Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and diversity
of maize
in the american
continent
José Antonio Serratos Hernández
Universidad Autónoma
de la Ciudad de México
www.greenpeace.org.mx
This document was written for Greenpeace Mexico
by Dr. José Antonio Serratos Hernández,
researcher and maize project coordinator at the
Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México
January 2009
Index
Introduction 2
References 31
1
Introduction
Maize is the cereal of the peoples Maize is the cereal which has had strategy because it is linked
and cultures in the American more importance in the economy to the technological path of
continent. The most ancient sector worldwide during all the thedeveloped countries and also
civilizations in America –from 20th century and the beginning because the in situ conservation in
the Olmecs and Teotihuacans in of the 21st. In theindustrialized several less developed countries
Mesoamerica to the Incas and countries, maize is mainly used is not supported due to financial
Quechuans in the Andean region as forage, raw material for restrictions. It is foreseen that
of South America- flourished the production of processed within afew years, the lack of
accompanied with this plant. foods and, recently, for ethanol care and attention to these rural
This link between culture and production. On the other hand, in communities where the mayor
agriculture had motivated the some Latin American countries and percentage of native germplasm
humanists and scientists to ask: increasingly more in Africa, a great is, will have a negative impact
which is the origin of this cereal? percentage of maize produced on maize diversity. It is also
How was the evolution of maize or imported is used for human foreseen that the public policies
once the different human groups consumption. In this sense, maize that promote the intensive capital
adopted and cultivated it for their had been and still is a key factor technologies which move the jobs
own profit? These questions for the survival of farmers and towards urban areas or towards
had led them to explore the indigenous people who live in most foreign countries, will determine
past, and nowadays -thanks to of the countries of the American the rate of extinction of genetic
the technological and scientific continent. It is paradoxical resources of maize.
development- led them to unravel that, even with each time less The risk of loosing the genetic
several enigmas which surround and less economic resources diversity of maize is very high. The
the domestication of this crop. allocated for the inhabitants of economic conditions of poverty
Although not all the details the poorest communities, they are and marginalization faced by the
that allow us to explain its origin the stewards of maize diversity. farmers, as is already evident in
and domestication had been Such situation is putting at risk several regions of America, will lead
found, the scientists reached a valuable seeds: the researches to a generalized extinction of maize
consensus: the direct ancestor of and studies conducted through diversity. One way to alleviate this
maize is the teosinte. Nevertheless, out several years from the point of situation is to re-value the crop
during more than 70 years and view of scientific and humanistic through the knowledge of its origin
before reaching such conclusion, disciplines, have proved that the and diversification in the American
there was a deep debate which role of the farmer is of uttermost Continent. This document aims to
contributed to the advancement importance for the preservation recover the history of the scientific
of knowledge in several areas of and diversification of maize. research and socio-cultural aspects
the scientific endeavor. So is it that However, the research and related to the origin and diversity
some of the greatest scientists of development programs for in of native maize, in order to allow
the 20th century studied maize, situ conservation of maize are the peoples of America rescue
its origins and diversification. For very restricted and had not been the plant which is a symbol of the
example, in 1983 the American generalized to important regions American continent and its culture.
researcher Barbara McClintock with great concentration of ethnic
was awarded the Nobel Prize in and farming groups. 1
These genetic elements are also known as “jumping genes”,
Physiology due to her discovery of Nowadays, keeping maize due to its ability to “jump” from one part to another in the
chromosomes.
the mobile genetic elements1 in the germplasm banks, or ex situ
chromosomes of maize. conservation, is the dominant Image: Maize from Noregachi, Chihuahua / © David Lauer
One of the greatest geneticists and as a geographical zone where the teosinte was classified, was the
researcher of cultivated plants of major part of the crop diversity is maize’s closest wild relative.
the 20th century, Nikolai Vavilov located and where its wild relatives Along with maize, teosinte
(1887-1943, http://www.vir.nw.ru), coexist or coexisted (Figure 1). was described during Colonial
contributed to the concept of Particularly, Vavilov takes into times in Mexico, and Francisco
center of origin. account several aspects to define Hernandez Boncalo (1515/1517-
Thanks to his research we know the centers of origin of agricultural 1578) was the first one to report
about and were explored the eight crops: 1) they are geographical the existence of this plant in
regions in the world where the areas where such crops are still 1570. The Spanish botanist and
cultivated plants have their origin. sown; 2) they are linked to large physician Hernandez Boncalo
More than theory, it is the field work land extensions; and 3) “the carried out expeditions in order
and the biogeographic exploration primary centers of origin of crops to study Mexico’s flora and wrote
which constitutes the legacy of are located in mountain ranges”. several documents regarding
Vavilov to the human race. This According to Vavilov’s findings, the the plants of the New World and
legacy is kept in one of the first origin of maize and approximately its medicinal herbs. Many of his
germplasm banks of cultivated 49 species more are located in the writings were lost in the fire at
species in the world, and which Primary Center VII (Figure 1), which El Escorial, in 1671, but these
was built at the beginning of the is in southern Mexico and Central were recovered thanks to the
20th century in Leningrad. America. Since its first exploration copies Boncalo kept in several
The “Center of origin” of in Mexico, it was evident for Vavilov different writings about botany
cultivated plants had been defined that Euchlaena, the genus in which and medicine.
Figure 1. Location of the centers of origin / domestication of cultivated plants, according to Vavilov. Adapted by Antonio Serratos
from: http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/atlas/viewdata/viewpub.asp?id=2718
After those first references from “a simple ear of teosinte evolved in morphology from the female
Francisco Hernandez during the into and gave origin to the huge inflorescence of teosinte to the ear
rule of Felipe II in Spain, and the maize cob, even with the influence of maize, the analysis of intermediate
first dispersion of maize through of human selection”. Other studies structures (Figure 2) produced by
out Europe during the 16th century, regarding the origin of maize were their progeny suggested different
the research on maize and teosinte carried out by Hershberger (1893). interpretations of the origin of maize.
stopped until few centuries later. These studies suggested that maize During the first quarter of the 20th
Maize, from the Natural System is the result of hybridization between century, before the first archeological
of Linnaeus (1748), was classified in teosinte and other kind of grass, explorations related to maize took
the genus Zea and since then it did maybe an extinct one. place, the studies on the cell-genetics
not suffer any major modifications The origin of maize has not of teosinte and maize started.
until the 20th century, when teosinte been easy to track down. The ear is Between 1930 and 1932 Barbara
was included in that genus. Other unique among cereals; therefore, its McClintock3 laid the foundations of
taxonomical and botanical studies evolution has been a great scientific the research which would grant her
carried out at the end of the 19th challenge. On the other hand, the the Nobel Prize, 50 years later, due
century and the beginning of the fossil record of ancient remains to her findings on the genetics of
20th; summarize the relationship of maize, found in several parts in maize and to the methodology for
between teosinte and maize and Mexico, show a great morphological chromosomal analysis.
their possible evolution. The ioneer change from the small female
studies of teosinte taxonomy were inflorescence (“mazorquita” or “small
done by Schrader (1833), who ear”) of teosinte –which only has a 2
G.W. Beadle, 1978. “Teosinte and the origin of maize”. Maize
classified it as Euchlaena mexicana. few kernels that are easy to thresh, breeding and genetics; D.B. Walden (Ed.), Wiley Interscience;
Pages 113-128.
According to George Beadle2, in and the female inflorescence (ear) 3
McClintock B. 1929. “Chromosome morphology in Zea mays”.
Science, Volume 69, Number 1798, Page 629; McClintock
1875 the botanist Ascherson already of maize which has a great amount B. 1930. A Cytological Demonstration of the Location of an
Interchange between two Non-Homologous Chromosomes of
considered that Euchlaena truly of kernels strongly attached to the Zea Mays PNAS Vol. 16, Number 12; Pages 791-796; Creighton
belonged to the genus Zea; but he “olote” (cob or raquis). Although HB, McClintock B. 1931. A correlation of cytological and
genetical crossing-over in Zea mays. PNAS Volume 17, Number
found really difficult to explain how there is a notorious discontinuity 8, Pages 492–497.
Figure 2. Morphological sequence of the possible evolution of the ear from teosinte to maize. Elaborated by Antonio Serratos from several
sources: The pictures 1 and 2, from left to right, are from the web page of the Koshland museum (www.koshland-science-museum.org/
exhibitdna/crop02.jsp), pictures 3 and 7 were obtained from the webpage of the John Doebley’s laboratory (teosinte.wisc.edu/taxonomy.
html), and figures 4 to 6 from Iltis (footnote No. 12). Pictures 8 and 9 are of the race Conico from the Altiplano (Antonio Serratos personal files).
