0.23185766612

P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 90.0% Upper 90.0%

0.704463 -81.479461878 119.5400918 -64.752446382 102.8130763
0.231858 -0.4267413909 1.7141429657 -0.2485965032 1.535998078

tive product, the test score increases by 0.643

Test Length Type
24 52 1 Test
20 40 2
30
16 36 2
11 28 1 25
10 44 3
4 16 1 20
f(x) = 0.267482517482517 x + 3.63566433566435
24 48 1
18 52 2 15

16 60 3
10
15 44 2
14 36 1 5
15 44 2
24 60 3 0
10 20 30 40 50
10 24 3
1 32 1
8 40 3 SUMMARY OUTPUT
9 24 1
0 32 3 Regression Statistics
17 52 2 Multiple R 0.5378310743
9 36 3 R Square 0.2892622645
26 60 2 Adjusted R Square 0.2770081656
28 56 1 Standard Error 5.8884801278
15 20 1 Observations 60
8 40 3
2 48 1 ANOVA
0 20 2 df SS MS
11 24 3 Regression 1 818.4965034965 818.4965
8 36 3 Residual 58 2011.103496504 34.6742
24 60 1 Total 59 2829.6
10 44 1
15 52 2 Coefficients Standard Error t Stat
7 28 3 Intercept 3.6356643357 2.225895671386 1.633349
26 56 1 Length 0.2674825175 0.055054167712 4.858533
11 20 3
18 52 2 A) Standard error = 5.88, It is the Standard distribution of the error variable. Low valu
16 16 2
8 20 3 B) R^2 = 0.289, About 29% of variance the memory test scores explain variance in len
12 40 1
10 16 3 C) At 95% confidence level, α > P-Value, we reject the null hypothesis or we can say
score and length of commercial
14 44 1
19 32 2
8 20 3 D) At 90% confidence levels the slope coefficient lies between 0.1754 and 0.36
11 56 3
24 56 1
15 60 2
9 24 3
18 48 2
14 16 2
14 32 1
11 16 3
15 40 2
11 24 3
27 36 2
5 28 3
17 56 2
8 32 1
15 28 1
8 48 1
24 28 2
21 48 2
 Test

66435

40 50 60 70

F Significance F
23.60535 9.3536804E-06

P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 90.0% Upper 90.0%

0.107813 -0.8199499476 8.091278619 -0.0850377228 7.3563663941
9.354E-06 0.1572796274 0.3776854076 0.1754565714 0.3595084636

the error variable. Low value means the errors are close to the mean of Є.

cores explain variance in length of commercials

ll hypothesis or we can say there is significant linear relation between Memory test

ween 0.1754 and 0.36

Price Size Apartments Age Floors
8,604 77.8 78 15 8 P
12,049 60.7 117 14 12 16,000
9,261 69.7 89 10 7
14,000
6,324 99.3 88 9 6
2,261 48 48 18 8 12,000

3,773 69 60 11 12 10,000
7,796 27.8 74 17 7 8,000 f(x) = 44.9662366114165 x + 4039.88344395478
4,425 53.5 56 12 4
6,000
8,838 79.5 101 13 14
4,000
-731 52 44 10 6
9,104 64.6 64 17 7 2,000
9,237 10 82 16 5 0
0 20 40
6,555 95.3 92 19 8
-2,000
4,970 75.9 110 16 18
10,421 4.4 42 5 7
2,863 44.6 54 21 7 SUMMARY OUTPUT (When prices are taken as it in data)
2,350 59.9 72 12 9
7,844 80.7 110 6 8 Regression Statistics
2,477 27.4 48 17 6 Multiple R 0.3416867705
4,878 26.6 15 16 3 R Square 0.1167498491
6,140 44.2 75 22 5 Adjusted R Square 0.0935064241
6,330 63.5 70 9 7 Standard Error 3286.9489692
8,510 102.8 99 17 6 Observations 40
3,155 6.3 43 16 4
13,295 92.8 122 17 8 ANOVA
3,708 46.2 77 10 6 df
10,001 78.7 89 12 10 Regression 1
7,256 42.5 62 15 8 Residual 38
1,950 51.6 36 9 4 Total 39
11,072 81.2 74 19 7
4,107 24.3 61 19 5 Coefficients
6,488 1.5 49 15 8 Intercept 4039.883444
617 38.2 32 25 4 Size 44.966236611
9,291 54.8 96 8 4
873 26.1 51 17 6 A) Standard error = 3287, Standard error is used to analyze
11,530 54.9 101 15 8 B) the P-value = 0.031, So, at 95% confidence interval we re
10,838 78.4 76 13 5
5,811 53.5 49 13 4 C) R^2 = 0.1167, About 11.7% of the variance in price is expl
6,559 44.5 87 14 8
7,771 44.6 84 11 6
 Price

