Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Best-in-Class Benchmarking Analysis - Large
Best-in-Class Benchmarking Analysis - Large
NEW HEIGHTS
Best-in-Class Benchmarking Analysis for Large Employers
U.S. Edition
LARGE EMPLOYERS
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................................................................................4
OVERVIEW..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................4
METHODOLOGY................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5
BEST-OF-THE-BEST ATTRIBUTES.......................................................................................................................................................................... 24
FINAL REMARKS.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................31
ABOUT GALLAGHER..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................32
The intent of this document is to provide you with general information regarding the status of, and/or potential concerns related to, your current employee compensation
and benefits environment. It does not necessarily fully address all of your specific issues. It should not be construed as, and is not intended to provide, legal advice.
Questions regarding specific issues should be addressed by your general counsel or an attorney who specializes in this practice area.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 3
LARGE EMPLOYERS
Executive Summary
Overview
Wherever employers are on the road to a better workplace, better benchmarking can speed their progress. Objective comparisons
make it possible to fold short-term goals into long-term strategies, smoothing the way to operational excellence and organizational
wellbeing. And benchmarking against employers that are already reaching high levels of success can uncover untapped opportunities
— both large and small — for improvement.
The Best-in-Class Benchmarking Analysis showcases statistically significant patterns, best practices and philosophies common
among organizations that most effectively manage their healthcare costs and their people. These employers have arrived at a
winning formula for attracting, rewarding and retaining the right talent, and ultimately retiring them at the right time — helping to
minimize turnover and unlock cost efficiencies. Savings can be invested in salaries, wages, bonuses and specific employee benefits
that target competitive advantages, and support revenue and market growth.
This report interprets data from large employers with 1,000 or more full-time employees (FTEs) that responded to Gallagher‘s 2018
Benefits Strategy & Benchmarking Survey. A separate report on midsize employers with 100 to 999 FTEs is also available.
Based on findings, the analysis describes key attributes of best-in-class organizations in two profile groups, defined by excellence in:
• Healthcare cost control
• Human resource (HR) management
Each group represents a best-in-class competency that’s critical for outperforming other large employers. The report also describes
the strategies, tactics and programs that distinguish the best-of-the-best employers — those organizations that lead their peers in
both healthcare cost control and HR management.
Methodology
Gallagher followed a six-step process to identify and characterize best-in-class large employers:
1 2 3 4 5 6
1 Analyze data from Gallagher’s 2018 Benefits Strategy & 4 Divide the total scores for each profile group into quarters
Benchmarking Survey. — or quartiles — according to their values, and assign each
employer to a quartile. The top quartile for each group
2 Identify the profile groups and establish evaluation criteria:
includes the highest-scoring, best-in-class employers for
• Profile group 1: Healthcare cost control healthcare cost control (29%) or HR management (24%).
• Profile group 2: HR management 5 Identify the best-of-the-best employers among the best-in-
3 Select questions from the survey that are relevant to the class pool. These exceptional performers scored in the top
two profile groups. For each group, score the responses, quartile of both profile groups. Just 24 large employers (7%)
and then total those scores. qualified as the best of the best in 2018.
• 340 large employers responded to the entire set of 6 Determine the attributes that separate the best-in-class
profile group questions. and best-of-the-best employers from all other large survey
participants, by analyzing response data for questions on
strategy, tactics and programs.
340LARGE EMPLOYERS
THAT RESPONDED TO ALL
PROFILE GROUP QUESTIONS
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 5
LARGE EMPLOYERS | Healthcare Cost Control
Priority placed on
managing health
benefit costs
3-year trend —
health plan premium Perceived success of
increases or decreases the healthcare cost
• Most recent renewal management strategy
• 1 year prior
• 2 years prior
The highest possible total score was 21 points. Scoring at least 14 points, 99 employers (29%) qualified for the top quartile as
best in class for healthcare cost control in 2018.
