FORMAL SUBMISSION OF ENQUIRY & NOTIFICATIONS TO: OTTAWA POLICE

RCMP ONTARIO & THE OTTAWA, ONTARIO & CANADIAN GOVERNMENT

RE: HEALTH & SAFETY / PUBLIC SAFETY
Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002
February 7, 2022

To: (for each, your individual attention and response)

1. Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, RCMP Commanding Officer, RCMP National Headquarters, Headquarters Building, 73 Leikin
Drive, Ottawa ON K1A 0R2;
and...
2. Douglas Robert Ford Jr. MPP, Office of the Premier, Legislative Building; 1 Queen's Park Toronto, ON Canada M7A 1A1
and...
3. Peter John Sloly OOM, Ottawa Chief of Police, Ottawa Police Headquarters, 474 Elgin St., Ottawa, Ontario, K2P 2E6
and...
4. James Alexander Watson, Ottawa Mayor, 110 Laurier Ave. West Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1

Cc(b): Selected appropriate parties (Individual cover letters may be adjoining)

Cc(e): Selected appropriate parties (Individual cover note may be adjoining)

Section A

Dear Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa Mayor
James Alexander Watson,
Section A Part 1
This document of enquiry and notification, is hereby formally submitted to you, as the addressee(s), for each of your individual
attentions, and your individual forthwith response.
Each and every member of the Canadian public has a right to answers and clarifications with respect to any and all matters which can or
may adversely affect and/or threaten, immediately and/or potentially, their health and safety, well-being, and/or potentially violate
and/or infringe upon their legal, constitutional and/or human rights.
Section A Part 2
Every member of the Canadian public has a right to submit such a document to any individual, representative, institution, department,
company, corporation, agent/agency, contractor/sub-contractor or otherwise... whether governmental or non-governmental...
whom/which may be in a position of authority, control, influence, responsibility and/or significance, in any manner and/or level, to any
or all of the informations presented herein, by way of this document... and as such... it would be considered the addressee's duty,
obligation and responsiblity to address any questions, expressed concerns and/or requests of clarifications contained herein.
As such I do hereby formally submit this document to yourself, the addressee(s).
Section A Part 3
Additionally, as such document is in respect to Health and Safety, Public Safety, Security, Legal, Constitutional and/or Human Rights
issues... and additionally, as per any and all applicable moral and/or legal duties, obligations, responsibilities, laws, statutes, regulations
and/or requirements concerning any such communications, enquiry and expressed concerns... it is hereby clearly requested by way of
this document, that the addressee ensures both that this formal submission of enquiry be officially kept on record, and additionally that
response is accurate, truthful, complete, and undertaken in a forthwith manner free of any undue delay or attempted tactical
dissuasions or delays.
Section A Part 4
For every member of the Canadian public, and certainly as a nation, we are in troublesome and deeply concerning times presenting
both present and potential dangers to both physical health, and to psychological/mental health... directly, and additionally, as
detrimental resultants of social and economic environment, and situational damages, and likewise, due to infringements and/or
restrictions and/or mandates and/or impositions of multiple natures and/or applications.
Section A Part 5
From an initial, albeit rather late, 'few weeks to flatten the curve'... to now what is soon in excess of two years of many needless and
preventable deaths, increased physical and psychological health damages, social and economic devestations, infrastructural and
logistical destructions, and much more... and most of it 'seemingly' completely illogical and senseless.
All presenting threats to the very health and safety, well-being, and security of every member of the Canadian public, and certainly their
family, friends and loved ones, their neighbors, and society as a whole.
Section A Part 6
Throughout this period we have been continually damned by questionable policies, unacceptable hypocrisies, indications of potential
corruptions, constantly changing narratives, changing assurances, changing 'science', changing goalposts, changing requirements... all
which might be viewed justifiably as 'broken promises' proclaimed by those whom we, as a public, had perhaps naively entrusted too
quickly.
Section A Part 7
Any attempts towards achieving some level of clarity or understanding, additionally hampered by unacceptably ambiguous or
questionable data and statements, further damned by the concerning revelations of altered definitions and parameters, even
laws/legislations, all again by those same 'trusted authorities'.
Highly questionable, clearly biased, potentially agenda-oriented, heavy-handed censorship and information control has only further
fueled concerns, stress and justifiable levels of significantly eroded 'loss of trust'.
All quite vexing and detrimental in itself to mental health well-being, and as such, public health and safety.
Section A Part 8
The situation had accelerated quite rapidly to the point of continual, changing and increasing levels of scientifically and morally
questionable impositions, mandates, restrictions and duress, the levels and extent of which would be more akin, in many eyes, to an
authorative dictatorship, rather than a functional democracy.
Section A Part 9
All of these things have directly and quite adverseley affected the social and economic environments within which we have all been
forced to live, and has unjustly introduced significant stress, anxiety, confusions and suffering destructions and losses not only into each
individual's life, and environment... but that of their family, friends and loved ones, neighbors, and society as a whole.
Section A Part 10
This environment, quite naturally can contribute to, or result in: extreme depression, hopelessness, anxiety, lonliness, disparity and
many other sufferings, to an extent where for many, the very will to live, the will of existance, has been severely psychologically
harmed... posing threat to mental health and well-being.
A situation which clearly has reached a breaking point and can no longer be consciously tolerated.
Section A Part 11
One thing which has become increasingly clear over the last two years...
above and beyond the ambiguous and certainly potentially misleading presented data and numbers, questionable policies,
unacceptable hypocrisies, indications of potential corruptions, constantly changing narratives, changing assurances, changing 'science',
changing goalposts, changing requirements, heavy-handed censorships, unjust discreditations, clear refusals to answering critical
questioning, refusals to engage in meaningful open public debate with highly qualified and/or accredited professionals of differing
opinion, and the far too many statements being made without clear and firmly substantiating facts or supporting studies, nor
confirmations:
There is a quite noticable, notable, and potentially deliberate: constant... and in such circumstances of urgency and importance...
completely unacceptable and abusive... over-use of ambiguous and non-commital language such as "we hope", "we're expecting", "it
appears", "it seems as though", "by all indications", "we think", "it's the opinion of" and a whole massive slew of such tactically and
legally evasive language... as an obvious means of "non-commital" or intentionally engineered 'legal deniabilities'... and potentially, the
intentional misrepresentation of fact and/or truth.
This has been further damned by very obvious tactical avoidances of actually answering pertinent questions, and again, further more so
by avoidance of clarifications regarding source...and as such the legitimacy, accountability and culpability/liability... of directives and/or
the asserting/issuing authority.
Such behaviours can only further contribute threats to health and safety. Examples are subsequently provided within this document,
and it is an issue requiring immediate addressing and correction, as with all other identified matters and concerns, as they can and will
directly impact both 'health & safety' and 'public safety'.
Understand very clearly, after some of the controversial and highly questionable behaviours, tactics and attitudes witnessed of
governmental and policing representatives, all addressed matters require your immediate attention.
Section A Part 12
It has also been quite notable, that despite the irrefutably highly questionable, clearly biased, heavy-handed censorship and information
control... that 'little to no' punitive censorship or actions have been undertaken towards mis-informations which are by, or in support
of... the governments, international organisations/agencies, or their 'approved partner' and 'stakeholder' corporations. A highly
questionable, very visible, blatantly biased and unacceptable imbalance.
