You are on page 1of 3

The n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l of m e dic i n e

edi t or i a l s

Therapy for Bronchiolitis: When Some Become None


Caroline Breese Hall, M.D.

In past centuries, infant mortality in the first year knowledged benefit of diminishing the respiratory
of life was described as the greatest plague.1 In­ distress from other obstructive airway illnesses,
fants in the 21st century continue to be plagued such as asthma.11 Furthermore, corticosteroids
by high rates of hospitalization, and bronchiolitis may affect the pathogenesis of bronchiolitis at­
is the number one cause.2,3 Despite therapeutic tributed to respiratory syncytial virus. Both clin­
advancements, hospitalizations for bronchiolitis ical and experimental studies indicate that an
have continued to increase. The annual rate of altered and augmented immune response of the
emergency department visits for bronchiolitis dur­ young infant contributes to the phenotypic ex­
ing the season of respiratory syncytial virus, the pression and severity of respiratory syncytial vi­
major cause of this condition, has been estimated rus disease and may predispose the infant to
as 22.8 per 1000 for children 12 months of age or pulmonary sequelae.7,8 The variable compliance
younger.2 Yearly costs for bronchiolitis hospitali­ with the recommen­dations against the routine
zations exceed $700 million. Yet even these strik­ use of corticosteroids may also relate to the
ing figures underestimate the health care burden conflicting results of the studies.5,6 They have
imposed by bronchiolitis. They do not reflect the been heterogeneous in design and generally in­
costs associated with the many more frequent of­ volved small numbers of patients, thus reducing
fice visits of less ill children or with the second­ the strength of their evidence-based recommen­
ary infections among high-risk family contacts.4 dations.
A better indicator of the need for control of In this issue of the Journal, Corneli and col­
bronchiolitis is the increasing accumulation of leagues12 report on a randomized trial examining
therapeutic studies and the continued conun­ whether dexamethasone administered to previous­
drums and controversies they engender.5,6 The ly healthy infants presenting with a first episode
clinical manifestations, course, and pathology of of wheezing diagnosed as moderate-to-severe
bronchiolitis have been well described, but the bronchiolitis reduces the need for hospitalization.
pathogenesis has not. Whether the pulmonary The results, although negative, are important and
disease results from the acute lytic effects of the will probably be accompanied by close scrutiny
virus, the infant’s immune response, or both re­ of the study’s design and the extent of its clini­
mains unclear.7,8 This may partially explain why cal relevance.
effective interventions remain elusive. The study, which involved 20 emergency de­
Current therapeutic options for bronchiolitis partments, was designed to avoid many of the
are few — primarily antiviral drugs, bronchodila­ deficits of previous corticosteroid trials. It was
tors, and corticosteroids — and all are controver­ conducted over three respiratory seasons, and
sial. Not one is routinely recommended.5,6 Yet personnel at each site received yearly training in
one or more of these agents, as well as antibi­ study procedures. The infants in the trial received
otics, are administered to as many as 50 to 80% a single oral dose of dexamethasone (1 mg per
of infants with bronchiolitis admitted to hospi­ kilogram of body weight) or placebo, and during
tals in the United States and other countries.9,10 the next 4 hours their respiratory status was as­
Part of the rationale for their use is their ac­ sessed with use of a standardized scoring instru­

402 n engl j med 357;4  www.nejm.org  july 26, 2007

The New England Journal of Medicine


Downloaded from nejm.org by putri KARTIKA on November 18, 2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
editorials

