Professional Documents
Culture Documents
II. ORGANIZATION
A. DEFINING ORGANIZATIONAL CORRUPTION
Organizational corruption, according to a general definition, consists of the abuse or misuse
of a position of trust or power for personal benefit rather than the purposes for which trust
or power was conferred.
B. SOCIO-CULTURAL ASPECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CORRUPTION
A first approach to the structural roots of corruption involves defining the problem
conceptually. As a starting point, we have Goode’s definition (1984). From a legal point
of view, an individual commits corruption when he is or is about to become a public official
and accepts or obtains, either for himself or for another person, some form of irregular
compensation different to that stipulated by law as a motive or reward for any official act,
which favors or disfavors any individual or group of individuals. Although from the legal
point of view the above characterization is widely accepted, from a sociological point of
view, it provides us with a narrower definition for the purposes of this paper. According to
this author, corruption is an action that deviates from the general normative expectations,
in search for a personal benefit or for the benefit of a restricted group, mainly by
misappropriation of a public resource. This latter definition is particularly clear in pointing
out that corruption is closely linked with the characteristics of the society referred to.
Following the classical sociological terminology of Tönnies (1947 [1887]) we can contrast
two extreme models: a cold society and a warm society. In the first type there are no
relations between individuals and therefore interpersonal knowledge is very limited, even
within families. In contrast, a warm society implies the existence of an extensive network
of personal relationships and mutual knowledge. In these societies, family contacts are
extremely frequent and the family is a strong network of mutual aid.
C. ADMINISTRATIVE ASPECT OF CORRUPTION
The widespread interest at national and international level in combating administrative
corruption is strictly connected with the idea that it produces many negative effects, distorts
incentives and weakens institutions. On the other hand, administrative corruption has been
also considered as an extra-legal institution which – under certain conditions – could even
produce positive effects.
However, preventing corruption needs a tool-box: good quality regulation, also when
regulation determines sanctions; controls, which should be sustainable and informed to
deterrence and planning; administrative reforms, in order to reduce monopoly and
discretionary powers, to strengthen the Civil Service and to ensure transparency and
information.
VERBAL COMMUNICATION
Verbal communication occurs when we engage in speaking with others. It can be face-to-
face, over the telephone, via Skype or Zoom, etc. Some verbal engagements are informal,
such as chatting with a friend over coffee or in the office kitchen, while others are more
formal, such as a scheduled meeting. Regardless of the type, it is not just about the words,
it is also about the caliber and complexity of those words, how we string those words
together to create an overarching message, as well as the intonation (pitch, tone, cadence,
etc.) used while speaking. And when occurring face-to-face, while the words are important,
they cannot be separated from non-verbal communication.
NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION
What we do while we speak often says more than the actual words. Non-verbal
communication includes facial expressions, posture, eye contact, hand movements, and
touch. For example, if you’re engaged in a conversation with your boss about your cost-
saving idea, it is important to pay attention to both their words and their non-verbal
communication. Your boss might be in agreement with your idea verbally, but their
nonverbal cues: avoiding eye contact, sighing, scrunched up face, etc. indicate something
different.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Whether it is an email, a memo, a report, a Facebook post, a Tweet, a contract, etc. all
forms of written communication have the same goal to disseminate information in a clear
and concise manner – though that objective is often not achieved. In fact, poor writing
skills often lead to confusion and embarrassment, and even potential legal jeopardy. One
important thing to remember about written communication, especially in the digital age, is
the message lives on, perhaps in perpetuity. Thus, there are two things to remember: first,
write well – poorly constructed sentences and careless errors make you look bad; and
second, ensure the content of the message is something you want to promote or be
associated with for the long haul.
LISTENING
The act of listening does not often make its way onto the list of types of communication.
Active listening, however, is perhaps one of the most important types of communication
because if we cannot listen to the person sitting across from us, we cannot effectively
engage with them. Think about a negotiation – part of the process is to assess what the
opposition wants and needs. Without listening, it is impossible to assess that, which makes
it difficult to achieve a win/win outcome.
VISUAL COMMUNICATION
We are a visual society. Think about it, televisions are running 24/7, Facebook is visual
with memes, videos, images, etc., Instagram is an image-only platform, and advertisers use
imagery to sell products and ideas. Think about from a personal perspective – the images
we post on social media are meant to convey meaning – to communicate a message. In
some cases that message might be, look at me, I’m in Italy or I just won an award. Others
are carefully curated to tug on our heartstrings – injured animals, crying children, etc.
D. COMMUNICATION STYLES
Passive
Individuals who use the passive communication style often act indifferently, yielding to
others. Passive communicators usually fail to express their feelings or needs, allowing
others to express themselves. Frequently, a passive communicator’s lack of outward
communication can lead to misunderstanding, anger build-up or resentment. At the same
time, these communicators can be safer to speak with when a conflict arises, because they
most likely will avoid a confrontation or defer to others.
Aggressive
It’s often apparent when someone communicates in an aggressive manner. You’ll hear it.
You’ll see it. You may even feel it. The aggressive communication style is emphasized by
speaking in a loud and demanding voice, maintaining intense eye contact and dominating
or controlling others by blaming, intimidating, criticizing, threatening or attacking them,
among other traits.
Passive-Aggressive
Passive-aggressive communication style users appear passive on the surface, but within he
or she may feel powerless or stuck, building up a resentment that leads to seething or acting
out in subtle, indirect or secret ways.
Most passive-aggressive communicators will mutter to themselves rather than confront a
person or issue. They have difficulty acknowledging their anger, use facial expressions that
don’t correlate with how they feel and even deny there is a problem.
Assertive
Thought to be the most effective form of communication, the assertive communication
style features an open communication link while not being overbearing. Assertive
communicators can express their own needs, desires, ideas and feelings, while also
considering the needs of others. Assertive communicators aim for both sides to win in a
situation, balancing one’s rights with the rights of others.
Beyond affinities to religion, spirituality is also described as having deep connections and
trust among co-employees, including a shared alignment with the organization’s own goals
and values — taking the cue mainly from its “enlightened” managers. Whichever mode or
combination of modes for spirituality the company subscribes to, these have shown to
redound to employee wellness — an indispensable aspiration of any organization. Beyond
the precepts of holistic development, employee wellness has been associated with job
satisfaction and employee motivation, resulting in tangible benefits for the company such
as higher productivity, lower employee turnover, reduced stress levels, and improved
customer service.