Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In much the same way as the Celts had their tradition of the High Kings, so the Angles and
Saxons, in the first couple of centuries after their eastern kingdoms had been formed, often
recognised the overall authority and supremacy of one king over all the rest. Usually this was at a
time at which that ruler's kingdom was at its strongest, and initial force of arms had demonstrated
the ability of that ruler to claim the title of bretwalda or 'brytenwealda'. The second form of this
word is probably the older. It originates in a Germanic concept of an over-king, literally meaning
'Britain ruler'. Another early form of the title is 'bretenanwealde', with the last part, 'anwealda'
meaning 'sole ruler'. Bosworth and Toller show 'wealda' as meaning 'a ruler', citing variations in
Old Saxon, Old High German, and Icelandic (a variation of Old Norse). They add that 'wealdan'
means 'to have power over'.
Only one bretwalda is mentioned in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, but Bede, writing a century and-
a-half earlier than the ASC's compilation, supplies many of the missing names (although he
leaves out the Mercian kings). Some others are not named bretwalda as such, but pretty much
fulfilled the functions of the title in all but name (and it is possible that records were made after
Bede's time and were later lost). These probable bretwaldas are shown in green text.
Until Edwin of the Northumbrians took the title, the bretwaldas only counted the territory to the
south of the Humber as being within their influence. The Deiran and Bernician Angles thought of
themselves as being apart from the southerners, perhaps even more so when Edwin smashed
North Rheged and greatly enlarged Northumbria. Also, it is highly possible, given that the Angle
and Saxon kings would have known about the British tradition of a high kingship, that the
assumption of the bretwalda title was a deliberate attempt not only at legitimising their own
claims to land they had conquered, but to demonstrate to the Britons that they were now in
charge and were the rightful successors to those Britons who had failed to defend their island.
Linguistically, a great many place names in the newly-forming England preserved or applied the
Latin -vici ending (for some reason Briton/Gaulish place names reverse the sequence from noun-
modifier to modifier-noun). In proto-Celtic we have *wīko-, *wīku-, meaning a village, while
Latin has 'vicus', also meaning village, Gaelic has 'fich', village again and not too dissimilar from
the Latin form given several centuries of drift, Anglo-Saxon has 'wíc' as a 'dwelling-place,
lodging, habitation, house, mansion', or as a village or town, while the plural form means
'entrenchments, camp, castle, fortress; street, lane; bay, creek'. This appears to have been
extended to mean a market town or trading town. All of these languages share a common proto-
Celtic/Celto-Ligurian base, but proto-Germanic seems to contain no similar word. It appears
possible that 'wic' is another word that was borrowed from the Britons, either in its Latin or
Brythonic form (which probably were nearly identical). Gothic does contain 'weihs', which
seems to be cognate. But Goths also took over Gaulish territory, so who would be
uncontaminated by cross-cultural influences? The various groups that made up the
Scandinavians, probably.
At first glance Old Norse seems to have no word like the Anglo-Saxon 'wic', and the nearest
cognate appears to be 'byg∂' (byg-voiced 'th'), meaning a dwelling, and 'byggva', meaning 'to
dwell'. But further investigation uncovers the intriguing possibility that the word was borrowed
into Old Norse from its meaning of trading town, then modified with the -ing suffix to form the
word 'viking', a trading voyage or trader. Most people think of a Viking as only a seaborne
warrior but the truth is that these Norse sailors both raided and traded. This goes against the
theory that the word is derive from 'vik', a 'creek or inlet'. A jump from a creek or inlet to an
expedition or voyage by water makes less sense than going from trading town to a trading
expedition to such a town. So the very existence of Vikings by that name seemingly is based on
the Anglo-Saxon conquest of England.
(Information by Peter Kessler, with additional information by Edward Dawson and details of late
sub-kings of Sussex by David Slaughter, from The Oxford History of England: Anglo-Saxon
England, Sir Frank Stenton, from A History of the English Church and People, The Venerable
Bede (Leo Sherley-Price translation - revised by R E Latham), from The Oxford History of
England: The English Settlements, J N L Meyers, from the Historia Brittonum (The History of
the Britons), Nennius (J A Giles, Ed & Trans, 1841, published as part of Six Old English
Chronicles (Henry G Bohn, London, 1848)), from The Place Names of England & Wales, J B
Johnston (1915), from Arthur's Britain, Lesley Alcock (1978), from Murray's Classical Atlas for
Schools, G B Grundy (Ed, Second Edition, 1963), from The Medieval Traveller, Norbert Ohler
(1995), from The Times Atlas of World History, Geoffrey Barraclough (Ed, Fourth Edition edited
by Geoffrey Parker, reprinted 1997), from Roman Britain: A New History, Guy de la Bédoyère,
and from External Links: An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, Bosworth and Toller (p 1172, 1898),
and Vortigern Studies.)