ment. The study is singular in the number of in­ emergency departments within these age groups
fants enrolled (600) and in the broad spectrum of would be of interest. The majority of infants hos­
contributing emergency departments. pitalized with bronchiolitis are less than 6 months
Nonetheless, variations in practice among the of age, and most are 2 to 3 months old.3,14 These
sites probably existed. The primary outcome — youngest infants are the most likely to have acute
the decision to hospitalize or discharge the infant complications, such as apnea, and altered respons­
— was determined by individual physicians, but es to corticosteroid therapy. Children older than
it was corroborated as a valid measure of the 1 year of age, although less likely to be hospital­
effect of dexamethasone by the secondary out­ ized because of their larger airways and more
come — the change in the respiratory status competent immune systems, continue to have
after 4 hours as measured by the Respiratory As­ considerable rates of hospitalization.3,15 The char­
sessment Change Score. No significant difference acteristics of bronchiolitis among these younger
was found between the infants treated with the and older children may differ from those of the
corticosteroid and those receiving placebo. The illness as it occurs in children between 2 and 12
trial was designed to closely duplicate the meth­ months of age. For this very reason, their exclu­
ods of a previous controlled study of 70 infants sion from the study is warranted, but applying
that demonstrated, in contrast with this trial, sig­ the findings of the study to these children is
nificant benefit from the oral administration of not justified.
dexamethasone as compared with placebo.13 How­ An important question is whether corticoste­
ever, the degree of change in score that is pre­ roid administration diminishes the risk of the re­
dictive of a relevant change in clinical status has current wheezing that develops in 20 to 50% of
not been determined. The short period of obser­ infants diagnosed with bronchiolitis.7,8 Although
vation also potentially limits the study’s value for these episodes of recurrent wheezing are most
predicting the subsequent prognosis. frequent in the first several years after an infant
The strict criteria for inclusion in the study contracts bronchiolitis, they have been linked to
by Corneli et al. enhanced the uniformity of the later occurrence of asthma and chronic lung
the enrolled population, but these criteria also abnormalities.7,8 The effect of corticosteroid
limited the study’s representation of the overall therapy on the development of later pulmonary
population of infants presenting with bronchi­ dysfunction is unresolved. Among the limited
olitis. What should be considered, therefore, is number of studies examining this issue, a few
whether the results of this carefully defined seg­ have suggested benefit, but more have not.16
ment of bronchiolitis cases can and should be Follow-up of the children enrolled in the Cor­
applied to the treatment of other infants with a neli study could extend its value and answer a
first episode of bronchiolitis. If not, will the con­ major clinical question.
clusions be clinically and economically relevant? These questions and the potential limitations
Of 8686 patients initially assessed, 93% were of the study should not diminish recognition of
considered ineligible, 91% of whom did not meet the soundness of the study’s results and their
the inclusion criteria. A notably large proportion, clinical pertinence. The findings are bolstered by
41%, was excluded because the infants had had the study’s size and the controlled, randomized
a previous episode of wheezing; one fourth were design. The conclusions are corroborated by
not considered ill enough to meet the criteria for the additional demonstration that the findings
moderate-to-severe bronchiolitis. Still, these in­ were independent of site and extended beyond
fants were judged by their parents or primary the 4 hours of initial observation, according to
physician to be ill enough to require evaluation an interview with the parent or guardian and
in an emergency department, and they would chart review. Corticosteroid therapy did not sig­
make up an even larger proportion of the bron­ nificantly affect the duration of hospitalization
chiolitis cases seen in office practices than the or the need for subsequent medical visits or re­
infants who were enrolled in the study. admission.
Infants younger than 2 months and children Despite the value of this study, the long his­
older than 12 months were also excluded from tory of therapies and recommendations attending
the study. Knowing the proportion of children bronchiolitis suggest that the study’s results will
with bronchiolitis presenting to the participating not appreciably change the nature of the care pro­

n engl j med 357;4  www.nejm.org  july 26, 2007 403


The New England Journal of Medicine
Downloaded from nejm.org by putri KARTIKA on November 18, 2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
The n e w e ng l a n d j o u r na l of m e dic i n e

