ASSIGNMENT 1 FRONT SHEET

Qualification BTEC Level 4 HND Diploma in Business

Unit number and title Uni7: Business Law

Submission date 30 September 2021 Date Received 1st submission

Re-submission Date Date Received 2nd submission

Student Name Nguyen Minh Tuan Student ID GBH200002

Class GBH0909 Assessor name Tran Thi Thu Giang

Student declaration

I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully understand the consequences of plagiarism. I understand
that making a false declaration is a form of malpractice.

Student’s signature

Grading grid
P1 P2 M1 D1
  Summative Feedback:  Resubmission Feedback:

Grade: Assessor Signature: Date:

Internal Verifier’s Comments:

Signature & Date:

Contents
I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4
 II. .............................................................................................................................. Sources of Law 5

1. The definition, function and application of Law ................................................................................. 5

2. Explain the differences between the source of Law in UK ................................................................. 6

3. How case law can be applied in Vietnam ........................................................................................... 7

4. The development and recent reforming of different sources of law in UK........................................ 8

5. Vietnamese Law System ..................................................................................................................... 9

6. Explain the role of the Vietnamese National Assembly .................................................................... 11

III. UK parliament and Case law ............................................................................................................. 12

1. The process of making Law of the UK Parliament ............................................................................ 12

2. Explain one legal suit in the UK ......................................................................................................... 12

IV. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................................... 13

V. References ............................................................................................................................................ 14

Table of Case ............................................................................................................................................ 15

Table of Statutory law .............................................................................................................................. 16

I. Introduction
Acting as a paralegal at the Vietnamese law firm. The author has an opportunity for exchanging one year in a UK
law firm - an associated partner of the author's law firm. This report will analyze basically the difference between
the UK legal system and the Vietnamese legal system; moreover, the report also mentions aspects of law in UK
such as source of law, the way for making law and various cases for applying the UK legal system.
 II. Sources of Law
1. The definition, function and application of Law
Law is a rule of civil conduct, commanding what is right and prohibiting what is wrong. There are many rules of
civil conduct that commend what is right and condemn what is wrong; however, these rules are not necessarily
laws. Only when a sovereign state issue rules prescribing what is right and wrong that can a rule be called a law.
Therefore, a law is a rule that prescribes certain conduct and is enacted and enforced by a government (Ashcroft
et al., 2011). In addition, there is a difference between law and regulation. Firstly, to set a law, there are several
processes such as create the bill and have to gain acceptance of cabinet; however, the regulation is set by a
governmental agency, often to actually implement a given law which means that does not have to go through the
bill process described above. Secondly, the law are rules that govern everyone equally whereas regulations only
affect those who deal directly with the agency that is enforcing them. For example, in the comparison of
customary law and law; specifically, for customary law, those who are living in a certain city, have to learn about
the rules of living there for knowing whether should do or not do something. However, with the law, there is not
any law that forces new citizens to have to do something in their place.

There are four main functions of law. The first function is in terms of protects the rights and freedoms of an
individual. It means that the law protects individuals from other individuals, from organizations, and even from
the government. The second function of law provides a framework and rules to help resolve disputes between
individuals. In other words, the law created a system where individuals could bring their disputes before an
objective fact-finding person, such as a judge or jury. The next law's function is to help society maintain order
which means that the citizen can be protected when the structure and organization of law accompany order
(Cronusprod, 2019). The final function is in term of educate human behavior, it is referring to the way of law has
educated people who were going to school for influencing to their mind to be good people.

The Law amending and supplementing a number of articles of the Law on the handling of administrative violations
was passed by the XIV National Assembly at its 10th session on November 13, 2020, and takes effect from January
1, 2022. There are a number of changes and additions in the term of the concept of recidivism, the principles of
handling administrative violations for repeated administrative violations, the statute of limitations for sanctioning
administrative violations, the competence to prescribe penalties for violations. administrative violations on the
application of measures to handle administrative violations, and prohibited acts (Department of Justice, 2020).

