Call in the Civilians | Foreign Policy http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/10/26/call_in_the_c...

Call in the Civilians

Counterinsurgency is at least 50 percent civilian. So where have all the Foreign Service officers gone?

BY RON CAPPS | OCTOBER 26, 2009

Amid the roiling controversy over U.S. strategy in Afghanistan, one fact often gets lost: The soldiers are only half
the picture. It will take both combat troops and civilians to tackle what the Army's new counterinsurgency
manual sees as objective No. 1: "foster[ing] development of effective governance by a legitimate government."
Such a task entails ensuring personal security, public participation, and social and cultural acceptance of the
regime. The Afghan government is going to need a lot of help on its way there -- help from expert civilian
advisors. Yet those civilians are nowhere to be found.

Call it Washington's blind spot. Since the September 11 attacks, the United States has suffered from a myopia
that sees military expansion as paramount and civilian support as an afterthought. As a result, the State
Department's ranks have been depleted and overstretched to the core. And the civilian half of warfare has
suffered.

1 of 3 12/17/11 3:45 PM
Call in the Civilians | Foreign Policy http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/10/26/call_in_the_c...

Just think back to a few years ago in Iraq. In 2004, the Pentagon brass realized that guns alone wouldn't bring
security, but there weren't enough civilians at the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International
Development (USAID) to get the state-building job done. The Defense Department has about 2.3 million
uniformed service members and more than 800,000 civilians. The State Department and USAID combined have
about 8,000 Foreign Service officers. The Defense Department had to fill 350 civilian positions in Iraq and is
preparing to fill 300 in Afghanistan.

Those two perilous countries are just the beginning. Some U.S. embassies are as much as 30 percent
understaffed. Things are so bad that the State Department has had to hire 2,300 family members to fill positions
overseas.

Up until today, the situation has continued to deteriorate, even as the military promotes stability operations
-- capabilities like "strengthening governance and the rule of law" and "fostering economic stability and
development" -- as a mission of equal importance to combat operations. Trouble is, these really aren't tasks for
soldiers. But the civilians are missing in action, so the Army has to step in.

Development and diplomacy, like defense, are clearly defined and specialized fields. No one would task a USAID
agricultural economist with helping develop Afghanistan's or Iraq's internal defense strategy. But with the
current deficit of Foreign Service officers (FSOs) at the State Department and USAID, the government routinely
tasks U.S. special operations forces with implementing development and public diplomacy tasks. One
exasperated officer asked me, "How am I, as a military professional, supposed to know what's best for the
development of this country? That's USAID's job." But there is no USAID officer in the area, so she soldiers on.

Worldwide, the State Department and USAID need about 5,000 new FSOs to conduct core and public diplomacy,
oversee foreign assistance, and manage stabilization missions. The State Department has been hiring about 700
new officers a year, a rate that barely beats attrition in the rapidly graying Foreign Service. USAID is 75 percent
smaller than it was a generation ago, and despite bringing in 300 officers a year, it is still not meeting the global
demand for development specialists.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's two immediate predecessors tried to get funding for more FSOs from
Congress. Colin Powell, for example, increased the Foreign Service by about 1,000 people a year. But most of
these newbies went to consular and diplomatic security positions, not core and public diplomacy jobs.
Condoleezza Rice asked Congress for 1,100 more FSOs annually, but she got considerably fewer. Still, it's a
question of scale; Congress and the administration need to open the taps and hire thousands, not hundreds.

These personnel shortages reduce the United States' ability to project what Clinton calls "smart power." Absent
civilians place an unfair burden on the U.S. military and present the wrong image of America to the world: that of
a country which implements foreign policy with a bayonet. In the end, the sorry state of State reduces the
effectiveness of U.S. efforts to promote international security and make the country and the world less secure.

2 of 3 12/17/11 3:45 PM
Call in the Civilians | Foreign Policy http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/10/26/call_in_the_c...

The Afghan people won't stand for long any force that they view as an occupier. Time to move quickly and fill the
ranks of the civilian brigades who can fight the other half of the war.

Like Be the first of your friends to like this.

Save big when you subscribe to FP.

ALI AL-SAADI/AFP/Getty Images

Ron Capps is peacekeeping program manager at Refugees International. He

served in Afghanistan as a soldier and in Iraq as a Foreign Service officer.

(10) SHOW COMMENTS LOGIN OR REGISTER REPORT ABUSE

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER | VISIT US ON FACEBOOK | FOLLOW US ON RSS | SUBSCRIBE TO FOREIGN POLICY

ABOUT FP | MEET THE STAFF | FOREIGN EDITIONS | REPRINT PERMISSIONS | ADVERTISING | WRITERS’ GUIDELINES | PRESS ROOM | WORK AT FP

SERVICES:SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES | ACADEMIC PROGRAM | FP ARCHIVE | REPRINT PERMISSIONS | FP REPORTS AND MERCHANDISE | SPECIAL REPORTS | BUY BACK ISSUES

PRIVACY POLICY | DISCLAIMER | CONTACT US

1899 L STREET NW, SUITE 550 | WASHINGTON, DC 20036 | PHONE: 202-728-7300 | FAX: 202-728-7342
FOREIGN POLICY IS PUBLISHED BY THE SLATE GROUP, A DIVISION OF THE WASHINGTON POST COMPANY
ALL CONTENTS ©2011 THE SLATE GROUP, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

3 of 3 12/17/11 3:45 PM