Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Field of Expertise:
Biophysics, with specialization in Bottom-up reconstitution of cellular processes
This was the work carried out during Dr. (Last Name)’s Ph.D. studies.
Project Description: Phagocytosis is the process by which immune cells of our body eliminate
pathogens that would otherwise cause disease. This process involves internalization of pathogens
by phagocytic cells in an organelle called as phagosome. Upon internalization, phagosome is
transported from the periphery of the immune cell towards the nucleus in a centripetal fashion.
This transport has long been considered as a pre-requisite for the cell to be able to “mature” the
phagosome by its acidification which leads to degradation and elimination of the pathogen inside
the phagosome.
Key outcome of the project: Dr. (Last Name) and colleagues showed that preventing
phagosomal motion leads to delay in acidification of the phagosome and subsequent degradation
of the pathogen.
Please discuss whether it has been implemented yet in the field, whether academically or in
industry practice. Dr. (Last Name) published two primary author papers in Biophysical Journal
and Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical on this work, and this technique was highlighted as an
Page 1 of 3
“Emerging Biophysical Technology” in 2012 by the Biophysical Journal. Dr. (Last Name) and
colleagues were also invited to write a detailed methods paper in the journal Methods in
Molecular Biology on this topic so others could implement it.
Project Title: Regulation of the actin filament growth by competition between molecular
machineries
Project Description: This work included two sub-projects. 1) The dynamic nature of the actin
cytoskeleton lies at the heart of a number of cellular processes, like cell movement, cell division,
wound healing, etc. Formins are known to bind the plus ends of actin filaments and accelerate
their elongation. Capping proteins are known to bind growing ends of actin filaments and
prevent their elongation. For the last few decades, capping protein and formin were thought to
bind the filament ends in a mutually exclusive manner (i.e., only one of them could bind at a
time). This presented a conundrum: how do cells stop formin-elongating filaments from growing
uncontrolled? Dr. (Last Name) and colleagues demonstrated that in contrast to existing view,
formin and capping protein can simultaneously bind barbed ends to form a multicomponent
“decision complex”. As a result of this, both capping protein and formin catalyze each other’s
displacement. 2) In the second project, Dr. (Last Name) and colleagues demonstrated that
profilin, a ubiquitous actin monomer binding protein, controls the balance between linear and
branched actin networks and competes with formin and capping protein for barbed-end binding.
Key outcome of the project: These unique mechanisms provided us with unprecedented
understanding of how multiple protein regulators compete and collaborate to exert fine control
on size of actin containing cellular organelles such as filopodia.
Project Description: This work includes two sub-projects. 1) The rate limiting step in a cell’s
ability to use actin polymerization for its motility is depolymerization of pre-existing actin
networks to generate monomers required for polymerization of new filaments. Dr. (Last Name)
and colleagues discovered the first direct evidence of actin filament depolymerization by
ADF/Cofilin protein family, which has long been predicted and debated. Their experiments
demonstrated its dual function on actin filaments – filament severing and enhanced
depolymerization. 2) Dr. (Last Name) and colleagues also discovered a novel multicomponent
pathway of actin filament depolymerization in which cyclase-associated protein (Srv2/CAP)
synergizes with cofilin to enhance pointed-end depolymerization of an actin filament by ~ 350-
fold (54 s-1); these are the fastest rates of actin turnover ever observed in vitro.
Page 2 of 3
Key outcome: These are the first direct demonstration of how living cells can depolymerize their
actin cytoskeleton.
Description: How did multicellular organisms evolve? This has been one of the most intriguing,
yet unsolved questions facing biologists studying evolution. The first multicellular organisms
arguably evolved by many unicellular organisms aggregating together for common benefit. In
collaboration with Professor (Name) at the University of California San Francisto, Dr. (Last
Name) is developing Stentor coeruleus as a model organism to study the evolution of
multicellularity. Stentors can live both as solitary organisms and can also form colonies
containing a large number of individuals. Dr. (Last Name)’s goal was to determine the benefits
Stentors gain by forming colonies.
Key outcome of the project: Dr. (Last Name) showed that when individuals come together,
their feeding flows (mechanism to feed themselves) get hydrodynamically coupled and they can
feed better, thus demonstrating a direct benefit of multicellular-like behavior.
Page 3 of 3