Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Condition Assessment of Medium Voltage Underground PILC Cables Using Partial DischargeMappingandPolarizationIndexTestResults
Condition Assessment of Medium Voltage Underground PILC Cables Using Partial DischargeMappingandPolarizationIndexTestResults
net/publication/4345256
Conference Paper in Electrical Insulation, 1988., Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE International Symposium on · July 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ELINSL.2008.4570270 · Source: IEEE Xplore
CITATIONS READS
8 831
2 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Huzainie Shafi Halim on 08 February 2017.
where,
B. Insulation resistance testing S = Severity Factor, A = Discharge Factor, D = Density Factor and K =
When dc voltage is applied to insulation the electric field Critical Factor
stress gives rise to current conduction and electrical
polarization. Considering an elementary circuit as shown in The critical factor K is calculated as follows:
Figure 2, when the switch is closed, the insulation become
electrified and a very high current will flow. However, these K = k1* k2 (2)
currents immediately drop in value, and decreases at slower k1 = Vi/Vo (3)
rate until it reaches a nearly constant value. The current drawn k2 = Ve/Vo (4)
by the insulation may be analyzed into several components
namely Capacitance charging current, Dielectric absorption where,
current, Surface leakage current, Partial Discharge current and k1 = Inception Voltage Factor & k2 = Extinction Voltage Factor, Vi =
Inception Voltage, Ve = Extinction Voltage and Vo = Phase Voltage
Volumetric current. In general this test may be conducted at
applied voltage of 100 – 15,000 V.
A = Qm/Qa (5)
where,
C. Polarization Index A = Discharge Factor, Qm = Maximum Discharge and Qa = Average
Discharge
In good insulation, the effect of absorption current decreases
as time increases. In bad insulation, the absorption effect is
prevailed by high leakage current. Therefore, a good D = Nm/NT (6)
insulation system shows a continued increase in its insulation
where,
resistance value over the period of time in which voltage is D = Density Factor, Nm = Number of Discharges @ L ± 10m, NT = Total
applied. The time resistance method is less dependent of Number of Discharges and L = Location of Highest Discharge
temperature and equipment size. It can provide conclusive
results as to the condition of the insulation. Electric circuit of Having got all the severity value of partial discharge and the
insulation under DC voltage test is shown in Fig. 2. polarization index test result, specific level severity were
Polarization index (PI) test is carried out using an electronic assigned to both of them and categorized them based on the
ohmmeter that give an indication of insulation resistance in range as stated in TABLE 1.
Mega ohms and Giga ohm. Cable terminations at both ends
are cleaned before making the measurement with special TABLE 1
PARTIAL DISCHARGE AND POLARIZATION INDEX SEVERITY RANGE
cleaning solvent. Subsequently after the cleaning, grounding
mechanism via cable sheath was also checked and verified PD Severity PI Severity
through the conductor resistance measuring devices. Insulation SL <2.0 PIH >2.5
resistance measurement values are recorded at 1 minute and SM 2.0~5.0 PIM 1.5~2.5
10 minutes of voltage application. The ratio at 10 minutes to 1 SH >5.0 PIL <1.5
minute determines the PI [4].
L, M and H represent the Low, Medium and High value of
S respective severity. Table 1 shows the assigned severity level
of partial discharge and polarization index. . Extension to this,
C weightage factor were assigned to both diagnostic testing as
D stated in TABLE 2. The weightage value is based on the impact
RL RA of each individual diagnostic parameter to the health condition
of the tested cable. As the severity value range are not the
same for both the diagnostic severity, scaling need to be done
for consistency. The assigned numerical values as listed in
Fig. 2. Electric circuit of insulation under dc voltage test. C = charging TABLE 3.