5
At the same time, the study of the origin of maize; this hypothesis that the maize originated from a
the cytogenetics of maize and explicitly ruled out teosinte as the cross between perennial teosinte and
teosinte progeny, as well as the ancestor of maize. an ancient tunicate-popcorn maize.
morphological analyses, shed Particularly, a research of Based on this theory, he postulated
some light on the origin of maize Mangelsdorf (1959) put forward that the existing teosinte sprung up
by reproducing morphological some of the events that could have from the hybridization between these
series which suggested a possible happened during the evolution of two species.
path in the evolution of maize from domesticated maize. For decades, the theory of the
teosinte. The studies of differences This research was based on origin of maize from a wild type
and similarities in the chromosomes the morphological analysis of the of maize -supposedly nowadays
of maize and teosinte hybrids, and remains of maize found in he Bat extinct- had several different
the morphology of its progeny, gave Cave (New Mexico, United States of “versions”. At the same time,
researchers such as Collins (1921), America) in comparison to the more the hypothesis of teosinte as the
Emerson (1924), Beadle (1932, recent maize considered to have ancestor of maize remained as
1939), Emerson and Beadle (1932) primitive traits (the tunicate maize antagonist to the hypothesis of a
and Arnason (1936) elements to set and the popcorn maize) and its wild wild extinct maize. George Beadle,
possible steps in the evolutionary relatives: teosinte and tripsacum. who since 1939 had carried out
path of both species. With the information derived from researches regarding the origin
Nevertheless, for many his experiments with the hybrids of maize5, shaped the theory of
researchers the weakness of the of tripsacum and modern maize, teosinte evolution and the human
fossil record and the differences Mangelsdorf (1959) established that intervention in the process of maize
between the ear of both plants were an extinct wild maize of the tunicate domestication.
facts that prevented them to give a kind and a species of tripsacum gave
satisfactory explanation on the origin origin to maize (Figure 3). During the
of maize from teosinte. In 1938, 70s, in the 20th century, with the
Paul Mangelsdorf and R. Reeves4 discovery of the perennial teosinte 4
Mangelsdorf, P.C. and R.G. Reeves. 1938. The origin of maize.
proposed the foundations for one (Zea diploperennis), Mangelsdorf PNAS 24(8). Pages 303-312.
5
Beadle G.W. 1939. “Teosinte and the origin of maize”; J.
of the most influential hypothesis on modified his theory and proposed Heredity 30; Pages 245-247.
Tripsacum
Tunicate
X
Popcorn
Popcorn
Archeological
cob
Figura 3. Analysis of tunicate maize, popcorn andy tripsacum in the theory on the origin of maize, according to Mangelsdorf (1959).
Adapted by Antonio Serratos from the illustration of Mangelsdorf (1959).
7
For example, in the Popol Vuh availed the opportunity of domesticate started to use molecular biology
(1986), maize was always mentioned it through a selection process. technologies came on the scene.
as such and what is narrated is Although it would take long to Under the scheme of the dominant
how the gods create “the human make a reference to all the aspects theory of teosinte, two schools of
body and flesh” from the maize discussed in the work of Iltis, it scientist discussed the issue of the
dough10, but its ancestor is never is important to mention that this characteristics of the center of origin
mentioned nor is it the way the gods theory is marked by its affinity to of maize. That is, after establishing
created the maize. Therefore, and some scientific theories which were that the teosinte was the ancestor
contradicting Beadle arguments popular and well established trends of maize, the researchers compared
(1980), with the anthropological at the end of the 70s, specifically ideas and information regarding
elements gathered so far, it is no the catastrophes theory (Rene the details of the center of origin
possible to link teosinte in the Thom13) and the concepts of genetic of maize. A group of specialists
Mesoamerican or Andean cultures’ assimilation and epigenesis (Conrad considered that the center was
cosmovision with the origin of maize. Waddington14). unicentric, for another group it was
A theory linked to current Although the catastrophic multicentric. Besides, at that time,
research groups is the catastrophic sexual transmutation theory set a third group was still conducting
sexual transmutation (Iltis, 198311), out by Iltis is fascinating in many studies, based on Mangelsdorf
which at that time represented a ways, the criticism it suffered theories, and considered that
novel way of thinking on the origin since it was published seemed the origin of maize was an event
of maize. This theory establishes to be due to a misinterpretation preceded by a wild ancestor already
that the female inflorescences (ear) of the concepts of Waddington extinct and that teosinte was a
of maize derived from the central (1975a) and of the evolutionary hybrid of maize and tripsacum.
spike of the male inflorescences models formalized through the
(tassel) of teosinte. In a surprising catastrophe theory (Thom 1977).
twist, Iltis proposes that, unlike In particular, it was considered that
everything established so far, maize the genetic assimilation is a form
evolved thanks to a sudden sexual of “Lamarckism15”; as a result, its
transmutation which condensed the scientific worth was discredited.
branches of teosinte, placing them Actually, the genetic assimilation
in the female expression area of the concept is the Darwinist version of 10
Popol Vuh. 1986. Antiguas historias de los indios quichés de
plant. Thus, severe alterations in acquired traits and it is a concept Guatemala por Albertina Saravia. Editorial Porrúa, Colección “Sepan
cuantos…” Num. 36, Sixteenth edition. Mexico, Mexico City.
the nutrient distribution of the plant that allowed Iltis (1983) to describe 11
Iltis H.H. 1983. “From teosinte to maize: The catastrophic
sexual transmutation”. Science 222; Pages 886-894.
happened, therefore unchaining a a possible morphogenetic and 12
The idea of genetic assimilation involves a phenomenon as
well as mechanism due to which the phenomenon takes place.
drastic morphological change. These structural unbalance (Thom, 1977) in This phenomenon can be described as de change of an acquired
modifications in the structure of the development of teosinte, which trait into an inherited trait”. “Genetic assimilation is the proposed
name for that process…” (Waddington, 1975a).
the male tassel, so to turn it into a explained its transformation into 13
René Thom, Stabilité structurelle et morphogénèse,Interédition,
París, 1977 (Estabilidad estructural y morfogénesis, Editorial
cob, did not involved mutations but, primitive maize. GEDISA, Barcelona, Spain, 1987). In this book, Thom applies
his Catastrophes theory to the biology of development and
according to Iltis, a phenomenon Towards the end of the decade morphogenesis.
known as genetic assimilation12 . This of 1980, the hypothesis of the 14
Conrad H. Waddington. 1975b. A catastrophe theory of
evolution. In: “The evolution of an evolutionist” Waddington C.H.
abnormal quantum change would origin of maize from teosinte was Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, United States of America,
Pages 253-266
then be profited by human selection gaining force and consolidating 15
“Lamarkism” term used for the studies which are based on
or, in other words, once humans as the most accepted theory the idea of the scientific Lamark with regards to the “inheritance
of the acquired traits”. In a simplistic manner, Lamark has been
discovered this “useful monstrosity”, among the scientific and academic pictured as an anti-scientist.
produced by very particular communities. Around that time, the
conditions, the hunter-gatherers new generations of researchers who Image: Teosinte from Oaxaca / © David Lauer
During the decade of 1990, it therefore, it is not surprising that shows the evidence of a hybrid
seemed that scientists had reached the conclusions of Doebley and produced by crossing a Tripsacum
an agreement on the prevalence of collaborators are a complement dactyloides (one of the tripsacum
the theory of teosinte; nevertheless, to the proposed theories of those species) and Zea diploperennis (the
from time to time new researches scientists: a series of mutations perennial teosinte), two wild relatives
arisen involving the supposedly result in the sexual transformation of maize23. With the work, Eubanks
extinct wild maize -on the same of the male inflorescence of teosinte revives the theory of Mangelsdorf,
line of thinking as Mangelsdorf and into the female inflorescence of known as tripartite theory, and
his collaborators16. As a summary, maize. Likewise, in that work they suggests that the hybrids of
Figure 4 shows the diagrams concluded that the Tunicate gene Tripsacum-diploperennis are one of
developed in 1995 by Wilkes and (also known as Tu) does not have the missing links which would solve
Goodman17 and which picture the any role in the origin of maize. This the puzzle of the origin of maize. The
different theories about the origin conclusion seems to bury one of main argument of Eubanks is that
of maize. Also, at that time, the the basic suppositions of the theory tripsacum and perennial teosinte
studies carried out with the help of Mangelsorf (1939, 1959) which hybrids represent the extinct wild
of new technologies on molecular states that a kind of tunicate maize20 maize, which is the principal element
biology were consolidated. Such participated in the origin of maize. in the theory of Mangelsdorf (1939).
studies would allow a deeper In 1991, Doebley and Stec21, Meanwhile, Doebley and
exploration on the origin of maize: when studying the morphology of collaborators explored, at a
millions of years in the evolutionary the progeny of maize and teosinte, molecular level, the genes of
scale. Between 1990 and 1992, found that the molecular genetic biochemical and enzymatic
John Doebley, from the University analyses are coherent, once more, processes that could contribute
of Minnesota, in order to define with the results of Beadle: they to the evolutionary change from
the differentiation of teosinte and identified five genomic regions that teosinte to maize24.
maize and using molecular markers, control the differences between the
formulated several variations from two plants. These scientists highlight
the pioneer studies of Beadle. the importance of the gene Teosinte
With this research, John Doebley branched (or tb1) due to its effect
consolidated the theory of teosinte on the inflorescence architecture
as ancestor of maize. and its impact on the morphological
In one of the first works where the development of maize. Subsequently,
molecular markers methodology18 in a review paper published in 199222, 16
Specially Mary Eubanks, from the Durham University in North
was used to analyze the origin of Doebley stated that the works Carolina, USA.