For the term recidivism, recidivism means a person who is committing an administrative violation for the first
time and continues to have a tendency to violate the second time in a short time.
 For handling administrative violations many times. In other words, a person who commits an
administrative violation many times shall be sanctioned for each violation, except for cases of repeated
administrative violations which are prescribed by the Government as an aggravating circumstance.

For authority to stipulate the sanction of administrative violations and the regime of application of
administrative handling measures. It is supplemented with the enforcement of penalties for violations, remedial
measures, remedial levels, sanctioning authority, and so on. This regulation aims to ensure consistency and
synchronization in the system of decrees on sanctioning administrative violations in the fields of state
management, improve the effectiveness and efficiency of management of law enforcement on the handling of
administrative violations. administrative violations.

For the statute of limitations for handling administrative violations, amendments to increase the statute of
limitations for sanctioning administrative violations in the field of invoices to 02 years. In addition, adding
provisions on the calculation of the statute of limitations in case an individual intentionally evades or obstructs
the application of administrative handling measures in the direction that the statute of limitations is recalculated
from the time of termination of the act of evasion.

For prohibited acts, the Law adds a number of prohibited acts in handling administrative violations such as
determining improper administrative violations, applying sanctions, and remedial measures. not true and so on.

2. Explain the differences between the source of Law in UK

The laws governing a country or people are important aspects of that nation's existence and are in some way
contributing to its history. Common law and statutes are followed by most countries in the world. The
combination of the two is necessary for justice to be served; however, these types of common law and statutes
law have their differences.

On the one hand, common law is a custom that came to be recognized by the courts as binding on the community,
and therefore law. In the past, there were no laws prescribing the proper rule of conduct in hundreds of situations.
When a dispute came before a judge, the court prescribed a rule of its own based on the customs of the time.
Over a period of several centuries, these court decisions developed into a body of law. Thus, the court is the final
making decision through legal judgments, precedent (Ashcroft et al., 2011).

The example of this case is in term of William Egan who was charged with the common law offense of
nonfeasance (the failure to perform a required duty). State law provided that in relation to crimes, the common
law of England was in full force and effect where there was no statute on the subject. The court said it was clear
 that the legislature intended the common law of England to apply. Because the common law provided
for the offense of nonfeasance, the prosecution of Egan could continue.

On the other hand, Statutes are laws enacted by legislative bodies. The federal Congress, state legislatures, and
city councils, all composed of people that voters elect. Cities and other municipalities make laws usually called
ordinances, a specific type of statutory law. Sometimes a systematic collection of the laws, rules, or regulations
of a government body or authority is called a code (Ashcroft et al., 2011).

The example of this case is an accident involving a power lawnmower operated by his father, Alan Clark, injured
five-year-old Paul Clark. Paul sued the lawnmower’s manufacturer, along with Alan and Alan’s insurer. Alan said
the doctrine of “parental immunity” prevented him from being sued by his dependent son. The state supreme
court had held in a case two years previously that parental immunity was abolished; thus, a child could sue a
parent. The state supreme court said that it was the policy of courts to stand by previous decisions because judges,
lawyers, and citizens have a right to rely on previous holdings. Thus, stare decisis required that parental immunity
not prevent the suit.

However, case law and statutory law have a relationship in certain circumstances. In other words, although
statutory law provides the short-run certainty of written law, stare decisis endows case law with long-run
certainty. This is because case law cannot change abruptly, and in the process of distinguishing gradually,
countervailing judicial biases tend to delete. In addition, for case law, the courts have more flexibility than in
statutory law. Because statutory laws are inevitable incompletely, which is create the advantage to the statutory
law over the case law one.

