Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lindsey Mills
Project management plays a vital tool in today’s business world and can be defined in
many ways. Project management is defined by HBE (2004) as the allocation utilization and
allocation of resources to achieve a specific goal within a very specific period. This course has
taught me that being a project manager is more than just managing tasks or people, it is about
leadership as well. Projects only last for short periods of time, and as a leader, I’ve learned that
this presents the project leader with a brief amount of time that is concentrated and this takes
genuine effort to influence the project team in such a way that creates positive results and
Part 1
One of the key learnings for me during this course has been defining the role of a project
manager and a project leader. Before this course, I thought they were the same. I have learned
through this course that management is different than leadership. The Harvard Simulation taught
me that being a project manager is more than just being a supervisor over a project. Managers
make sure tasks get done. They communicate with stakeholders. They keep projects on track.
And the manager is operationally driven. Leaders, however, coach, teach and offer one on one
support, developing people in the process of management. Project leaders want their team
members to be self-sufficient, grow and learn through the life cycle of a project. In this course,
having the ability to practice these skills through the Harvard Simulation was very eye-opening. I
learned that for my project team to be successful they not only needed a project manager that
would keep them on track task-wise but one who would also be available to coach with one-on-
one support throughout the life of the project. I learned that on some weeks I did not have
enough coaching and during those times, the team would feel that the project was doomed for
OGL 321 Module 7 3
failure because of the lack of communication and support. Being a worthy project manager
means also learning to be a good coach and support person for the project team.
In OGL 320, the course before this, I had the opportunity to take a quiz “How Good Are
Your Project Management Skills?”. When I took this quiz a few months ago I did not feel
confident in my project management skills. Looking back on my reflection from this module I
scored a 71 which meant that I had an average understanding of what it means to manage
projects. When I took the quiz back then, I think I had a mindset of manager versus leader. One
of the areas I used to struggle in was the concept of “false starts”. I was able to get a project
started and have strong results in the beginning and middle of a project but I was unable to see
these results come into full fruition by the project deadline. In this course, I have learned that
project leadership is a key component to avoiding these “false starts”. This course has taught me
that leadership by way of coaching and development of the team is one of the ways to bring a
team through the entirety of a project. I can see this is because the team feels supported and
perhaps gains vital skills along the way by way of the one-on-one training and preparation done
so by the leader.
It was eye-opening to take this quiz again a few days ago after completing this course. I
did score a few points higher this time with a 74. Although, I was somewhat disappointed that I
am not in the highest category of “accomplished project manager”. What this tells me is that I
still have room to grow and learn how to be a better project leader. This course has taught me
through the Harvard Simulation how project scope, schedule, leadership, and communication
play critical roles in having successful projects. The simulation was an opportunity to practice
how I would respond as a project leader through various scenarios. Projects are unpredictable
OGL 321 Module 7 4
and throughout the course, these simulations became increasingly difficult. I enjoyed these
challenges because they caused me to think about my leadership approach. As I made decisions
in each of the scenarios, I could experience whether or not these helped or hindered the project's
progress.
Communication Style
One specific area that I have grown in throughout this course is communication. I have
learned that as a project leader communication is critical to the success of any project. The
Harvard Simulation taught me that the level of communication is directly linked to the skill level
of the project team. Throughout the course, there were weeks when the simulation required team
members that were highly skilled to complete the complexities required. I learned that the higher
the skill of the team members the communication approach from me as the project leader
changed. Members that had a high skill level did not need as much one on one coaching from
me. In fact, in some cases, they would say “we can’t learn anything more from you”. This was an
indication to scale back the communication. I learned that too much communication through
team meetings and one on one connections, actually took away precious time that the team
needed to work on the project and complete the deadlines. Team members that had lower skills
needed more one-on-one coaching to be successful. I found that in some simulations I needed to
have one on one coaching more than once a week. I have taken this knowledge and applied this
to my current role as a Store Manager and the leadership team I have at Starbucks. I have
leadership team consists of 3 shift supervisors that have more than 2 years’ experience in the
role. The other 2 have one year or less of experience in their current leadership positions. During
our meetings, I discovered that some of the information was too complex for my supervisors
OGL 321 Module 7 5
with less experience. I found that after our meetings they would both have multiple questions and
I realized that they needed more one-on-one coaching support. Our meetings are typically one
hour long. I needed to come up with a strategy so that my team could get the most out of our one
hour together despite the different skill sets that my team has. I decided that what I needed to do
was change the schedule. For one of my leaders Emily, who needs additional support, I decided
to meet with her 30 minutes before our leadership team meeting. For the other, Katie, we now
meet 30 minutes after the team meeting is over. This change in the schedule has helped our team
immensely. I have found that I can answer their questions before the meeting and or clarify
complex topics after the meeting is over. This means that during the team we are all together we
can focus on our stores' goals and I no longer need to worry that the less experienced leaders are
falling behind.
