Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Presentation Handout

    Uploaded by

    api-592952496
    57 views2 pages
    The document compares gifted education policies and funding across 5 states. It shows that while all states define and require identification of gifted students, some like New Hampshire have less stringent policies around identification criteria, universal screening, and mandated programming. Texas allocates the most state funding at over $428 million while North Carolina also provides significant funding but Tennessee and Missouri do not mandate state funding.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    presentation handout

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares gifted education policies and funding across 5 states. It shows that while all states define and require identification of gifted students, some like New Hampshire have less stringent policies around identification criteria, universal screening, and mandated programming. Texas allocates the most state funding at over $428 million while North Carolina also provides significant funding but Tennessee and Missouri do not mandate state funding.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    57 views2 pages

    Presentation Handout

    Uploaded by

    api-592952496
    The document compares gifted education policies and funding across 5 states. It shows that while all states define and require identification of gifted students, some like New Hampshire have less stringent policies around identification criteria, universal screening, and mandated programming. Texas allocates the most state funding at over $428 million while North Carolina also provides significant funding but Tennessee and Missouri do not mandate state funding.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Comparison Matrix using data from 2018-2019 State of the States

    New Hampshire Texas Tennessee North Carolina Missouri

    Gifted and Talented


    Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
    Services delivered
    Definition of "gifted" in
    No Yes Yes Yes Yes
    law or rule
    Requires identification
    No Yes Yes Yes No
    by law or rule
    Mandated State-Mandated with State-Mandated with
    criteria/methods for No partial LEA State-Mandated partial LEA No
    identification determination determination
    Universal screening Referral for
    Not required LEA LEA LEA
    process Identification
    # of public school
    177,365 5,431,910 973,659 1,427,822 884,035
    students (18-19)
    32,253 identified/served
    # of identified students
    - 436,442 22,626 178,227 5,203 identified/not
    (18-19)
    served

    Percent of gifted - 8.03% 2.32% 12.48% 3.65% identified/served

    Gifted Education
    Administrator/Coordinat
    - No No Yes -
    or must have
    credentials
    Mandated programming
    No Yes LEA Yes No
    options or services
    State funding No Yes No Yes No
    State funding amount
    - $428,288,310 - $77,482,434 -
    (18-19)
    Steps to Advocacy

    Choose 3 tools for advocacy that you want to try!

    You might also like