You are on page 1of 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/320773512

Screen Media Exposure and Obesity in Children and Adolescents

Article  in  PEDIATRICS · November 2017


DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1758K

CITATIONS READS

230 1,449

7 authors, including:

Jorge A. Banda Lauren Hale


Purdue University Stony Brook University
36 PUBLICATIONS   807 CITATIONS    224 PUBLICATIONS   7,469 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Amy S. Lu Sandra L Calvert


Northeastern University Georgetown University
57 PUBLICATIONS   1,659 CITATIONS    134 PUBLICATIONS   7,536 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Sleep and Suicidal Behavior View project

Stability and change in U.S. Parent Reports of Children's Parasocial Relationships View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Amy S. Lu on 05 January 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Screen Media Exposure and Obesity
in Children and Adolescents
Thomas N. Robinson, MD, MPH,​a,​b Jorge A. Banda, PhD,​a Lauren Hale, PhD,​c Amy Shirong Lu, PhD,​d,​e
Frances Fleming-Milici, PhD,​f Sandra L. Calvert, PhD,​g Ellen Wartella, PhDh

Obesity is one of the best-documented outcomes of screen media exposure. Many abstract
observational studies find relationships between screen media exposure and increased
risks of obesity. Randomized controlled trials of reducing screen time in community settings
have reduced weight gain in children, demonstrating a cause and effect relationship.
Current evidence suggests that screen media exposure leads to obesity in children and
adolescents through increased eating while viewing; exposure to high-calorie, low-nutrient
food and beverage marketing that influences children’s preferences, purchase requests,
consumption habits; and reduced sleep duration. Some evidence also suggests promise
for using interactive media to improve eating and physical activity behaviors to prevent
or reduce obesity. Future interdisciplinary research is needed to examine the effects of
newer mobile and other digital media exposures on obesity; to examine the effectiveness of
additional interventions to mitigate the adverse effects of media exposures on obesity and
possible moderators and mediators of intervention effects; to effectively use digital media
interventions to prevent and reduce obesity; and to uncover the mechanisms underlying the
causal relationships and interactions between obesity-related outcomes and media content,
characteristics, and context.

aStanford Solutions Science Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, California; bLucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford, Palo Alto, California; cProgram in

Public Health, Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York; dDepartment of Communication Studies, College of Arts, Media and
Design, and eHealth Technology Laboratory, Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts; fRudd Center for Food Policy
and Obesity, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut; gChildren’s Digital Media Center, Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia; and
hCenter on Media and Human Development, School of Communication, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

Drs Robinson and Banda conceptualized the manuscript, drafted the initial manuscript, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript; Drs Hale, Lu, and
Fleming-Milici conceptualized the manuscript and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript; Drs Calvert and Wartella critically reviewed and revised the
manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.
The analysis, conclusions, and recommendations contained in each paper are solely a product of the individual workgroup and are not the policy or opinions of, nor
do they represent an endorsement by Children and Screens: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development or the American Academy of Pediatrics.
DOI: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1542/​peds.​2016-​1758K
Accepted for publication Apr 19, 2017
Address correspondence to Thomas N. Robinson, MD, MPH, Stanford Solutions Science Laboratory, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, 1265 Welch Rd,
MSOB X129, Stanford, CA 94305. E-mail: tom.robinson@stanford.edu
PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275).
Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
FUNDING: This special supplement, “Children, Adolescents and Screens: What We Know and What We Need to Learn,​” was made possible through the financial
support of Children and Screens: Institute of Digital Media and Child Development.
POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