6114165 x + 4039.88344395478

20 40 60 80 100 120

en prices are taken as it in data)

SS MS F Significance F
54267788.977 54267788.977 5.022919 0.03093508768
410553273.998 10804033.526
464821062.975

Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 90.0% Upper 90.0%
1200.414895948 3.3654059589 0.001758 1609.77053432 6469.9963536 2016.0385961 6063.7282918
20.06358051974 2.2411870387 0.030935 4.34964130008 85.582831923 11.139953547 78.792519676

andard error is used to analyze fit, the model having lower value is preffered. The model is good fit
t 95% confidence interval we reject the null hypothesis or we can say there is a significant linear relation.

% of the variance in price is explained from Size of the apartment

Prices (in thousands)
8.604 Prices (in thousands)
12.049 16
9.261
14
6.324
12
2.261
10
3.773
7.796 8 f(x) = 0.044966236611417 x + 4.03988344395478
4.425 6
8.838 4
-0.731 2
9.104 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 1
9.237 -2
6.555
Prices (in thousands) Linear (Prices (in thousands))
4.97
10.421
2.863 SUMMARY OUTPUT
2.35
7.844 Regression Statistics
2.477 Multiple R 0.3416867705
4.878 R Square 0.1167498491
6.14 Adjusted R Square 0.0935064241
6.33 Standard Error 3.2869489692
8.51 Observations 40
3.155
13.295 ANOVA
3.708 df SS
10.001 Regression 1 54.267788977
7.256 Residual 38 410.553273998
1.95 Total 39 464.821062975
11.072
4.107 Coefficients Standard Error
6.488 Intercept 4.039883444 1.200414895948
0.617 Size 0.0449662366 0.02006358052
9.291
0.873 A) Standard error = 3.287, Standard error is used to analyze fit, the model having l
11.53 B) the P-value = 0.031, So, at 95% confidence interval we reject the null hypothesi
10.838
5.811 C) R^2 = 0.1167, About 11.7% of the variance in Price is explained from Size of the
6.559
7.771
ousands)

478

80 100 120

Linear (Prices (in thousands))

MS F Significance F
54.267788977 5.0229193426 0.03093508768
10.804033526

t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
3.3654059589 0.0017583484 1.60977053432 6.4699963536 1.6097705343 6.4699963536
2.2411870387 0.0309350877 0.0043496413 0.0855828319 0.0043496413 0.0855828319

sed to analyze fit, the model having lower value is preffered. The model is Good fit
interval we reject the null hypothesis or we can say there is a significant linear relation.