450 -‐ 500 Tribes of Angles, Jutes and Saxons, along with mixtures of various other peoples, invade
the eastern coast of Britain, pushing westwards along river valleys and quickly forging
early kingdoms. A popular modern term for this is 'engla-‐tocyme', literally the 'coming of
the English', although that term will not exist for several centuries after this date. All the
tribes are speakers of the Anglo-‐Frisian group of Low German languages, using the same
language with slight differences of dialect.
477 Newly arrived Saxons under Ælle and his sons, Cymen, Wlencing, and Cissa, land at
Cymens ora and beat off the Britons who oppose their landing (part of the proposed
British territory of Rhegin), driving them to take refuge in the great forest called
Andredesleag (The Weald). These Saxons quickly become known as the Suth Seaxe.
477 -‐ 514? Ælle King of the Suth Seaxe. Leader at Mons Badonicus c.496?
486 Clovis of the Franks defeats, captures and executes Syagrius, the last Roman commander
of Soissons. The Franks are now completely dominant in northern Gaul and Roman control
has been thrown off. The death of Syagrius also sends a signal to the Saxons and other
Germanic peoples that attempting to settle in Gaul is now hopeless. This would seem to
be the single defining event that forces the Saxons to turn their attention to invading
Britain instead.
This is a probable date for the siege of Mons Badonicus -‐ at the very least it would seem to
496 be the correct decade based on available evidence. Not mentioned in surviving Anglo-‐
Saxon records, the most likely chain of events is that it is Ælle, as bretwalda, who leads the
attack on the Britons in the region of Caer Baddan.
Sub-‐Roman Britannia underwent rapid change in the course of fifty years between AD
550-‐600, with Angle and Saxon kingdoms being established at the start of this period on
the east and south coasts (click or tap on map to view full sized)
Ælle's route is probably northwards towards the Thames Valley (the Weald would still be
passable along one of the Roman roads, possibly the Sussex Greensand Way which may
have been built to link several villas to Stane Street - the main Noviomagus-London road).
There he builds up his forces from the large numbers of Saxons there (along with a
probable force from Kent), and then heads westwards along the upper Thames Valley until
he emerges through the Goring Gap.
It seems creditable to assume that the north-facing Wansdyke, constructed in the fifth or
sixth centuries, has been put up by British forces in Wiltshire in the face of just such a
threat of Saxons breaking through from the Thames Valley. It may either have been
constructed to ward off this very attack (and perhaps channel the attackers towards Badon),
or in response to it, to ensure that no future attacks of this nature could take place. In that it
is very effective, until the West Seaxe breakthrough in 577.
There is now a gap in bretwaldas between the start of the sixth century and the rise of
Ceawlin in the middle of the century. This is probably due to the Mons Badonicus defeat
and the long peace between the Britons and the Germanic coastal settlements. As there is no
significant warfare, there can be no significantly superior war leader to push forward the
Germanic advance. Quite the opposite, in fact, as there seems to be a reverse migration of
Angles and Saxons into the Continent during the first half of the sixth century. Those that
remain are firmly in control of the east (see feature link, right).
Hinton Hill lies near the village of Wellow in Somerset, and in 577 it was the site of the
Battle of Deorham between the allied free Britons of the three cities of Caer Baddan, Caer
Ceri, and Caer Gloui and the invading West Saxons (External Link: Creative Commons
Licence)
c. 500 The Old English poem Widsith mentions several minor Germanic peoples, not all of whom
can be properly identified alongside the more obvious peoples such as the Angles,
Austrasian Franks, Burgundians, Danes, Finns, Geats, Jutes, and Ostrogoths.
c. 520 Another great Old English Poem is Beowulf, which records events of this time in the Anglo-‐
Saxon homelands in Denmark and southern Scandinavia. A prince of the Geat court,
Beowulf visits Hrothgar Scylding at his hall of Heorot where he rids Hrothgar of the
monster, Grendal.
531 On the Continent, the Franks of Austrasia conquer the Thuringians. Portions of territory
are lost to the Saxons, probably to the Continental Saxons, but there also seems to be a
reverse migration of Germanics from the east coast of Britain, where the British victory at
Mons Badonicus has cut them off from the acquisition of new lands. These returning
Angles and Saxons appear to be given land in Thuringia by King Theuderich. However, it is
also at this time, in this century, that the migration of Britons from the mainland to
Brittany is at its heaviest, weakening the British defensive position for the future.