This quite naturally should be raising concerns, for example, of 'vested interests' or other undue influences.
These issues all cause increase of potential detriment to personal health and safety, both physical and psychological.
Section A Part 13
The public deserves better than this, and such wrongful, incompitent and/or negligent practices and visible imbalances do need to cease
and desist in the immediate... and be subject to appropriate enquiries and investigations.
It is strongly compelled that one must bear in mind at all times... the principles of truth, clarity, honesty, openness, transparency,
balance, equity, accuracy, accountability... are of the most basic of essentials necessary in order to regain or repair some of the
damaged, and resultant (rightfully and justifiably) diminished public's trust, and respect.
Section A Part 14
It is without malice, nor any specific accusation nor allegation, that it must be clarified...
Any individual, representative, institution, department, company, corporation, agent/agency, contractor/sub-contractor or otherwise...
whether governmental or non-governmental... whom/which may be in a position of authority, control, influence, responsibility and/or
significance... in any manner, relationship and/or degree in respect to the covid/pandemic situation... whom would refuse, or is
incapable, of practicing unfalteringly... such essential aforementioned principles... should give serious considerations to resigning from
their position, in order to allow for a more capable replacement... regardless of their rank or position.
Section A Part 15
It is inarguable... and as is certainly substantiated by mountains of documented data, news and facts...
Both the corporate world, and the political world, is absolutely rife with 'vested interests', nepotism, widespread corruptions and
potentials of ulterior motives.
The only individuals or parties whom would argue otherwise, likely having 'vested interest' themselves in any such assertions, and/or
potential involvement and/or complicity in such wrongdoings and/or corruptions.
Simple irrefutable facts, and very important to bear in mind.
Section A Part 16
As you may, or perhaps may not, be aware: there are current and ongoing investigations, now slowly moving into legal filings and
procedures, into all of these matters taking place internationally... through the continual and increasing clarifications of facts, timelines,
structures, relationships and involvements, elucidating the existent potentials for corruptions, wrongdoings, vested interests, nepotism,
policy and political influencing, and potential ulterior motives/agendas... which are all very real, quite irrefutable, and need to be taken
quite seriously.
Section A Part 17
Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, You are both lifelong professionals in the field of Law
Enforcement, with distinguished and (currently) untarnished careers, and as with Alberta RCMP Deputy Commissioner Curtis Zablocki,
each of you, of all people, should clearly understand that wherever circumstance may introduce access to massive financial gains, or
provide opportunities or abilities to increase powers, controls and/or influence... and when witnessed within any same such
environment... multiple and ongoing inexplicable, illogical, irrational unbalanced and unreasonable behaviours, compounded by highly
questionable impositions, mandates, coercions, suppressions and censorships...
furthermore, rife with clear indications of potential corruptions, wrongdoings, nepotism, vested interests, policy and political
influencing, and/or potential ulterior motives or agendas...
and whereas such matters can or may impose profound and detrimental effect upon the individual, and society...
and which can or may adversely affect and/or threaten their health and safety, well-being, and/or potentially violate and/or infringe
upon their legal, constitutional and/or human rights...
that all such matters must be taken quite seriously, and (most certainly will be) subject to all warranted, and absolutely thorough,
unbiased and non-partisan... scrutinies, enquiries and/or investigations.
Any individuals found to have been engaging in, or complicit to, wrongdoings and/or violatons furthermore prosecuted.
Certainly any politician or law enforcement officer whom truly, and not just superficially for personal gains or position... believes in
democracy, human rights, constitutional rights, the law, truth and justice... could not, and should not, be in any disagreement with this.
Section A Part 18
The current 'covid pandemic' related situation is not just national, but international, both in nature and scope... as are the current
investigative undertakings and legal initiations taking place... internationally.
Such matters and undertakings take time. Patience is essential, particularly in our present trying situation.
It should be stressed, and clearly understood, the absolute inevitability of forthcoming enquiries, investigations, and most certainly,
resultant legal proceedings, hearings and/or trials... 'All in due time'.
Section A Part 19
The actions of all, in all nations, particularly those in political office, law enforcement, and certainly, the media... are all being carefully
monitored and scrutinized by collaborating investigative parties internationally.
In this respect, the current Canadian situation has inadvertently provided, by way of the current protests, an unprecedented level of
greater evidences and insights to an extent not previously witnessed... an unexpected, and highly beneficial blessing.
Section A Part 20
In addition, the protests have sparked a light and a beacon of hope worldwide... which can only serve to accelerate and facilitate the
eventuate implimentation of appropriate enquiries, investigations, hearings and trials.
Section A Part 21
Informations with respect to the extensive and greater matters involved are not of particular 'immediate' concern in respect to this
particular and focused communication... consider this but a raindrop foretelling a coming storm... as they will be forthcoming in
appropriate and due time... however, as Ottawa and Ontario's political and law enforcement leaders... whom 'undoubtably' strive for
truth, honesty, justice and what is best for the Canadian people... please do not entertain undue worries and concerns, as you can rest
assured... that such detailed and evidenced informations will be forthcoming, and in substantial abundance... All in due time.
Section A Part 22
This communication is in respect to current Ottawa and Ontario situation(s) in particular, and certainly to certain conducts and
behaviours of its officials and/or their representatives. It is strongly cautioned, in your own interest of course, to be very prudent and
aware in any and all actions, decisions and undertakings, and to likewise endeavour to be sure that all Canadian officials, your peers and
colleagues, do not place themself on the wrong side of history, the constitution, the law (both national and international)... and
ultimately... justice.
ie. It has been noted from the CBC: 'Only fully vaccinated now allowed to serve on Alberta juries' and 'Policy implemented without
formal notice given to lawyers'... you do understand, that above and beyond basic legal and constitutional rights
infringements/violations... that this policy implimentation clearly signals potentials of underlying motives of possible vested and/or
politically nepotist interests and/or influence, potential complicity to possible ulterior agenda or motive... and perhaps most
concerningly in terms of law and justice...
what clearly appears to be the attempted partisan stacking of juries... be sure to understand just how SERIOUS the implications are...
that is some seriously legally 'scalding hot waters' (potentially even criminal) and/or a possible career-ending position for anyone to
place oneself into.
It is understandable, certain officials can be placed under pressures, particularly by their 'superiors'... or perhaps their political campaign
financial contributors... but do be clear in understanding: ultimately, all parties will be held fully accountable for their own actions and
decisions, including any potential compliance/complicity, regardless of any claimed coercion/duress due to employment, position... and
whether knowingly, or as might be claimed otherwise.
Section A Part 23
TAKE NOTICE: Informations and notifications as expressed herein, and by way of this document, do remove any and all ability and/or
opportunities in respect to any attempted claims of 'deniability' in any and all matters and concerns addressed, and as such... in respect
to any potential transgressions which may have been, or are currently being, committed to date... it would be highly advisable to cease
and desist from, and/or to rectify/resolve such.
Section A Part 24
Whilst wrongful or unjust transgressions may occur, it is important to note... the vast majority of the rank and file Canadian law
enforcement officers have been doing a phenomenal, balanced and professional job to date in respect to the current protest situation
in Canada, which one must bear in mind, is only a reflection of larger international concerns. The overall maintaining of fairness and
balance, at least up to recently, by the vast majority of officers, in a trying and undoubtably stressful situation, is noticed and
commendable. Do not place them, by any of your orders, directives, or instructions, whether direct, implied, or by proxy, and/or by
coercion/duress relating to their employment security... into morally and/or legally compromising positions which could detrimentally
affect their lives, future careers and/or freedom.