17
Wilkes H.G. and Goodman M.M. 1995. “Mystery and missing
maize, Doebley and collaborators19 carried out so far, with the support links: The origin of maize”. Maize Genetic Resources, Maite
Program Special Report; Taba, S. (publisher), Mexico, Mexico City,
concluded that, in five segments of of biotechnological methodologies, Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT).
18
The molecular markers methodology is based on a series of
four chromosomes of the hybrids allowed to back up the theory of biochemical processes which involve extraction, purification and
of teosinte and maize is found the Beadle –the morphological differences fragmentation of the deoxyribonucleic acid of the organisms in
order to detect and identify segments which are specific in that
genetic information which caused between maize and teosinte started genetic material. See Figure 7.
19
Doebley J., Stec A., Wendel J., Edwards M., 1990. “Genetic
a morphological modification in the with a few mutations which had a and morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F2 population:
female ears and male tassels of strong influence on the morphology Implications for the origin of maize”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,
Volumen 87; Pages. 9888-9892.
these two species. They suggested of the adult maize plant. On the 20
The turnicate maize is a type of maize where each grain is
wrapped in vegetative tissue. See Figure 3, the second drawing,
that in maize, as consequence other hand, in that work, Doebley from left to right.
21
Doebley J., Stec A. 1991. “Genetic analysis of the
of that morphological change, anticipates that cloning the genes morphological differences between maize and teosinte”.
an expression of secondary male involved in the evolutionary change of Genetics, Volume 129; Pages. 285-295.
22
Doebley J. 1992. “Mapping the genes that made maize”.
sexual traits embedded in a female teosinte –in order to give origin to the Trends in Genetics, Volumen 8, Número 9; Pages. 302-307.
23
Eubanks M. 1995. “A cross between two maize relatives:
genetic context are produced. maize – would become a reality in the Tripsacum dactyloides and Zea diploperennis (Poaceae)”.
Economic Botany 49(2); Pages 172-182.
This research was, clearly, derived short term. 24
Hanson M.A., Gaut B.S., Stec A., Fuerstenberg S.I., Goodman
from the studies of Beadle and Some years later, Mary Eubanks M.M., Coe E.H., Doebley J. 1996. “Evolution of anthocyanin
biosynthesis in maize kernels: The role of regulatory and
Iltis –mentioned hereinabove -, published in 1995 a study which enzymatic loci”. Genetics, Volume 143; Pages. 1395-1407.
Vertical evolution: Maize from wild maize Vertical evolution: maize and teosinte come from a common ancestor but the
Kempton (1934); Mangelsdorf (1974, 1986); Wilkes (1989); Goodman (1988) domestication of maize is carried out from wild maize
Montgomery (1906); Weatherwax (1918, 1919, 1954)
11
Status of the knowledge on the center of
origin and on the domestication of maize
At the beginning of the 21st century, The scarcity of crucial information on we know it nowadays, developed
the research on the origin of maize the fossil and archeological records of from a unique domestication event
is determined by the importance of teosinte and maize, in comparison to which took place nine thousand
molecular biology methodologies. the potential number of areas located years ago in the south of Mexico.
Based on these methodologies, throughout America, limits the correct The results of their analysis led to
it has been possible to explore definition and geographical location other conclusions that, according
evolutionary scenarios of millions of of the centers of origin, domestication to the authors, definitely support
years where the genomic structures and diversity of maize. the unicentric characteristic of the
of plant organisms which are In practical terms, this scientific origin of maize. First of all, the Zea
ancestors of the families to which investigation would be of importance mays ssp parviglumis was identified
maize and teosinte –and many other for issues as controversial as the as the only progenitor of maize,
plants – belonge to. In the same review of the biosafety laws where, and the teosinte Zea mays ssp
way, some genetic mechanisms as happens in Mexico, is essential mexicana as a contributor to its
that could be involved in the specific to have the scientific information diversification, mainly in the central
transformation of teosinte into maize which is relevant for the protection plateau maize. Due to the fact that
have been described in timeframes of native maize. the distribution of these teosintes is
ranging between seven and nine The process of domestication is a limited to the Balsas region and to
thousand years (estimated time third element involved in how maize the highland plateau (altiplano) in
during which the domestication of was originated. Either by a gradual the center of Mexico, respectively,
maize took place). Nevertheless, selection or by a catastrophic sexual Doebley and collaborators deducted
in more than seventy years of transmutation, human involvement that they could define the specific
discussion and exchange of ideas is an essential condition for the geographic location of the birthplace
regarding the origin of maize, there transformation of teosinte into maize. of maize. Nonetheless, it is important
has been just one agreement among On the other hand, determining to be cautious because, as we
the scientific communities: teosinte is domestication is key for locating the already mentioned, the fossil and
the ancestor of maize. center of origin and diversification of archeological records are very limited
Although recent studies are still the crop. Let us remember that with and, therefore, it is not prudent to
providing important data on the the emergence and discussion of draw a definitive conclusion.
origin of maize, they are lacking the theories on the origin of maize, In spite of the preference of the
a more precise definition of basic some domestication mechanisms unicentric theory over the multicentric
aspects such as how and where closely linked to human work and theory that many research groups
this plant had its origin. It is not yet agriculture were proposed, so, it have, it is not possible to fully discard
possible to determine the supremacy has always been recognized that the multicentric theory because it
of any theory on the location of the the farmers of the different American has contributed with very important
center, or centers, of origin and cultures can not be separated from pieces of evidence that supports
domestication of maize because the domestication and diversification it - particularly, the correlation
we are still lacking data on the fossil of maize in subsequent times and up between the chromosomal knobs
and archeological records of this to the present. of each racial composite and the
process. There are very few specific The studies on the domestication geographical regions where those
paleontological and archeological of maize have given birth to are located. This is a strong enough
explorations which focused in the contrasting theories related to the proof which points at not only to the
analysis of maize in America. The center of origin: the unicentric and origin and domestication of maize but
most well know are the ones of multicentric theories. Although the also at its diversification. Kato (2005)
Puebla (Tehuacan) and Oaxaca (Guila controversy on the single or multiple analyzed the characteristic patterns of
Naquitz) in Mexico, New Mexico character of the domestication center the chromosomal knobs32 of teosinte
(Bat Cave) in the United States of is a very old one, we cannot say it is and maize, and found that they could
America, and some more in other already solved. A study by Yashihiro be associated to geographic patterns
parts of Mexico (See Notes 60 and Matsuoka, from the Doebley group31, of the populations of each one of
61) and Ecuador (See Note 62). concludes that all the maize as these species.
31
Matsuoka Y., Vigouroux Y., Goodman M.M., Sanchez-Gonzalez
J., Buckler E., Doebley J. 2001. “A single domestication for
maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping”. PNAS
USA, Volume 99, Number 9; Pages 6080-6084.
32
The Chromosomal knobknobs are elements of the chromosomes
with the shape of a knot . The knobs contain particular chemical
substances (heterocromatine) that are visible with the help of
a microscope. The location of the knobs is determined with
special stains at the meiosis (formation of gametes for sexual
reproduction) in the microsporocysts (immature pollen). See the
article of Angel Kato (1997) where is detailed an analysis on the
chromosomal knobs in teosinte and maize.
33
Wilkes, G. 2004. Corn, Strange and Marvelous: But Is a
Definitive Origin Known? In: “Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and
Production” C. Wayne Smith (Publishing House), Wiley & Sons,
Inc. Pages 3-63.
13
The diversity of maize in
the American Continent
15
Table 1. Compilation of the races of maize catalogued per country. By Antonio Serratos, based on several information
sources (Notes 34 and 37). See the map on Figure 8.