In this course, I have learned more about how I approach my team and how I handle team
projects. Through the sequence of decision-making in the Harvard Simulation, I have seen how I
emphasize various aspects of team dynamics and how I approach project work. Each week
during the simulation we would earn points based on team morale and stress. This is something
that I found myself consumed with. Each week of the scenario I strived to keep the team happy
during these simulations. One of the reasons why I think I am stressed over team morale is
because this is something that I strive to keep under control in my current role. At Starbucks one
of the major responsibilities of a Store Manager is to maintain a working environment that is one
where people feel they are supported and maintain positive morale. While this does not mean
every day will be free of stress, as a manager, I am tasked with doing my best to alleviate stress
for the team and create a place that is encouraging for my employees. During the Harvard
OGL 321 Module 7 6
Simulation, I learned that various projects caused the stress to increase for the team. This was a
big challenge for me in my leadership approach. The simulation taught me that even if you are a
great project leader, there will be times when the stresses of a project are inevitable. Sometimes
the complexities require the team to give more, such as work overtime hours or take on extra
tasks when more work is added. I learned that the best way to approach this is with a positive
attitude. As a leader, I learned that communication is a key element when stress is high. Team
members need to have all the details and be updated often on team progress. In the last scenario
of the Harvard Simulation, there was an incident of a car crash among the team members which
caused a major blow to the morale of the group. This taught me that there will be situations that
affect a project that will be out of my control. I learned that as a leader there has to be a balance
between prioritizing team stress and morale but also completing the task at hand. I think that I
tend to prioritize team members over the schedule or budget. Despite team stress and morale, it is
the role of the project leader to make sure that the project is completed on schedule and within
the budget. I learned that sometimes this means that there will be added stress for the team and
there will be situations where the team may be unhappy for some time.
Accepting Failures
According to HBR (2004), projects big and small are prone to failure and they do well
over half of the time (pg. 123). Knowing this, as a project leader this course has shown me that
failures are not something to be ashamed of or shy away from. Failures are opportunities to grow
and learn. Being a continuous learner is something I want to strive for and I am discovering that
failure is just part of that process of learning. During this course, I had many failed projects
through the Harvard Simulation. Each time I failed a project I took notes on the parameters I had
in place and used this information to help me try again. Taking the time to reflect on what went
OGL 321 Module 7 7
wrong with each scenario helped me not only complete the current project but helped me as the
weeks of this course went on. I used these notes to complete other projects I was able to use my
knowledge of failures to help me get better results on harder projects. This is a concept I can use
in my current role. At Starbucks, we have projects big and small. A small project might be re-
organization of a back stock room or training a new group of employees. Other more complex
projects for me are; mentoring a struggling leader or continuing to getting results despite the
many challenges of the COVID pandemic. I have realized that I need to create space in my
management approach to document failures and strategies that have not produced positive
results. I have decided to do this by creating a OneNote document of current and past projects
that I have worked on. This will help me remember where I have been, what worked within
various projects, and what did not. It will help me modify my approach for future projects big or
I never thought of myself as a project leader. But I have seen through this session how
project leaders communicate a vision and this is something I do every day. Every day I lead a
team of people to create a place at Starbucks where I want people to feel joy, warmth, and
belonging. I’ve seen that the role of a project leader also ensures that deliverables are met. They
help stakeholders remain confident that their company’s goals can be achieved through the
resources and teams that the company has in place (Aston, 2021). Without project managers it
would be impossible for organizations to organize, train, mitigate risk, control quality, plan and
lead teams (Aston, 2021). This session has taught me how important project leaders are and
reaffirmed that the work that I do to lead my team is significant and contributes to the success of
my company. I often think about the accountability that I have to continue to drive results and I
OGL 321 Module 7 8
know that I have been given many responsibilities that go beyond just being a manager but also
being a leader. As former President John F. Kennedy once said “To whom much is given, much
is required”. My work is not done and I will continue to strive for excellence in my project
leadership approach.