PEDIATRICS Volume 140, numberDownloaded


s2, Novemberfrom
2017:e20161758
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on November 13, 2017 Supplement Article
Obesity is one of the most challenging significant associations between the children in the control school.
public health problems facing both screen time and obesity in children. In a subsequent 2-year trial, 70
developed and developing countries However, null results (those that 4- to 7-year-olds and their families
worldwide. Screen media exposure are not statistically significant) do were randomly assigned to either
is one of the best-documented not indicate that a relationship does receive a screen-time reduction
causes of obesity in children and, not exist. Observational studies are intervention that involved installing
likewise, obesity is one of the best- susceptible to errors in measuring an electronic television time manager
documented outcomes of screen screen time and the accompanying in their home or a control parenting
media exposure. For the purpose of loss of statistical power and potential intervention.‍8 Compared with
this review, screen media refers to bias introduced. There have now controls, children in the screen-time
content on any technology platform been a number of experimental reduction group had significant
with a screen. research studies in which screen decreases in television viewing
media exposure was manipulated to and computer use, energy intake,
test this relationship, demonstrating and age- and sex-adjusted BMI that
Current State evidence of a cause and effect link persisted for 2 years. An analysis of
between screen media exposure and possible mediators suggested that
The relationship between screen
excess weight gain in children. the effects of reduced screen time
media exposure and obesity has
on changes in BMI were associated
been widely studied. Starting in the Experimental Studies of Reducing with reductions in dietary energy
mid-1980s,​‍1 many epidemiologic Screen Time intake but not increased physical
studies have revealed associations
A number of rigorous experimental activity measured by accelerometry.
between screen time and obesity.‍2
trials tested the effects of reducing These studies that focused solely on
For example, in 1 longitudinal cohort
children’s screen media exposure reducing screen media exposure are
study of a nationally representative
on weight gain.‍6 The first to also joined by other experimental
sample of US 10- to 15-year-olds,
address screen time exclusively studies of reducing screen time along
there was a strong dose-response
was a 7-month, school-based with changes in diet, physical activity,
relationship between the number
randomized controlled trial among and other obesity risk behaviors that
of hours per day children viewed
third and fourth grade children have produced reduced obesity and
television and the prevalence of
from 2 California schools.‍7 One weight gain or obesity compared
overweight, and as much as 60% of
school was randomly selected to with controls.‍7 Together these
the 4-year incidence of overweight
receive an 18-lesson, multiple- studies demonstrate a direct cause
was estimated to be attributable to
component screen-time reduction and effect relationship between
excess television viewing.‍3 Longer-
curriculum delivered by the regular screen media viewing and weight
term cohort studies have revealed
classroom teachers, and it included gain and demonstrate that reducing
that more television viewing during
behavior change skills, an electronic screen media time results in less BMI
childhood predicts overweight
television time manager, and gain in children.
and obesity in adulthood.‍4,​5 In a
educational parent newsletters.
longitudinal study in New Zealand,
The intervention targeted reducing How Does Screen Media Exposure
up to 17% of the overweight Lead to Obesity?
time spent watching television,
prevalence observed at 26 years of
playing sedentary video games, and
age was estimated to be attributable A number of possible mechanisms
using computers. The other school
to viewing >2 hours of television per are thought to explain the effects of
received no intervention. Both
day on weekdays during childhood screen media exposure on obesity.‍2,​9‍
schools received the same measures
and adolescence.‍5 Observational These include displacing physical
at the beginning and end of the
studies have also revealed that activity, increasing energy intake
school year. Over the 7 months of
greater screen time is associated with from eating while viewing and/or the
the trial, children in the school that
cardiometabolic risk factors more effects of advertising, and reducing
received the screen-time reduction
broadly, including hypertension, sleep.
curriculum significantly reduced
elevated cholesterol levels, insulin
their television viewing, video game Although it is often assumed that
resistance, elevated inflammation,
use, and number of meals eaten in screen media time displaces time
and the metabolic syndrome.‍2
front of the television. Intervention spent being more physically active,
Observational research is limited participants also significantly slowed epidemiologic studies have only
in its ability to demonstrate cause their gain in BMI, triceps skinfold inconsistently revealed cross-
and effect relationships, and not thickness, waist circumference, and sectional or prospective associations
all epidemiologic studies find waist-to-hip ratio compared with between screen time and less

S98 Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on November 13, 2017 Robinson et al


