Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Colonialism 101:
Antecedent to All
Vatican Papal Bulls
Alcibiades I is the premier document among all of the philosophers works
explaining the political and geo-strategic reasons they were pursuing the
establishment of their new discipline. Philosophy was built on the back of
Original Copy of the 1493 Papal Bull Discovery Doctrine ‘Inter Caetera’
colonialism after the widespread genocide of the Ionian Peninsulas that resulted
in the 500-year First Dark Age of human history.
The objective was ABSOLUTE POWER - another way to totalitarianism and the
undoing of human free will. In ancient times, all thinking was considered to be
human motivation, specific to each individual person, and occasionally inspired
by elusive “spirits” from another world.
However, as time progressed, people began to consider that there was a way to
contain the science of the mind, and so began the battles of mind
frameworks.Politicians began to acknowledge that powers went to war with the
way that thoughts were formulated, rather than just fought between the people
who expressed them.
Below are a few excerpts from Alcibiades I, one of Plato’s most important writings
in which he documents the process in which his mentor, Socrates, introduces this
newfound science of controlling the way people develop thoughts, of extreme
importance in obtaining “absolute power.”
Excerpt #1:
“SOCRATES: Then let us compare our antecedents with those of the
Lacedaemonian and Persian kings; are they inferior to us in descent? Have we
not heard that the former are sprung from Heracles, and the latter from
Achaemenes, and that the race of Heracles and the race of Achaemenes go back
to Perseus, son of Zeus?
[Zeus being a mythological creature of a past life, rather than a living deity. All
the deities of Classical Greece were considered to have been deceased in a war
where they all drowned. The Greek temples were built as tombs to the dead
deities.]
Notice that
Socrates is
encouraging a
false history-
that Xerxes of
Persia was a
descendant of
the same
deceased deity
as all Greeks.
With this
passage, Plato,
who is a
politician of a
family of the
Macedonian (makkednoi) ‘Greek’ belief system is dominated by various ruling
narratives on the deaths of the deities that formed the pantheon of their government of
cultural and religious practices. Athens,
establishes a
lack of concern over the actual genealogy of Xerxes the Persian. It is more
important to Plato that the reader blindly accept an undocumented rumor than to
study the actual genealogy and physical whereabouts of the person(s) in
question. In other words, the observer’s mind is being separated from physical
reality, even as the young politician Alcibiades (a member of the political families
of Athens, to which Plato also belonged) blindly accepts that he himself is a
descendant of the deceased deity. And Plato treats as useless Xerxes’ own
personal account of his ethnic origins. Not even Zeus is allowed an opinion as a
spirit- as Zeus is dead- and cannot exert any participation in the present. This
3
Antecedent to All Vatican Papal Bulls Sunsqwau Behike Hefzibah 8/22/2017
Excerpt #2:
"For, as you hope to prove
your own great value to
the state, and having
proved it, to attain at once
to absolute power, so do I
indulge a hope that I shall
be the supreme power
over you, if I am able to
prove my own great value
to you, and to show you
that neither guardian, nor
kinsman, nor any one is
able to deliver into your
hands the power which
you desire, but I only..."
Excerpt #3:
"SOCRATES: At your fancying that the contest on which you are entering is with
people here.
ALCIBIADES: Do you mean to say that the contest is not with these?
SOCRATES: And suppose that you were going to steer a ship into action, would
you only aim at being the best pilot on board? Would you not, while
acknowledging that you must possess this degree of excellence, rather look to
your antagonists, and not, as you are now doing, to your fellow combatants? You
ought to be so far above these latter, that they will not even dare to be your rivals;
and, being regarded by you as inferiors, will do battle for you against the enemy;
this is the kind of superiority which you must establish over them..."
Socrates is saying that although the politician may have considered himself a rival
of PEOPLE, he is in a rivalry over the means by which people formulate their view
of the world. Socrates insinuates that there is an enemy in the minds of the
politician’s own comrades, against which the actual contest is fought, rather than
the physical battle ahead of them in the real world. He encourages Alcibiades to
snuff out the rival mental framework among his SUPPORTERS as a priority. The
fight against the political positions of his enemies will be taken care of by his
mind-controlled subjects.
Socrates’ idea of absolute power is one where the subjects’ minds don’t venture
to consider alternatives. He goads Alcibiades to achieve that while being
comforted with the suggestion that his fellow human beings are as unwitting as
they are “inferior.”
The death of Aesop: Indigenous oral history and culture was targeted for
elimination during the Greek Dark Ages. Aesop was one of such victims.
Excerpt #4:
"But what is the other agreement of which you speak, and about what? what art
can give that agreement? And does that which gives it to the state give it also to
the individual, so as to make him consistent with himself and with another?"
Excerpt #5:
“ ....Turn your attention to Midias the quail-breeder and others like him, who
manage our politics; in whom, as the women would remark, you may still see the
slaves' cut of hair, cropping out in their minds as well as on their heads; and they
come with their barbarous lingo to flatter us and not to rule us. To these, I say,
you should look...”
Socrates is careful to infer that the system of thought which he wishes Alcibiades
to adopt isn’t just so that Alcibiades can exercise influence over his peers in the
ruling class. Socrates wants Alcibiades to focus on the control of all people from
all classes and sectors of the nation and even the world. He is keen to talk about
The designation of Indigenous Nations and Peoples as subhuman, animals, savages, and
lacking of agency or technological accomplishment was keen to be incorporated into
every legislative interaction of European colonial powers in the territories where they
make a presence.
the farmer as a SLAVE and as person of low esteem, who speaks the backward
language [of a SAVAGE.] He is clear to point out that Alcibiades has been
mistaken in assuming that he exercises dominance over the farmer simply
because of the difference in their respective socioeconomic conditions. He says
that true domination is the mind control over all, even over those who do not seek
political power.