Not directly involved in the chaotic transfer of the Roman empire to Germanic control, the
Thuringians migrated from the Cimbric Peninsula into territory to the east of the Rhine,
land that had been left partially deserted by the Alemanni moving southwards
c.571-‐588 Ceawlin King of the West Seaxe.
584 Ceawlin and his brother Cutha of the West Seaxe defeat Æthelbert of the Cantware at
Wibbandun. This is notable as being the first recorded conflict between two groups of
invaders, and a conflict between two rulers with ambitions greater than the rule of their
own kingdoms. Ceawlin especially is looking to re-‐establish the title of bretwalda at this
time, and perhaps this victory secures it for him, although 571 is another likely date for
this.
591-‐592 The usurpation of Ceawlin of the West Seaxe gifts the bretwaldaship of southern England
to Æthelbert of the Cantware, his only serious rival for the title -‐ if he does not already
have it, as suggested by the Anglo-‐Saxon Chronicle and its reference to Æthelbert being
'baptised' early in his reign, ie. about 588.
c.588-‐616 Æthelbert / Ethelbert I (Saint) King of the Cantware
597 Augustine is sent by Pope Gregory to England to establish the Catholic church and
Christianise the Anglo-‐Saxons. He is cautiously received in Kent, thanks to King Æthelbert's
Christian wife (although there are signs that Æthelbert himself may have strongly
suggested beforehand that the mission be sent), and establishes the archbishopric at
Canterbury.
603 The first meeting takes place between the Roman Church in the form of St Augustine of
Canterbury, and the Celtic Church (the descendant of the former British Church of the
Roman period). It is arranged by Æthelbert using the Hwicce as intermediaries and the
meeting occurs at a place Bede names at St Augustine's Oak, on the border between the
Hwicce territory and that of the West Seaxe. The meeting goes favourably well for
Augustine.
A second meeting is quickly arranged, although perhaps not in the same year. This takes
place at Abberley in Worcestershire, probably close to the border between the Hwicce and
Pengwern, but ends in disappointment for the Roman envoy, with no agreements of
cooperation or unity being reached between the two churches, especially in regard to the
important question of the calculations for Easter and evangelising the pagan English. The
failure is a blow for Æthelbert's prestige as bretwalda.
The Roman city of Canterbury was, by the sixth century, in ruins, with small Anglo-‐Saxon
houses built in between. The remains of the city wall can be seen in the distance while the
initial home of the Roman Church in Britain was a little way to the south
616-‐625-‐7 Rædwald / Raedwald King of the East Engle. Buried at Sutton Hoo.
616 After seeking asylum at Rædwald's East Engle court since being forced to flee Deira by
Æthelfrith of Bernicia, Edwin is able to regain his throne when Rædwald defeats Æthelfrith
at the Battle of the River Idle. The battle confirms Rædwald as bretwalda, seemingly after
Æthelfrith's defeat by Britons at the Battle of Bangor-‐is-‐Coed around 613 has weakened
him. In turn, Edwin succeeds him as the first bretwalda north of the Humber. He never
extends his bretwaldaship over Kent, treating it as a fellow kingdom and its king, Eadbald,
as his peer.
627-‐632/3 Edwin King of the Bernician & Deiran Northumbrians.
632/3 Edwin is killed at the Battle of Hatfield Chase by Penda of Mercia (just outside the western
borders of Lindsey) while the latter is allied to Cadwallon, king of Gwynedd and High King
of the Britons. Cadwallon repays many years of defeats, deaths, rapes and pillaging at
Northumbrian hands by conducting a year-‐long campaign of revenge in the kingdoms of
Bernicia and Deira, also killing Edwin's replacement, Eanfrid. It is likely that Lindsey, which
had been a Deiran vassal, becomes independent for a while following this destruction of
its masters.
633-‐642 Oswald (Saint) King of the Bernician Northumbrians.
642 Oswald of Bernicia & Deira is killed by Penda of Mercia on 5 August at the Battle of
Maserfelth. The location of Maserfelth is still disputed but opinion favours Oswestry
('Oswald's tree') in Shropshire. Supreme power in England switches from the north to the
Midlands.
Expelled from Bernicia by Edwin of Deira in AD 616, Oswald and his brother, Oswiu, sought
refuge on Iona where they converted to Christianity -‐ Oswald brought it back with him
when he became king of Bernicia
642-‐655 Penda King of the Mercians
654-‐655 Penda of Mercia is killed in battle by Oswiu of Northumbria, and with this victory supreme
power in England swings back to the north. Oswiu cements the increasingly accepted
union of Deira with Bernicia to create a single kingdom of the Angles north of the Humber,
known as Northumbria.