QUARTILE DISTRIBUTION
19% 29%
29%
23%
Unlike large employers that excel in HR management, those likely to link to broader HR initiatives that often focus on
ranked the best for healthcare cost control typically don’t engagement (68% vs. 91%). Presumably, this choice allows
consider attraction and retention a top three operational a greater focus on financial performance and broader
priority. So, their employee communication strategy is less operational objectives.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 7
LARGE EMPLOYERS | Healthcare Cost Control
The best in class are also discerning in their health benefits Similarly, employer-subsidized dental benefits are still the norm
and insurance coverage choices. More often than their peers, for most large employers, but they’re scarcer among the best at
they give employees just one or two health plan options. While controlling healthcare costs.
this practice may limit employee choice, it reins in expenses There’s a break from this pattern when it comes to employer-
related to administrative complexity and allows more focused subsidized indemnity or cancer care insurance. While these
plan management. additional types of coverage are not common overall, the best
Best-in-class employers are also less likely to cover infertility in class offer them more frequently. Employees can benefit
services or fertility treatments. These optional and expensive by gaining greater financial security in the face of unexpected
benefits are typically hallmarks of organizations that strongly health issues and treatment costs.
focus on fostering employee loyalty and retention. In fact, they
differentiate the best in class for HR management.
8%
Hospital indemnity
3%
6%
Cancer care
2%
Analysis of leave types offered by large employers reveal The best in class may recognize that paid leaves can create a
some clear differences in how employees’ time away from sense of financial security, but in keeping with their emphasis on
work is managed. cost control they’re more likely to forgo certain types — including
jury duty, bereavement and time off for incidental sickness.
PAID LEAVES
76%
Jury duty
84%
72%
Bereavement
81%
59%
Incidental sick time
70%
94%
Individual coverage
86%
75%
Family coverage
63%
Well-considered, value-driven plan design and management Indeed, more than one-third (36%) of best-in-class employers
makes it possible for the best in class to more stringently tamp did not increase employee cost sharing in 2018, compared to
down costs. By limiting out-of-pocket healthcare expenses for 21% of their peers. They were less likely not only to increase the
a healthcare cost-sensitive workforce, they make coverage and employee contribution to the health plan’s premium cost, but
care more affordable — increasing the likelihood that employees also to raise deductibles, copays or coinsurance. Notably, a high-
will seek the services they need and adhere to treatment plans. deductible health plan (HDHP) option is also less prevalent.
This strategy helps deter costly emergency health situations,
boosting employees’ physical, emotional and financial wellbeing
to support a more productive and engaged workforce.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 9
LARGE EMPLOYERS | Healthcare Cost Control
36%
No increase to cost sharing
21%
OFFER AN HDHP
Instead, large employers with the best cost-control results Likewise, best-in-class employers are reducing pharmaceutical
are relying more on sophisticated tools and processes. For costs through a more calculated approach to pharmacy
instance, 23% use reference-based pricing compared to 12% of benefit management. One tactic they tend to favor above
their peers. This cost-control mechanism caps the maximum other large employers is carving out pharmacy benefits from
amount employers will cover for certain healthcare services the health plan (42% vs. 32%). Advantages of working directly
or procedures — often those that vary widely in price but with a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) include more insight
don’t deliver superior outcome improvements, such as knee into effective pharmacy management strategies, tactics and
replacement surgeries. The employee or other covered patient communication — and customized alerts to underutilization of
pays the difference in cost above the reference price. supporting tools.
42%
Carve out pharmacy benefits
32%
Completion of an
Success of employee engagement survey
communications
from 2016 to 2018
The highest possible total score was 22 points. Scoring at least 14 points, 83 employers (24%) qualified for the top quartile as best in
class for HR management.
QUARTILE DISTRIBUTION
19%
24%
29%
28%
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 11
LARGE EMPLOYERS | HR Management
31%
Use multi-year labor cost modeling
18%
36%
Use multi-year labor cost modeling
26%
A comprehensive strategy that addresses important HR issues Without an integrated employee communication strategy to
is another forte of best-in-class employers. The most inclusive activate success, core HR and other organizational strategies
wellbeing strategies recognize the importance of not only often fall short of their potential. Effective communications
physical and emotional health, including community and social are the connection point for employees to better access,
aspects, but also career and financial fitness. Because work and understanding and use of their benefits, programs and support
personal lives are intertwined, taking steps to support the whole tools. They also serve as a reliable mechanism for helping
employee — on and off the job — is also a strong move toward the workforce achieve a clear and consistent grasp of their
optimizing investments in the workforce. organization’s goals, priorities and mission. Best-in-class
employers are three times as likely to have a comprehensive
Employees who experience less financial stress, feel supported
communication strategy compared to other large employers.
in their career growth, and have opportunities to give back
to their communities tend to perform better and feel more
satisfied. Much more frequently than their peers, employers
that excel in HR management choose a holistic approach
centered on these particular workforce opportunities and
outcomes (52% vs. 31%).