3. How case law can be applied in Vietnam

In Vietnam, on June 18, 2019, the Council of Judges of the Supreme People's Court issued Resolution No.
04/2019/NQ-HĐTP on the application of precedent in the trial process. Case precedent in Vietnam is considered
a judgment or decision of a Court without explanation and application of the law applied by the Court to settle a
case with similar contents. Therefore, the understanding of legal precedent and case law in Vietnam is not
different from the understanding in the common law system; however, there are several issues to keep in mind
when issuing case law. Firstly, the subject of creating and promulgating precedent is the Court, which applies the
law to settle disputes and conflicts in society. Secondly, case precedents are formed during the court's
adjudication by the effective judgment or decision of the Court. Thirdly, judgments and decisions becoming
precedents must have standards and create principles in the trial process; moreover, these norms and principles
are commonly formed through the interpretation of the law in judgments. Next, case precedent must be used as
 a basis to settle similar cases that occur in the future. After that, case precedents are gathered and
published in a separate order by the Court. Finally, the case law must be highly specific. Thanks to the high
specificity, individuals and organizations will easily access case precedents, understand their rights and obligations
in specific cases, and be able to predict the outcome of the case (Than, 2015). Currently, Vietnam has a total of
43 case precedents for study and research (Lawlibrary, 2020).

4. The development and recent reforming of different sources of law in UK

Contemporary legal systems in developed countries usually have two forms, one is the common law system and
the other is the civil law system. While the precedents used in the common law system are binding, the civil law
system is essentially based on the use of codified statutes and precedents that are not formally binding. According
to Slapper and Kelly (2016), the English legal system uses the common law system, and it has both pros and cons.

In terms of advantages, it can be argued that subsequent cases are decided on the basis of previous cases of a
similar nature which will lead them not to depend on the judge's own extraordinary conclusions concerning a
case. Thus, formal justice is achieved by referring to a case of precedent, which is used to justify the judgment of
successive cases. In addition, because the outcome of cases, which have precedent, is predictable for the reasons
mentioned above, individuals are more likely to follow a rule established in the precedent of a case. These
characteristics are underpinned by values such as equality before the law, security before the law, and legal
certainty or predictability, which are core features that inform the doctrine of law of binding precedent (Slapper
and Kelly, 2016).

A criticism is that the binding force of precedent places constraints on the discretion of the judiciary and
sometimes leads to the lapse of justice (Wild et al., 2013). Judges engaged in forging the shackles of their peers'
feet, and this can be illustrated by the doctrine of ordinary employment. In this case, the employer was not liable
when their employees acted within the scope of their work, and this decision was manipulated by many
employers in the years that followed. As such, it severely limits the ability of judges to punish employers for
negatively impacting the welfare of their employees until the doctrine is repealed.

However, there was a change in reforming the legal UK system; specifically, in the period of time from 2000 to
2010. In this time, the UK legal system established the Ministry of Justice in 2007, replacing the Department for
Constitutional Affairs and, before that, the Lord Chancellor's Department. The Ministry of Justice has the function
of being responsible for the courts, judiciary, funding of cases, prisons, sentencing, and the probation service –
responsibilities that had previously been shared between the Home Office and the Department for Constitutional
Affairs; moreover, many of the functions historically exercised by the Lord Chancellor are now exercised by the
 Secretary of State for Justice. Furthermore, establishing the Legal Services Board in 2007, which is an
independent body responsible for overseeing the regulation of lawyers in England and Wales. In addition, the
Legal Services Board is politically and financially independent of the government. Costs are covered entirely by a
levy on the approved regulators of the legal professions. Its overriding mandate is to ensure that regulation in the
legal services sector is carried out in the public interest and that the interests of consumers are placed at the heart
of the system. Moreover, establishing the Supreme Court in 2009, which is replacing the judicial functions of the
House of Lords. In other words, the Supreme Court is the final court of appeal for all United Kingdom civil cases,
and criminal cases from England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Hearing appeals on arguable points of law of
general public importance and concentrates on cases of the greatest public and constitutional importance.

