Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Title:
Supervisor:
Relevant Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs):
The project is designed so that students will achieve the following PLOs:
1 Engineering Knowledge 7 Environment and Sustainability
2 Problem Analysis 8 Ethics
3 Design/Development of Solutions 9 Individual and Team Work
4 Investigation 10 Communication
5 Modern Tool Usage 11 Project Management
6 The Engineer and Society 12 Lifelong Learning
Department
Project Title
Supervisor(s)
Student Names
Week Number
Sr. No.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 e student(s)
task
Student
Signatures
(respectively)
Supervisor(s)
Approval
Annex 3.10: Project Title & Explanation
Project Title
Prepared By:
Supervised by: Date
Objectives:
Summarize the objectives of the project
1. Objective one
2. Objective two
Description:
In this part, describe the main part of the
project in which you can summarize the
design method or experimental work
that helped you reaching the final
product of the project.
Department
Project Title
Supervisor(s)
Students attended the
meeting
Meeting No. Meeting Date
PART I
Meeting Outcomes, Recommendations and Decisions:
Outcomes/Recommendations/ Timing /
Subject Responsibility
Decisions Comments
1
Student Signatures
(respectively)
PART II
Students Performance Measure
(This part is to be used by the supervisors to keep continual evaluation of the FYP students)
Scoring system: 0 = Not exist/acceptable, 1 = Weak, 2 = Acceptable, and 3 = Good 4=
Excellent
Performs tasks Performs tasks Functions
Attendance and
Student Roll No.s in the planned in acceptable effectively in
punctuality
time quality team
13
12
11
10
Name:
Week
Report No.
Department
Project Title
Supervisor(s)
Total Score=30
punctuality Attendance and
Roll No.
Session: (2018 - 2022)
the planned time Performs tasks in
Scoring system:
in team Functions effectively
3 = Good
Roll No.
the planned time Performs tasks in
Semester: ( Fall
(Form A)
4=Excellent.
Roll No.
From:
1 = Weak,
No PLOs
. Item to be checked Score
No
Item to be checked PLOs
.
11
5 Student’s time management
Student
Mark (Sub-Total (1)+ Sub-Total (2)
Modified mark out of 30
Project Title:
Supervisor(s):
Student Names
with Regd Nos:
On time
No of marks to be
Late for ….... days (in this case 2 marks are reduced from the total reduced
mark for the first day of lateness and Afterwards extra reduction with a rate of 1
A=
mark/day is applied)
(III) Evaluation of the Written Report Formality, Style and Quality of Technical Writing
(Communication, Project Management)
Total Scores=20
Rubrics: 0.5 = Very Weak, 1= Weak 1.5 = Acceptable, and 2 = Satisfactory
3=Good 4= Excellent
No
. Item to be checked PLO Score
4 Figures and Tables citations (i.e. all figures and tables have numbers and captions, 10
and are mentioned in the text before they placed
5 Graphs Quality (Size, Axes, Labels, and Legend) 5
6 Mathematical equations (clarity and explanation of the equations) 10
7 English Language Quality (paragraphs, relations between sentences, using 10
punctuations, grammar, and spell check.
8 References are cited in the text and written in standard format. 12
Obtained Marks
Form D)
Evaluation of the thesis Approach and Final Product - (Final Product: Physical system,
new design, Software, Methodology to be applied … etc)
Total Scores=20
Rubrics: 0.5 = Very Weak, 1= Weak 1.5 = Acceptable, and 2 = Satisfactory
3=Good 4= Excellent
No PLO
. Item to be checked PLOs Score
No.
Quality of the introduction and the Review for available data, Engineering
1 Knowledge 1
products and works.
Problem description and project objectives (Report should 2
clearly identify the project purpose besides the problem
2 Problem Analysis
statement/formulation, reality, creativity and its direct impact to
the environment, economy and society).
Brain storming, ideas generation and deciding the course of 5
design using the modern tool (Report should demonstrate the
3 different ideas and design alternatives and apply appropriate Modern tools
techniques, modern engineering and IT tool raised to solve the
problem and justify the selected approach for design)
Design inputs, assumptions, heuristics, technical constraints and 3
4 Design/Development
other constraints
reasoning informed 4
Design process/approach is logic, free from technical or logic by contextual
5 knowledge/
errors and answer all how and why questions.
Investigation
Design outputs (drawings, material data sheet, instructions, 3
6 Design/Development
software, programs, etc.) are existed and satisfactory.
Existence of the Project final product and its applicability for 3
7 Design/Development
use/operate
Verification that the final product is complete and met the 4
8 Investigation
design inputs and the purpose of the project
The final product is evaluated and justified against all Engineer and society, 6,7,8
9 applicable constraints (technical, environmental, social, Environment and
economical, ethical, health and safety) Sustainability
Conclusions and recommendations are addressed based on the 12
analysis and deep discussions for the final product -AND/OR-
10 based on the analysis and discussions for results obtained from Lifelong Learning
(or performance of) the final product. Conclusion quality is also
considered.
11 Gantt Chart of project activities are properly laid down Project management 11
Final Marks for the Project (Oral Presentation, Report, Approach and Product and Portfolio)
Evaluator Name
Date