n Price is explained from Size of the apartment

Garbage (Pounds) House Size (Square feet) Children Adults
14.9 1555 0 0 SUMMARY OUTPUT
13.7 1452 0 1
19.5 2374 2 0 A) Regression Statistics
8.3 2016 1 1 Multiple R
5.8 2044 1 0 R Square
9.9 2210 1 0 Adjusted R Square
12.7 1441 1 0 Standard Error
15.3 1516 2 1 Observations
6.0 1462 2 1
10.7 1660 1 0 ANOVA
18.4 1955 1 1
14.4 1572 2 3 Regression
16.0 1803 3 1 Residual
14.6 1862 2 0 Total
9.6 2194 2 0
17.9 1892 0 2
4.0 1463 1 1 Intercept
12.1 2164 1 1 House Size (x1)
17.1 2473 3 0 Children (x2)
14.9 1501 2 0 Adults (x3)
17.9 1984 1 1
8.0 1906 1 0
10.9 1794 1 0 B) P-value of the model is 1.51847E-17. So, a
15.1 1881 2 1 C) Interpretating coefficients
12.3 1762 4 0 For one sqaure feet increase in house size
15.2 1912 1 1 For an increase of one child in house the
13.3 1780 1 1 For an increase of one adult in house the
11.4 1907 0 1
12.6 1656 1 0 D) At 95% confidence level, we can say that
and number of adults in the house
12.4 1631 0 0
13.4 1458 0 1
18.1 1886 2 4
15.6 1889 2 0
12.1 1742 0 1
9.5 1316 1 0
17.7 2055 1 2
19.2 1847 6 0
15.0 1536 1 1
13.2 1732 2 1
15.8 1962 0 0
19.0 2073 3 0
9.2 2039 1 1
15.0 1747 0 0
16.0 1504 1 0
 7.8 1865 0 1
11.5 1748 0 0
8.8 2054 1 0
6.6 1843 1 0
11.9 1071 0 0
15.4 2046 1 1
17.4 1500 1 0
13.5 1685 1 0
12.2 1685 1 1
6.2 2239 0 0
18.9 1994 0 0
17.1 1509 0 1
10.9 2013 2 1
11.9 1289 0 1
15.5 1827 0 3
20.1 1834 1 1
12.3 1340 0 1
16.0 1872 1 1
12.3 2678 0 1
9.9 1518 2 1
12.2 1662 0 1
10.5 1790 1 1
13.8 1679 1 1
8.3 1982 0 0
10.9 1866 1 0
15.8 1871 4 0
4.7 1703 0 0
11.0 2092 0 1
6.5 1320 1 1
19.1 1676 2 1
11.2 987 2 1
17.7 2058 1 1
12.2 1316 0 1
10.8 1830 1 0
9.9 1766 0 0
11.5 2337 3 0
7.8 1374 0 0
11.7 1330 4 0
5.0 1682 1 0
13.8 1797 2 1
15.2 1355 1 0
14.9 1681 2 1
8.9 1738 2 1
17.9 2200 2 0
14.5 1921 2 0
17.6 1889 3 1
10.1 1216 0 1
12.1 1645 1 1
7.4 1447 0 0
10.7 1566 0 0
12.9 2221 0 1
12.5 1776 2 0
13.7 2151 0 1
11.8 1876 0 2
19.7 1595 1 2
9.5 1194 0 0
13.0 1502 1 1
15.1 2039 0 1
11.5 1724 0 1
6.5 1966 0 0
7.6 1669 1 1
14.0 1713 1 1
9.1 1034 2 1
16.6 1662 2 0
5.8 1231 0 2
12.1 2334 0 0
1.4 1701 0 1
17.9 2305 4 1
3.4 1766 0 0
19.4 2540 4 1
8.9 2010 1 1
10.5 1847 0 0
7.0 1560 0 1
9.0 1835 0 0
6.0 1187 1 1
14.3 2222 1 0
12.0 1782 1 0
22.3 2045 0 3
20.8 2389 9 0
17.7 2507 1 3
11.3 1710 1 2
11.4 1770 1 0
8.2 1421 1 0
8.1 1089 0 0
19.5 1767 0 1
10.7 1367 0 2
15.6 1656 1 3
13.4 1997 0 0
18.8 2178 5 1
18.5 1695 3 2
 6.1 967 1 0
12.9 1917 1 1
14.9 1882 1 1
21.3 1542 5 0
12.9 1796 2 0
12.0 2235 1 1
6.2 2206 0 0
10.2 1932 1 0
11.0 1617 0 2
9.1 1902 1 0
8.6 2066 1 0
11.6 2188 1 0
8.8 1973 0 1
7.6 898 2 0
9.5 1557 0 0
10.1 1691 2 0
18.0 1286 2 0
9.7 1334 4 1
13.3 1753 0 1
4.8 1305 2 1
14.2 2036 0 0
9.9 1570 1 1
11.9 1969 2 0
15.7 2026 0 1
13.2 1803 2 0
12.8 1915 0 0
12.4 1814 1 1
21.0 1962 1 0
18.1 2044 3 2
8.4 2090 0 1
13.0 2072 2 1
10.6 1929 0 0
16.6 1821 1 1
15.1 1498 2 0
11.4 1656 2 0
7.5 1800 0 1
8.7 2017 0 0
18.6 1673 2 1
7.4 1623 1 1
15.4 1734 1 1
8.9 1884 0 1
14.6 2193 1 1
8.2 1729 0 1
9.4 1716 0 1
19.4 1620 0 1
20.6 1569 4 1
5.5 1905 0 1
14.4 2319 0 1
12.4 1980 1 1
11.4 1590 1 0
19.6 1934 0 1
16.9 1975 2 1
22.2 2178 6 1
10.9 1369 0 0
9.5 1805 0 1
12.2 2397 0 1
9.1 1657 0 1
11.4 2050 0 0
14.9 1945 1 2
10.4 1582 1 0
13.7 1688 1 3
10.5 2179 1 1
11.4 1526 0 1
10.7 2010 0 0
20.3 2293 1 1
6.8 1603 1 0
12.2 1928 1 1
12.0 1746 1 2