physical activity. This may be because Food advertising is another associated with increased obesity and
of the difficulties in validly measuring explanation for the link between weight gain among children, most
both screen media exposure and screen media exposure and excess consistently among those between
physical activity. Experimental energy consumption.‍15 According ages 3 and 7.‍23,​24
‍ At least 3 possible
studies of reducing screen time to the Federal Trade Commission, mechanisms have been suggested:
have generally revealed only small food and beverage companies spent sleep deprivation causes changes in
if any measurable increases in $1.8 billion on marketing to children the appetite-regulating hormones
physical activity.‍6 This suggests that and adolescents in the United States ghrelin and leptin to increase
displacement of physical activity may in 2009.‍16 It is estimated that in hunger and decrease satiety, short
not be a strong link between screen 2014, 2- to 11-year-olds and 12- to sleep duration can affect children’s
time and obesity. 17-year-olds saw an average of choices to consume more calories
12.8 and 15.2 food, beverage, and and fewer nutritionally-dense
In contrast, much more evidence
restaurant advertisements per day foods, and shorter sleep duration
supports screen media effects on
on television, respectively.‍17 In may lead to increased snacking and
energy intake as the prominent
addition, youth are now exposed to eating outside of normal mealtimes,
mechanism linking screen time and
marketing in new media, including including during the night.‍23
obesity in children. Epidemiologic
food company-sponsored websites,
studies reveal that children who
apps, and advergames as well as in
consume more screen media also Future Research
advertising on third-party children’s
consume fewer fruits and vegetables
websites and marketing via mobile
and more energy-dense snacks, Changes in Screen Media Exposure
devices and social media.‍16 This
energy-dense drinks and fast food,
new marketing is engaging and Although television still represents
receive a higher percentage of their
often disguised as entertainment or the largest source of screen media
energy from fats, and have a higher
messages from friends, making it exposure for most children, recent
total energy intake.‍10,​11
‍ Laboratory-
more difficult for children, even older data suggest that children are
based experimental studies have
children, to recognize its persuasive spending more and more time using
revealed that screen media exposure
intent.18 Research shows that food computers, video games, tablets and
can lead to incremental energy
advertising impacts children’s food smartphones, and time spent using
consumption without increased
preference and food intake.‍15 Again, smartphones has even overtaken
feelings of hunger or compensation
the strongest evidence comes from television among adolescents.‍25 This
by lower intake during the rest of
experimental studies. For example, has also led to changing social and
the day.‍12 Screen-time reduction
randomized controlled trials of food physical contexts in which children
interventions also have documented
commercials embedded in animated are interacting with screen media
reductions in dietary intake
programs revealed that advertising content. Because this transition is
compared with controls.‍7,​8
increases automatic eating for foods happening quickly, there has been
Eating while viewing is one not being advertised,​‍19 and even a limited evidence about whether
important way that screen media single 30-second commercial impacts these new sources of screen media
exposure increases children’s energy brand preferences.‍20 In addition, will continue to produce similar
intake. Studies have revealed that a randomized controlled trial also impacts on childhood obesity. The
children consume a large proportion revealed that fast food branding experimental studies of reducing
of their daily calories and meals altered young children’s actual taste screen time leading to less weight
while watching screen media. In 1 perceptions in side-by-side taste gain targeted total screen time
study, up to a third of daily energy tests.‍21 from television, video games, and
intake and half of children’s meals computers altogether.‍7,​8‍ The impact
were consumed in front of a screen.‍13 Inadequate sleep is another of using specific individual media
Some of this effect may be because likely mechanism linking screen requires empirical study but also
of the large amount of time spent media exposure, excess energy may not reflect real-world media use.
with screens, the types of high- consumption, and obesity. A recent However, many of the hypothesized
energy foods and beverages that systematic literature review of screen mechanisms linking screen media
are consumed while viewing, media time and sleep found that over 90% exposure to obesity, such as
acting as a trigger or prompt to of the studies demonstrated positive concurrent eating, advertising,
eating, media extending the duration associations between screen time and insufficient sleep, lead us to
of eating, or media distracting from and adverse sleep, usually measured hypothesize that most emerging
or obscuring feelings of fullness or by later bedtimes and less total sleep digital media, with their increased
satiety.‍14 time.‍22 Sleep deprivation has been abilities for interactivity, immersion,