Country Race
Amarillo Ocho Hileras, Amarillo de Ocho, Altiplano, Amargo, Avatí Morotí, Avatí Morotí Mita, Avatí Morotí Ti, Avatí Pichingá, Azul, Blanco Ocho Hileras, Calchaqui, Camelia,
Canario de Formosa, Capia Blanco, Capia Garrapata, Capia Rosado, Capia Variegado, Catete Oscuro, Chaucha Amarillo, Chaucha Blanco, Chulpi, Colita Blanco,
Argentina Complejo Tropical, Cravo, Cristalino Amarillo, Cristalino Amarillo Anaranjado, Cristalino Blanco, Cristalino Colorado, Cristalino Naranja, Cristalino Rojo, Culli, Cuzco,
(47) Dentado Blanco Rugoso, Dentado Amarillo, Dentado Blanco, Dentado Amarillo Marlo Fino, Dentado Blanco Marlo Fino, Dulce, Marrón, Morochito, Negro, Pericarpio
Rojo, Perla, Perlita, Pisingallo, Socorro, Tuzón, Venezolano
Achuchema, Amarillo Subtropical, Altiplano, Aperlado, Argentino, Ayzuma, Bayo, Blanco Mojo, Blanco Yungueño, Blando Amazónico, Blando Blanco, Blando Cruceño,
Camba, Canario, Cateto, Chake Sara, Checchi, Cholito, Chuncula, Chuspillu, Concebideño, Colorado, Cordillera, Confite Puneño, Coroico, Coroico Amarillo, Coroico
Bolivia Blanco, Cubano Amarillo, Cubano Blanco, Cubano Dentado, Cuzco Boliviano, Cuzco Huilcaparú, Duro Amazónico, Duro Beniano, Enano, Harinoso de Ocho Hileras,
(77) Huaca Songo, Hualtaco, Huillcaparu, Jampe Tongo, Janka Sara, Kajbia, Karapampa, Kcello, Kellu, Kellu Huillcaparu, Kepi Siqui, Kulli, Morado, Morochillo, Morocho,
Morocho Chaqueño, Morocho Chico, Morocho Grande, Morocho Ocho Hileras, Morocho Catorce Hileras, Niñuelo, Oke, Parú, Pasankalla, Patillo, Patillo Grande,
Perla, Perla Amarillo, Perla Primitivo de los Llanos, Perola, Pisankalla, Pojoso Chico, Pororo, Pura, Purito, Reventón, Tuimuru, Uchuquilla, Yungueño
Caiano, Caingang, Canario de Ocho, Caribe Precoz, Cateto, Cateto Sulino, Cateto Sulino Precoce, Cateto Sulino Escuro, Cateto Sulino Grosso, Cateto Assis
Brasil Brasil, Cateto Grande, Cateto Nordista Precoce, Chavantes, Cravo, Criollo de Cuba, Cristal Semidentado, Cristal Sulino, Cravo Riograndense, Cravo Paulista,
(44) Dente Amarelo, Dente Riograndense, Dente Riograndense Rugoso, Dente Riograndense Liso, Dente Paulista, Dente Branco, Dente Branco Riograndense, Dente
Branco Paulista, Dente Colorado, Entrelazado, Guaraní Popcorns, Hickory King, Indígena, Lenha, Morotí Precoce, Morotí Guapí, Perola, Pinha, Pipoca, Saint Croix,
Semidentado Riograndense, Semidentado Paulista, Semidente Amarelo, Semidente Azul, Tusón
Colombia Amagaceño, Andaquí, Cabuya, Cacao, Capio, Cariaco, Chococeño, Clavo, Común, Costeño, Güirua, Imbricado, Maíz Dulce, Maíz Harinoso Dentado, Montaña,
(23) Negrito, Pira, Pira Naranja, Pollo, Puya, Puya Grande, Sabanero, Yucatán
Cuba
(11) Cubano Amarillo, Chandelle, Coastal Tropical Cristalino, Cuban Flint, Maíz Criollo, Tusón, Argentino, Canilla, White Pop, Yellow Pop, White Dent
Amarillo Malleco, Amarillo Ñuble, Araucano, Capio Chico Chileno, Capio Grande Chileno, Capio Negro Chileno, Camelia, Choclero, Chulpi, Chutucuno Chico,
Chile Chutucuno Grande, Cristalino Chileno, Cristalino Norteño, Curagua, Curagua Grande, Dentado Comercial, Diente Caballo, Dulce, Harinoso Tarapaqueño, Limeño,
(29)
Maíz de Rulo, Marcame, Morocho Blanco, Morocho Amarillo, Negrito Chileno, Ocho Corridas, Pisankalla, Polulo, Semanero
Canguil, Sabanero Ecuatoriano, Cuzco Ecuatoriano, Mishca, Patillo Ecuatoriano, Racimo de Uva, Kcello Ecuatoriano, Chillo, Chulpi Ecuatoriano, Morochón,
Ecuador
Huandango, Montaña Ecuatoriano, Blanco Harinoso Dentado, Cónico Dentado, Uchima, Clavito, Pojoso Chico Ecuatoriano, Tusilla, Gallina, Candela, Maíz Cubano,
(31)
Tuxpeño, Chococeño, Blanco Blandito, Cholito Ecuatoriano, Yunga, Enano Gigante, Yunquillano, Yungueño Ecuatoriano
Criollo, Huesillo, Nal-Tel, Nal-Tel Amarillo, Nal-Tel Amarillo Tierra Baja, Nal-Tel Blanco Tierra Baja, Nal-Tel Amarillo Tierra Alta, Nal-Tel Blanco Tierra Alta, Nal-Tel Ocho,
Guatemala Imbricado; Serrano, San Marceño, Quiché, Quicheño Rojo, Quicheño Grueso, Quicheño Ramoso, Negrita, Negro, Negro Chico, Negro Chimaltenango Tierra Fria,
(33) Negro Chimaltenango Tierra Caliente, Salpor, Salpor Tardío, Salvadoreño, San Marceño, Olotillo, Olotón, Comiteco, Dzit Bacal, Tehua, Tepecintle, Tusón, Tuxpeño
El Salvador,
Honduras,
Costa Rica, Nal Tel Blanco, Nal Tel Amarillo, Nal Tel Rojo, Nal Tel Panamá, Clavillo, Salvadoreño, Negro, Chocoseño, Cariaco, Huesillo, Cubano Amarillo Cristalino
Nicaragua, Panamá
(11)
Ancho, Apachito, Arrocillo Amarillo, Arrocillo, Azul, Blandito, Blando Sonora, Bofo, Bolita, Cacahuacintle, Carmen, Celaya, Chalqueño, Chapalote, Clavillo, Comiteco,
Mexico Conejo, Cónico, Cónico Norteño, Coscomatepec, Cristalino Chihuahua, Complejo Serrano Jalisco, Cubano Amarillo, Dulce de Jalisco, Dulcillo Noroeste, Dzit Bacal,
(65:69 collated; 6 Elotes Cónicos, Elotes Occidentales, Elotero de Sinaloa, Fasciado, Gordo, Harinoso, Harinoso de Ocho, Jala, Lady Finger, Maíz Dulce, Maizón, Motozinteco, Mushito,
impresise) Nal Tel, Nal-Tel de Altura, Olotillo, Olotón, Onaveño, Palomero de Chihuahua, Palomero Toluqueño, Pepitilla, Ratón, Reventador, San Juan, Serrano de Jalisco,
Tablilla, Tablilla de Ocho, Tabloncillo, Tabloncillo Perla, Tehua, Tepecintle, Tunicata, Tuxpeño Norteño, Tuxpeño, Vandeño, Xmejenal, Zamorano Amarillo, Zapalote
Chico, Zapalote Grande
Paraguay
Avatí Mita, Avatí Morotí, Avatí Ti, Avatí Guapí, Opaco, Pichinga Redondo, Sape Moroti, Sape Pyta, Tupí Morotí, Tupí Pyta
(10)
Ajaleado, Alazán, Alemán, Amarillo Huancabamba, Ancashino, Arequipeño, Arizona, Arizona Mochero, Blanco Ayabaca, Cabaña, Capio, Chancayano, Chancayano
Amarillo, Chancayano Blanco, Chancayano Pintado, Chaparreño, Chimlos, Chullpi, Chuncho, Colorado, Confite Introducido, Confite Morocho, Confite Puneño,
Perú Confite Puntiagudo, Coruca, Cubano Amarillo, Cubano Amarillo Piricinco, Cuban Yellow Dent, Cuzco, Cuzco Cristalino Amarillo, Cuzco Gigante, Enano, Granada,
(66) Hibrido Amarillo Duro, Huachano, Huancavelicano, Huarmaca, Huayleño, Jora, Kculli, Marañon, Mochero, Mochero Pagaladroga, Morocho Cajabambino,
Morocho Canteño, Morocho, Opaco, Pagaladroga, Pardo, Pardo Amarillo, Paro, Perla, Perlilla, Piricinco, Piscorunto, Rabo de Zorro, Rienda, Sabanero, San
Gerónimo Huancavelicano, Sarco, Shajatu, San Gerónimo, Tambopateño, Tumbesino, Tuxpeño, Uchuquilla
Uruguay Cateto Sulino, Cristal, Dentado Branco, Dentado Rugoso, Morotí Amarillo, Morotí Blanco, Pisingallo, Semidentado Rugoso
(8)
United States of Argentino, Canilla, Cariaco, Chapalote, Confite Morocho, Corn Belt Dent, Creole, Early Caribbean, Haitian White, Northern Flint, Northern Flour, Palomero
America Toluqueño, Saint Croix, Southern Dent, Tuson, White PopCorn
(16)
Venezuela Aragüito, Cacao, Canilla Venezolano, Cariaco, Chandelle, Chirimito, Común, Costeño, Cuba Amarillo, Guaribero, Huevito, Negrito, Pira, Pollo, Puya, Puya Grande,
(19) Sabanero, Tusón, Tuxpeño
40
Since 1968, Eduardo Casas, Dan Hanson and Edwing
Wellhausen, implemented the taxonomic and number analysis
of some races of Mexican maize in they study, published in the
magazine Genetics: “Genetic relationsips among collections
representing three Mexican racial composites of Zea mays”,
Volume 59, Pages 299-310.
