Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disability rights aspects of ambient noise for people with auditory disorders under the Americans with Disabilities
Act
Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 31, 015001 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000657
Volume 28 http://acousticalsociety.org/
Six cinema halls with capacities from 150 to 310 seats in a shopping promenade were built in the city of
Mar del Plata, Argentina. The architects of this project were Mariani, Pérez Maraviglia and Oscar
Cañadas. The employer of the project was Florencio Aldrey Iglesias, who has a long and recognized
experience both locally and nationally. The place chosen by the company was the former terminal bus
station in the city, maintaining the main building but reorganizing spaces and functions. In the terminal
area, a new building of the shopping promenade has been built including the six cinema halls on the
highest floor. The client asked the acoustical consultants to provide excellent acoustical quality,
complemented by the latest technology equipment, including the new Atmos format of the Dolby
Laboratories Inc. Starting from these premises, the following tasks were carried out: a sound insulation
project; a HVAC systems project in strict accordance with the acoustic requirements, and an acoustic
design project using simulation model. The projects with the construction details, the acoutsic simulation
executed on software and the measurements in the halls are presented.
1. INTRODUCTION
It is common to find cinema halls that do not meet the appropriate parameters. In Argentina
such cinema halls are seen in many multiplexes, skimping materials during the construction
works. The city of Mar del Plata hosts the film festival at which productions from around the
world are presented. In 2015, films were screened in the hall complex "Paseo Aldrey," called as
the new promenade built in the city. It was therefore necessary to design the halls with
appropriate technical framework due to the importance of the festival.
Moreover, in recent years there has been a paradigm shift in relation to the film format. The
film production exclusively uses digital systems. This means a great simplification of production
processes and thus reducing costs1. With regard to sound, the digital system implies an increase
in the dynamic range since extra audio compression processes disappear. In addition to the usual
recommendations for sound insulation and acoustic conditions in this type of hall, one of the
halls must have the surround sound system Dolby ATMOS 2 . The performance of building
systems was needed to be optimized to get the best sound condition of the halls in a framework
of economical requirement and short deadlines.
There were three premises: 1) Sound Reduction Index R’w of 70 dB between the halls; 2)
noise profile of NC 25, mainly caused by HVAC systems3; and 3) reverberation time as flat as
possible, around 0.5 s in the larger halls and about 0.4 s in the smaller ones, 4 for the
intelligibility5. The acoustic project was initiated from agreements with members of the study of
Architecture, followed by verification by simulation models, continuous monitoring on site, and
confirmation by measurements at the end of each task.
2. SOUND INSULATION
The sound insulation design took into account of previous experiments carried out by
acoustic consultants and recommendations of Saint-Gobain. As shown in Figure 1, the halls have
surface contacts with each other. Moreover the two central halls (called Sala 3 and Sala 4) have
contacts with the machine room.
A typical problem in a cinema hall is the mechanical transmission through the partitions,
floors, and ceilings due to low frequency sound energy generated by the of movie reproduction
system. The first guideline of insulation was to keep all joints with anti-vibration material and
make a floating floor. This structure was raised over the existing slab as shown in Figure 2.
Several kinds of vertical partitions were used6 in the halls. The partitions between the halls
were designed to realize the Sound Reduction Index R’w of 70 dB (Figure 3). An internal air gap
was not designed due to the required width for the circulation areas. This partition was designed
from a structural profile for the support of all the facing, with its highest point at 9 m. The
galvanized sheet structure holds the gypsum boards and was mounted on these main profiles,
using three of each side and the last being varied in stiffness and weight of the material. Inside
the partition, glass wool with a total thickness of 200 mm was installed, surrounding the metal
columns which support the complex.
1
+20.90 3
6 6 6 6 6 6 6
1 3 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 1
100
15
Structural profile
Knauf Diamant
board thk. 15mm
Support + Sealant
Knauf elastic band
Figure 3. Cross-section of the hall partition.
Structural profile
Glass wool
thk. 100mm 35kg/m3
Knauf Diamant
board thk. 15mm
Two gypsum rock
boards thk. 12.5mm
Glass wool
thk. 100mm 35kg/m3
Andina
Isoacoustic board
Glass wool
thk. 50mm 35kg/m3
Glass wool
thk. 100mm 35kg/m3
Structural profile
Fiberglass thk.
100mm 35kg/m3
Two gypsum boards
thk. 12.5mm
Cementitious
board thk. 15mm
Concrete block
9x19x39
Glass wool thk.
100mm 35 kg/m3
Perforated metal sheet
Aluminum frame
Glass wool
thk. 50mm 35 kg/m3
Perforated metal sheet
Figure 5. Cross-section of the partition between the hall and the engine room.
A similar configuration was used for the closing walls to the emergency exits as well as the
projection room, reducing the thickness of the glass wool and the gypsum boards. It realized the
index R’w of 55 dB.
For ceilings, a casing composed of gypsum boards with a 100 mm thick glass wool was
chosen, expecting the index R’w of 55 dB. The sound absorbing ceiling is supported by this set of
materials, as shown in Figure 4.
Finally, the most critical insulation was designed for the halls adjacent to the machine room.
A concrete block wall was built to increase the insulation since the noise level from the machine
rises above 85 dBA, characterized as tonal noise in the 250 Hz octave-band. In addition, the
noise increases with the passage of time due to unbalanced turbines and bearing wear. As shown
in Figure 5, the wall was completed with the addition of "half linings" composed of gypsum
boards on each side, expecting the index R’w greater than 70 dB.