Inevitably, employees need to be away from work. Policies In keeping with their support for transition programs, employers
and processes that smoothly transition them — as they leave that lead the way in HR management also see the value in
and return to work — help reduce compliance-related risk and providing enough time away from work for optimal employee
minimize operational interruptions. wellbeing. The best in class more often fund their relatively
generous short-term disability (STD) and long-term disability
The best in class seem to recognize the value of these
(LTD) policies. And the duration of STD coverage is more likely
structures, because they’ve developed stay-at-work and return-
to extend to 26 weeks, allowing employees to take the time off
to-work programs as part of their overall absence management
they need to return to work as healthy, productive employees.
strategy — at a rate that’s 15 percentage points higher than
their peers. They are also more likely to offer extended leaves of
absence or paternity leave.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 13
LARGE EMPLOYERS | HR Management
51%
Paternity leaves
38%
21%
Salary continuation plan
11%
13%
13 weeks
31%
Leading employers understand the competitive importance of retirement healthcare benefits as a core offering that helps reduce
employees’ stress, and supports their long-term financial wellbeing and retirement readiness. Compared to their peers, the best in
class are more than twice as likely to make these benefits available to their workforce.
Investing in employee growth and wellbeing to boost job performance and engagement
When employees see their employer as a partner in advancing employee growth and purpose — a commitment that translates
their career interests, they’re motivated to perform at their best. to more skilled, engaged and loyal workers. And far more than
The best in class tend to select benefits such as career-building their peers, they say they spend the right amount on employee
and work-related education programs that strongly promote training and development (68% vs. 46%).
Employers that expertly manage HR also lead the way in efforts to develop and pursue a career path, and identifying
implementing programs and practices that help advance and pairing their development needs with action plans. Tuition
employee career development and wellbeing. They‘re ahead of assistance is offered by 82% to ease the financial burden for
their peers — by 28 percentage points or more — in defining those who are pursuing formal education opportunities.
clear performance goals for employees, supporting their
64%
Give timely and constructive feedback
39%
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 15
LARGE EMPLOYERS | HR Management
Financial stress will often negatively affect employees’ Solid best-in-class support for the social aspects of emotional
physical and emotional health, their productivity, and even wellbeing is evident from their greater use of several benefits.
their interactions with colleagues and customers. So it’s Among others, they include employee assistance programs
notable that the best in class are more likely to offer programs (EAPs), wellness committees or champions, lactation rooms for
that help employees ensure their finances are in order and nursing mothers and flexible work arrangements. Employees
their retirement planning is on target. These opportunities of all generations — especially the younger set — also value
include financial advisor sessions, financial literacy or related opportunities to exercise their social conscience by connecting
educational opportunities, and debt counseling. with the communities where they work. Some popular
programs for giving back include volunteering and community
engagement activities. All of these components are more often
provided by employers that are best in class.
INVEST IN WELLBEING AS A WAY TO IMPROVE THE EMPLOYEE EXPERIENCE AND WORKFORCE SATISFACTION
66%
Wellness committee or wellness champions
34%
61%
Lactation or nursing mothers’ rooms
49%
55%
Flexible working arrangements
31%
25%
Adoption assistance
14%
12%
Onsite meditation rooms
5%
65%
Employee development training
42%
45%
Mentoring programs
23%
23%
Career counseling
9%
55%
Financial advisor sessions
40%
47%
Gym subsidies
34%
36%
Debt counseling
17%
Best-in-class employers couple rich wellbeing programs with The best in class measure program effectiveness at notably
attractive incentives to drive participation. And they’re more likely higher rates than their peers — capturing data on employees’
to boost employee involvement by giving spouses, dependents participation, biometrics, financials (claims), engagement
and retirees program access. Much more often than their peers, and assessed health risks. Success with chronic condition
they rely on cash or gifts as motivational tools (59% vs. 34%). management can substantially lower healthcare costs for
employees and employers, and more than two times as many of
A significant investment in wellbeing calls for tracking and
the best employers evaluate these results.
