Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psychological Test
refers to a device or procedure designed to measure variables related to psychology like
intelligence, personality, aptitude, interests, attitudes, and values
involves analysis of a sample of behavior and mental processes
psychological tests differ with respect to test content, format, administration procedures, scoring,
interpretation procedures, and technical quality.
Test Content
content (subject matter) of the test will vary with the focus of the particular test. But even two
psychological tests purporting to measure the same thing—for example, personality —may differ
widely in item content
Test Format
pertains to the form, plan, structure, arrangement, and layout of test items as well as to related
considerations such as time limits.
Format is also used to refer to the form in which a test is administered: computerized, pencil-and-
paper, or some other form
Administration
Refers to the manner in which the test is given to the test takers or examinees.
Some tests are designed for administration on a one-to-one basis, which may require an active and
knowledgeable test administrator.
Some test administration may involve demonstration of various kinds of tasks on the part of the test
taker as well as trained observation of a test taker’s performance.
Some tests are designed for administration to groups, which not even require the test administrator
to be present while the test takers independently do what the test requires
Scoring
A score is a code or summary statement, usually but not necessarily numerical in nature, that
reflects an evaluation of performance on a test, task, interview, or some other sample of behavior.
o A cut or cutoff score is a reference point, usually numerical, derived by judgment and used
to divide a set of data into two or more classifications. Some actions or decisions are taken
or made on the basis of these classifications like who gets admitted or not in a degree
program offerings of universities, or who gets hired or promoted among applicants in a
particular job position.
Scoring is the process of assigning such evaluative codes or statements to performance on tests,
tasks, interviews, or other behavior samples.
realibility (Consistency) validy (accuracy) of the test
Technical Quality or Psychometric Soundness
refers to how consistently and how accurately a psychological test measures what it purports to
measure OR the reliability and validity of a test
A test is said to be psychometrically sound for a particular purpose if reliability and validity
coefficients are acceptably high.
An index of reliability can tell us something about how consistently a test measures what it measures
while an index of validity can tell us something about whether a test measures what it purports to
measure. People often refer to a particular test as “valid” if scores on the test have been shown to
be good indicators of how the person will score on the criterion.
*** Reliability and Validity will be further discussed in the succeeding topic on Test Construction
B. Utility Analysis
utility analysis may be broadly defined as a family of techniques that entail a cost–benefit
analysis designed to yield information relevant to a decision about the usefulness and/or
practical value of a tool of assessment.
The endpoint of a utility analysis is typically an educated decision about which of many
possible courses of action is optimal
If undertaken to evaluate a test, the utility analysis will help make decisions regarding
whether:
o one test is preferable to another test for use for a specific purpose
o one tool of assessment (such as a test) is preferable to another tool of assessment
(such as behavioral observation) for a specific purpose
o the addition of one or more tests (or other tools of assessment) to one or more tests
(or other tools of assessment) that are already in use is preferable for a specific
purpose
o no testing or assessment is preferable to any testing or assessment
If undertaken for the purpose of evaluating a training program or intervention, the utility
analysis will help make decisions regarding whether:
o one training program is preferable to another training program
o one method of intervention is preferable to another method of intervention
o the addition or subtraction of elements to an existing training program improves the
overall training program by making it more effective and efficient
o the addition or subtraction of elements to an existing method of intervention
improves the overall intervention by making it more effective and efficient
o no training program is preferable to a given training program
o no intervention is preferable to a given intervention
Information
Pros Cons
Source
Test Contains general description of test, Primarily designed to sell the test to
catalogues including what it is designed to do and test users and seldom contains any
who it is designed to be used with. critical reviews. Information not
Readily available to most anyone who detailed enough for basing a decision
requests a catalogue. to use the test.
Test Manual Usually the most detailed source Details regarding the test’s
available for information regarding the psychometric soundness are usually
standardization sample and test self-serving and written on the basis
administration instructions. May also of studies conducted by the test
contain useful information author and/or test publisher.
regarding the theory the test is based A test manual itself may be difficult to
on, if that is the case. Typically obtain
contains at least some information by students, as its distribution may be
regarding psychometric soundness of restricted to qualified professionals.
the test.
Reference Much like a Consumer Reports for Few disadvantages if reviewer is
Volumes tests, contains descriptions and genuinely trying to be objective and is
critical reviews of a test written by knowledgeable, but as with any
third parties who presumably have review, can provide a misleading
nothing to gain or lose by praising or picture if this is not the case. Also, for
criticizing the instrument, its very detailed accounts of the
standardization sample, and its standardization sample and related
psychometric soundness. matters, it is best to consult the test
manual itself.
Journal Up-to-date source of reviews and As with reference volumes, reviews
Articles studies of psychometric soundness. are valuable to the extent they are
Can provide practical examples of how informed and, to the extent that is
an instrument is used in research or possible, unbiased. Reader should
applied contexts. research as many articles as possible
when attempting to learn how the
instrument is actually used; any one
article alone may provide an atypical
picture.
Information
Pros Cons
Source
Online Widely known and respected online Consumer beware! Some sites
Databases databases such as the ERIC database masquerading as databases for
are virtual “gold mines” of useful psychological tests are designed more
information containing varying to entertain or to sell something than
amounts of detail. Although some to inform. These sites frequently offer
legitimate psychological tests may be tests you can take online.
available for self-administration and As you learn more about tests, you will
scoring online, the vast majority are probably
not. become more critical of the value of
these self-administered and self-
scored “psychological tests.”