current. RA = absorpsition current. RL = volumetric leakage current
33
TABLE 2
PARTIAL DISCHARGE AND POLARIZATION INDEX WEIGHTAGE FACTOR TABLE 5
PARTIAL DISCHARGE SEVERITY AND PI VALUES
PD Severity PI Severity Combined
weightage weightage weightage PD MAPPING RESULTS
CABLE
PHASE
PI Value
Severity
0.35 0.65 1.0
PD
K A D L (m)
TABLE 3
SEVERITY SCALING A 0.40 2.98 0.56 38 4.21 1.01
C1
Assigned Condition Health B 0.20 3.88 0.91 21 18.19 1.04
Severity
numerical value Index C 0.40 2.43 0.85 21 5.15 1.05
L (low) 1 Good ≤ 1 0.53 1.67 0.86 50 2.71 1.11
A
M (medium) 2 1 < Fair ≤ 2
C2
H (high) 3 Bad > 2 B 0.29 1.34 0.76 75 3.52 1.10
C 0.60 1.35 0.50 37 1.14 1.11
A 0.58 2.08 0.97 154 3.47 1.61
IV. CASE STUDY
C3
B 0.40 1.65 0.84 530 3.41 1.88
C 0.56 4.62 0.20 379 1.63 1.78
In this paper, the cables that are going to be discussed are
three cores PILC rated at 22kV and are in service ranging A 0.70 1.85 0.51 175 1.35 1.29
C4
between 7 to 15 years. The information on the cables is B Na Na Na Na Na 1.94
presented in TABLE 4.Partial discharges were measured up to C 1.00 2.88 0.58 828 1.67 1.86
the test voltage (1.3Uo or 16.5kV). The cable termination parts A 0.54 2.29 1.00 127 4.23 2.66
are excluded from the measurement due to equipment
C5
B Na Na Na Na Na 2.63
limitation [5]. Severity technique was applied for the analysis. C 0.56 1.58 1.00 127 2.84 2.61
Fig. 3 shows the graph of partial discharge mapping for cable 0.90 1.97 1.00 83 2.20 3.42
A
C1. Each point represents the discharge magnitude in pC at the C6
B 0.60 3.02 1.00 83 5.07 2.35
relevant cable location (L) which is in meter. Standard
C 0.64 2.83 1.00 83 4.39 3.24
procedures are also followed to obtain inception and
extinction voltages. System provides the measurement for A 0.39 2.49 0.74 56 6.27 3.94
C7
34
TABLE 6 The severity range of both diagnostic measurement
COMBINED SEVERITY FOR CONDITION ASSESSMENT
parameters can be fine tuned as numbers of field testing data
gathered in future are increased. Weightage factor can also be
Condition Health
fine tuned based on the trending and monitoring activity with
regard to cable performance as well as feedback from the
PD Severity
PD Severity
PD Scaling
PI Severity
PI Scaling
network operator. In this paper two diagnostic parameters
Combine
PI Value
Severity
Range
Range
Cable
Phase
Index
index of cable under test. With proper assignment of
A 4.21 3 1.05 1.01 3 1.95 3.00 Poor weighting factor more diagnostics parameters can be included
B 18.09 3 1.05 1.04 3 1.95 3.00 Poor to give more accurate condition assessment hence
C1
C 5.15 3 1.05 1.05 3 1.95 3.00 Poor priority can be given to cables having the higher severity
A 2.71 2 0.70 1.11 3 1.95 2.65 Poor combinations. The cables with less deterioration should be
B 3.52 2 0.70 1.10 3 1.95 2.65 Poor
C2
C 4.39 2 0.70 3.24 1 0.65 1.35 Fair Cable Joint – Laboratory Performance Evaluation,” Asia Pacific
A 6.27 3 1.05 3.94 1 0.65 1.70 Fair Conference on MV Power Cable Technologies, Sunway Pyramid,
B 1.70 1 0.35 3.96 1 0.65 1.00 Good Malaysia 2005.
C7
C 0.30 1 0.35 4.00 1 0.65 1.00 Good [2] Gabe Paoletti “Partial Discharge Theory and technologies related to
medium voltage electrical equipment”, Annual IEEE IAS conferences
October 1999.
[3] R. Mackinlay & M.Domun, “Report on PD Mapping of 1kVv cables in
V. CONCLUSIONS TNB,”Service Report, EA Technology, 1997.
[4] P.E. Paul Gill, Electrical Power Equipment Maintenance and Testing,
Marcel Dekker, New York, Country, United State of America, pp 31 -
The polarization index measurements are non-destructive 61. 1998.
testing that enable to evaluate the cable system insulation [5] Foo S.T. & Huzainie Shafi “Final Report for Condition Monitoring
condition. Partial discharge mapping on the other hand is very Using Partial Discharge Method on Cable Mapping,” TNB Research
effective for PILC. It locates partial discharge activities and Sdn Bhd , 2000.
[6] Ghosh P.S. “TNB Distribution Division Maintenance Manual:
indicates the level of partial discharge. Polarization index and Underground cable system,” TNB 2007
partial discharge mapping can complement each other in
diagnosing defects especially in the insulation of the PILC
cables. One can identify insulation quality, while the latter can
also spot local defects.
Polarization index measurement is a very useful and simple
testing tool in determining cable condition. It provides
valuable information for any cable defect in term of leakage
current and the analysis can look into each particular cable
phase. However, further study should be undertaken to
classify the various frequencies representation for
measurement on cable. Severity technique provides
information on cable condition in term of partial discharge.
Partial discharge may exist anywhere in PILC cable due to the
nature of its design. Even though partial discharge mapping is
used for locating defect, it can also be applied to evaluate
cable condition. The information can be utilized to support
decision making for any further action on preventive
maintenance. It is clearly shown that the health condition will
be more accurate with using this combine severity of partial
discharge and polarization index. Having this combination
will enable network operator to confidently energize the cable.
35