Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q3.
Alpha Corporation: The firm was not able to generate enough cash flow from operations to pay all of its
expenditures. Proceeds from disposal of depreciable and other assets and from sales of discontinued
operations add ups to supplement cash flow from operations to pay all its expenditures.
Beta Corporation: Cash flow from operations in 1989 and 1990 was enough to pay for capital
expenditures but in the year 1991 cash flow from operations was insufficient to pay for capital
expenditures.
Gamma Corporation: The firm was able to pay for its capital expenditures through cash flow from
operations in all the years.
Q4.
Alpha Corporation: The firm was not able to generate enough cash flow from operations to pay all of its
expenditures and dividend paid. Proceeds from disposal of depreciable and other assets and from sales
of discontinued operations add ups to supplement cash flow from operations to pay all its expenditures.
Also, proceeds from long-term debt and sale of class B common stock might be used to pay off dividends
in years 1989 and 1990.
Beta Corporation: Cash flow from operations in 1989 and 1990 was enough to pay for capital
expenditures but in the year 1991 cash flow from operations was insufficient to pay for capital
expenditures. There was no dividend payment in any of the given years.
Gamma Corporation: The firm was able to pay for its capital expenditures through cash flow from
operations in all the years. There was no dividend payment in any of the given years.
Q5.
Alpha Corporation: In this exhibit the capital expenditures were more than the net cash flow provided
so there was no excess cash.
Beta Corporation: For this exhibit, in 1991 the firm spent $8,000 in marketable securities with its excess
cash. There was no more investing done other than that.
Gamma Corporation: This company bought a total of $1,325,908 in treasury shares over a three year
period with their excess cash. They also used their cash to pay back debt with a total of $286,567 over
the three year period. Also, they purchased Kienzle business in 1991.
Q6.
Alpha Corporation: This company used their disposal of depreciable and other assets of $157 and also
the proceeds of sale of discontinued operations to be able to pay for their capital expenditures.
Beta Corporation: This firm was able to use its excess cash to pay for their capital expenditures.
Gamma Corporation: This firm was also able to use its excess cash.
Q7.
Were the working capital (current assets and current liability) accounts other than cash and cash
equivalents primarily sources of cash, or users of cash?
Alpha Corporation: This company used a lot of cash for investing in depreciable assets over the three
year period. Over the period it seems that this company’s assets and liabilities were mainly users of
cash.
Beta Corporation: In the financing activities for this company, they used their cash to pay off a lot of
things including net payments under working capital line of credit, net payments under equipment line
of credit, principal payments, and payment of subordinated debt. It's safe to say this company mainly
used their cash.
Gamma Corporation: This company's assets and liabilities definitely flip flopped from year to year on
users or sources of cash. Most of the accounts in Net Cash by Operating Activities, use
“(Increase)/Decrease in most columns. For instance, Accounts Receivable was negative the first two
years, and positive for the last. The other accounts including inventories, prepaid expenses, accounts
payable, etc. do the same thing in changing from year to year.
Q8.
Alpha Corporation: In this exhibit, the amortization of capitalized software and also investment in
depreciable assets affect cash flows tremendously. Also, in 1990 they spent 222.6m in their short-term
borrowings.
Beta Corporation: The major account that affected the cash flows in this exhibit was their cash paid to
suppliers and employees. Looking at the statement, you can see that is where the vast majority of their
capital is going.
Gamma Corporation: As noted earlier, with so much money going to their purchase of treasury shares
that is the main place their cash flows are going. They also purchased the Kienzie business in 1991
which was a large bit of their cash flow for that year.
Beta Corporation: Increasing Steadily. Net income for Beta Corp increased by nearly $5,000 from ‘89-90
and then another $1,000 from 1990-1991.
Gamma Corporation: net income has fallen drastically from 1989 to 91, having plunged into negative in
1991.
Beta Corporation: cash flow from operations has increased in 1990 from 1989, approximately double
but decrease in 1991 by 45% approximately.
Gamma Corporation: cash flow from operations has decreased through all years. It decreased by 3%
from 1989 to 1990 and 27% around from 1990 to 1991.
Q12. Dividends?
Alpha Corporation: Dividend paid decrease over years. It was 26 million in 1989, 7.2 million in 1990, and
0 in 1991.
Beta Corporation: It was positive in 1989 but became negative in 1990 and 1991.
Gamma Corporation: Company proceeds debt but at decreasing level. Also payment of debts was
higher in 1989 and decrease in 1990 and again increase in 1989.
Beta Corporation: The working capital accounts for Beta Corporation have increased over all three
years, with a little decrease being shown in 1990.
Gamma Corporation: Gamma Corporation’s working capital accounts increased from ‘89-90 and then
saw a decrease from ‘90-91.