17.0 1726 1 3
17.1 1791 0 1
13.8 1839 1 1
17.2 1607 3 1
13.7 2294 1 1
9.7 1578 0 1
9.2 1774 1 0
10.1 2144 1 0
10.0 1776 5 1
16.5 1902 1 1
9.7 1440 1 0
18.7 1696 0 1
12.8 1059 1 1
11.3 1744 0 0
5.9 1759 0 2
12.1 1579 0 1
15.4 1863 1 0
13.1 1651 1 0
11.2 1255 0 0
8.7 1400 1 0
10.0 2047 0 1
12.3 1711 0 0
13.5 1496 1 1
9.5 1403 0 0
21.4 2004 0 1
9.6 1706 1 1
18.1 1859 0 0
9.0 1971 0 0
15.7 1786 3 1
8.2 1928 1 1
12.5 2315 1 0
9.3 1946 1 1
14.3 1531 0 0
18.6 2090 0 0
10.2 2079 0 0
17.3 1786 3 0
7.1 2029 1 0
10.9 1938 1 2
8.0 2267 1 0
15.3 2370 1 0
12.0 2226 0 0
4.2 1975 1 0
7.4 1741 1 1
7.9 2039 1 0
9.9 2149 0 1
19.8 1853 2 0
6.2 1367 0 0
6.6 1850 2 1
8.8 1583 0 0
11.4 1591 2 0
13.3 1124 1 1
7.2 1653 0 1
14.1 2083 0 1
9.6 1862 1 3
11.6 1676 0 0
9.1 1568 0 0
10.7 1840 1 0
12.4 1839 1 1
11.4 1439 2 1
20.3 1552 2 1
11.1 2028 4 0
15.7 1487 1 4
9.2 2129 1 1
12.8 1908 1 1
12.1 2032 0 1
13.4 1885 1 1
9.1 2076 3 0
12.4 1781 1 1
6.9 1888 0 1
8.7 1294 0 1
14.0 1775 1 0
8.3 1495 2 1
14.0 1611 0 1
6.2 1597 0 1
17.5 2298 1 1
14.5 1445 1 0
14.1 2045 1 1
16.6 1713 1 1
15.1 2341 1 1
11.3 1677 2 1
14.1 1552 0 1
10.4 1640 1 1
11.2 1710 1 1
10.8 2215 1 0
20.0 2138 1 3
14.1 1877 0 1
9.7 1806 2 0
12.0 1348 1 1
10.5 1704 1 1
14.9 2294 3 3
13.2 2179 2 1
15.7 1777 2 0
13.6 2083 0 1
14.5 1527 6 1
14.9 1886 0 2
8.4 1645 1 1
16.1 1863 3 0
14.1 1758 3 2
15.6 1397 2 2
19.2 1736 1 1
13.1 1826 0 1
10.7 2254 0 3
14.5 2154 0 1
0.0 1774 0 0
11.9 1476 2 1
9.9 1779 1 0
16.5 1992 1 1
7.8 1358 0 1
14.2 1773 1 1
9.7 1585 0 0
11.6 1611 1 1
15.9 1657 3 0
18.1 1694 2 1
19.9 1658 0 2
19.9 2367 1 0
14.1 1832 1 1
11.2 1297 1 0
16.0 1847 3 0
5.0 1688 0 1
12.8 1443 0 1
15.8 1918 1 1
17.4 1653 2 1
17.1 1669 1 0
10.9 1457 0 0
7.0 1480 0 0
13.2 1914 2 1
12.2 1950 1 0
15.2 1894 4 1
11.5 1984 2 1
13.5 2138 0 0
10.2 2007 1 0
11.7 1619 1 1
11.5 1672 1 1
10.3 1221 2 1
8.6 1855 0 1
9.2 1901 1 1
13.0 1656 3 1
14.0 1534 0 1
11.4 2463 1 0
13.5 2284 1 1
18.5 1508 2 0
15.8 1799 4 0
7.2 1401 3 0
13.6 1647 3 1
15.4 1972 1 0
14.7 1594 0 0
16.6 1888 0 2
12.3 2132 1 0
12.3 2458 0 2
11.0 1638 1 0
6.2 2162 1 1
14.9 2014 3 1
6.5 1748 1 0
13.8 1488 2 0
20.6 1867 2 1
19.6 1776 1 0
14.1 1427 1 0
 8.0 1868 0 0
6.5 1932 2 0
10.4 2133 0 1
9.3 1946 0 2
18.6 2068 0 1
10.3 1751 1 0
16.1 1813 0 1
16.8 1675 0 4
17.5 1822 2 0
17.6 1871 7 1
14.5 1813 2 0
5.8 1695 0 2
11.7 1754 0 2
14.1 1529 2 1
4.6 2091 2 1
13.8 1789 0 0
14.5 1887 0 1
10.0 1467 1 1
12.3 2133 1 0
11.4 1972 2 0
10.5 1794 1 1
13.1 1511 2 0
9.1 1694 0 0
13.6 1823 1 1
10.5 2006 0 0
14.4 1576 3 0
10.2 2218 1 0
14.2 2202 1 1
17.2 1367 1 1
5.7 1994 1 0
12.8 1759 1 1
21.1 1821 1 0
17.7 1474 1 0
12.4 1474 1 0
7.7 2246 1 1
15.8 2204 0 2
6.4 2109 0 0
7.6 1859 1 1
20.6 2012 0 1
12.7 1752 1 1
18.2 2491 1 3
14.4 1870 1 0
13.4 1722 3 0
9.3 1768 0 1
16.3 1413 1 1
17.4 1708 4 0
14.0 1686 2 1
14.3 1881 1 1
14.2 2299 1 0
16.5 1869 4 0
18.2 2294 2 0
14.9 1330 2 0
9.8 1733 1 1
12.8 1884 2 1
11.8 1319 0 0
15.5 1620 3 0
19.1 1931 2 1
16.9 1369 1 0
13.9 1317 1 0
11.7 1878 2 0
10.3 2304 2 1
10.7 1963 0 1
6.0 1610 1 0
7.9 2156 0 0
6.2 1977 0 0
13.3 1815 0 1
21.9 1450 8 0
9.6 1388 1 1
12.1 1813 1 1
12.0 2111 1 0
21.7 1847 1 1
11.9 1817 2 0
13.3 2225 0 0
6.7 1518 0 1
10.3 1508 0 1
16.4 1567 0 2
14.8 2100 1 1
13.2 2709 1 1
7.0 1862 1 1
3.8 2009 1 0
9.0 1665 2 2
gression Statistics
0.4125258192
0.1701775515
0.164467764
3.6724826455
440