655?-‐670 Oswiu King of the Bernician Northumbrians
664 An English priest, Wighard, is selected to be archbishop of Canterbury by the new king of
Kent, Egbert I, perhaps with support from Oswiu of Northumbria. He is sent to Rome to
receive consecration from Pope Vitalianus, but is killed by bubonic plague before the act
can be carried out.
670-‐675 Wulfhere King of the Mercians
678-‐690 The English Bishop Wilfred arrives in Frisia and the Anglo-‐Saxon Christianisation of the
Germanic lands begins, although the first mission is quickly aborted as the fiercely pagan
Redbad gains the throne and enmity against the Merovingian kings increases. A second
attempt in 690 proves much more successful and for the best part of a century churchmen
and monks crisscross the Channel or North Sea, intent on spreading the Christian faith
amongst their Germanic cousins who border the Merovingian Frankish kingdom. There is
special interest in the conversion of the German Saxons, whom the English consider their
kinsfolk.
695 Pope Sergius ordains Bishop Willibrord as the bishop of the Frisians. The bishop is a
Northumbrian missionary and a follower of Bishop Wilfred, one of a wave of English
Christians to enter Germanic lands in this period in order to bring them into the faith.
A Northumbrian missionary who spent his early years under the influence of St Wilfred,
bishop of York, Willibrord was appointed bishop of the Frisians at Utrecht, during which he
became known as the 'Apostle to the Frisians'
c.735-‐757 Æthelbald / Ethelbald King of the Mercians.
757-‐796 Offa King of the Mercians
793 In what is the first major attack by Vikings on English territory, Lindsfarne Monastery is
sacked by raiders and the monks are slaughtered. The age of enlightenment and learning
in Britain in which Lindisfarne had played a major role now begins a steep decline. The
situation is not helped by the continuing dynastic discord in the kingdom of Northumbria.
802-‐839 Ecgberht / Egbert King of Wessex
825 Ecgberht gains revenge for his father's death when he defeats the mighty Mercians at the
Battle of Ellandon. The Mercian king, Beornwulf, is killed in battle. Ecgberht swiftly
intercedes in Kent, sending his son, Æthulwulf, with a force to seize the key to the whole
of the south-‐east. Kent, the oldest of the English kingdoms, with the most prestige and
with great wealth, is also home to the primary see at Canterbury. The sub-‐kingdoms of
Essex, Sussex and Suthrige submit to Ecgberht and are also ruled by Æthulwulf. From this
point, Wessex remains the strongest of the Anglo-‐Saxon kingdoms.
This silver penny was produced during the reign of Beornwulf of Mercia, although its
condition is far from ideal, with partly garbled legends -‐ it is from an East Anglian mint, the
moneyer's name being Eadgar, which is shown in the reverse
827 Athelstan of East Anglia kills Ludecan of Mercia in battle after yet another attempt by the
once great Midland kings to restore that greatness. With this act, Athelstan secures the
independence of the East Angles and establishes himself as king. Although he still
acknowledges Ecgberht of Wessex as his overlord, his is the only one of the smaller English
kingdoms not to be absorbed directly within Wessex.
839-‐856 Æthelwulf / Ethelwulf King of Wessex
856-‐860 Æthelbald / Ethelbald King of Wessex
860-‐866 Æthelberht / Ethelbert King of Wessex
865-‐871 Ivarr the Boneless, king of Dublin, and his brothers, the sons of Ragnarr Lothbrok, lead the
first Viking army to invade mainland Britain in search of conquest rather than pillage.
Landing in East Anglia, they ravage the kingdom for a year before heading into
Northumbria in 866. That kingdom falls in 867 and a puppet king is installed. The Great
Army moves south, campaigning during the spring and summer. East Anglia falls in 869,
and the capital of Alt Clut is sacked in 870. Ynys Manau also falls to them around 870, and
between 870-‐871, Ivarr's brother, Bagsecg, is involved in the attacks, leading the Great
Summer Army into England and adding his forces to those of Ivarr and Halfdan.
866-‐871 Æthelred / Ethelred King of Wessex
871-‐874 Bagsecg is killed at the Battle of Ashdown in Wessex in 871, and the following year the
Great Army is back in Northumbria. It winters in late 872 and early 873 at Torksey on the
River Trent in Lindsey, before moving west into Mercia, which is defeated in 874 and a
vassal king is installed on its throne. Later that year the army divides, with one half going
to Cambridge and the rest heading towards the Tyne and eventually settling in York.
871-‐899 Ælfred / Alfred the Great King of Wessex
874-‐878 The Danes have overcome much of England, and Wessex is virtually the only independent
survivor (along with the southwest of Mercia), achieving total dominance over all the
English within less than a century. The West Saxon kings are titled 'Emperors of Britain' in
the tenth century, which is probably a natural extension of the role and prestige of the
bretwaldas.