Section A Part 25
It is undoubtable, as many law enforcement officers have families and loved ones themselves, that many of the concerns of the
protestors may in fact, reflect their own concerns. As law enforcment professionals, they should take heart, as they will undoubtably
have... as with many of their colleagues worldwide... a forthcoming opportunity to engage their positions and authorities, in the
protection of their families and loved ones, the people and their nation... in the pursuit of justice, and with the greatest of pride and
honour. All in due time.
It must be stressed, the utmost importance of currently striving to maintain balanced professionalism during these somewhat
tumultuous times. Be assured, the times will change, and all will eventually be held to account.
Section A Part 26
It is additionally critical to be aware, and at all times:
It cannot be refuted that any and all unwarranted and/or unjust 'officially' empowered and/or enacted acts of aggitation and/or
incitement, as has been witnessed and fully documented lately, can, and in many cases will... push an individual, or individuals, into acts
or actions completely contrary to their better will and wishes... such tactics, have at times, been purposefully and deliberately utilized by
authorities, in order to attempt to garner, through biased media, 'public support'... and to additionally gain and/or create 'justification'
for further heavy-handed tactics, violence, or as a means of 'justifying' the implimentation of greater and further impositions... upon
individuals, upon whole societies.
Section A Part 27
Such matters have occured worldwide and are on record, and certainly demonstrated throughout history.
Such acts of aggitation and incitement by authorities can cause within a vicimized and wrongfully subjugated public a multitude of
sufferings which would include, but certainly not be restricted to: acts of self-harm, suicides, crimes, assaults, and even reactive
'extremist' acts/actions within a society... and as such, and in any such cases:
Any such aggitator(s)... particularly any governmental or law enforcement whom might act and/or engage as, or in complicity as...
wrongfully, unlawfully, unjustifiably or unconstitutionally inciting party or parties... must face and will face investigation as per any
indentified potential wrongdoings and/or violations, must face potential penalties and/or reprimands and/or dismissals, must be held
fully accountable and liable, professionally and/or criminally, for any and all such documented and evidenced actions, incompetance,
violations and/or failures.
Section A Part 28
Certainly any politician or law enforcement officer whom truly, and not just superficially for personal gains or position... believes in
democracy, human rights, constitutional rights, the law, truth and justice... could not be in disagreement with this.
Section A Part 29
As such, it is hereby urged and compelled to all those whom are as such, addressed and/or concerned in these matters, towards full and
proper compliance to any and all questions, requests, concerns and/or requirements brought forth herein and by way of this document.
Section A Part 30
TAKE NOTICE: By way of this formally and officially submitted document It is strongly urged that the addressed Ottawa & Ontario
Government and RCMP, and Ottawa Police representative authorities will act in logic, balance, understanding and sensibility, and to
engage in manners as to provide just and acceptable resolution to all expressed concerns, injustices and grievance, abiding by all
applicable duties, obligations, responsibilities, statutes, human and consitutional rights, and laws both national and international.
Section A Part 31
TAKE NOTICE: By way of this formally and officially submitted document I would strongly urge (as in 'legally inform and require') all such
addressed parties to cease and desist from any and all current and/or potential wrongdoings, questionable/unacceptable practices
and/or behaviours and/or failures, refusals, violations and/or unconstitutional actions or undertakings... and to engage, as requested, in
full and proper compliance to their duties, responsibilities and obligations... fully mindful and respectful of the legal and constitutional
rights of the Canadian public.
Section A Part 32
TAKE NOTICE: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa
Mayor James Alexander Watson:
Section A Part 33
These matters, by way of the informations and concerns expressed herein and by way of this document, and any and all associated
documents and/or informations submitted in relation to such... bring clear, irrefutable, and undeniable awareness of these matters and
concerns to your attention, 'on the record' and as such, and as this document is in relation and respect to Health and Safety, Public
Safety, Security, Legal and/or Human Rights issues...
Section A Part 34
and additionally, and as per any and all applicable moral and/or legal duties, obligations, responsibilities, statutes, regulations and/or
requirements concerning any such communications, enquiry and expressed concerns:
1. It is hereby clearly and formally requested by way of this document, that the addressees ensure this formal submission of enquiry
and notification: Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002 be officially kept on record.
2. It is hereby clearly and formally requested by way of this document that all response is accurate, truthful, complete, and undertaken
in a forthwith manner free of any undue delay or attempted tactical dissuasions. All such response clearly identifying the individual,
position, and authority responsible and accountable for such said response.
3. It is hereby clearly and formally requested by way of this document that the addressee, ensures full compliance to all applicable
moral, professional and/or legal: duties, obligations, responsibilities, statutes, regulations and requirements commensurate to, and in
respect of, your position and/or influence, and additionally, in accordance with and respect to The Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms... and ensure the likewise behaviours and/or engagement by any and all whom may be, or act, under your authority and/or
instruction, directly and/or by delegation, or otherwise influence.
Section A Part 35
TAKE NOTICE: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa
Mayor James Alexander Watson:
1. By way of this formal submission Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002 you are hereby notified, as of February 7, 2022 <and
this document hereby claimed as 'legally admissable evidence of such notifications', and the right of provision/submission/testimony of
such as evidence: to be used within any formal, bureaucratic, and/or legal proceedings involving any or all related or relevant matters,
both within Canada, and Internationally>, that any and all herein identified and/or addressed Canadian Governmental appointees,
agencies and/or representatives, as of February 7, 2022, must engage in full, logical, effective and immediate complaince to their duties,
responsibilities and obligations... and to do so specifically in the best interests of the Canadian public and the upholding of The Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms... and specifically to any and all issues and concerns as may have been addressed and/or identified
withinin and/or by this formally and officially submitted, to your attentions, document of enquiry and notifications.
2. Copy of this document Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002 may, and in instances will, be provided to various relevent parties,
both within Canada, and Internationally, for their information, monitoring and awareness... as may be deemed appropriate.

FORMAL SUBMISSION OF ENQUIRY & NOTIFICATIONS TO: OTTAWA POLICE

RCMP ONTARIO & THE OTTAWA, ONTARIO & CANADIAN GOVERNMENT
RE: HEALTH & SAFETY / PUBLIC SAFETY
Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002

Section B
TAKE NOTICE: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa
Mayor James Alexander Watson,
Section B Part 1
Each of the addressee's, individually, and by way of your position and authority, wield both influence over, and power of implimentations of,
policies and/or directives... upon and within your own particular, by such appointment, spheres of influence, control and authorities. As
such, it is reiterated and stressed: your individual clarifications are essential in such respects and is hereby clearly and unequivocally
formally requested .
TAKE NOTICE: This document of enquirey and notification, Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002 is hereby formally submitted to
the addressee(s), to each for their individual attentions, and of each, their individual forthwith response.
Section B Part 2
Each and every member of the Canadian public has a right to answers and clarifications with respect to any and all matters which can or
may adversely affect and/or threaten, immediately and/or potentially, their health and safety, well-being, and/or potentially violate and/or
infringe upon their legal, constitutional and/or human rights.