df SS MS F Significance F
3 1205.932737564 401.9776 29.80453 1.5184705E-17
436 5880.3881488 13.48713
439 7086.320886364

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 90.0%
7.1942995852 1.092335968788 6.58616 1.302E-10 5.04740078679 9.3411983835 5.3937410445
0.0018989225 0.000591526374 3.210208 0.001424 0.00073632481 0.0030615202 0.0009238764
1.10275008 0.14072371452 7.836278 3.583E-14 0.82616889781 1.3793312622 0.8707873018
1.0424956827 0.232733205175 4.479359 9.576E-06 0.58507722093 1.4999141444 0.6588685091

the model is 1.51847E-17. So, at 95% confidence level the model is valid.
ting coefficients
aure feet increase in house size the amount of garbadge increases by 0.002 pounds
ease of one child in house the amount of garbage goes up by 1.1 pounds
ease of one adult in house the amount of garbage goes up by 1.04 pounds

nfidence level, we can say that Amount of garbage for weeks is Significantly linearly related to House size, Number of children
er of adults in the house
 Upper 90.0%
8.9948581259
0.0028739685
1.3347128582
1.4261228562

ize, Number of children

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics Boxes

Multiple R 0.898431 20
R Square 0.807178
10

Residuals
Adjusted R 0.798973
Standard E 7.069091 0
60 80
Observatio 50 -10
-20
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 2 9831.893 4915.947 98.37392 1.589E-17
Residual 47 2348.687 49.97205
Weight (hu
Total 49 12180.58
Residual P
Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0% 20

Residuals
Intercept -28.42712 6.886963 -4.127671 0.000149 -42.2819 -14.57234 -42.2819 -14.57234 10
0
Boxes 0.604108 0.055678 10.85011 2.155E-14 0.492099 0.716117 0.492099 0.716117
-10 0 10
Weight (hu 0.374298 0.084674 4.420475 5.783E-05 0.203957 0.54464 0.203957 0.54464
-20
We