(Cariaco - Mochero)
Polulo
Nal-Tel - Tusilla
Pira
Canilla
Piricinco
Pagaladroga
Palomero Toluqueño
Cónico
Olotillo
Harinoso de 8
Zapalote-Vandeño
Dentado Blanco
Chaparreño
Arizona
Maíz Dulce
(Pororo)
Yellow Pop
Chirimito
Guaribero
Morado
Arrocillo Amarillo
(Chalqueño)
Pepitilla
Harinoso de 8-0
Tabloncillo
(Tuxpeño)
Jala
Zapalote Celaya
Bolita
Candela
Negrito
Guirua
(Rienda - Chimlos)
Sabanero
Cacao
Chococeño
Chococeño
Chancayano
Capio
Tuxpeño
Comiteco
Canilla
Avatí Pichinga
Pisankalla - Pisankalla
Enano
Confite Morocho
Aragüito
White Pop
Clavo
Imbricado
Entrelacado
Coroico
(Cacao - Alazán)
Negrito
Montaña
Cariaco
Chulpi
Chillo
Pojoso Chico
Cacahuacintle
Arequipeño
Huachano
Alemán
Puya
Confite Puntiagudo
Cangüil
(Cabuya - Huandango)
(Andaquí - Montaña)
Morochón
(Mishca - Morocho)
Pollo
(Puya - Puya)
Cuban Flint
Yucatán
Criollo
Tusón
Sabanero
Clavito
(Kcello - Pollo)
Patillo
Cateto Nortista
Perla
(Tusón - Costeño)
Huevito
Común
Jora
Chuncho
Olotón
(Costeño - Gallina)
Uchima
41
Cervantes T., Goodman M.M., Casas-Díaz E., Rawlings J.O.
1978. Use of genetic effects and genotype by environmental
interactions for the classification of Mexican races of maize.
Genetics, Volume 90; Pages 339–348.
42
A Dendogram is a graph which shows the closeness of groups
of organisms due to its similarity or its remoteness due to is lack
Bolivia Colombia Chile México Perú of similarity, represented by statistic coefficients.
43
Yakoleff-Greenhouse V, Hernández-Xolocotzin E, Rojkind-de-
Cuadra C, Larralde C. 1982. Electrophoretic and immunological
Brasil Venezuela Ecuador Paraguay Cuba characterization of pollen protein of Zea mays races. Economic
Botany 36(1): 113-123.
Figure 5. The classification -done by using numerical taxonomy- of the maize races in 44
Camussi A., Spagnoletti P.L., Melchiorre P. 1983.
“Numerical taxonomy of Italian maize populations: Genetic
the American continent. Adapted by Antonio Serratos, with information from Goodman distances on the basis of heterotic effects”. Maydica Volume
and Bird (See Note 39). 28; Pages 411-424
17
The studies on the diversity of maize.
1990-to the present
During the decade of 1990, resistance to pests and diseases, showed that there is a great, but
genetic and biochemical traits linked to secondary chemical unexplored48, richness of useful
associated to factors which are substances of the maize plant. traits in the native Mexican maize
considered of great agronomic Scientists from Ottawa germplasm that also could be
importance for the protection of the University, the National Institute for extrapolated to all the races of
crop were linked to the numerical Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock maize in the American continent.
analysis. Through the analysis Research (INIFAP, in Spanish) and On the other hand, at the
of the content of the chemical the International Center for the beginning of the 90s the scientists
substance DIMBOA (2,4-dihydroxi- improvement of maize and wheat Jesus Sanchez and Major Goodman
7-metoxi-(2H)-1,4-benzoxasin- (CIMMYT, in Spanish)46, carried (1992a, b) worked again the
3-(4H)-ona) – the assessment of an investigation, on the basis of classification of maize diversity in
damages caused by the insect the discovery of resistance factors Latin America and reviewed the
Ostrinia nubilalis (the European corn in native races47, to explore the racial description of Mexican maize
borer) and by the fungi Giberella diversity of Mexican maize and made in 1952 by Wellhausen and
zea and Ustilago maydis – Lana classify it based on its resistance to collaborators (Note 34, Subsection
Reid and collaborators45 were post-harvest pests. They found that 1). In a similar work to the one
able to determine that the group some races of the maize groups of Cervantes and collaborators
of maize classified by Wellhausen Ancient Indigenous and Prehistoric (1978), Sanchez and Goodman
and collaborators as Prehistoric Mestizos, by the description of (1992a) concluded that conventional
Mestizo (See Note 34 Subsection Wallhausen and collaborators (Note taxonomy results agreed with
1) was more resistant to the attack 34, Subsection 1), are sources the numerical taxonomy in the
of the assessed insect and fungi. of resistance to the infestation of classification of maize. In their study
This work was one of the first the insect Sitophilus zeamais, one with Mexican races, they could
characterizations of the Mexican of the most destructive pests of define with a greater precision the
maize germplasm related to its stored maize. This type of studies races that so far were not defined.
Vandeño
Tuxpeño
Tehua
Olotillo
Tepecintle
Jala
Comitéco
Olotón
Celaya
Bolita
Zapalote Grande
Zapalote Chico
Pepitilla
Cacahuacintle
Chalqueño
Cónico
Cónico Norteño
Arrocillo Amarillo
Palomero Toluq.
Maíz Dulce 45
Reid L., Arnason J.T., Nozzolillo C., Hamilton R. 1990.
Nal-Tel
“Taxonomy of Mexican landraces of maize, based on their
Reventador reisistance to European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis”. Euphytica,
Chapalote Voume 46; Pages 119-131
Harinoso de 8
46
Arnason JT, Baum B, Gale J, Lambert JDH, Bergvinson D,
Tabloncillo Philogene BJR, Serratos A, Mihm J, Jewell DC. 1994. “Variation
in resistance of Mexican landraces of maize to maize weevil
Sitophilus zeamais, in relation to taxonomic and biochemical
Indígenas Exóticas Mestizas Modernas parameters”. Euphytica, Volume 74; Pages 227-236.
Antiguas Precolombinas Prehistóricas Incipientes
47
Serratos A, Arnason JT, Nozzolillo C, Lambert JDH, Philogene
BJR, Fulcher G, Davidson K, Peacock L, Atkinson J, Morand
P. 1987. Factors contributing to resistance of exotic maize
Figure 6. Classification of Mexican maize races. The blue and red lines correspond populations to maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. Journal of
Chemical Ecology 13: 751-762.
to the two main groups of Mexican races generated with data from genetic effects 48
Nevertheless, we recommend checking the works of
and environment-genotype interaction. The groups described by Wellhausen and Hernandez Casillas (1986), Hernandez-Xolocotzi (1988),
Gonzalez (1994) and Garcia Lara and collaborators (2003).
collaborators are included as a comparison element (Note 34, Subsection 1): Ancient
Indigenous, Pre-Columbian Exotic, Prehistoric Mestizos and Modern Incipient. Modified
by Antonio Serratos with information from the Notes 34, 40 and 41. Image: Black Maize / © Greenpeace
20
With molecular methodologies, mentioned, the diversity of maize
similar to the ones depicted in the was recognized since the first studies
Figure 7, current investigations on the American races, described
have been carried out to describe in the books sponsored by the
the diversity of maize. In this way National Academy of Sciences of
the genetic resources of maize in USA (See Note 34). The analysis
Brazil49 have been re-assessed, of the germplasm variability, from
where, through the use of the the morphological and botanical
molecular study of 79 landraces studies to the isoenzymes and
of that country, it was possible phytochemical studies, accounts
to define that the farmers’ maize for the great diversity of maize.
management contribute to the With the molecular methodologies,
maintenance of the genetic not only phylogenetic relationships
variability, besides preserving the have been defined but also the
identity of those races. germplasm diversity has been
This conclusion coincides on the confirmed, allowing its taxonomical
majority of investigations about systematization. With all those
the diversity of maize in several elements, gathered throughout a lot
countries, and at different time of years of scientific research, it has
frames, that links the farmer with the been possible to recognize –as is
diversity of maize. shown in the work of Matzuoka and
Another molecular study collaborators (2001) – the historical
carried out by Joanne Labate and path of maize in every part of the
collaborators describe the diversity American continent. The evident
of dent maize in the corn belt of variability of maize germplasm in the
USA50 with a historical perspective continent had led many scientists
of its germplasm. Nowadays, the to ask how the evolution and
diversity of maize is very limited in diversification of maize took place
that country; nevertheless, in its under domestication, since its origin
germplasm banks are kept hundreds to the present. As we can observe,
of varieties which show the original this question leads us directly to
diversity of its landraces. Thanks a fundamental issue on the study
to the molecular methods used in of maize where social and natural
its analysis, Labate and her team sciences work together, withthe
confirmed the divergence and human intervention in the process
distinctive traits of the two major and development of the culture (or
groups which constitute the maize agriculture) of the representative
germplasm in USA: flint and dent crop of America.
maize. For those researchers it is 49
Carvalho VP, Ruas CF, Ferreira JM, Moreira RMP, Ruas PM.
clear that, besides of the historical 2004. Genetic diversity among maize (Zea mays L.) landrace
assessed by RAPD markers.
knowledge of their germplasm, 50
Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Sullivan H,
Smith JSC. 2003. Molecular and historical aspects of corn belt
the description of maize genetic dent diversity. Crop Science 43: 80-91
variability allows a better use of
germplasm for practical purposes Image page 20: tender blue Maize, State of Mexico
Image in this page: Blue maize from Oaxaca
of genetic improvement. As already © David Lauer
21
The maize migration
and diversification in America
Domestication is a process driven the main information sources on and defines the race complexes in
by humans. For researchers such landraces in America to illustrate the the different cultural areas of the
as Antonio Turrent51, the genetic regions where the races diversity is continent. In accordance with their
improvement process carried out by distributed throughout the continent particular environmental and cultural
farmers in the rural and indigenous (Table 1). traits, Bird describes six main
communities in most parts of In order to explain the early regions, as shown in Table 2.