measuring program outcomes to justify spending. These
assessments come with a side benefit — they may reveal areas for
improvement or evolution that can help inform strategic planning.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 17
LARGE EMPLOYERS | HR Management
Eligibility 37%
Spouses
25%
19%
Dependents
10%
10%
Retirees
4%
Incentives 59%
Cash or gifts
34%
51%
Biometrics
28%
51%
Financial (claims data)
23%
46%
Health risk assessments
26%
30%
Preventive care
16%
28%
Healthcare utilization
17%
24%
Chronic condition management
11%
10%
Lost work time
4%
As part of their attraction and retention strategy, the best in (43% vs. 28%). Conversely, they’re less likely to spend under
class invest substantially in benefits. They tend to outspend $6,000 (1% vs. 17%). The ROI of these HR management tactics is
their peers — more often allocating $15,000 or more to expressed as increased employee satisfaction and engagement,
employer-paid benefits for each eligible employee as well as lower turnover.
43%
$15,000 or more
28%
1%
Less than $6,000
17%
Recognizing the role of strategic healthcare management in engaging and retaining high-value employees
Employers commit to employee physical health and wellbeing best in class are much more likely to make improving employee
with the obvious intent of reducing healthcare costs, but the health and wellbeing a top HR priority.
Compared to their peers, the best in class tend to place a higher They’re also more likely to directly contain plan costs by
value on health, wellbeing and disease management programs ensuring enrollments are appropriate and designated
as levers to control healthcare costs. Even though these benefits surcharges are applied, and offering incentives for employees
require an upfront investment, they’re more widespread that waive coverage. Notably, the best in class were less likely
among employers that excel at HR management. For instance, to change plan carriers in the last two years — suggesting
offer rates are greater for employee resources that support they may be more content with their health plan and the
convenient access to good quality, affordable healthcare. These achievement of their health management goals.
resources include telemedicine, an onsite clinic with medical Several traditional health management program options are
services, decision support, and cost-transparency tools that more frequently offered by best-in-class employers. They
help employees make better clinical and financial decisions. include flu shots, tobacco cessation, disease management
Leading employers more frequently deploy a variety of health programs and an onsite wellness coordinator or health
plan management mechanisms that work together to help professional. Also more common are health risk assessments
prevent and minimize employee health issues and related costs. and biometric screenings, as well as weight management,
As an example, they have a greater tendency than their peers physical activity programs and the availability of healthy foods
to integrate health and disability management programs — at work. As all of these benefits work together to promote a
allowing for early identification of risks, preventive outreach, healthy environment that supports healthier employees, they
care coordination and a faster return to work when a disability also mitigate the costs of medical services and prescription
does occur. drugs, as well as absenteeism and presenteeism.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 19
LARGE EMPLOYERS | HR Management
82%
Telemedicine
69%
81%
Disease management programs
68%
74%
Healthcare decision support
52%
71%
Healthcare cost-transparency tools
54%
64%
Eligibility audits
46%
11%
Change of plan carriers
22%
69%
Disease management programs
46%
68%
Health risk assessments
49%
63%
Physical activity programs
39%
48%
Healthy vending and/or eating
34%
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 21
LARGE EMPLOYERS | HR Management
Best-in-class employers report more generous health plan options Employers that expertly manage HR set lower deductibles for
and coverage than their peers. They’re more likely to contribute to individual and family plans. The difference in their offer rates
employees’ health savings accounts (HSAs) — helping them bear for these plan types isn’t statistically significant for HDHPs, but
the burden of high deductibles or other healthcare expenses. As deductible amounts tend to be less than the Internal Revenue
an alternative to an HDHP, a health maintenance organization Service thresholds ($1,350 for individual coverage and $2,700
(HMO) plan sets stricter limits on employee cost share, and is for family coverage in 2018).