RESIDUAL OUTPUT

Observation
Predicted Time (minutes)
Residuals
1 61.18392 0.816081
2 73.19189 3.808109
3 38.87229 0.127713
4 59.72564 -7.725644
5 76.10695 2.893047
6 38.09668 -4.096676
7 52.86927 -1.869269
8 67.55736 2.442644
9 68.22509 2.774905
10 65.77493 -12.77493
11 48.21909 9.780908
12 49.56729 8.432714
13 58.92302 2.076982
14 64.05325 7.946748
15 88.09568 -4.095676
16 62.80828 4.19172
17 61.96544 -3.965435
18 63.884 17.116
19 66.01606 3.983938
20 41.17715 0.82285
21 59.17092 7.829084
22 62.0081 10.9919
23 84.06525 -1.065252
24 71.88568 1.114316
25 60.04005 7.959945
26 58.47923 2.520768
27 61.18766 -6.187662
28 70.67886 12.32114
29 60.54761 -2.547613
30 54.62238 -3.622379
31 88.48994 -5.489943
32 33.76316 3.236836
33 59.34981 -7.349812
34 85.73385 0.266145
35 47.84628 -1.846282
36 78.4313 8.568702
37 51.59963 -1.599631
38 23.73888 -1.738879
39 65.29146 2.708542
40 38.72027 -15.72027
41 77.0809 -16.0809
42 62.27908 -7.279078
43 64.65366 3.346336
44 60.87469 5.125307
45 60.26531 0.734693
46 38.14984 -2.149845
47 80.91145 -3.911454
48 75.05522 -12.05522
49 57.14289 -7.142893
50 62.62334 -3.623339
 Boxes Residual Plot
20
10
Residuals

0
60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
-10
-20
Boxes

Weight (hundreds of pounds)

Residual Plot
20
Residuals

10
0
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
-20
Weight (hundreds of pounds)
Time (minutes) Boxes Weight (hundreds of pounds) Codes
62 126 36.05 3
77 154 22.94 2
39 96 24.86 3
52 127 30.54 1
79 151 35.57 2
34 103 11.49 1
51 125 15.45 3
70 138 33.71 2
71 139 33.88 2
53 140 25.72 1
58 114 20.78 2
58 117 19.54 2
61 141 5.8 2
72 130 37.26 2
84 156 59.53 1
67 136 24.25 2
58 128 34.91 1
81 137 25.51 2
70 131 40.89 2
42 103 19.72 3
67 129 25.83 2
73 129 33.41 2
83 154 51.99 3
73 144 35.59 3 A)
68 127 31.38 2
61 127 27.21 2 B)
55 126 36.06 1
83 153 17.84 2 C)
58 126 34.35 1
51 136 2.38 1
83 182 18.62 1
37 91 19.28 2
52 131 23.08 1
86 156 53.22 3
46 115 18.17 3
87 156 33.71 2
50 127 8.83 3
22 73 21.55 3
68 127 45.41 2
23 102 14.77 1
61 149 41.4 1
55 130 32.52 1
68 126 45.32 2
66 132 25.54 2
61 135 19.07 3
36 101 14.86 1
77 150 50.02 1
63 146 40.83 1
50 137 7.5 1
59 140 17.3 1
SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.8984307287
R Square 0.8071777742
Adjusted R Square 0.7989725731
Standard Error 7.0690914685
Observations 50

ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 2 9831.893453056 4915.947 98.373917306 1.5892479E-17
Residual 47 2348.686546944 49.97205
Total 49 12180.58

Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95%

Intercept -28.427120008 6.886962978702 -4.127671 0.0001487176 -42.281902449
Boxes 0.6041078605 0.055677573359 10.85011 2.155316E-14 0.49209903043
Weight (hundreds of pounds) 0.3742981716 0.084673736765 4.420475 5.783146E-05 0.20395658485

ŷ = -28.43 + 0.604 boxes + 0.3743 Weight

As standard Error being low and about 80% of the variance in time can be explained by the independent variables (boxes and

Interpretation
For an increase of one box, the time increases by 0.604 minutes
For an increase of 100 pound of weight, the time increases by 0.3743 minutes.
 Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
-14.572337567 -42.281902449 -14.572337567
0.7161166905 0.4920990304 0.7161166905
0.5446397583 0.2039565849 0.5446397583

ndent variables (boxes and weight), the model is good fit