IN THE COURT OF FAMILY COURT AT BANDRA

AT MUMBAI

CIVIL M.A. 92 OF 2019

Mrs. Swati V Pardhi …

Petitioner

VS

Mr. Vandesh S Pardhi …

Respondent

WRITTEN ARGUMENTS OF RESPONDENT

ABOVENAMED AS UNDER:

MOST RESPECTIVELY SHEWETH:

1. The contents of present Civil Misc. Application is totally

false, frivolous and vexatious, hence the present Civil Mise
Application is required to be rejected with costs
2. The Respondent state that, the Petitioner approached to this
Hon'ble Court with unclean hands by suppressing material
facts. Hence the present Civil Misc. Application is required
to be rejected with cost
3. The Respondent state that, the Petitioner have filed present
application just for harassment. The present case is filed
without any cause of action.
4. The Respondent state that the Petitioner have filed the
Petition No. A- 1386 of 2000 for Dissolution of marriage
between the Petitioner and the Respondent. The Respondent
craves leave to refer and rely upon the petition filed by the
petitioner before Hon ble Court respondent against the
present Respondent.
5. The Respondent states that the petitioner in the said petition
also prayed for interim relief hence, Hon ble Family Court
vide by order dated 18/05/2007 have been pleased to partly
allow the said application for interim and granted Rs. 500/
(Rupees Five Hundred Only) per month.
6. The Respondent states that the respondent is the law-abiding
citizen and paid the interim maintenance to the petitioner as
per the order.
7. The Respondent states that vide by the consent term dated
10/11/2006 the petitioner admitted in para no 4 that there are
no exchanges pending between the parties and in para no 6
the petitioner admitted that there are no dues and claims of
whatsoever nature against each other in future. The
Respondent further states that vide by the said consent term
the petitioner and the respondent mutually agreed for the
Mutual Consent Divorce and prayed before the Hon'ble
Court for mutually dissolution of the marriage between the
parties.
 8. The Respondent states that in the above facts and
circumstances the present Civil Misc. Application filed by
the petitioner is totally on wrong footing and just filed for
harassing the respondent.

In view to the above, the present Civil Misc. Application be rejected

with costs.

PLACE: Bandra

DATE: 04/01/22

Advocate For Respondent

IN THE COURT OF FAMILY COURT
AT BANDRA AT MUMBAI
CIVIL M.A. 92 OF
2019

Mrs. Swati V Pardhi

…Petitioner
VS
Mr. Vandesh S Pardhi
…Respondent

WRITTEN ARGUMENTS

DATED_ THIS DAY OF_______2022

Ms. Sonal Hemant Mishal

Advocate for Respondent

Office No.1, Basement, Shopper's

Point, Next to Moti Mahal hotel,
Andheri (W), Mumbai-400058 Contact:
+919969849102/ 9820846067
Email:sonalmishal5@gmail.com
Code No- I-17497