Additionally, in the period of time from 2010 to 2015, there were also having numerous changes in UK legal
system. Specifically, abolishing local police authorities and replacing them with elected Police and Crime
Commissioners in 2012. Establishing the College of Policing in 2012 which is a professional body for everyone
working across policing. Moreover, establishing the National Crime Agency in 2013 for replacing a number of
other agencies. The functions of it refer to against organized crime, human, weapon and drug trafficking,
cybercrime, and economic crime that goes across regional and international borders, but can be tasked to
investigate any crime. Establishing the Family Court, which is a court of limited jurisdiction that hears cases
involving family law. The stage witnessed the implementation of major reforms to civil procedure, with the new
emphasis on active case management by the judges. In the same period, the first steps were also taken to limit
expenditure on legal aid by narrowing the range of issues in relation to which legal aid would be available
(Partington, 2015).

5. Vietnamese Law System

Vietnamese law mainly consisted of two types of sources which are legislative documents and customary law.
Moreover, the case law has appeared in the source of law when the Council of Judges of the Supreme People's
Court issued a resolution in 2019 which is mentioned above. The case law will be explained as follow.

Case precedent, according to the recognized precedent regulations, the Judicial Council of the Supreme People's
Court has the duty to select the cassation decision of the Judges' Council of the Supreme People's Court, the
judgment, decisions that have taken legal effect, have the standards of the courts, summarize and develop into
case precedents and publish them for the courts to study and apply in adjudication. To carry out this task, the
Supreme People's Court gradually publishes case precedents. Case precedent in Vietnam is first formed during
 the process of the courts interpreting and applying the provisions of the written law which aims to
increase the persuasiveness of court decisions (Truong, 2021).

In terms of advantages, the case law will help the cases to be clearer. In other words, case law will store the
defendant's specific information about the case to help the court easily adjudicate and make the most accurate
judgment. In addition, with precedents available, the court will also easily hear a case if the new case has similar
circumstances to the old case. For example, in judgment No. 71/2018/DS-PT dated August 14, 2018, on the
dispute over the land use right transfer contract. Mr. A signed a land-use permit for Mr. B, at this time, Mr. A did
not tell Ms. C, leading to Ms. C's lawsuit to the court to cancel the land transfer contract (Law libraryA, 2018). The
Court has applied precedent No. 16/2017/AL on recognizing the land use right transfer contract as an inheritance
product that is one of the inheritances of the transfer contract. In the precedent, it is assumed that the recognition
of the contract for the transfer of land use rights is legal and that the transferred land area is not included in the
inheritance block, but the rights belong to the transferee's right to use (Law libraryB, 2017). Therefore, the court
did not accept Ms. C's request to initiate.

In term of disadvantage, there are still many cases arising in the trial practice that need to apply case law, but the
Court is still confused, leading to the fact that precedent cannot promote its role as a supplementary source in
the law source system. Because case precedent is still very new, many judges are still afraid and confused in its
application, citing case precedents, leading to inconsistent precedents. Even many judges do not invoke
precedent in their judgments and decisions, but only adjudicate according to the way precedent sets forth. For
example, Judgment No. 66/2017/DSST dated November 22, 2017, of the NT District People's Court, accepted the
plaintiff's claim, recognized the disputed land area of 724 m2 for the plaintiff. The legal facts and facts of the
judgment are similar to Case No. 04/2016/AL of the TANDTC. The judgment that accepted the plaintiff's claim was
in line with the line laid out by the case law. However, when arguing for its ruling, the NT District People's Court
did not invoke Case No. 04/2016/AL (Dai & Suong, 2019).