offered at a higher rate by the best in class. Certain elective services and procedures are more frequently
These employers are also more inclined to reduce medical available to employees of the best-in-class organizations.
plan contributions for employees that complete a health risk Bariatric surgery fits with their long-term view on supporting
assessment. Overall, it’s evident they take a definite interest employee wellbeing and growth — by reducing financial barriers
in identifying and addressing employee health risks, and to appropriate care while tightly managing costs. Specifically,
then supporting improved outcomes through programs and this procedure can improve physical and emotional wellbeing
related benefits. and curb downstream costs related to obesity and productivity.
Other expensive but highly valued benefits more commonly
offered include infertility services or fertility treatment, and
transgender-related services and coverage.
35%
HMO plan option
23%
49%
$0-$749
30%
38%
$0-$1,499
27%
31%
$1,500-$2,999
23%
21%
$3,000-$4,999
32%
10%
$5,000+
18%
45%
Gender reassignment surgery
24%
Competitive health benefits — that satisfy employees — carry Affordability of health benefits is a factor that’s front and
an elevated importance in the tight labor market where center for employees. Compared to their peers, more leading
employers now operate. Employed or unemployed, job seekers employers consider the cost of their plan deductibles, copays
are evaluating and comparing employer benefit packages, and and coinsurance to be reasonable, and their family coverage
they stand a better chance of getting more of what they want. to be affordable. In keeping with these assertions, they’re also
more confident their employees are satisfied with their benefits.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 23
LARGE EMPLOYERS | Best of the Best
BEST IN CLASS
for healthcare
cost control
BEST IN CLASS
for HR management
Best-of-the-Best Attributes
Not surprisingly, many of the differentiating characteristics of • Supporting career growth and wellbeing to drive employee
the best in class in each profile group also distinguish the best engagement and organizational success
of the best. Three key themes emerged from an analysis of the • Implementing medical and pharmacy cost controls to enable
best-of-the-best attributes: employee affordability and long-term plan sustainability
• Deliberately planning compensation and benefit strategies
to align with organizational objectives
Deliberately planning compensation and benefit strategies to align with organizational objectives
Top operational and HR priorities shape decisions made Through the use of strategic, long-term total compensation
throughout an organization, and for the best of the best, planning, employee preference surveys and competitive
employee attraction and retention is not one of the most urgent benchmarking, they’re able to maintain a strong workforce
drivers. A more intense focus on maintaining or growing market proactively centered on business growth.
share sets these employers apart from their peers.
46%
Multi-year labor cost modeling
19%
42%
Survey of employee preferences
22%
Supporting career growth and wellbeing to drive employee engagement and organizational success
The best of the best understand that cultivating human capital There’s certainly a good reason that attraction and retention
to elevate engagement is a critical factor in achieving business tend to be lesser priorities for best-of-the-best employers.
success. To strengthen and maintain engagement, they use Findings show they’re far more likely than their peers to have
several tactics that support employees’ career growth and a system in place that keeps employees engaged by providing
boost their satisfaction — most often managerial processes for interesting and challenging work (58% vs. 24%). The gap is
communicating clear performance goals, giving constructive similarly significant for those that emphasize increased diversity
feedback and addressing development needs. And these and inclusion as a top three HR priority. And more often, the best
employers also excel at making sure the workforce knows their of the best communicate with the intent of fostering trust and
individual contributions are valued. They convey to employees confidence among employees, and provide clear and
how their work performance has a positive impact on the transparent information on how to earn bonuses
organization’s strategy, mission, vision and values — at a rate and pay increases.
that’s 30 percentage points higher than their peers.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 25
LARGE EMPLOYERS | Best of the Best
71%
Give timely and constructive feedback
43%
58%
Provide interesting and challenging work
24%
Employers that are the best at both healthcare cost control and Programs may span physical and emotional health, including
HR management are more likely to offer employee wellbeing community and social aspects, as well as career and financial
programs than their peers (91% vs. 75%). And to promote active fitness. Notably, there’s a heavier emphasis on financial
engagement in wellbeing options, they’re more inclined to use wellbeing (58% vs. 35%), specifically financial literacy and
deductible differentials — lowering costs for employees that related education. This suggests an awareness that employees
meet certain participation or outcome metrics. who feel more secure about their financial position are less
stressed on the job — and better prepared to retire at a time
that’s mutually desirable for them and their employer.
