SAP v.

AMuLI6

P.o 13833

FACTS: feAATE ResPospg>T PEO A. coMAVAIPT

FneoyMPTOS AGrT PETITPRs
TH PANCA AoJuo1 cATDe
conAIT, THE soP
yTAnyapo THAT AS TEASTV OF T SuSHCT*
AP OF AD,
A oyne1os PesnaT CTIOAS Ac 12
FP.A. &AA, THE APuo\cA TD go FAOR
oFT zsPOtDETS BT Th TITO PRs AsSEP-
TO THATT AOJuolcATMe tA JusocTO
T 02c TH
VkOy uDue Thy AOnILANO AD pls

JITOS Th pefA®TnpAT oF ASPARIA

P
T (Fogn
AO VAoGAY

DEPACTp OF AGPARIA foen AOTMOIC ATW

 AS Tunso\CTO NEP

emu6: s , syCTOS 1, ¢a, F, 2m oF THE

THE
Pecou@ coveS H6PACAAS
O1SuTVS idVOwIE TH SAE, AuEPATOA MoCTSASE,

CTWv LAOS upe THE cWEA6E OF THE

oP OTHE AGPACA A . TH PHEAsE"
"se a -
OF TH CAee)

SeCno e. A. T THE eoASI0

in1TG TuCASOC TON APAS OALI T

AO lSPosIqWS OF DAR ANo LsP.