In the Vietnamese law system, primary legislation (first legislation) and secondary legislation are two forms of
law. The difference between first legislation and secondary legislation is in terms of issuing agency. The state body
of Primary legislation is enacted by Parliament whereas the secondary legislation is enacted by the Government.
Moreover, there are differences in the functions of this first and secondary legislation. It means that the first
legislation has the function to create the law while the secondary legislation is to implement the law. Additionally,
the first legislation has been applying the form of Act, Code, Law while the Secondary legislation has been applying
the form of Decree, Circular, and Decision. Specifically, the primary legislation has to create a law that takes care
 of residents, creates the opportunity for these resident's development in terms of work, study, safety;
however, the secondary legislation has the function to supplement, manager, support, and enforce follow any
that the first legislation proposed (Vietnam Government’s, 2013).

6. Explain the role of the Vietnamese National Assembly

The Constitution stipulates that the National Assembly is the highest representative body of the People, the
highest organ of state power of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. This special position comes from the fact that
the National Assembly is the only body directly elected by voters nationwide. The National Assembly has the main
roles such as Constitutional - Legislative, deciding important issues of the country, supreme supervision over the
operation of the State.

In terms of Constitutional - Legislative, the National Assembly will make the Constitution and amend the
Constitution. The draft Constitution is consulted by the people and submitted to the National Assembly for
consideration. The Constitution is adopted when at least two-thirds of the total number of National Assembly
deputies approve; furthermore, the referendum on the Constitution will be decided by the National Assembly. In
addition, the National Assembly also makes laws and amends laws. The members and organizations with the right
to submit laws are the President, the government, the courts, the procuracies, and the committees directly under
the central government. The draft law will be presented to delegates and the National Assembly for consideration
and approval when half of the total number of deputies approve (Parliament, 2020).

In terms of deciding important issues of the country, the National Assembly decides on the goals, targets, policies,
and basic tasks of socio-economic development of the country, decides on the policy of culture, education;
moreover, the National Assembly also has the ability to amend or replace law for ensuring the equality of ethnic
in the nation. In addition, the National Assembly decides on the issue of war and peace, prescribes the state of
emergency, and takes other special measures to ensure national defense and security, and decides on amnesty
and referendum (Parliament, 2020).

In terms of supreme supervision over State activities. The National Assembly will supervise committees,
delegations directly under the central government and the National Assembly for evaluating the operation of the
State. Moreover, at each session, the National Assembly will spend about 3-4 days to conduct interrogate -
interrogate, which is the act of National Assembly deputies raising issues under the responsibility of the person
being questioned and asking these people to answer about their responsibilities with the mentioned issue;
furthermore, each session was broadcast live on radio and television for voters nationwide to watch (Parliament,
2020).
 III. UK parliament and Case law
1. The process of making Law of the UK Parliament

Figure 1: Process of making law (University of Greenwich, 2021)

It can be seen that, there are four main stages to legislation in Parliament. For the first stage, it is referred to as
legislative proposal which means the Government proposes to come up with a legislative idea or initiative from
a social request or a request to amend a law, which will create a Government Green Paper. This is open for public
discussion with interested groups, once findings are gathered a white paper is published which outlines a firmer
plan for Government policy in stage two. Cabinet Minister must agree whether the proposal is taken forward.
Once agreed a Bill is drawn up and the Minister responsible for the policy introduces the Bill to Parliament for
debate which is in the stage of three. In the final stage, after gaining the agreement of Cabinet, the Bill will turn
to Royal to achieve for the assent; after that, the law will be created (Partington, 2016).

2. Explain one legal suit in the UK

The legal suit in the UK will mention the case of Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd in 1968. The fact, Lord Suirdale
(Richard Michael John Hely-Hutchinson) sued Brayhead Ltd for losses following a failed takeover. Mr. Richards as
a chief executive officer and de facto chairman of Brayhead had secured Lord Suirdale's money and damages in
return for the injection of money into Lord Suirdale's Perdio Ltd. Suirdale's Perdio Ltd was subsequently taken
over by Brayhead Ltd and Suirdale won a seat on Brayhead Ltd's board of directors; however, Perdio Ltd's business
 status did not recover. The next time, Perdio Ltd was liquidated and Suirdale resigned from his position
in Brayhead Ltd; moreover, Suirdale sued Brayhead for the damages he suffered. However, Brayhead Ltd refused
to pay on the basis that Mr. Richards did not have the authority to perform the contract of guarantee and
compensation in the first place. Roskill J argued that Mr. Richards had explicit authority to bind Brayhead Ltd, and
the company appealed (Nanda, 2012).