Mexico, since ancient times, is a diversification of maize in America Based on the information and
continuous process that reaches we will use the scenarios described on the analysis of racial complexes,
the present. As we may remember, by Robert Bird53, where he Bird proposes the hypothesis of
humans are a key factor in any and summarizes all the information diversification of these complexes,
all the theories about the maize derived from the research and in the different regions of the
origin, and to explain its evolution exploration of maize in Americas continent, from seven ancient
under domestication. Although one at the beginning of the decade types of maize and from the
of the arguments against teosinte of 1980. Bird sets the evolution introgression of teosinte. Although
as ancestor of maize lies in its of maize in a timeframe of 2 that hypothesis was not developed
lack of appealing as food and its thousand 500 years, linked to the further, in the present document the
low yield, a team coordinated by cultural history of Mesoamerica information and analysis of Robert
George Beadle52 in the 70s was and South America, and proposes Bird is used as a reference showing
able to determine that teosinte the correlation of morphological the different regions of the continent
satisfactorily complied with the yield and cytogenetic studies of races where is located the diversity of
and could be used as food under and racial complexes of maize maize (Figure 8).
“primitive” experimental conditions. with certain general characteristics
Therefore, Beadle considered that of the civilizations and human
human intervention in the evolution groups in the continent. Without
of teosinte on domestication was forgetting the complex interaction Turrent A, Serratos JA. 2004. Context and Background on
51
Figure 7. Illustration of the molecular methodology used to analyze the genetic affinity among individuals and populations.
The explanation is in the article. Elaborated by Antonio Serratos and based on the references in the diagram.
Table 2. Groups of racial complexes representative of the macro geographical regions of America, and its general
cultural traits. By Antonio Serratos, with information from Bird (Note 53).
1. Central Andes. Over 1800 m above see level, from the center-north of Peru to the northwest of Argentina. The Harinosos Redondos de los Andes Centrales, Harinosos
predominant languages are Quechua and Aymara. Pequeños del Altiplano, Cristalinos Pequeños del Altiplano,
Cristalinos Bolivianos, Confite Morocho, Chutucuno Chico
2. South Basin and West Amazons. Covers an arch area from Paraguay to Venezuela in the region of tropical Harinosos Imbricados del Amazonas, Palomeros
forests. Several groups of tribes. Elongados Paraguayos, Morotí Camba
3. North Andes and the Central American Altiplano. Comprises from north of Peru (Huanuco), Colombia Cristalinos del Norte Andino, Pollo Serrano, Montaña,
and Venezuela to Guatemala. The predominant languages are Chibcha and Paezan, in the Andean north, and Mayan in Rienda-Clavo
the Guatemalan Altiplano.
4. The Caribbean and Low Lanas. Coasts from Venezuela to Belize and the Caribbean islands. The Caribbean Dentados Anchos Caribeños, Harinosos del Bajío Tropical,
tribes have a more complex social structure in comparison to the one of the tribes in the tropical forests. Canilla-Chandelle, Palomeros Redondos Caribeños
5. The Central Altiplano of Mexico or “Mesa Central”. State of Mexico, Federal District, Tlaxcala, Hidalgo,
Morelos and Puebla. Three of the most important civilizations of Mesoamerica: Teotihuacans, Toltecs and Aztecs. At least, Dentados Cónicos Mexicanos, Palomeros
there is some commercial and cultural influence from northwest of Mexico to Nicaragua.
6. The east of USA. Oriental woods of USA, the Dakotas and Carolinas. Cristalinos Norteños
23
The peoples and cultures in America
and the maize diversity
Figure 8. Distribution of maize races in the American continent. The areas in green correspond to the zones where
native germplasm has been collected. The black dots are the current areas of maize production in Latin America. By
Antonio Serratos based on information from different sources58.
25
Table 3. Races of maize catalogued in Mexico. * The number in parenthesis is the number of collections registered in the
catalog of LAMP (1991). ** The groups are set as described in Sanchez and Goodman (1992a).
183
348
11
124
187 118
270
263 148
336 59 206
27
Due to the survival of the From the biological point of view, the
approximately 300 maize races in inner mechanisms of diversification
the continent, we can say that the had been studied to understand
indigenous-campesino culture in the the morphological diversity with
communities of the native peoples which the farmer directly works,
and, later, with the Mestizo and and “preserve the long term maize
Creole farmers, was a key factor for selection potential”65.
the survival of their cultures and the With the aim of knowing the
diversity of maize. In other words, evolutionary mechanisms of
maize constituted the support for the maize in the traditional agricultural
indigenous resistance for more than ecosystems, Gael Pressoir and Julien
500 years, after the destruction of all Berthaud, in two separate research
their ancient ways of life. works, assessed the genetic
The maize and the indigenous diversity, the agroecological factors
and farming peoples had had, since and the farmer’s management of
then and still nowadays, a very close seed in six communities in the
relationship that had turn the farmers Central Valleys in Oaxaca. They
into guardians of this genetic richness. described the impact of the selection
For example, when re-assesing carried out by the farmer on the
the traditional indigenous Mexican differentiation and diversification of
agriculture, Ekart Boege63 showed the maize. What they concluded was
link between the indigenous peoples that in these communities, distance
existing nowadays and the diversity has no influence on the isolation of
of maize each ethnic group has. A maize populations and that there is
study carried out by Perales and his a high level of seed flow inside and
group64 on the maize diversity related outside of the communities, therefore
with the etnolinguistic diversity among ensuring the conservation of the
the tzeltales and tzotziles in Chiapas, diversity of maize. The great variation
concluded that the differentiation and on the interval of flowering and
preservation of the races of particular anthesis is a key factor for
ethnic groups is related to language the structuring of the population
and, therefore, with the amount of which partly explains the
reliable information each farmer can morphological evolution of maize in
use for preserving their patrimony that region of Oaxaca.
by growing and producing “their
maize”. It is in this kind of studies
where we can appreciate the value
of the maize collections preserved 63
Boege-Schmidt E. 2006. “Territorios y diversidad biológica.
in germplasm banks and described La agrobiodiversidad de los pueblos indígenas de México”;
Biodiversidad y conocimiento tradicional en la sociedad rural,
in other sections herein, as well as Concheiro Bórquez L and López Barcenas F (coord.). Centro de
Estudios para el Desarrollo Rural Sustentable y la Soberanía
the culture developed around them. Alimentaria, LX Legislatura, Congreso de la Unión, México.
Therefore, maize collections become Perales H, Benz BF, Brush SB. 2005. “Maize diversity and
64
28
Analysis and perspective of the diversity of maize
in the american continent
Through the history of the study and in USA. In this work is described include the information from the
exploration of the diversity of maize, what in capitalism is considered farmers and, as a priority service,
we can see that there are two major the paradigm of technological grant preferential access to that
strategies for the conservation of these innovation process, the process maize for improvement programs
resources: the recollection and storage of adoption and distribution of and projects.
of maize samples in germplasm banks inventions which are specific to All the studies on maize and
or ex situ conservation, and the in situ different markets and the rate of its relationship with the traditional
conservation, which implies supporting acceptance of these processes agricultural systems show
the reproduction of social and among entrepreneurs66. In that that farmer and ethnic groups
environmental conditions of the farmer, sense, the agrotechnological path of management in different areas
allowing him to preserve the maize. USA conceive the genetic resources of America, is fundamental for
From the pioneering works of the and the ex situ conservation as a the continuity of crop diversity.
Committee for the Conservation of capital stock in germplasm banks This fact have been recognized
maize of the Academy of Science of for industrial application and as during decades, but there has
USA, it is clear that their conservation insurance for future risks. Then, not been a definitive attention to
strategy is focused in the extensive conservation of maize is carried in situ conservation programs
and exhaustive recollection of maize out through the alienation of the that would allow the sustainability
genetic resources. We can see germplasm resources from the and feasibility of traditional or
that in the books of the races of farmers, which were generated agroecological systems.
maize in Latin American countries during centuries of communal work. This kind of agriculture and
(Note 34), the effort was focused Based on the general strategy the research linked to it has had
in botanical, genetic, agronomic for maize production that lies on the different stages and degrees of
and technical aspects of maize intensive use of hybrids and on the success. Nevertheless, the research
germplasm. Although in those control of native genetic material, “from bottom to top”, that is, with
books the importance of farmers for this model is exported to the less participation of farmers and of
the diversification and conservation developed countries. In this way, alternative type, had always been
of the crop is mentioned, they do the explorations of maize diversity in marginal in comparison to the
not go deeper on that factor and, Latin America began, and generated dominant agricultural research.
as a matter of fact, the farmer the resources which make up the
and his agricultural system are first maize germplasm banks in
placed just as context for maize. Mexico, Colombia, Brazil and Peru,
This strategy could not be focused around which regularly cooperate
otherwise, if we take into account regional networks of plant genetic
the technological path USA was resources or continental networks,
been building since back then. In such as the Latin American Maize
that country, the implementation Project. This project was the
and adoption of maize hybrids was soundest effort to concentrate the
promoted since the beginning of the information on maize diversity in the
20th century, and all the research Continent. Although it is based in
system was brought together the agricultural research strategy of
around that technology. The public USA, its paramount importance is
policies and the government’s undeniable, because is key for the
direct economic support allowed analysis and a source of agronomic
generating a great concentration information of the core collections
of control on the maize production of the diversity of maize in America.
throughout the American Corn Belt. We cannot deny the great value
In a classical work on agricultural that ex situ conservation has,
economy, Zvi Griliches describes nevertheless, in order to develop 66
Griliches Z. 1957. “Hybrid corn: An exploration in the
economics of technological change”. Econometrica, Volume 25,
the process of adoption of hybrids all its potential, it is necessary to Number 4, Pages 501–522.
29
Despite the efforts that, in much more complex situations that
different times and carried out need governmental support so
by international and national they can develop and that involve
organizations, had been done political and social stakeholders
in order to preserve the genetic who need the support of programs
resources of maize and the that promote actions towards social
communities where these are organization and communal work.
located, it has not been possible The indigenous and farmer
to achieve a greater impact in the peoples where the survival of the
agricultural sector as a whole. maize diversity lies, are threaten
This problem deepens when we by economic factors, making them
talk about maize because in Latin leave their lands and emigrate to
America the financial resources obtain better life conditions. The
allocated for agriculture are each destruction of the social net in these
time more and more slender. communities increases the risk of
Likewise, development models extinction of maize and its diversity
are uncritically copied by Latin by disrupting the key factors for
American countries from the ones its survival: farmers, indigenous
of industrialized countries -that people, and agroecological
have very different conditions- producers. In this scenario, it is
rendering severe social, economical essential to move towards a new
and environmental problems in stage where is included a revalue
the countries that adopt these of maize in the entire American
models. The deterioration of the continent as an agglutinating
social, economic and political focal point for the defense and
conditions of the agricultural and sustainability of the rural farming
livestock sectors, in general, and and indigenous lands.
of the farmers, in particular, risks In view of all the scientific,
the diversity of maize throughout social and humanistic evidences
the American continent. It is analyzed, which show us that
necessary to underline that the the diversification of maize is a
key factor for solving this problem process that took place throughout
is the conservation of the means America and in all the civilizations
and modes of production of of the continent, it is necessary to
campesinos. We cannot overlook revalue the meaning of maize in the
the fact that maize diversity in the continent. We can say; the maize is,
continent needs support for the as the Olmecs, Mayans, Aztecs or
rural society who lives out of the Incas said, the axis of the life of the
agriculture, as well as the fact that peoples of America and, therefore,
farmers need to improve their life it must be regarded as the most
and work conditions so they do representative crop of the American
not abandon agriculture as their continent. The protection of maize
way of life. Implementing ways of must involve all the peoples of
protecting in situ the diversity of America, independently of political
maize requires taking into account borders that divide them.
Anderson E, Cutler H. 1942. Races of Zea mays I: their recognition and Cervantes T., Goodman M.M., Casas-Díaz E., Rawlings J.O. 1978. Use
classification. Ann Missouri Bot Gard, 21: 69–88 of genetic effects and genotype by environmental interactions for the
classification of Mexican races of maize. Genetics, Volume 90; Pages
Arnason TJ. 1936. Cytogenetics of hybrids between Zea mays 339–348.
andEuchlaena mexicana. Genetics 21: 40-60
CIMMYT, 1999, A core subset of LAMP, from the Latin American Maize
Arnason JT, Baum B, Gale J, Lambert JDH, Bergvinson D, Philogene Project 1986-1988. Mexico, D.F.
BJR, Serratos A, Mihm J, Jewell DC. 1994. Variation in resistance of
Mexican landraces of maize to maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais, in Collins GN. 1921. Teosinte in Mexico. J. Heredity 12: 339-350.
relation to taxonomic and biochemical parameters. Euphytica, Volume
74; Pages 227-236. Creighton HB, McClintock B. 1931. A correlation of cytological and
genetical crossing-over in Zea mays. PNAS Volume 17, Number 8,
Beadle GW. 1932. The relation of crossing over to chromosome Pages 492–497
association in Zea-Euchlaena hybrids. Genetics 17: 481-501.
Doebley J, Goodman JJ, Stuber CW. 1985. Isozyme variation in the
Beadle G.W. 1939. Teosinte and the origin of maize. J. Heredity 30; races of maize from Mexico. American Journal of Botany 72(5): 629-639.
Pages 245-247.
Doebley J, Stec A, Wendel J, Edwards M. 1990. Genetic and
Beadle G.W. 1978. Teosinte and the origin of maize. En: Maize breeding morphological analysis of a maize-teosinte F2 population: Implications
and genetics, D.B. Walden (Ed.), Wiley Interscience; Pages 113-128. for the origin of maize. PNAS, Volume 87; Pages 9888-9892.
Beadle G.W. 1980. The ancestry of corn, Sci. American 242; Pages Doebley J., Stec A. 1991. Genetic analysis of the morphological
112-119. differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics, Volume 129;
Pages 285-295.
Benz BF. 2001. Archaeological evidence of teosinte domestication
from Guilá Naquitz, Oaxaca. PNAS Volume 98, Number 4, Pages Doebley J. 1992. Mapping the genes that made maize. Trends in
2104–2106. Genetics, Volume 8, Number 9; Pages 302-307.
Bird, RMcK. 1980. Maize Evolution from 500 BC to the present. Emerson RA. 1924. Control of flowering in teosinte. J. Heredity 15,
Biotropica, Volume 12, Number 1, Pages 30-41. Pages 41-48.
Boege-Schmidt E. 2006. Territorios y diversidad biológica. La Emerson RA, Beadle GW, 1932. Studies of Euchlaena and its hybrids
agrobiodiversidad de los pueblos indígenas de México. In: with Zea. II. Crossing over between the chromosomes of Euchlaena and
Biodiversidad y conocimiento tradicional en la sociedad rural, Concheiro those of Zea. Z Indukt Abstamm Ver 62: 305-315.
Bórquez L and López Barcenas F (coord.). Centro de Estudios para el
Desarrollo Rural Sustentable y la Soberanía Alimentaria, LX Legislatura, Eubanks M. 1995. A cross between two maize relatives: Tripsacum
Congreso de la Unión, Mexico. dactyloides and Zea diploperennis (Poaceae). Economic Botany 49(2);
Pages 172-182.
Broda J. 1978. Relaciones políticas ritualizadas: El ritual como
expresión de una ideología. In: Economía política e ideología en el Florescano, E. 2003. Imágenes y significados del dios del maíz. In: Sin
México prehispánico, Carrasco P. and Broda J. (eds), CIS-INAH. maíz no hay país, Esteva G, Marielle C (coord), Dirección General de
Editorial Nueva Imagen, Mexico, DF; Pages. 221-254. Culturas Populares e Indígenas, CONACULTA, México, DF.
Bush MB, Piperno DR, Colinvaux PA. 1989. A 6000 year history of García-Lara S, Burr AJ, Serratos JA, Díaz-Pontones DM, Arnason J,
Amazonian cultivation. Nature, Number 340, Pages 303-305. Bergvinson DJ. 2003. Defensas naturales en el grano de maíz al ataque
de Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch. Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Mecanismos
Camussi A., Spagnoletti P.L., Melchiorre P. 1983. Numerical taxonomy y bases de resistencia. Revista de Educación Bioquímica 22(3): 138-145.
of Italian maize populations: Genetic distances on the basis of heterotic
effects. Maydica, Volume 28; Pages 411-424. Gaut BS, Doebley JF. 1997. DNA sequence evidence for the segmental
allotetraploid origin of maize. PNAS, Volume 94; Pages 6809-6814.
Carvalho VP, Ruas CF, Ferreira JM, Moreira RMP, Ruas PM. 2004.
Genetic diversity among maize (Zea mays L.) landrace assessed by Goodman, MM, Bird RMck. 1977. The races of maize IV: Tentative
RAPD markers. Genetics Mol Biol 27(2): 228-236. grouping of 219 Latin American races. Economic Botany 31: 204-221.
Casas-Díaz E, Hanson D, Wellhausen E. 1968. Genetic relationships González R LP. 1994. Caracterización de microorganismos de mucigel de
among collections representing three Mexican racial composites of Zea raíces adventicias y suelo rizosférico de maíz de la región Mixe, Oaxaca.
mays. Genetics Volume 59, Pages 299–310. Doctorate Thesis, Universidad Autónoma Benito Juárez de Oaxaca. 95 p.