The best of the best have a stronger tendency to measure Half of these employers solicit employee satisfaction feedback
wellbeing effectiveness — most frequently by analyzing to get a pulse on workforce receptivity and the value they place
healthcare claims data and information on program utilization on their wellbeing options. They also consider clinically based
and preventive care. Besides insight into ROI that guides data such as biometrics and health risk assessments at a greater
decisions on spending, these assessments can reveal specific rate than their peers.
areas of opportunity for program improvement or other changes.
50%
Biometrics
32%
46%
Health risk assessments
30%
38%
Healthcare utilization
18%
33%
Preventive care
18%
29%
Chronic condition management
13%
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 27
LARGE EMPLOYERS | Best of the Best
Implementing medical and pharmacy cost controls to enable employee affordability and long-term plan sustainability
In their efforts to control spend, best-of-the-best employers The best of the best have a greater tendency to encourage
are more likely to take an active, hands-on approach to health employees to select high-value care — by comparing the
plan management, beyond design structure. They use eligibility costs of certain healthcare providers, medical procedures and
audits more often to ensure only qualified individuals are prescription drugs. And reference-based pricing that limits the
enrolled in the plan — including identifying dependents who employer‘s outlay for very pricey elective procedures is also
can get coverage through their own employer — and surcharges more prevalent. Compared to their peers, they’re more than
are applied appropriately. Right up front, these practices twice as likely to implement this cost-control method.
provide a direct check on total healthcare spend. The fact that Onsite clinics are a significant investment in employees’ physical
they‘re also less interested in adjusting employee premiums fitness and serve as a platform to deliver health and wellbeing
based on smoker status may seem inconsistent. However, there initiatives. They provide convenient, high-quality care at a
could be a favorable cost benefit trade-off because they don‘t reduced cost or no cost, and options can be customized to
need to verify self-reported tobacco use. the employer’s culture and priorities. Half of best-of-the-best
Two approaches for closely managing pharmacy benefits are employers offer an onsite health clinic with medical services,
more highly favored by the best of the best. One is the use of compared to just 19% of their peers.
a specialty PBM dedicated to handling this expensive class of Characteristically, these top performers also contribute variable
drugs. The other is a pharmacy carve-out that offers insight amounts to the medical plan, based on criteria such as wellbeing
into the overall spend and how to more actively manage it. By program participation or health risk-assessment completion. This
using a stronger hands-on approach, employers are elevating practice incentivizes healthy employee behaviors and creates a
their efforts to contain healthcare costs and manage HR efforts. financial buffer for covering those who are not actively involved
They‘re also combining health plan options with patient support in their health or healthcare.
services to maximize the value of their spend. Most provide
their employees with decision support resources to inform
better healthcare choices.
57%
Carve out pharmacy benefits
33%
Best-of-the-best employers maintain affordable health plans They’re more likely to share annual deductible costs — although
by combining a dedicated focus on managing healthcare costs this is a common plan design choice across the board — and
with some degree of cost sharing. But compared to other large less likely to increase employee contributions to premiums.
employers, there are some notable differences in how they From an outcomes standpoint, perhaps the most important
divide the financial responsibilities with their employees. distinction for the best of the best is their belief that employees
find family coverage reasonably priced (88% vs. 65%).
COST-SHARING TACTICS
88%
Apply to a family plan
70%
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 29
LARGE EMPLOYERS | Best of the Best
Best-of-the-best employers are significantly more likely to offer return to work at peak productive capacity. On the flipside, the
and pay for a STD plan. This physical wellbeing benefit comes best of the best are less likely than other large employers to
with a financial wellbeing bonus because it provides income offer incidental sick leave that grants days off specifically for
protection if health issues prevent employees from working. employee illness. Taking a more flexible approach to paid time
And looking at STD purely from an absence management off that offers a combination of sick or vacation days may be
angle, coverage may encourage employees to take authorized a more effective workaround in meeting both employer and
time off to fully recover from health issues — allowing them to employee needs.