Section B Part 3
It is without bias, malice, nor any specific or undue accusation or inferral, and with full respect to the hard working, honest and dilligent
members... whom are the vast majority... of the officers whom serve in both the Police and the RCMP, that the following issues are
exampled, addressed and identified. It should be noted by all, that the vast majority of the rank and file of the Canadian law enforcement
officers nationwide have been doing, for the most part, a balanced and professional job to date in respect to the current protest situation in
and throughout Canada, and diligently striving to maintain respect and adherence to the legal, constitutional and/or human rights of the
public.
It is noted that they are often acting under orders or instructions, whether direct or implied, and at times under duress of such.
Section B Part 4
TAKE NOTICE: It should be noted, and borne in mind, by Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa
Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa Mayor James Alexander Watson... that although you may possibly 'feel', by 'opinion', that some of
the following observations, analysis, expressed concerns, and requested actions, corrections and/or resolutions 'may' be somewhat
problematic or challenging...
Section B Part 5
You are governmental, legal and law enforcement leadership, of whom it is expected will always strive to act in accordance with the law, the
constitution, and in the best interest of the public for whom, and/or in representation of whom, you act and you work. You are expected to
be reputable, honorable and professional individuals whom truly, and not just superficially for personal gains or position... believe in
democracy, human rights, constitutional rights, the law, truth and justice... You are required to be both capable and competent in your
duties, obligations and responsibilities... as the Canadian public would both expect and demand. Do not disappoint.
Section B Part 6
As such, it is key, and critical, that you, and any and all of your "partners" and "stakeholders"... to quote terminologies frequently bandied
about by many of your 'capable, reputable and professional' colleagues... must, as they also quite frequently say, and to paraphrase: "must
learn from it and go forward". Ensure they do not disappoint.
You must look positively upon this... as an opportunity to engage in what your professions might refer to as 'Affirmative Developmental
Actions'... and in the words (frequent in use, again) of Canada's current Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau himself, you must endeavor to "Build
Back Better". In layman's terms: 'Fix what ain't right'.
Certainly again, any politician or law enforcement officer whom truly, and not just superficially for personal gains or position... believes in
democracy, human rights, constitutional rights, the law, truth and justice, progressive improvement... and in doing their job correctly, and
professionally, and in the public interest... could not be in disagreement with this.

WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 2, 2022, COUTT'S BORDER

Section B Part 7
Regardless of one's opinion with respect to current situations... whether that be regarding Covid, vaccines, mandates, restrictions, protests
or any other such issues... there are certain key and pertinent observations which have come to light, and been brought forward to public
attention, as a direct result of the international interest and observance of the current Canadian situation.
Section B Part 8
These observations relate to rightful concerns in relation to police and governmental professionalism, conduct, transparency, legitimacy and
authority... and certainly also to public safety... issues which should be of the greatest importance to each and every member of the
Canadian public.
Section B Part 9
Issues, concerns and observations, as had been made clear through careful observation and note of statements, and as such had
additionally brought further issues to realization... in example by way of the video of the apparent RCMP officers, in conversation with
Coutts border crossing protestors.
This is in no way critical to the two individuals, whom by all appearances, were/are assumed to be both legitimate RCMP officers, and
equally important, were/are assumed to be acting legitimately, under unclear, unverifiable and unsubstantiatable instruction, in apparent
accordance, and by authority and directives of their superiors whomever that might mysteriously be.
Section B Part 10
Assuming one has taken note of the use of the words/phrases 'apparent', 'by all appearances', 'assumed', 'whomever' 'unclear',
'unverifiable', 'unsubstantiated' and 'mysteriously might be', it is critical to take note of the following, and additionally the subsequent, and
very legitimate, public safety concerns which have been brought forward, and to light.
Additionally and as has been clarified, it is not with the intention of being critical of or to the officers observed, but with the intentions of
ensurance and/or improvements of and to: logical procedures, professionalism, transparency and legalities.
All of which should be addressed and corrected in an immediate and urgent fashion, 'as and why' being subsequently addressed and
clarified within and by way of this document.
This in fact, should be part and parcel of ongoing 'continued improvements objectives' of every politician or law enforcement officer whom
truly, and not just superficially for personal gains or position... believes in democracy, human rights, constitutional rights, the law, truth and
justice... and in doing their job correctly and professionally, and in the public interest.
Section B Part 11
From the publicly available videos documenting the discussion between two apparent (unverified) RCMP officers apparently authorized
and/or appointed (again unverified) by the Alberta (or Federal?) RCMP (unverified), with Coutts border crossing protestors on Wednesday
February 2, 2022:
Section B Part 12
First officer (lighter hair): "I get that, that's why I'm here today to be the one on behalf of the RCMP that's speaking out and talking to you
guys"
1. Who, exactly, is "I'm".
Any governmental representative or agent should first of all (both of them) be clearly identifying themselves by full name, rank, detachment
or station, and badge number. (subsequent explanations/validations)
They should be showing their photo ID cards, and additionally providing evidence to in fact substantiate the legitimacy/validity of such
presented ID, and their current active employment and 'bestowed' authority as such, and providing photocopies for such if and as when
requested. (subsequent explanations/validations)
2. "the one on behalf of the RCMP"... according to whom exactly, and by who's order, directive, authorisation and/or appointment? Again
requiring physical authenticated and official documentation presented, and additionally, copy or copies of such presented
validations/authentications provided. (subsequent explanations/validations)
Section B Part 13
Any governmental representative, policing or otherwise, must be required, in the interest of both legitimacey and public safety, to clearly
identify (fully) themselves, their purpose, and to substantiate such with appropriate evidence, they are public employee's, unlike a member
of the public... and whether it be a protest, or public gathering and/or event, by any individual, individuals, or group, whether that be (as in
the current) freedom protestors, or an Indigenous protest, or BLM, or any other individual(s) and/or group whom may feel they have
legitimate grievances and wish to exercise their rights and/or abilities to protest... individuals whom are not paid by public taxpayer funds,
and are not acting, or purporting to be acting, as and in the function and/or authority of a public employees, or in representation or request
of any public-funded/governmental agencies.
Section B Part 14
First officer (lighter hair): "what we have been told to impart upon you, is that today is the day that you're opening the highway, and the
reason that that's happening is because we've been instructed to do so by the people that are in charge"
Section B Part 15
1. "what we have been told" Told by whom exactly... full name, position, and authority... and additionally, any such demands and/or
instructions by any such party, ie. 'told' (unsubstantiated heresay) presented formally and officially in document form signed and dated ...
official, substantiated, on the record, and free of any manipulations and/or error.
Unadulterated copies of any and all such presented documents provided upon request in the immediate.
Section B Part 16
2. "today is the day that you're opening the highway" this is an outright order, not 'negotiations' nor 'discussions'... if these 'apparent' or
'alleged' authorized and legitimate officers had gained access and/or presented themselves as with intention of negotiation and/or
discussions... then they have quite obviously done so under false pretence, whilst not necessarily by or of their own initiative, potentially
having been instructed/ordered to do so, it is a situation which may eventually require and/or be subjected to, or a part of, enquiry or
investigation, and as such... this action of misrepresentation and/or false pretence, whether intended or otherwise, brings disrepute and
discredit to the good name of the RCMP, a disgrace of/to their honor.
This should not have happened, not in this instance... and not ever. This will require public clarifications as to why these two officers had
been placed, by their superiors, in such a position of potential disgrace to the name and reputability of the RCMP.
Section B Part 17
3. "the reason that that's happening is because we've been instructed to do so"... in legal terms, and in any courts, enquiries, hearings
and/or trials this is absolutely nothing but heresay, completely void of presentation of substantiating official documentations, signed and
identifying the issuing party(s) full name, position and authority of/to such orders... as such, any member of the Ontario and Candian public
would have every legal right not to accept any such assertion as anything more than 'heresay' and the right to demand documentation,
clear evidence, and substantiation of such.
Additionally... as has been clarified... this is being done by two individuals 'purporting' to be legitimate RCMP officers, and additionally, and
just as importantly... 'purporting' to be acting legitimately... again, no evidence having been provided to substantiate these facts.
(subsequent explanations/validations)
Section B Part 18
4. "by the people that are in charge"... 'what on earth' kind of comment is this and which is who exactly... absolutely unacceptable
ambiguity... is it perhaps 'mission control' in Houston, Texas? Direct instructions from the Prime Minister in Ottawa? The person working at
the local donut shop? Who exactly?
The unacceptable lack of clarity, transparency and evidenced validity is absolutely shocking... and the importance of these matters, and
certainly the critical relationship to health & safety, and public safety... which you should need not reminding: is your utmost responsibility,
your duty of care, and your duties, responsibilities and obligations to each and every member of the public of whom you act/endeavor in
representation of, and of whom you serve... will all be made additionally clear by and through subsequent sections of this document and by
way of the informations and concerns presented herein.
Section B Part 19
Heresay, impropery identified officers, questions as per their legitimacy, the legitimacy of their statements, the legitimacy and authority of
whomever had issued such orders all requiring legal substantiation and confirmation.
Copy of such instructions in official document form, on appropriate official letterhead, clarifying non-ambiguously, completely and in very
specific terms any and all such instruction, signed by the attending officer's direct 'instructing' issuing official/officer, signed and dated with
clear and exacting details as to their full name, and all pertinent accompanying informations such as badge number, rank, position, and
authority... and if that individual is acting upon the request and/or behest of any third party... clear indication and identification of these
facts... provision of likewise documentation and communications from any and all such said parties in relation to the matters at hand, and
exacting and legally binding clear indication of exactly whom is referred to so (perhaps deliberately) ambiguously and wholely
unprofessionally as the stated "people that are in charge"
TAKE NOTICE: This applies not just to the 'freedom protest' in question and in example, nor this Coutts area encounter, but clarifies the
professional standards which should be expected of all serving officers, at all times, in all relevant circumstances... anywhere in Canada.
Understand this very clearly.
Section B Part 20
Officer: "George, yes I appreciate you bringing that out and talking on behalf of the group right, you know you've got to have somebody
that's willing to speak up and talk".
Section B Part 21
It is known fact that law enforcement agencies will at times try to 'establish' or 'identify' individuals in any such situations as a means to
their own ends. This can include 'framing' any such individual, regardless of their actual status within any such group, as some form of
'officially recognised leader or spokesperson'.
This is done in many cases for one or more of many potential reasons, which could include, but certainly not restricted to:
1. Attempting to portray a (sometimes false) narrative that the police (or such authorities) are undertaking steps and actions to understand
and address concerns, working towards finding peaceful resolution. Obviously, in this incidence that is clearly not the case... the officers
clearly, and by their own recorded testimony, had entered into the meeting already clear they would not be doing anything other than
issuing 'orders' and threatening arrests, siezures and/or other punitive measures.
2. Attemting to identify an individual, whether legitimately or nefariously in their intents, for the purpose of subsequently attempting to
discredit, search for damaging informations, target perhaps not only the individual, but potentially family or friends through punitive or
damaging actions... ie. 'raiding the family home' or questioning neighbors to instill views or 'paranoia' of having a 'questionable' or
'wrongful' person as a neighbor.
3. Check databases for their registrations etc, and potentially those of family members... and attempt, initiate, incite and/or implement
measures or actions, directley, or through 'partners and stakeholder', potentially with intentions of inducing resultant problems or
hardships. The list goes on and on.
Section B Part 22
What is extremely noticable and notable in this case, is the officer first quickly adamant to obtain a name... and then immediately, without
validity, confirmation, nor justification stating "talking on behalf of the group" as opposed to a correct and factual statement such as, in
example... "voicing your (own, individual) concern(s)".
Section B Part 23
The same officer than states: "I get that, that's why I'm here today... to be the one on behalf of the RCMP"
Again, this is nothing more in legal terms than 'heresay' without presenting documented and factual confirmation, and provision of copies of
such.
There is no court of law, national nor international, within which one could successfully argue against, or disprove, such possibilities, again,
in example, which could include, but not restricted to:
1. Any such officers may have, in sound mind and good conscience/intent, decided by themselves, without such claimed instructions or
orders, to attempt to 'bluff' the protestors and end the standoff/protest early/quickly.
2. Any such officers may have, perhaps, in example, due to potential personal psychological issues, decided by themselves to attempt,
perhaps in delusion and/or illusions of self- grandeur or 'hero-complex', to attempt to end the standoff, without the knowledge and/or
authorisation/approval of their superiors... in an attempt to perhaps subsequently present themselves as 'heroes' or in persuit of
recognitions and/or promotions, dreams of their own TV reality series.
3. Any such officers could have potentially been approached, directly or indirectly, by third parties, such as, in example, business or political
interests perhaps incentivizing, to try and trick the protestors and end the standoff/protest early/quickly.
4. Any such officers could have been instructed, asked or induced, directly... or indirectly by inferal... by superiors, or other officials, but
'unofficially' and 'off the record'... perhaps even in violation of certain laws, statutes and/or rights... again, to attempt through such
subterfuge, perhaps additionally through force, to bring end to the standoff/protest.
Section B Part 24
There are countless possibilities. There was far too much unsubstantiated heresay, no documented confirmations of anything from
identities, to actual orders/instructions, to even whom such requesting parties may have been.
The clearly evidented intentions of predetermined refusal of 'communications/negotiations' and intentions to order, decree and present
clear threat and intimidation through punitive actions/measures... a betrayal and destruction of trust.
Shockingly unprofessional and incompitent, not so much on behalf of the two attending officers whom were likely simply following orders,
but on the part of their superiors, on the part of the RCMP, the Alberta government, the decision makers in any such situation. Learn going
forward, such blatant violations of trust and/or understanding is detrimental to the trustworthiness of both the RCMP and the Government
and reflects negatively upon all their rank and file members.
Section B Part 25
Officer: "that's speaking out, and talking to you guys right, what we have been told to impart upon you"
Again 'told' how... Verbally instructed? Documented instruction? Officially? Unofficially? Quite importantly: by whom? what is their level
and position of authority in such matters?
Section B Part 26
Protestor: "You'd rather come in and strong-arm, no negotiations" (you say you're) "Here today, to deliver a message" and... "but , you are
saying 'you are moving now' thats not communication, thats demand. You are not making communication"...
This is absolutely correct as has been previously clarified, and such behaviour brings potentials of disrepute, untrustworthiness and disgrace
to the name and reputability of the RCMP... and critically, could impact negatively on future negotiating abilities and effectiveness, in any
and all situations and/or crisis intervention matters. A very important consideration.