Membrane resonator
membrana
Figure 7. Distribution of materials on the walls.
A. ACOUSTIC PARAMETERS
The following acoustic parameters were calculated for each room: reverberation time (Eyring
and Schroeder); spatial distribution of sound pressure level; speech intelligibility (%ALCons and
STI); clarity (C50) index for speech and its frequency response. To perform these analyses, the
software E.A.S.E. was used.
B. SIMULATIONS RESULTS
The results for the Hall 3 are presented below. These results are representative and similar to
those of the other halls. Figure 8 shows the values for the Eyring reverberation time with the
lines of tolerance range. The values at mid-frequencies are about 0.5 s with slight deviations at
low frequencies. The exceeding values at the lower frequencies are corrected by the bass traps as
explained in Section 3, although the software does not provide accurate results in that frequency
range. These results indicate that the reverberation time in each frequency band is close to the
recommendation.
To evaluate the other parameters, the chosen loudspeakers were installed in the simulation
model, considering its directivity and real sound power level. The loudspeakers of the brand
QSC are used in all halls, precisely the "Stage SC-323" model for the L-C-R system and the "Sub
SB-5218" model used as subwoofer. Figure 9 shows the results of the %ALCons to quantify the
degree of speech intelligibility. The values calculated are below 3% which classifies the
intelligibility throughout the halls as "excellent".
The distribution of reflections is homogeneous in all the reflectograms and there are no
unwanted echoes or extreme colorations represented by late reflections with significant energy
content above the reverberant tail.
The frequency responses calculated at each of the seats show that the spectral content is
uniform over all the frequency range under analysis and there are no significant colorations.
Figure 11 shows the result for the seat 3.
Then reverberation times were analyzed by the Schroeder’s method to evaluate variations in
different listening positions. Figure 12 shows there is a good correspondence between the two
calculation methods, with some variations that suggest that the reverberation time turns out to be
slightly higher than that obtained with the statistical method (Eyring), due to the addition of the
statistical tail.
Several visits were made during the construction process to verify the project's compliance
and to perform some measurements. It was necessary to evaluate the acoustic insulation
according to the relevant regulations. It was also necessary to verify the characteristics of the
sound fields once the surface materials were installed. The background noise was also measured.
For these purposes the measurements were made using a sound level meter 01 dB Metravib
model "Solo", connected to a computer with the dBBatti32 V5.2 software of the same company.
The reverberation time were measured at eight positions in the hall. An average at each
position and a global spatial average of the room were performed to avoid problems caused by
local colorations or by local modes at the measurement points in each case. The measurements
procedure followed ISO 33829. Figure 15 shows the comparison between the spatially-averaged
reverberation time and the simulations for Hall 4.
Finally, the evaluation of the reverberation time shows that the objective has been achieved.
It is worth considering the fact that elevation of 0.1 s in the reverberation time at 315 Hz is
associated with the resonances produced by the access to the room below the level of the seats.
Also the bass trap behind the ceiling worked for the frequencies below 60 Hz.
Reverberation
Tiempos Time
de Reverberación
Comparison
0.7
0.6
time [s]
0.5
de reverberación
Reverberation
0.4 Simulado
Simulated
0.3 Promedio
Average
Tiempo
0.2
0.1
0
125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1000 1250 1600 2000 2500 3150 4000 5000 6300 8000
Frecuencia por bandas de 1/3
Octave-band de octava[Hz]
frequency [Hz]
Figure 15. Comparison of the reverberation times between the spatial-average and the simulation for Hall
4.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The acoustic insulation performance highlighted that the design of the partitions between
rooms, even without indoor air gap and reduced in thickness, comfortably achieved the required
index R’w. The background noise level due to HVAC systems also comfortably reached the
target, overcoming extreme difficulties in our situation. Finally, it should be noted this acoustic
project was accomplished by all the members in the work: entrepreneurs, designers, directors,
builders and installers.
REFERENCES
1
“Remaking the Movies. Digital content and the evolution of the film and video industries”, Organization for
Economic Co-Operation and Development, www.oecd.org/publishing, 2008.
2
“Dolby Atmos Next-Generation Audio for Cinema”, Dolby Laboratories. www.dolby.com, 2014.
3
“Movie theatre construction experience in the USA”, Cavanaugh, W, Acoustic Seminar, Marseilles, France, 1998.
4
“Technical Guidelines for Dolby Stereo Theatres”, Allen, Ioan, Dolby Laboratories Incorporated, USA, 1994.
5
“Acústica Arquitectónica”, Recuero López, M Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 1991.
6
“Sound insulation in movie theatres”. Jacobi, G, Acoustic Seminar, Marseilles, France, 1998.
7
“IRAM 4063-4 Standard: Acústica, Medición del aislamiento acústico en los edificios y de los elementos de
construcción - Parte 4: Medición "in situ" del aislamiento al ruido aéreo entre locales”; corresponding to ISO 140-4
Standard: Acoustics -- Measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements - Part 4: Field
measurements of airborne sound insulation between rooms, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2002.
8
“IRAM 4070 Standard, Ruidos. Procedimiento para su evaluación utilizando los perfiles NC y RC”, Buenos Aires,
Argentina, 2008.
9
“ISO 3382 1997 Standard; UNE-EN ISO 3382 Standard, Acústica. Medición del tiempo de reverberación con
referencia a otros parámetros acústicos”, Madrid, Spain, 2001.