Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Worksheet -4
ID-20175008
Q1. It is argued that the relationship between earnings and age is concave. Earnings increases till some
age and falls after that. Graphically the relationship is described below.
a) Write down an appropriate Linear Regression Model incorporating the non-linear relationship
between earnings and age. Include education, experience, hours worked and married (an indicator
variable) as regressors in your model.
b) Suppose a snapshot of the sample data is given below. Explain how you will construct the new
variable Age-sqr. What would be the STATA command to generate this new variable?
Answer:
Variables: Wage: monthly earnings in $ Hours: average weekly hours Educ: years of education Exper:
years of experience Age: age in years Married: 1 if married, 0 if others
Answer:
e) What is the estimated partial effect of age on wage? Answer: Partial Effect of Age on Wage:
FOC:
𝜕(𝑤𝑎𝑔𝑒)
𝜕(𝑎𝑔𝑒)
= 20.28059 − 0.2668972(𝑎𝑔𝑒) = 0
SOC:
Hence, we can say that from estimated equation at age=76 years the estimated earnings will reach its
maximum.
g) Can we conclude that the relationship between earnings and age is concave? Explain.
Answer:
A relationship or function is concave on an interval, if its first order partial differentiation moronically
decreasing on that interval or the function has a decreasing slope.
As per that, we can find that the slope of the estimated relationship between earning and age is
decreasing [20.28059 − 0.2668972(𝑎𝑔𝑒)]. Hence, we can conclude that relationship between earning
and age is concave.
Answer: Yes, according to the estimated equation married people earn more on average.
Q2. Answer:
a) Do we need to include the cubic experience term in this regression?
Answer:
No, we do not need to include the cubic experience term in this regression as the p-value of estimated
coefficient is larger than 𝛼 = 0.01, 0.05, 0.10. That mean according to the data, we cannot reject the null
hypothesis that 𝛽𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒3 = 0.
−.052 − 0
𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟3 = = −0.59
0.0883
|𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟3 |<1.96, i.e. regression coefficient of exper3 is not statistically significant. We may omit
it.
Q3. Answer:
a) Do we need to include the quadratic experience term in this regression?
−.70 − 0
𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟2 = = −1.22
0.5706811
|𝑡𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟2 |<1.96, i.e. regression coefficient of exper2 is not statistically significant. We may omit
it.
We cannot tell as we can only comment about the highest order polynomial.
Q4.
Answer:
a) Do we need to include experience in this regression?
Answer: