Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NOTE: Under American Law, distinction has been made Art. 443. He who receives the fruits has the obligation to pay
between: the expenses made by a third person in their production,
gathering, and preservation.
a. Perennial crops (those growing each season without need
of replanting, like oranges and apples) DUTY OF RECIPIENT OF FRUITS TO REIMBURSE NECESSARY
EXPENSES:
Example: A is the owner of a piece of land upon which fruits were NON-APPLICABILITY OF ARTICLE WHEN PLANTER IS IN GOOD
grown, raised, harvested and gathered by B in bad faith. Who FAITH
should be considered the owner if the fruits?
- Art.443 does not apply when the planter is in good faith,
Ans: A should be considered the owner of the fruits, since he is the because in this case, he is entitled to the fruits already
owner of the land, and B is a planter in bad faith but he must received, hence, there is no necessity of reimbursing him
reimburse B for the expenses for production, gathering, and (Art. 544)
preservation.
CHARACTERISTIC OF THE EXPENSES REFERRED TO IN
- The reason for reimbursing B even though he is in bad faith, ART.443
is that were it not for the said necessary cultivation
a. They must have been used for production, gathering, or
expenses, there would not be any fruits grown at all, or left
preservation, not for the improvement of the property.
or preserved.
b. They must have been necessary, and not luxurious or
- Thus, this article is merely in consonance with the principle
excessive, indeed, they must be commensurate with
that no one may enrich himself unjustly at another’s
those ordinarily necessitated by the product.
expense.
QUERY
Note: Under Art. 449, “He who builds, plants, or sows in bad faith
on the land of another loses what is built, planted, or sown - Suppose the expenses exceed the value of the fruits (as
without right to indemnity.” How can this Art.449 be reconciled when, for example, typhoons have damaged the crops)
with the answer to the example given above? must there still be a reimbursement for the expenses. Must
there still be a reimbursement for the expenses?
Ans:
Ans: Yes, if the owner insists on being titled to the fruits. This is
ART.449 ART. 443
because:
Applies only if the crops have Applies when the crops have
not yet been gathered (here already been gathered (hence, a. The law makes no exception or distinction
the landowner gets the fruits accession continua cannot b. The same thing would have happened had the owner been
without indemnity by the apply) also the planter
principle of accession c. He who gets expected advantages must be prepared the
continua) shoulder losses.
Annual crops (like cereals, grains, rice, corn, sugar) are deemed
manifest (existing) the moment their seedlings appear from the
ground, although the grains have not yet actually appeared.
ANIMALS