vided by the primary physician faced with a young, cal and research approaches. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;22:Suppl:
S58-S65.
distressed infant and anxious parents. Withhold­ 8. Martinez FD. Respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis and
ing therapy is much more difficult than giving it. the pathogenesis of childhood asthma. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2003;
22:Suppl:S76-S82.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was re­ 9. Behrendt CE, Decker MD, Burch DJ, Watson PH. Interna­
ported. tional variation in the management of infants hospitalized with
respiratory syncytial virus. Eur J Pediatr 1998;157:215-20.
From the Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Roch- 10. Christakis DA, Cowan CA, Garrison MM, Molteni R, Mar­
ester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY. cuse E, Zerr DM. Variation in inpatient diagnostic testing and
management of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics 2005;115:878-84.
1. Knapp VJ. Major medical explanations for high infant mor­ 11. Rowe BH, Spooner C, Ducharme FM, Bretzlaff JA, Bota GW.
tality in nineteenth-century Europe. Can Bull Med Hist 1998;15: Early emergency department treatment of acute asthma with
317-36. systemic corticosteroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;1:
2. Leader S, Kohlhase K. Recent trends in severe respiratory CD002178.
syncytial virus (RSV) among US infants, 1997-2000. J Pediatr 12. Corneli HM, Zorc JJ, Mahajan P, et al. A multicenter, random­
2003;143:Suppl:S127-S132. ized, controlled trial of dexamethasone for bronchiolitis. N Engl
3. Shay DK, Holman RC, Newman RD, Liu LL, Stout JW, Ander­ J Med 2007;357:331-9.
son LJ. Bronchiolitis-associated hospitalizations among US chil­ 13. Schuh S, Coates AL, Binnie R, et al. Efficacy of oral dexa­
dren, 1980-1996. JAMA 1999;282:1440-6. methasone in outpatients with acute bronchiolitis. J Pediatr
4. Falsey AR, Hennessey PA, Formica MA, Cox C, Walsh EE. 2002;140:27-32.
Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk 14. Parrott RH, Kim HW, Arrobio JO, et al. Epidemiology of
adults. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1749-59. respiratory syncytial virus infection in Washington, D.C. II. Infec­
5. American Academy of Pediatrics Subcommittee on Diagno­ tion and disease with respect to age, immunologic status, race
sis and Management of Bronchiolitis. Diagnosis and management and sex. Am J Epidemiol 1973;98:289-300.
of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics 2006;118:1774-93. 15. Nicholson KG, McNally T, Silverman M, Simons P, Stockton
6. Management of bronchiolitis in infants and children. Evi­ JD, Zambon MC. Rates of hospitalisation for influenza, respira­
dence report/technology assessment. No. 69. Rockville, MD: tory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus among infants
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, January 2003:1-5. and young children. Vaccine 2006;24:102-8.
(AHRQ publication no. 03-E009.) 16. Gern JE. Mechanisms of virus-induced asthma. J Pediatr 2003;
7. Openshaw PJ, Dean GS, Culley FJ. Links between respira­ 142:Suppl:S9-S14.
tory syncytial virus bronchiolitis and childhood asthma: clini­ Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Network Medicine — From Obesity to the “Diseasome”


Albert-László Barabási, Ph.D.

A recent study reported that among people who Study, making use of the fact that the participants
carried a single copy of the high-risk allele for had been asked to name their friends to facilitate
the FTO gene, which is associated with fat mass follow-up in the study. The authors observed that
and obesity, the risk of obesity increased by 30%. when two persons perceived each other as friends,
The risk of obesity increased by 67% among peo­ if one friend became obese during a given time
ple who carried two alleles, and on average they interval, the other friend’s chances of following
gained 3.0 kg (6.6 lb) or more.1 Given that ap­ suit increased by 171%. Among pairs of adult sib­
proximately one sixth of the population of Euro­ lings, if one sibling became obese, the chance
pean descent is homozygous for this allele, this that the other would become obese increased by
link between the FTO gene and obesity appears 40%. The results of this study also indicate that
to be one of the strongest genotype–phenotype obesity is clustered in communities. For example,
associations detect­ed by modern genome-screen­ the risk that the friend of a friend of an obese
ing techniques. person would be obese was about 20% higher in
That obesity has a genetic component is not the observed network than in a random network;
surprising: researchers have long known that it this effect vanished only by the fourth degree of
often runs in families. In this issue of the Journal, separation.
Christakis and Fowler suggest that friends have In the past 7 years, our understanding of net­
an even more important effect on a person’s risk works has undergone a revolution because of the
of obesity than genes do.2 The authors recon­ emergence of a new array of theoretical tools
structed a social network showing the ties between and techniques for mapping out real networks.
friends, neighbors, spouses, and family members These advances have included some surprises in­
among participants of the Framingham Heart dicating that most real networks in technologi­

404 n engl j med 357;4  www.nejm.org  july 26, 2007

The New England Journal of Medicine


Downloaded from nejm.org by putri KARTIKA on November 18, 2021. For personal use only. No other uses without permission.
Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.

You might also like