This is additionally, in complete contradiction to the Alberta Government website assertion of: "Dedicated to building trust and confidence
with the communities served by the RCMP".
Section B Part 27
It is without malice, without intention of affront, nor any specific accusation(s) nor allegation(s), that it must be clarified...
Trust is built through honesty... not trickery, nor deceptive engagement.
The principles and practice of honesty and truth are two extremely important foundations of justice... and transparency is a very important
foundation of public service... if these principles cannot be adhered to unwaveringly by any representative of any government or law
enforcement agency... whether in Ottawa, Ontario or otherwise... such individuals should consider resignation and seeking gainful
employment in some other field or occupation where such attributes are not so essential.
Section B Part 28
The second 'apparent' (unverified) RCMP officer (darker hair) intervenes: "...(unintelligable)'s tried to tell you the message... so I just want
to make this clear, and then we can talk to your legal representative, and see if another option becomes available, ...but we need to deliver
this message... and in return, we've heard you, and we will deliver that message back to our (unintelligible)... I've heard you, but the
communication and direction we've been given is this... You, if you do not wish to be here, or do not wish to have your truck impounded
and be arrested, you are being given the option... to move out to your vehicle... and leave."
Section B Part 29
"but we need to deliver this message"... this has been addressed sufficiently within preceeding contents contained and expressed herein,
and by way of this document.
Section B Part 30
"in return, we've heard you, and we will deliver that message back"... Actually, the officers would likely, as would be quite common in such
verbal communications... simply present their own (inaccurate and potentially misconstrued), whether intentionally or otherwise, narrative
and/or perception of any such said 'we've heard you' and 'that message'.
Section B Part 31
"to our (unintelligible)"... Assumedly 'bosses' or 'superiors', again, who exactly, and quite obviously with no clarifications, no substantiation,
no documentation.
Section B Part 32
"You, if you do not wish to be here"... A very strange thing to be said in some respects, indicating potentials of perhaps some underlying
level of nervousness. Two officers placed, by essentially the pressures and duress of employment and by order of their superiors... into the
midst of a large group of upset members of the public. People fighting for what they (perhaps quite rightfully) percieve as the freedoms, the
futures and perhaps the very lives of their children and grandchildren... and ironically, of those of the very officers, and legislators, who
stand in opposition to them... inarguably passionate issues.
Essentially two officers, whom would likely do their best to camoflauge any such possible underlying nervousness or anxiety of being thrust
into the midst of a potentially volitile situation.
This raises very legitimate concerns... were these officers armed? What if any armed officer in any such a situation, anywhere in Canada...
whether it be a protest or similar scenario, 'snapped' without just cause... and started shooting civilians?
There is absolutely NO way to provide guarantee, this is inarguable in any court of law national or international whom judge on truths and
facts, simply based on the multitude of documented cases of assaults, rapes, murders and other heinious crimes commited by serving police
officers... well documented worldwide.
Nobody gets a free pass from reality and truth.
This also calls into question, afetr more than a week of peaceful 24 hour protests in Ottawa... the reports surfacing (and photos) of the
deployment of RCMP Tactical SWAT Team members, some seen armed with full auto Heckler & Koch MP5A3 SMG's, whom had been
apparently been training at Ottawa Connaught rifle range, were sighted in Ottawa at the protests and engaging with agressive and
intimidating demeanor, there have also been reports snipers had been witnessed...
understand very clearly, all such matters witnessed and recorded will require clarifications, as any authorities intentionally introducing
aggitating influence, and as such, deliberately, and by plan and calculation, introducing potentials for escalation, and resultant adverse
outcomes which could result in harm or death... an intentionally introduced threat to public safety...
will need to face full enquiry/investigation and where is appropriate... all applicable disciplinary actions and/or demotions/dismissals and/or
charges. It is without doubts that the Ottawa &Ontario Governmental representatives, Federal Government, Police and RCMP would most
likely try to cover-up, lie and justify... please do not try to deny such.
What safeguards had been taken or put into place to prevent any such occurance will need to be publicly clarified.
Section B Part 33
"or do not wish to have your truck impounded and be arrested, you are being given the option... to move out to your vehicle... and leave."
Irrefutably, and as evidenced by their audio/video recorded statements... this is clearly orders, backed by clear threats.
Again, it needs to be clarified to the public... did these officers enter into a premesis under guise of inferred intentions of communication
and negotiation(an incendiary act in itself)... ordered to do so by superiors who quite likely would never have the courage to do so
themselves... and sent in to a potentially volitile situation with (obviously and as has been clearly evidenced) no intentions of such, but
rather to, as apparently instructed by unidentified superiors, issue orders and threats which could furthermore serve in an incendiary
manner... and do so armed? Any such level of 'lack of foresight', and obvious lack of care and concern for the safety and security of the
public (and those two officers) in any such situation should call into question the capabilities and suitabilities of such individuals whom
issued such orders, and perhaps their suitability to continue functioning in such position(s) of responsibility.
Whilst thankfully cool heads prevailed on both sides, full credit to both the protesters and those officers, it could easily have become a very
different, and possibly even tragic, situation.
Such instances/outcomes can at times in fact be utilized, and as such desired, for political or otherwise agenda, and given such concerns,
there should be enquirey and/or investigation into whomever was behind such orders and actions, and to any potential ulterior motives as
to why they would have done so, and in such a seemingly 'somewhat reckless' manner.
Just as in Ottawa... 'ironically' after the introduction of heavily armed RCMP SWAT members and increased police numbers... of seizing fuel
and threatening charges were, and are, DELIBERATELY initiated incendiary acts.
Potentially 'career-ending' decisions which will undoubtedly 'have their day' of judgement.
Section B Part 34
"Once we start enforcement action, people will be arrested, trucks will be impounded, and siezed. That is the message we are told to
deliver, so we're delivering it... in return, we will deliver your message that its not what you want to do... you have no intent to comply"
1. Further dangerous and incendiary 'rhetoric' which could have, as there are no guarantees, acted as a trigger or flashpoint resulting in
incident, potentially involving injuries or even deaths. Again it must be stressed... and due to forthcoming informations with respect to the
current Covid/pandemic situation which will undoubtably result in enquiries, investigations, hearings, trials... and convictions, and the need
for full informations on all associated issues as to potential complicities...
a situation requiring full clarifications by the authorities, including the important 'were those officers armed'.
2. "we will deliver your message"... "that its not what you want to do... you have no intent to comply"... Nobody, absolutely nobody, whom
is working within the field of law, legalities or enforcement has right nor liberty to simply 'fabricate' statements. This is actually far beyond
shockingly presumptuous, and wavers firmly into legalities and/or rights violations.
Section B Part 35
The relationships between the City of Ottawa, Ottawa Police and the RCMP whom are presently acting in assistance to the police, whether
by contract or any other form of arrangement (which requires public clarifications) certainly requires examinations and review.
Additionally, if there had been any politically or federally induced influences which may contravene rights, laws, statutes or constitution also
requiring clarification.
Section B Part 36
Very similar concerns have surfaced from a roadblock set up nearby to Coutts, and again as a direct result of police statements, answers and
completely unvalidated or substantiatable heresay whilst impeding freedom of movement, and as such:
Denying or impeding delivery provision of essential medicines... creating potential threat to health and safety.
Similarly, in Ottawa:
Denying or impeding delivery provision of fuels in the dead of winter placing men, women and children at risk... and quite deliberately...
creating potential threat to the health and safety... and potentially violating legal and constitutional rights.
All actions and undertakings contributing to ever growing dossier's of observations, concerns and record.
Section B Part 37
Police/RCMP: "It has been... it has been... around for a while, I guess you could look it up? ..."
Citizen: " So what is it you're protecting? The road in front of you?"
Police/RCMP: "It's the highway, highways are considered critical infrastructure... in Alberta right, so its a... its a... like a Alberta specific
(unintelligable)"
Citizen: "So thats a, thats a joke... it trumps our mobility rights in every way shape and form..."
Police/RCMP: "All I'm sayin' is like, thats whats going on, so like..."
Citizen: "So any road in Alberta can be closed down... as 'critical infrastructure' and you can make it so we can't travel anywhere? That's
essentially what you're saying, any road is considered critical infrastructure and that you could set up a blockade like this anywhere you
want... and entirely infringe upon mobility rights"
(Governmental over-reach and abuse of powers)
Police/RCMP: the officer, obviously under orders, and uncomfortable... looks downward, silent...
How dare the government and supervisors place good officers in such embarrassing predicament.
Another citizen: " They're questions that they can't answer, (he adds) lets be respectful, respectful conversation" trying to make the officer
less uncomfortable.
Police/RCMP:"I'm just telling you what I know (been told) and thats all I can tell you, right (which is... nothing) thats what we've been told by
the higher ups, " Again, complete ambiguity, heresay and unsubstantiated.
Section B Part 38
Another officer, more 'military' in the appearance of his Police/RCMP uniform, comes over quite assertive and disruptive... trying to move
people off (by what right?) then demanding that the individual filming must show him media credentials...
Remember this very clearly, and remember that this all-too-common authoritarian behaviour which has gone on not for weeks or months,
but in fact for decades... this age-old imbalanced abuse of power and complete lack of accountability which must end. Time to, as Justin
Pierre James Trudeau is fond of saying... 'Build Back Better'.
Police/RCMP credentials, responsibility, substantiation of legitimacy, authorisation, clarifications of orders, and quite obviously, far more
accurate informations than 'the higher ups' or 'we've been told' being required... All shocking, all completely unacceptable, all such
imbalances and ambiguities must end, and all these matters will eventually be facing investigations. Just as with statements, actions and
decisions which have occurred in Ottawa... all on record... all responsibilities for all decisions and actions will require clarifications, and
further investigations, particularly as to any existent potentials of influence and/or vested interests, whether political, economic or
otherwise, in any and all such behaviours, standards of conduct, and decisions.
Section B Part 39
The estimated world population in 2020 was 7.753 Billion people, 7.875 Billion in 2021 (Source:
unfpa.org/data/world-population-dashboard). According to the World Health Organisation, there were, by 31 December 2020, 1,813,188
deaths 'attributable' to Covid 19. WHO additionally states... yet preliminary estimates suggest the total number of global deaths attributable
to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 is at least 3 million (not taking into account recent revelations by many including the WHO re: deaths
'from' and deaths 'with' and possibly 80% 'overcount').
Giving 'benefit of the doubt', for purposes of calculation, whyb not use the whole 3 million.
(Source: who.int/data/stories/the-true-death-toll-of-covid-19-estimating-global-excess-mortality)
Section B Part 40
3 million excess deaths from Covid of a 2020 population of 7.753 billion people (7,753,000,000) is a mortality rate of 0.00038694698
percent. It is critical to understand, and comprehend, the infinitesimal nature of that statistic.
Why not, just to be on the safe side, just to be 'liberal' with the numbers, and for demonstrative purposes: double the already excessive and
amplified figure of 3 million people from the WHO, to SIX MILLION... just to be safe.
Section B Part 41
Now... given a 'very generous' number for calculating purposes which leans heavily in FAVOR of the Canadian Governments stance of
justified mandates... 6 million excess deaths from Covid... of a 2020 population of 7.753 billion people (7,753,000,000) would be a mortality
rate of 0.00077389397 percent. Still less than 0.0008%, or eight ten-thousanths of just one percent.
Now, In a nation where the current government has imposed tyrannical heavy-handed lockdowns, and shut down businesses and crippled
economies, brutalised society and endangered the public through experimental 'medications/vaccines' ...all over a virus with a fatality rate
of less than EVEN IN THE MOST GENEROUS OF CALCULATIONS 'IN SUPPORT' OF CANADIAN GOVERNMENT IMPOSITIONS... 0.0008%... less
than a tenth of one-thousanth of just one percent... please understand very clearly that number.
Section B Part 42
Understand this very clearly... it would be political and/or career suicide to even think of suggesting that the odds of the aforementioned
potential Coutts meeting, or Ottawa armed SWAT and sniper 'adverse outcome' events occuring 'are so small' that it would not justify
immediate addressing and correction, and likewise for all health & safety and public safety concerns expressed herein and by way of this
document. Theeir odds in fact, far greater than the (even generous) 0.0008%.
The following presented informations as per, in example, Sarah Everard's (R.I.P.) tragic death, being likewise.
No government official nor law enforcement professional should even dare to think to be so foolish as to try and assert such foolishness...
look at the facts, look at the data, look at the statistics, do the math, stick to the science.
Perhaps, additionally, pay some attention to science, in example:
Lockdown Effects on Sars-CoV-2 Transmission – The evidence from Northern Jutland;
Source: medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.28.20248936v1
A LITERATURE REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS OF LOCKDOWNS ON COVID-19 MORTALITY;
Source:
sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf
Section B Part 41
TAKE NOTICE: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa
Mayor James Alexander Watson...
1. It should be considered as 'well advised' to take every health & safety and public safety related concern and relevant and pertinent
informations expressed herein and by this document Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002 extremely seriously... or in leau of
such, you will... based on the mathematics, the statistics, the facts, the data and the mountains of predominantly silenced or supressed
(as per motives) science... it might be prudent to issue an immediate official public statement and an official statement to the Canadian
Government (also publicly) not only to drop all mandates and demands immediately... but demanding initiation of full investigations into
all related matters and additionally, to issue full apologies to the Canadian people, and to demand full reperations for all damages which
have resulted from such policies and impostions. There is undoubtably going to be many careers fortified, and many destroyed, many
due to enquiries and investigations, in approaching times. or...
2. It would be advisable, in the present and immediate, and in lieu of such preceeding action, to immediately address all issues and
concerns identifed and expressed by and within this document, including, very importantly, the additional following informations and
concerns brought to Canada's attention by international 'partners' and 'stakeholders'... with critical-level respect and concerns to public
safety, and fully evidenced backed.
'To serve and Protect' is more than just a fancy motto... it is a duty, obligation and responsibility.
Section B Part 42
Concerns which had similarly been brought forward to the Government and Police Services of the United Kingdom on multiple occasions,
and additionally, to multiple UK Government and UK Police Services recipients... all in formally submitted physical document form...
between July of 2019, and the last such submission, being on the 23rd of July, 2020...
All refused answers, and refused necessary and critical clarifications.