Part 2
One of the ways I was able to learn more about project management leadership this
session was through the use of the Harvard Project Management Simulation. In this simulation
each week I was offered a description of a project. I was put in the position of the project leader
for each week. Based on the needs of the project and timeline, I could then pick how many
members I wanted for the team, select their skill level, select outsourcing, and the amount of
support I offered to the team as the project leader. After going through 7 different scenarios, I
have compiled a few suggestions that I think are valuable and could be used for anyone planning
One of the challenges you will have as you encounter each week’s scenarios is the
varying levels of scope. The scope is the complexity of the project or work necessary to achieve
the goal presented. The complexity of the project will require different kinds of teams. These
teams will either be small or large and have specific skill sets to accomplish the target. The
higher the skill level of the team the higher the cost and resources needed to complete the
project. One aspect I kept in mind during each simulation was “the people in the project are my
greatest asset and without them, the project could not be completed”. Outsourcing will be one
way you can lower the cost of resources for your project. However, be warned that with
outsourcing you may need to increase your communication with the team. Outsourcing means
OGL 321 Module 7 9
using a third party to complete task work. Adding a third party could mean that the quality of the
product diminishes and communication can get muddled. Remember that when you see the
resources and cost for your project are high, that for you to create the desired results, you have to
spend the money to get there. The schedule is also a major part of each week’s project scenario.
There will be various scenarios where the schedule-timeline seems impossible to meet. I want to
assure you that with the right number of team members and skill level, the schedule deadlines
can be met. There might be some projects that go over the projected timeline. As with any
project, there will be give and take, and this is just part of the life-cycle of any project.
After completing several scenarios, you will begin to notice patterns that make
projects end more successfully. One specific pattern I noticed was that smaller teams seemed to
work better than larger ones. The smaller the team the higher the skill level you can afford in the
budget. With an increase in skill, you can accomplish more tasks each week of the project and
get more done. When you can accomplish more tasks per week the closer you will be to
completing the project by the target end date. Another pattern to look out for is that each week,
regardless of the team size, you will need to add some kind of support for the group. Support for
the team can be offered in a few different ways. You can select from one-on-one coaching, daily
debriefing, and product reviews, just to name a couple. The level of support needed is also
directly related to the skill level of the team. The greater the skill level of the team, the less one-
on-one support the group will need from you as the project leader. As the scenarios become more
difficult you will need to check and adjust your approach to support. Even highly skilled team
members still need consistent communication to keep up with the complexities of each project.
OGL 321 Module 7 10
3) My Approach
One area of the Harvard Simulation that was hard for me was the scoring. At the end
of each project, I received a score based on whether or not I was able to meet the project’s
objectives for scope, schedule, resources, and the stress/morale of the group. Each week I
found myself striving to get maximum points in all of these categories. I quickly learned that
there will be some project scenarios where there was give and take in these areas. On some
weeks I was able to receive maximum points under schedule and scope but lost points in
resources and team stress. One way that I was able to maximize my points each week was to
take notes during each scenario. When I took notes along the way, I could use that
information for future scenarios. Even though each week the simulation was slightly
different, I still noticed some patterns that could be applied to each one that would help me.
Lastly, and the most important aspect of my approach was understanding that the score was
not the most important part of the simulation. Getting the highest score was not the purpose
of the simulation. The score was simply a metric to track my progress and growth as a project
leader. I learned that is a way to see how much I was learning from the course. As someone
that strives for excellence, it was hard for me to see low scores. I wanted to get maximum
results every week. If I found myself getting low scores, I tried to think outside of the box
and do the simulation one more time. There were a few scenarios I felt like giving up, I tried
the scenario just one more time. I found that this led me to getting the highest points possible.
OGL 321 Module 7 11
References:
management-important
HBE. (2004). Harvard business essentials: Managing projects large and small. Boston: Harvard
Mind Tools. (2017, August 15). How good are your project management skills? Retrieved