In term of legal issue, this formed the first major issue in the present case and has been dealt with effectively by
the Hon’ble justices in their respective judgments. The journey of the concept of ‘Authority with contextual
reference to this case has been one of evolving nature. With every judgment, the concept and its applicability
have been explained a step further. This issue was extremely important to resolve the matter of fact if Mr.
Richards had any authority to do what he did and also the matter of law, which authority is it (Nanda, 2012).

In term of holding decision, Lord Denning stated his inference as that Mr. Richards had in fact actual authority as
well, such authority being implied from the conduct of the Company i.e., of acquiescence of contracting without
the necessity of sanction from the board. Lord Pearson stated that ostensible and actual authority are not
mutually exclusive and stated that the decision by the Hon’ble Justice J.Roskill of ostensible authority does not
preclude or stand in the way of the court’s revelation of the actual authority of Mr. Richards as well. In the
judgments as can be inferred, it was laid down that Mr. Richards did, in fact, have actual authority and J.Roskill’s
opinion of him having ostensible authority does not hinder the view of the court, rather it adds to the rationale
of the law explained in the judgment (Nanda, 2012).

In term of case law, Lord Denning has used the precedent in Freeman & Lockyer v. Buckhurst Park Properties
(Mangal) Ltd in 1964, especially used the principle has laid down. With respect to actual, apparent, or ostensible
authority. Lord Denning in pursuance of clearing the issue took the principle laid down in the above case and
applied it to the present case stating that actual authority may be express or implied. It is express when it is given
by express words such as when a board passes a resolution that authorizes two of their numbers to sign a cheque,
and it is implied when it is inferred from the conduct of the parties and circumstances of the case. He stated the
actual authority is binding between the agent and the company and also between the company and others
whether they are elements within the company or not (Nanda, 2012).

IV. Conclusion
To summarize, all of the mentioned above illustrated numerously aspects in the UK legal system as well as the
Vietnam legal system. Moreover, in this report, the UK legal system has been analyzed in term of source of law,
the authority of Parliament and Government; additionally, there are also example of case law which is support
 people for understandingly. Acting as a paralegal at Vietnamese law firm, the author has analyzed the
basic understanding of the UK legal system in this report.

V. References
Ashcroft, J. and Ashcroft, J. (2011) Law for Business. 17th edn. USA: Cengage Education.

Cronuspod (2019) The Purpose of Law and its Functions in Society.

Available at: https://cronuslaw.com/the-purpose-of-law-and-its-functions-in-society/ (Accessed at:

16/September/2021).

Dai, N & Suong, T. (2019) Ap Dung An Le trong Xet Xu cac Vu An Dan Su, tu Thuc Tien cua Toa An Nhan Dan tinh
Dong Nai.

Available at: https://tapchitoaan.vn/bai-viet/binh-luan-trao-doi-gop-y/ap-dung-an-le-trong-xet-xu-cac-vu-an-

dan-su-tu-thuc-tien-xet-xu-cua-toa-an-nhan-dan-tinh-dong-nai (Accessed at: 29/September/2021).

Department of Justice (2020) Nhung noi dung moi cua Luat sua doi, bo sung mot so dieu cua Luat xu ly vi pham
hanh chinh nam 2020.

Available at: https://stp.hanam.gov.vn/Pages/nhung-noi-dung-moi-cua-luat-sua-doi-bo-sung-mot-so-dieu-cua-

luat-xu-ly-vi-pham-hanh-chinh-nam-2020.aspx (Accessed at: 16/September/2021).

