Review
Cavitary tuberculosis: the gateway of disease transmission
Michal Uibanousk, Alvaro A Ordonez" Cail A Ruiz-Bedoya, Sanjay Kin Wiliam Rishi
‘Tuberculosis continues to be a major threat to global health. Cavitation is a dangerous consequence of pulmonary
tuberculosis associated with poor outcomes, treatment relapse, higher transmission rates, and development of drug,
resistance. However, in the antibiotic era, cavities are often identified as the most extreme outcome of treatment
filure and are one of the least-studied aspects of tuberculosis. We review the epidemiology, clinical features, and
concurrent standards of care for individuals with cavitary tuberculosis. We also discuss developments in the
understanding of tuberculosis cavities as dynamic physical and biochemical structures that interface the host
response with a unique mycobacterial niche to drive tuberculosisassociated morbidity and transmission. Advances
in preclinical models and non-invasive imaging can provide valuable insights into the drivers of cavitation, These
insights will guide the development of specific pharmacological interventions to prevent cavitation and improve lung
function for individuals with tuberculosis
Introduction
‘Tuberculosis was responsible for an estimated 1. 4million
deaths in 2018, and is among the leading causes of
morbidity and mortality worldwide! Cavitation is a
seminal event and a key pathological feature of human
tuberculosis, Ithas negative implications not only forthe
patient, being associated with poor teatment outcomes,
including delayed sputum culture conversion, relapse
afer treatment, and development of drug resistance, bt
also at public level, since cavitation greatly inereases the
risk of person-to-person transmission.”
Several factors combine within the cavity to deve in
creased transmission, morbidity, and mortality (figure 1),
In the widely accepted model for tuberculosis cavity
formation, the necrotic centre of a granulomatous lung,
abscess erodes into an airway while some necrotic debris
remains inside the newly formed cavity” Phagocytes and
granulocytes penetrate poorly into these necrotic areas
‘creating an immune-sheltered zone of bacterial growth,
High oxygen concentration within the cavity also
provides a rich environment with high rates of bacterial
replication, leading to a large bacillary burden at the
inner edge of the cavity (10'10' bacilli, estimated to be a
100000 times higher than in necrotic tuberculosis
lesions." Rapid bacterial proliferation increases the
frequency of replcation-induced mutations and the
likelihood of developing drag resistance." These
concentrated bacili aze poised to be expelled from the
Ings by the bronchial ree dusing transmission events,
Finally, the inner contents of cavities ate also poorly
vvascularised, which limits the penetration of anti
mycobacterial drags and could further promote selection,
for drug-resistant mutants.*""™*
Apart from providing a growth niche, the cavity air
spice is not useful for respiration. During cavity
formation, both the basement membrane and alveolar
architecture are permanently destroyed. Even after
successful tuberculosis treatment, tuberculosis cavities
‘an persist, leading to lifelong pulmonary deficits and
recurrent opportunistic infections." In this Review we
discuss developments in the understanding of tuber.
culosis cavities as dynamic physical and biochemical
smartlnecomfntcon Wl20 Joe2020
Descanpnds ps
snonymous User (n/a) en Pontifical Xavierian University de ClinicaliCey es por Elsevier em
structures that interface the host response with a unique
mycobacterial niche to drive tuberculosis-associated
‘morbidity and transmission
Clinical importance and epidemiology of
tuberculosis cavities
Fstimated rates of cavitary tuberculosis at the time of
diagnosis range from 29% to 87%," However, these
rates could be overestimated because patients with
cavitary tuberculosis are more likely to have positive
sputum samples, and thus easier to diagnose, Similarly,
chest radiography—a clinical standard in tuberculosis
dhiagnostics—might underestimate the presence of cai
tation compared with CT scans." Rates of cavitation
are higher in patents with diabetes," but lower in
patients with poorly managed THIV co-infection although
increased cavitation is seen after 6 months of ant
retroviral therapy)" transplant recipients, and older
tients (> 60 years of ge)" Finally, the differences in
risk of cavitation altributed to infection by different
Key messages
+ Cavitation isa dangerous consequence of pulmonary
tuberculosis associated with poor outcomes, treatment
relapse ighertransmision rats, and development of
drug resistance
+ Modeling cavities or precinical studies is challenging
since cavities are the consequence of complexand.