PEDIATRICS Volume 140, number s2,Downloaded


November 2017
from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on November 13, 2017 S99
involvement, mobility, and timely Recommendations for Researchers: children and adolescents. Pediatrics.
feedback, could have similar or even Priority Research Questions 1985;75(5):807–812
more profound effects on causing 2. Strasburger VC; Council on
•• What are the roles of mobile and
weight gain in children. Communications and Media. Children,
other new digital media use and
adolescents, obesity, and the media.
patterns of use as they relate to
[published correction appears
Using Screen Media to Prevent and obesity for children with different
in Pediatrics. 2011;128(3):594].
Reduce Obesity characteristics? Pediatrics. 2011;128(1):201–208
•• What interventions mitigate the 3. Gortmaker SL, Must A, Sobol AM,
It is possible that some of the same
adverse effects of digital media Peterson K, Colditz GA, Dietz WH.
characteristics that may make new
use on obesity (individual, family, Television viewing as a cause
media potentially more effective
school, community, and policy) and of increasing obesity among
at promoting obesity can also be children in the United States, 1986-
what are the potential moderators
harnessed to prevent and reduce 1990. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
and mediators of intervention
obesity. Some evidence suggests 1996;150(4):356–362
effects (eg, content exposure,
short-term promise for changing
physical activity/inactivity, diet, 4. Viner RM, Cole TJ. Television
eating and increasing activity.‍26 For
biological factors, and sleep, for viewing in early childhood predicts
example, a number of studies have adult body mass index. J Pediatr.
children, teens, and young adults
demonstrated the potential of active 2005;147(4):429–435
with different characteristics)?
video games to increase physical
In brief, “What works, in which 5. Hancox RJ, Milne BJ, Poulton R.
activity and/or reduce measures of
settings and contexts, among Association between child and
obesity,​‍27 particularly when used
whom, and how?” adolescent television viewing and adult
as part of a more comprehensive health: a longitudinal birth cohort
weight-control program for •• How can we apply and integrate study. Lancet. 2004;364(9430):257–262
overweight or obese children‍28 or theories and insights from multiple
6. Ramsey Buchanan L, Rooks-Peck CR,
when played as a cooperative team.‍29 disciplines (eg, behavioral science,
Finnie RK, et al; Community Preventive
However, there have been a limited communication, computer science, Services Task Force. Reducing
number of randomized controlled medicine, and public health) recreational sedentary screen time: a
trials, and most of these studies have to effectively use digital media community guide systematic review.
been relatively short-term.27,​30
‍ interventions to prevent and Am J Prev Med. 2016;50(3):402–415
reduce obesity?
7. Robinson TN. Reducing children’s
Research Methods •• What are the causal relationships television viewing to prevent obesity:
and interactions between a randomized controlled trial. JAMA.
Observational studies will be obesity-related outcomes and the 1999;282(16):1561–1567
useful for documenting the following: 8. Epstein LH, Roemmich JN, Robinson JL,
use of and exposures to screen et al. A randomized trial of the effects
Media content (including of reducing television viewing and
media and changes over time,
marketing, advertising, computer use on body mass index in
identifying associations, and
messages, and modeling in young children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc
generating hypotheses about
entertainment programs and Med. 2008;162(3):239–245
causal relationships and possible
games);
moderators and mediators of 9. Robinson TN. Television viewing and
those associations. Experimental Characteristics of different childhood obesity. Pediatr Clin North
research with randomization to digital media (properties of the Am. 2001;48(4):1017–1025
manipulations in exposure (eg, technology and ways the content 10. Pearson N, Biddle SJ. Sedentary
randomized controlled trials of is presented); and behavior and dietary intake in
increased or decreased exposure to children, adolescents, and adults. A
Context in which media exposure systematic review. Am J Prev Med.
different media sources, experiences,
occurs (eg, food environment, 2011;41(2):178–188
and/or content) is needed to
family, multiple media use)?
demonstrate cause and effect 11. Ford C, Ward D, White M. Television
relationships, test interventions, and viewing associated with adverse
determine moderators (preexisting dietary outcomes in children ages 2-6.
characteristics that define References Obes Rev. 2012;13(12):1139–1147
different responses to exposures 1. Dietz WH Jr, Gortmaker SL. Do we 12. Chaput JP, Visby T, Nyby S, et al.
or interventions) and mediators fatten our children at the television Video game playing increases food
(mechanisms) of these relationships. set? Obesity and television viewing in intake in adolescents: a randomized

S100 Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on November 13, 2017 Robinson et al


