Name: Muhammad Abbas Khan kakar

Roll no. 221437108

Course: PLSC 304

Submitted to: Dr. Rashid Munir

(Part A)

I have picked Saudi Ambassador to Pakistan.

Alternative Hypothesis:

Saudi Arabia is coercing Pakistan to obtain military support for its

foreign engagements.

Null Hypothesis:

Saudi Arabia is not coercing Pakistan to obtain military support for its

foreign engagements.

Independent Variable:

military support for foreign engagements

Dependent Variable:

Coercion of Saudi Arabia

Rapport questions:

Q1: How do you see the relationship of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia so far?

Q2: People of Pakistan feels that Saudi Arabia is the ambassador of Pakistan internationally.
Is it true?

Formal Questions:

Q3: Have you personally observe any respect for Saudi Arabia in the eyes of the people of

Pakistan?

Q4: How much trust do you have in the military establishment of Pakistan that they will

cooperate with you in your difficult times?

Q5: Is there any time or era where you feel that Pakistan government and military don’t

support as much as they could?

Q6: In the recent past, Pakistan remained the part of many wars in the Middle East and some

of them were associated with Saudi Arabia. Did you feel that Saudi Arabia was the

beneficiary of these wars to gain dominancy in the region?

Q7: Why do you want that Pakistan and India should have settle down their bilateral issues

through peaceful dialogues whereas your own country has many disputes with your

neighbouring countries?

Q8: Why Saudi Arabia wanted Pakistan not to have good ties with Iran in the past? And

wanted Pakistan to fight against the militant groups of Iran?

Q9: In case of Yemen in 2015, military support was asked by Pakistan but there was a

rejection by Pakistani Parliament jointly. How did Saudi government perceive this decision?

Q10: It has been observed most of the times that sometimes there comes a clash between

Islamabad and Riyadh but military leadership of Pakistan came in between and try to resolve

the issue. Why that much importance for military instead of civilian government? Is there

secret expectations from military?

Q11: The latest troop sent to Saudi Arabia from Pakistan have assigned on a joint training

sessions with Saudi military but will not dispatched towards Yemen because Pakistan

military developed significant skills in mountain warfare and counter-insurgencies and will

transfer these skills to Saudi military. But the only mountainous region in Saudi Arabia that’s
currently engaged is Yemen border. Are they really doing joint exercises?

Q12: Saudi Financial help to Pakistan in difficult time is really great. But always they ask for

immediate return of the loan whenever there comes a clash between the two countries. Why

is this case?

I have added simple question at first by asking about the issues which does not have any kind

of controversies or different opinion and they are kind of informative question to only check

the informative capacity of the respondent. The questions which I asked earlier are general

questions and is also based on personal opinion somehow and I think any kind of people are

more likely to give personal opinion on national issues. Secondly I put a bit confusing

question in the middle which are based on information that has left with some vacuum and

could be analysed critically. I asked question about some issues which has been portrayed

differently to public of both the countries instead of the real facts. Most of the time media

propagates things in a very simple manner but the things are much complicated and they used

to hide the facts from public so I asked question trying to get the information which they are

trying to hide. In this way some difficult questions have been ordered in the middle.

(Part B)

Survey Questionnaire

Alternate Hypothesis:

I have selected the hypothesis; Rival terrorist organisations are more likely to attack state

institutions due to competition for supremacy.

Dependent Variable:
 Supremacy

Independent variable:

Attacking State institution

Null Hypothesis:

Rival terrorist organisations are likely to attack state institutions but not for the competition

of supremacy.

Section: 1

Q1: What is your Gender?

a. Male

b. Female

c. Others

Q2: What is your Age?

a. 10-20

b. 20-30

c. 30-40

d. 40-50

Q3: What is your Place of Birth?

a. Punjab

b. Sindh

c. KPK

d. Baluchistan

Q4: What is your Qualification?

a. Primary

b. Secondary

c. Under Graduate

d. Post-Graduate
Q5: Are you a government employ?

A. Yes

B. No

Section: 2

Strongly Strongly
Agree Neutral Disagree
Agree Disagree
Q1:

Terrorism is

an effective

tool for

politics?
Q2:Terrorist

always fight

for their

worthy

objectives?
Q3: Religion

play vital role

in bringing

the terrorism

up?
Q4:

Religious

sectarian

division in

Pakistan also
gave birth to

more terrorist

groups?
Q5:

Terrorists

only attack

public spots

to put

coercion on

government

to accept

their

demands?
Q6: Two

rival terrorist

organizations

never attack

each other to

gain

dominancy

over the

other?
Q7:

Terrorists

always attack

other
institutions

other than

military?
Q8: Do you

feel that the

only way for

terrorist

organization

to fight for

supremacy is

to have

assault on

state

institution?
Q9: Do you

think the

kidnapping

of high

profile

personalities

is also a

source to

enhance the

dominancy of

one terrorist

group?
Q10: Attacks

on Pakistani

institutions

from 2008 till

2015 was

also exercise

for gaining

supremacy

among

terrorit

groups but

not aims to

threaten the

security of

the state?
Q11: The

responsibility

for any

terrorist

activity

particularly

on state

institution

taken by any

specific

militant
groups is also

the symbol of

achieving

supremacy?
Q12: The

attack on

General

Musharraf in

2003 in

Rawalpindi

was proved a

great success

for terrorist

organization

to be

acknowledge

d more

powerful?
Q13: The

presence of

many

terrorists

groups and

the difference

of their

performing
activities

refers that

there is some

competition

among

themselves

for

supremacy?
Q14: Do you

think every

state own

some terrorist

organization?
Q15:

Attacking the

state

institutions

made

terrorist

group

recognisable

on

international

forum

specifically?