heterogeneous hest-pathogen interactions
+ Advances in medeling tuberculosis aie enable studies
te probe the complexpathelogcanche occupied by
Mycabacteriom toberulesis acl tin the cavity all
+ Cavitation is complex phenotype riven by biochemical
biophysical immunological. and micobilogial
proceses that needto be beter understaod io be
taigeted with potential therapies
+ Drugpenetration inte cavitary lesions should be
considered when electing anti-tuberculbsis drugs for
«linia tial, and treatment resimens shouldbe
‘optimised for patients with cavitary disease
@k®
ee fet 2026
pita it)
he,
Deputies
Pot St} the oeipine
net Shale atne,
arto ah ootReview
a
€
>
z
Irate
F pens
Fone The coy of eating ena aber
(Wtigh concentrate fetal bce gr inthe lot neat
seis thine sore theca B) cea prletion leds
‘epetonnaceaineatone drut determi ath
Data mtartewth squeedeng eane (Beta
Colagen mtn aeltedwthncealeonardinthe cant wal
Dolan fxr claen mata aah oman sg onth
tess see the anager ies rove the
Devine ng ater ()Treine pra the atl comporect
[Nycobactrum berlssrpleaton hich artbertothe higher
Steen) seo recs th ety nthe tong runing
oper o seo rk por anorabuterl dugpereatenhch
{te contitvas tothe igh bce brden” eben dng penton
‘rahabocivescktn ordneresstant mata” F)cartesokenpest
Cenatertheywesterbed of jahocee me reaedthser sve
[Khredhnaba Thro aviation an dos of ingore aed
‘drnicplmenary dete the cots pri aerate roy
{ener aing) tethay bcre ate cera cloatonby
‘rpetrsiitciare Te cobation wat epee high
‘mai neering ade sane of mate eee provi
eppeity secondary calrsatan en spp sees
year tbe sins Bling eee)
are sill unclear"
Cavitary tuberculosis carries & poor prognosis, with a
higher risk of treatment failure and relapse if cavities are
radiographically present during the first 2 months of
therapy: If cavities persist after 6 months of treatment,
the risk of relapse doubles compared with patients
whose cavities close by treatment completion.” The
association between cavitation and relapse could be
attributable to poor drug penetration into the poorly
vascularised cavity. Alternatively, cavitation could be a
‘marker for high baillary burden from extensive disease.*
‘Descangado pers Amamyenous User (ia) em Pontifical Xavierian University de CtiniealSey-ex
Cavitary tuberculosis can also result in liethreatening,
sequelae (eg, Rasroussen aneurysm."
Individuals with cavitary disease pose a risk to their
community and contacts. Higher bacterial burdens were
detected in sputuen samples from patients with cavitary
tuberculosis” and the presence of cavities and their
proximity to an airway correlated with increased coughing.
during tuberculosis treatment" Therefore, patients
with cavitary tuberculosis and a higher bacterial burden,
are more likely 0 release M tuberculosis leading to
increased transmission.” Outbreaks and case studies
suggest that cavities are the likely pathophysiologial
driver behind tuberculosis superspreaders ** However,
there is no consensus on the exact contuibution of
individuals with cavitary tuberculosis tothe total number
of transmission events, and the need for selective isolation
ae 4 precaution based on radiographic findings is still,
debated. To determine the value of selective isolation for
patients with cavitary disease, computational models of
tuberculosis transmission need to include prevalence
estimates for cavitary tuberculosis combined with
adjusted transmission rates for the sub-population with
cavities"
Cavity structure
Avtuberculosis cavity is a pathological, gas-filled space in
the lung parenchyma with a border resulting from
(M tuberculosis infection * Tuberculosis cavities are hetero
geneous in size, morphology, and wall composition,
Which can be evaluated non-invasively by radiological
Images and post-mortem analysis of gross appearance, oF
bstological characteristics.
Imaging
Noninvasive anatomical imaging (eg. xray and CT)
allows cavities to be evaluated by size (correlated with the
extent of disease), shape, and wall thickness (Figure 24)
Despite common belief, radiographical imaging is
tunable to reliably determine the age of 2 cavity
‘The radiological manifestations of tuberculosis cavities
are heterogeneous, with some patients having single or
‘multiple cavities ‘surrounded by consolidated, fibro:
nodular, or mixed pattems. Upper lobe cavities are
commonly seen in irumunocompetent adults, whereas
cavities in the lower Tobes associated with adenopathy
and pleural effusions can also be found in children and
immunocompromised adults. Multiple adjoining small
cavities can also fuse together to produce a large cavity*
Thicker cavity walls are associated with higher con-
centrations of bacili m the sputum, whereas thinner
‘walls are usually observed afer successful treatment"
Airfluid levels are seen in 10-20% of tuberculosis
cavities, and endobronchial spread {small nodules distant
to the cavity) is also evident in 10-20% of cases
{appendix pp 2-3)"
Most tuberculosis cavities occur in the apical oF
posterior segments ofthe superior lobes and, in seller
owner com/ntton Vl20 Jone 2020Review
numbers, the upper segments of the inferior lobes, We
analysed the location and size of 287 cavities in CT scans.
‘from 143 patients with cavitary tuberculosis taken from
the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
‘TB Portals database.” We found that 58% of all the cavities
‘were localised in the apical segments, whereas. 21%
vwere located in the inferior lobes, with a distribution
pattern similar to those reported previously (figure 2B,
appendix p 4)" Although most lage cavities occur in
the hing apices, some can also be found in the upper
segments of the inferior lobes, and smaller nodular
cavities occur throughout the hinge (figure 2).
Historically this distribution towards vulnerable regions
at the apices of the Iungs was attributed to reduced
vascular supply, higher oxygen tension, and impaired
lymphatic drainage in these regions compared with the
inferior lobes." However, the actual mechanism behind,
apically-oriented tuberculosis cavitation is still poorly
understood **
‘Gross appearance
‘The superlcil surface of the lungs fom individuals
with pulmonary tuberculosis appears covered with areas
of pneumonia (igure 2D, appendix p 5). Some areas
appear az discrete and well