LawlibraryA, 2018 Ban an 71/2018/DS-PT ngay 14/08/2018 ve Tranh Hop Dong Chuyen Nhuong Quyen Su Dung
Dat.

Available at: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/banan/ban-an/ban-an-712018dspt-ngay-14082018-ve-tranh-hop-dong-

chuyen-nhuong-quyen-su-dung-dat-71021 (Accessed at: 29/September/2021).

LawlibraryB, 2017 Hoi Dong Tham Phan Toa An Nhan Dan Toi Cao An Le so 16/2017/AL ve Cong Nhan Hop Dong
Chuyen Nhuong Quyen Su Dung Dat la Di San Thua Ke do mot trong cac Dong Thua Ke Chuyen Nhuong.

Available at: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/banan/ban-an/quyet-dinh-giam-doc-tham-5732013dsgdt-ngay-

16122013-ve-vu-an-dan-su-tranh-chap-thua-ke-tai-san-1865?tab=1 (Accessed at: 29/September/2021).

Nanda, (2012) “SSRN Electronic Journal”.

Partington, M. (2015) Transforming the English Legal System: Recent changes and Future prospects.
 Available at: https://martinpartington.com/transforming-the-english-legal-system-recent-changes-
and-future-prospects/ (Accessed at: 16/September/2021).

Partington, M. (2016) Legal system and Method.

Available at: https://london.ac.uk/sites/default/files/study-guides/legal-systems-method-study-guide.pdf

(Accessed at: 16/September/2021).

Parliament (2020) Vi tri, vai tro cua Quoc hoi.

Available at: https://thamquan.quochoi.vn/tin-tuc/gioi-thieu-ve-quoc-hoi/vi-tri-vai-tro-cua-quoc-hoi-c116.html

(Accessed at: 16/September/2021).

Slapper, G., & Kelly, D. (2016), The English Legal System.17th Edition. London: Routledge.

Than, C. (2015) An Le trong tinh hinh moi – Nhin lai dinh huong phat trien An Le cua Toa An Nhan Dan Toi Cao.

Available at: https://tapchikhplvn.hcmulaw.edu.vn/module/xemchitietbaibao?oid=019608f8-b7c6-4b55-b4c9-

10535f27a20e (Accessed at: 16/September/2021).

Lawlibrary (2020) Tong Hop toan bo An Le cua Viet Nam hien hanh.

Available at: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/banan/tin-tuc/tong-hop-toan-bo-an-le-cua-viet-nam-hien-hanh-3367

(Accessed at: 16/September/2021).

Truong, L. (2021) Phan tich cac loai nguon phap luat cua phap luat Viet Nam hien nay?

Available at: https://luatminhkhue.vn/phan-tich-cac-loai-nguon-phap-luat-cua-phap-luat-viet-nam-hien-nay--

.aspx (Accessed at: 16/September/2021).

Vietnam Government’s (2013). Hieu Luc cua Hiep Phap va Viec Sua Doi Hiep Phap.

Available at: http://vanban.chinhphu.vn/portal/page/portal/chinhphu/hethongvanban (Accessed at:

19/September/2021).

Wild, C., & Weinstein, S., & Smith, K., & Keenan, D. J. (2013), Smith & Keenan's English Law: Text and Cases. 17th
Edn. Harlow: Pearson.

Table of Case
1. Freeman & Lockyer v. Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd in 1964.
2. Hely-Hutchinson v Brayhead Ltd in 1968.
 3. No. 04/2016/AL of the TANDTC.
4. No. 66/2017/DSST dated November 22, 2017, of the NT District People's Court.
5. No. 71/2018/DS-PT dated August 14, 2018, on the dispute over the land use right transfer contract.
6. No. 71/2018/DS-PT dated August 14, 2018, on the dispute over the land use right transfer contract.

Table of Statutory law

1. Law on Handling Administrative Violations 2012 amended in 2020.