crossover study. Am J Clin Nutr. trend update 2015_rev 4-11-16.pdf. 24. Magee L, Hale L. Longitudinal
2011;93(6):1196–1203 Accessed December 5, 2016 associations between sleep duration
and subsequent weight gain: a
13. Matheson DM, Wang Y, Klesges LM, 18. Harris JL, Heard AB, Schwartz MB; systematic review. Sleep Med Rev.
Beech BM, Kraemer HC, Robinson TN. Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and 2012;16(3):231–241
African-American girls’ dietary intake Obesity. Older but still vulnerable: All
while watching television. Obes Res. children need protection from food 25. Rideout V. Common Sense Media. The
2004;12(suppl 9):32S–37S marketing. 2014. Available at: http://​ Common Sense Census: Media Use by
www.​uconnruddcenter.​org/​files/​Pdfs/​ Tweens and Teens. San Francisco, CA:
14. Robinson TN, Matheson DM.
Protecting_​Older_​Children_​3_​14.​pdf. Common Sense Media; 2015
Environmental strategies for
portion control in children. Appetite. Accessed December 5, 2016 26. Calvert SL, Staiano AE, Bond BJ.
2015;88:33–38 Electronic gaming and the obesity
19. Harris JL, Bargh JA, Brownell KD. crisis. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev.
15. Institute of Medicine Committee on Priming effects of television food 2013;2013(139):51–57
Food Marketing and the Diets of advertising on eating behavior. Health
Children and Youth. McGinnis JM, Psychol. 2009;28(4):404–413 27. Lu AS, Kharrazi H, Gharghabi F,
Gootman JA, Kraak VI, eds. Food Thompson D. A systematic review
Marketing to Children and Youth: 20. Borzekowski DL, Robinson TN. The of health videogames on childhood
Threat or Opportunity? Washington, DC: 30-second effect: an experiment obesity prevention and intervention.
The National Academies Press;2006 revealing the impact of television Games Health J. 2013;2(3):131–141
commercials on food preferences 28. Trost SG, Sundal D, Foster GD, Lent
16. Leibowitz J, Rosch JT, Ramirez E, of preschoolers. J Am Diet Assoc.
Brill J, Ohlhausen M; Federal Trade MR, Vojta D. Effects of a pediatric
2001;101(1):42–46 weight management program with
Commission. A review of food
marketing to children and adolescents: 21. Robinson TN, Borzekowski DL, and without active video games a
follow-up report. 2012. Available at: Matheson DM, Kraemer HC. Effects of randomized trial. JAMA Pediatr.
https://​www.​ftc.​gov/​sites/​default/​ fast food branding on young children’s 2014;168(5):407–413
files/​documents/​reports/​review-​food-​ taste preferences. Arch Pediatr 29. Staiano AE, Abraham AA, Calvert SL.
marketing-​children-​and-​adolescents-​ Adolesc Med. 2007;161(8):792–797 Adolescent exergame play for weight
follow-​report/​121221foodmarketi​ loss and psychosocial improvement:
ngreport.​pdf. Accessed December 5, 22. Hale L, Guan S. Screen time and sleep a controlled physical activity
2016 among school-aged children and intervention. Obesity (Silver Spring).
adolescents: a systematic literature 2013;21(3):598–601
17. Sheehan C, Harris JL; Rudd Center review. Sleep Med Rev. 2015;21:50–58
for Food Policy and Obesity. Trends 30. Quelly SB, Norris AE, DiPietro JL. Impact
in television food advertising to 23. Miller AL, Lumeng JC, LeBourgeois of mobile apps to combat obesity in
young people: 2014 update. Updated MK. Sleep patterns and obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic
2015. Available at: http://​www.​ childhood. Curr Opin Endocrinol literature review. J Spec Pediatr Nurs.
uconnruddcenter.​org/​files/​Pdfs/​TV ads Diabetes Obes. 2015;22(1):41–47 2016;21(1):5–17

PEDIATRICS Volume 140, number s2,Downloaded


November 2017
from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on November 13, 2017 S101
Screen Media Exposure and Obesity in Children and Adolescents
Thomas N. Robinson, Jorge A. Banda, Lauren Hale, Amy Shirong Lu, Frances
Fleming-Milici, Sandra L. Calvert and Ellen Wartella
Pediatrics 2017;140;S97
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1758K

Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at:
Services http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/Supplement_2/S97
References This article cites 25 articles, 3 of which you can access for free at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/Supplement_2/S97.f
ull#ref-list-1
Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or
in its entirety can be found online at:
https://shop.aap.org/licensing-permissions/
Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
http://classic.pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/reprints

Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it
has been published continuously since . Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the
American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
60007. Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:
.

Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on November 13, 2017


Screen Media Exposure and Obesity in Children and Adolescents
Thomas N. Robinson, Jorge A. Banda, Lauren Hale, Amy Shirong Lu, Frances
Fleming-Milici, Sandra L. Calvert and Ellen Wartella
Pediatrics 2017;140;S97
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1758K

The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
located on the World Wide Web at:
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/Supplement_2/S97

Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it
has been published continuously since . Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the
American Academy of Pediatrics, 141 Northwest Point Boulevard, Elk Grove Village, Illinois,
60007. Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN:
.

Downloaded from http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/ by guest on November 13, 2017


View publication stats

You might also like