31
Grant U, Hatheway WH, Timothy DH, Cassalett C, Roberts LM. 1963. León-Portilla, M. Mitos de los orígenes en Mesoamérica. Arqueología
Races of maize in Venezuela. National Academy of Sciences, NRC Mexicana, Volume X, Number 56, Pages 20-29. Editorial Raíces–INAH.
Publication 1136. Washington D.C.;
Li D, Blakey CA, Dewald C, DellaportaSL. 1997. Evidence for
Griliches Z. 1957. Hybrid corn: An exploration in the economics of acommon sex determination mechanism for pistil abortion in maize
technological change. Econometrica, Volume 25, Number 4, Pages and its wild relative Tripsacum. PNAS Volume 94; Pages 4217-4222.
501–522.
Linneo C. 1748. Systema Naturae. Estocolmo, Suecia:
Grobman A, Salhuana W, Sevilla R, Mangelsdorf PC. 1961. Races of http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/no_cache/dms/load/
maize in Peru. National Academy of Sciences, NRC Publication 915. img/?IDDOC=233236
Washington D.C.
Lumholtz 1902 (1986). El México desconocido. Instituto Nacional
Hanson MA, Gaut BS, Stec A, Fuerstenberg SI, Goodman MM, Coe Indigenista, 2 tomos, México DF.
EH, Doebley J. 1996. Evolution of anthocyanin biosynthesis in maize
kernels: The role of regulatory and enzymatic loci. Genetics, Volume Mangelsdorf, PC y Reeves RG. 1938. The origin of maize. PNAS
143; Pages 1395-1407. 24(8); Pages 303-312.
Harshberger, JW. 1893. Maize: A Botanical and Economic Study Mangelsdorf, PC y Reeves, RG. 1959. The origin of corn. Bot. Mus.
(Monograph). In: Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory of the Leafl. Harv. Univ., 18: 389-411.
University of Pennsylvania, volumen 1 Number 2.
Matsuoka Y, Vigouroux Y, Goodman MM, Sánchez-González J,
Hatheway WH. 1957. Races of maize in Cuba. National Academy of Buckler E, Doebley J. 2001. A single domestication for maize shown
Sciences, NRC Publication 453. Washington D.C. by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. PNAS, Volume 99, Number 9;
Pages 6080-6084.
Hernández-Boncalo F. (1515/1517 – 1578): http://www.franciscoteixido.
com/default.asp?q=6&p=2&lg=sp McClintock B. 1929. Chromosome morphology in Zea mays. Science,
http://www.madrimasd.org/cienciaysociedad/patrimonio/personajes/ Volume 69, Number 1798, Page 629
biografia.asp?id=27
http://www.publicaciones.cucsh.udg.mx/pperiod/esthom/esthompdf/ McClintock B. 1930. A Cytological Demonstration of the Location of
esthom20/19-37.pdf an Interchange between two Non-Homologous Chromosomes of Zea
ays. PNAS Vol. 16, Number 12; Pages 791-796
Hernández-Casillas JM. 1986. Estudio de caracteres químicos del grano
de las razas mexicanas de maíz y clasificación racial. Tesis de Maestría. McClintock, B, Kato Y. TA y Blumenschein A. 1981. Chromosome
Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo Estado de México. 79 p. Constitution of Races of Maize. Its Significance in the Interpretation of
Relationships between Races and Varieties in the Americas. Colegio
Hernández-Xolocotzi E. 1988. Experiencies in the collection of maize de Postgraduados, Chapingo, Mexico; CIMMYT, Programa de
germplasm. In: Recent advances in the conservation and utilization Recursos Naturales.
of genetic resources: Proceedings of the Global Maize Germplasm
Workshop. CIMMYT, Mexico DF, Pages 1-8. Paterniani, E y Goodman, MM. 1978. Races of Maize in Brazil and
Adjacent Areas. Mexico: International Maize and Wheat Improvement
Iltis H.H. 1983. From teosinte to maize: The catastrophic sexual Center, Mexico City.
transmutation. Science 222; Pages 886-894.
Perales H, Benz BF, Brush SB. 2005. Maize diversity and
Kato-Yamakake TA. 1976. Cytological studies of maize (Zea mays L.) ethnolinguistic diversity in Chiapas, Mexico. PNAS Volume 102,
and teosinte (Zea mexicana Schrader Kuntze) in relation to their origin Number 3, Pages 949-954.
and evolution. Massachusetts Report Agric Expt Station Number 635.
Piperno D y Flannery K. 2001. The earliest archaeological maize (Zea
Kato-Yamakake TA. 1996. Revisión del estudio de la introgresión entre mays L.) from highland Mexico: New accelerator mass spectrometry
maíz y teocintle. In: Flujo genéico entre maíz criollo, maíz mejorado y dates and their implications. PNAS, Volume 98, Number 4; Pages
teocintle: implicaciones para el maíz transgénico, Serratos JA, Willcox 2101–2103.
MC y Castillo F (eds), CIMMYT México DF. (http://www.cimmyt.org/
ABC/geneflow/geneflow_pdf_spa/FG-Revision.pdf) Pope, KO, Pohl MED, Jones JG, Lentz DL, von Nagy C, Vega FJ,
Quitmyer IR. 2001. Origin and environmental setting of ancient
Kato-Yamakake TA. 2005. Cómo y dónde se originó el maíz. agriculture in the lowlands of Mesoamerica. Science, Volume 292,
Investigación y Ciencia Agosto 2005: 68- 72. Pages 1370–1373.
Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Mitchell SE, Kresovich S, Sullivan H, Smith Popol Wuj. 1986. Antiguas historias de los indios quichés de
JSC. 2003. Molecular and historical aspects of corn belt dent diversity. Guatemala por Albertina Saravia. Editorial Porrúa, Colección “Sepan
Crop Science 43: 80-91. cuantos…” Num. 36, Decimosexta edición. México, D.F.
Sánchez-González, J.J. and M.M. Goodman. 1992a. Relationships Wellhausen E.J., Roberts L.M., Hernández-Xolocotzi E., Mangelsdorf
among the Mexican races of maize. Econ. Bot. 46(1): 72–85. P.C. 1952. Races of maize in Mexico. Bussey Institute, Harvard
University (Cambridge)
Sánchez-González, J.J. and M.M. Goodman. 1992b. Relationships
among Mexican and some North American and South American races Wellhausen E.J., Fuentes A., Hernández-Corzo A., Mangelsdorf P.C.
of maize. Maydica 37: 41–51. 1958. Razas de maíz en la América Central. Folleto técnico 31, Oficina de
Estudios Especiales, Secretaría de Agricultura y Ganadería, México DF
Sánchez González JJ, Ruíz Corral JA. 1996. Distribución del teocintle
en México. In: Flujo genéico entre maíz criollo, maíz mejorado y Wilkes HG. 1970. Teosinte introgression in the maize of the
teocintle: implicaciones para el maíz transgénico, Serratos JA, Willcox Nobogame valley. Botanical Museum Leaflets, Harvard University,
MC y Castillo F (eds), CIMMYT México DF (http://www.cimmyt.org/ Volume 22, Number 9, Pages 297 – 311.
ABC/geneflow/geneflow_pdf_spa/FGDistribucion.pdf)
Wilkes HG. 1977. Hybridization of maize and teosinte, in Mexico and
Schrader H. 1833. Index Seminum Hort Acad Gottingen 1832: 25-26. Guatemala and the improvement of maize. Economic Botany, Volume
See: http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?16116 31, Number 3, Pages 254 – 293.
Serratos A, Arnason JT, Nozzolillo C, Lambert JDH, Philogene BJR, Wilkes HG y Goodman MM. 1995. Mystery and missing links: The
Fulcher G, Davidson K, Peacock L, Atkinson J, Morand P. 1987. origin of maize. Maize Genetic Resources, Maize Program Special
Factors contributing to resistance of exotic maize populations to maize Report; Taba, S. (editor), México, DF, Centro Internacional de
weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 751-762. Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT).
Thom R. 1977. Stabilité structurelle et morphogénèse. Interédition, París Wilkes, G. 2004. Corn, Strange and Marvelous: But Is a Definitive
(Estabilidad estructural y morfogénesis, Editorial GEDISA, Barcelona, Origin Known?. In: Corn: Origin, History, Technology, and Production,
España, 1987). C. Wayne Smith (ed), Wiley & Sons, Inc. Pages 3 - 63.
Timothy DH, Peña B, Ramírez R, Brown WL, Anderson E. 1961. Races Yakoleff-Greenhouse V, Hernández-Xolocotzin E, Rojkind-de-Cuadra C,
of maize in Chile. National Academy of Sciences, NRC Publication 847. Larralde C. 1982. Electrophoretic and immunological characterization of
Washington D.C. pollen protein of Zea mays races. Economic Botany 36(1): 113-123.
33
Editorial review
Aleira Lara
Cecilia Navarro
Design
Atzin Aguilar
Greenpeace México
Santa Margarita 227, Col. del Valle,
C.P. 03100, Mexico, Mexico City
Contact us:
greenpeace.mexico@greenpeace.org