69%
Employer-paid STD plan
42%
Final Remarks
This Best-in-Class Benchmarking Analysis shifts the focus away from benchmarking averages — using data-driven guidance to
identify what high-performing organizations have in common. However, the findings aren’t meant to be prescriptive for the simple
fact that each employer has a unique set of needs, opportunities and challenges. Instead, they provide a relevant framework for
reflecting on total compensation approaches and priorities — both current and future — that more closely align with operational and
HR goals.
Fundamentally, best-in-class practices help organizations take a more proactive and structured approach to planning,
development and execution of HR and benefit policies and programs. The emerging themes and statistically significant attributes
contained in this report can be used to explore healthcare and other talent investments that have the potential to drive better
business outcomes.
G A L LAG H E R AJ G .COM 31
About Gallagher
Better. It’s something all companies strive for. Better outcomes from better performance. But how do you get there?
You start by building a better workplace. One that attracts, engages and retains top talent. What does that look like? It’s a workplace
where people feel they belong — where there’s a sense of developing a career instead of punching a clock. And a culture of
opportunity that draws new talent because it inspires employees to deliver their personal and professional best.
Gallagher Better WorksSM — a comprehensive approach to benefits, compensation, retirement, employee communication and workplace
culture aligns your human capital strategy with your overall business goals. It centers on the full spectrum of organizational wellbeing
— strategically investing in your people’s health, talent, financial security and career growth. And developing benefit and HR
programs at the right cost structures to support a multigenerational workforce.
From evaluating the demographics of your workforce to surveying and analyzing competitor trends, Gallagher helps you gather
new insights and apply best practices that promote productivity and growth. A data-driven focus allows you to continually improve.
That’s what it means to create a better workplace culture. It’s about never being content to rest each time you reach your best. Your
better is never finished.
As you develop and sustain this destination workplace culture, your people can thrive and perform at a higher level — optimizing
your annual talent investment and mitigating organizational risk to maximize your profitability. Best of all, you gain a competitive
advantage as a workplace that simply works better.
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (NYSE: AJG), an international insurance brokerage and risk management services firm, is headquartered in
Rolling Meadows, Illinois, has operations in 35 countries and offers client-service capabilities in more than 150 countries around the
world through a network of correspondent brokers and consultants.
Terms of Use
The intent of this Survey is to provide you with general information regarding current practice within the employee benefits environment. The data does not constitute recommendations or other
advice regarding employee benefit programs, and the user is in no way obligated to accept or implement any information for use within their organization(s). The decision to utilize any information
provided rests solely with the user, and application of the data contained does not guarantee compliance with applicable laws or regulations regarding employee benefits. Information provided by
the Survey, even if generally applicable, cannot possibly take into account all of the various factors that may affect a specific individual or situation. Additionally, practices described within the Survey
should not be construed as, nor are they intended to provide, legal advice.
The Web Site and the Content do not constitute accounting, consulting, investment, insurance, legal, tax or any other type of professional advice, and should be used only in conjunction with the
services of a Gallagher consultant and any other appropriate professional advisors who have full knowledge of the user’s situation.
Gallagher does not represent or warrant that the Content will be correct, accurate, timely or otherwise reliable. Gallagher may make changes to the Content at any time. Gallagher assumes no
responsibility of any kind, oral or written, express or implied, including but not limited to fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, omissions and completeness of information. Gallagher shall in no
event whatsoever be liable to licensee or any other party for any indirect, special, consequential, incidental, or similar damages, including damages for lost data or economic loss, even if Gallagher has
been notified of the possibility of such loss. For the purposes of this section the term “Gallagher” shall be construed so as to include Gallagher Surveys as a marketing division and/or Gallagher Benefit
Services, Inc. and its affiliates.
All rights reserved. No part of this book, including the text, data, graphics, interior design and cover design may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, without explicit consent from
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
www.ajg.com
25075A_BICL