Section B Part 43
The result of such negligence... despite all such effort and forewarning, and a quite literally, word-for-word example describing the exact
scenario which subsequently resulted in the murder of an innocent young woman, by an actively employed UK Police officer... the UK
Government and UK Police Service, in complete negligence and failures, failed to do their duty and protect the public from what should
have been a completely preventable tragedy. The rape, murder, dismemberment and burning of an innocent young lady, an innocent
member of the public... failed by the arrogant and absolutely incompetent imbeciles whom are within the UK Government and UK Police
Services.
Do not likewise fail the people of Ontario, and the people of Canada, by or through emulating their belligerent ignorance.
Section B Part 44
Unfortunately, bureaucrats and authorities such as those in the UK, have gotten away for far too long with a complacent and forgetful
public... and so, when the waters do splash a bit, they simply weather it out and wait for the public to forget, and for such waters to settle.
Then they sit by the waters, feet up, relaxed in the sunset of their own self-glorification congratulating themselves on their 'untouchable
stature', drinks of corruptions and nepotisms in hand, drunk on their own self-importance, gazinging sleepily at the calm still waters.
Section B Part 45
What they perhaps fail to understand, is that justice... in analogy... is akin to a hungry eighteen foot long crocodile which is patiently waiting,
unseen, yet just inches below the surface of those calm and tranquil waters... quietly observing their each and every move, poised and fully
prepared for that appropriate moment... to fully 'introduce itself'. All in due time.
Rest assured, as it is in those matters, it shall be in all matters... be vigilant in your actions, behaviours and decisions.
As you should both well understand with your investigative backgrounds and experiences Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, and
Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, these things do take time... but as you would also assumedly be well aware A.C. Boudreau, and Chief
Sloly... when the clock does finally strike twelve, and be assured that it will... and the round-ups begin, and the trials, and the justice... is it
not all worth it in the end... it is.
As it is said: 'don't end up on the wrong side of history'... very wise words, and good advice.
Section B Part 46
Ironically... within the issues raised in the United Kingdom, an incident initially fortold in earlier documented submissions (2019) occured in
Canada nine months later... and was subsequently quoted as supportive evidence in subsequent documented UK submissions (unfortunately
ignored) prior to Sarah Everard's horrendous and tragic suffering and death (more details in section C) at the hands of an ACTIVELY EMPLOYED
UK POLICE CONSTABLE. The aforementioned Canadian occurance...
Section B Part 47
From the 'National Post' of April 24, 2020: "N.S. mass murderer's uniform, cruiser let him kill at will. He looked like one of us, RCMP say"
..."Wortman disguised himself as an RCMP officer, equipped with a uniform and a car that was almost an exact replica of an official police
vehicle" and from that same article...
"I’ve been a police officer for 30 years now and I can’t imagine a more horrific set of circumstances than looking for someone who looks like
you,” Supt. Darren Campbell said. “That was obviously an advantage the suspect had on police, public, everyone he encountered." and...
"Catching and killing the man who murdered 22 people over the course of 13 hours in Nova Scotia all came down to chance, RCMP
officials revealed"and...
"As Wortman arrived in Enfield, an RCMP officer who was in the area stopped at a gas station to fuel up and, by chance, encountered the
gunman." Only stopped 'by chance', absolutely nothing to do with compitence, nor good police, detective and/or investigative work or
proceedures... only by "chance". Think about that for a moment, the death toll could easily have been 50, or more, before the 'to serve and
protect' police 'lucked out' by 'chance'.
Whilst perhaps harsh, this is not stated nor clarified for insult nor criticism of police... but for the establishment of facts.
Facts, truth, data, science... just as in the harsh reality of the informations resultant of investigation which will be forthcoming... 'All in due
time'... do not ever forget this fact.
Section B Part 48
Examining the numbers, hard data, and 'in the Canadian governments defence' of their lockdowns, forced vaccines and similar
undertakings... and this may also work as a great vaccine sales pitch for Prime Minister Trudeau... based on official facts, data and statistics,
based on science and mathematics, based on 'trust the science'...
given the 'actual' WHO 2020 deaths of 1.813 million in the 7.753 billion world population (one in 4,276 people), and based on 22 deaths by
a gun-toting crazy in full RCMP regalia in the Canadian population of 38 million(one in 1.72 million people)...
Prime Minister Trudeau could factually claim that in Canada you are 400 times more likely to die from Covid... than to be killed by a
gun-toting crazy 'appearingly legitimate' RCMP officer, driving an 'official looking' fully marked RCMP cruiser.
Section B Part 49
Evidenced and irrefutable fact is: even if 'supposed' authorities are in what appears to be 'official vehicles' this is no guarantee of anything,
and certainly as clearly evidenced, no guarantee that they are genuine, nor free of nefarious intentions... and in fact, any citizen or resident
of Canada has every right not to pull over their vehicle, or to be stopped whilst walking, in any area 'remote' or 'not in the public eye' (for
example on a country road, or highway roadside) or any other setting or situation where they might feel genuine concerns for their own
safety, and the questionable legitimacy of any such 'officials': EVEN IF THEY ARE WEARING A UNIFORM(s), IN MARKED CRUISER(s), AND WAVING
BADGE(s)... and in fact that member of the public should proceed... and has every right to do so... and if driving, at legal speed and
conforming to legalities, UNHINDERED... until reaching a 'visibly publicly populated area', a service station, or so on where they feel
substantially and suitabley 'less at risk of harm or death'.
Genuine law enforcement officials should be, and need to be, aware of this, by way of their superiors, and unless the individual poses
immediate threat to the public or is commiting indictable offence, such said genuine law enforcement officials must respect these facts,
indicate their need or desire to stop or question... and respectfully follow that member of the public. They must do so in non-intimidating
manner, maintaining respectful and non-alarming distance, as aforementioned, to a 'safer environment'. (RCMP and Ottawa Police MUST
inform the public of these facts, and rights, as a matter of public safety)
Whereupon such genuine law enforcement officials, will provide full documentation and substantiations as may be requested from that
member of the public... in fulfillment of 'to serve and protect' and their duties, obligations and responsibilities.
Again, RCMP and Ottawa Police MUST inform the public of these facts, and rights, as a matter of public safety, and as per their applicable
duties responsibilities and obligations, duty of care to the public, and as an imperative matter of public safety.
Section B Part 50
Unless of course the Canadian Government, Ottawa Police and officials, RCMP, and any and all political or law enforcement authorities
behind such decisions, will be providing non-ambiguous, written and fully substantiated guarantee of full legal, moral and financial liabilities
for any suffering or losses which may occur as a result of criminal impersonators of police or other authorities,or the illegal or
rights-violating actions of legitimate representatives... the Canadian Government, and any and all political or law enforcement authorities,
have no right to demand or assert otherwise. Not just the liabilities of the government, which would be, unfairly, at the taxpayers expense,
but as such, financial liabilities of those deciding authorities themselves... personally. By way of this document you are hereby notified of
these issues, concerns, and your responsibilities.
Section B Part 51
Horrendous crimes and murders are not just commited by criminal individuals, and gangs, as is well established and documented in many
cases, but also, and as is also well documented: by actual employed police officers, both alone, and in numbers. Unfortunate, unwanted, but
this is reality and is absolutely undeniable. There are 'mountains' of publicly documented, confirmed violations (and findings/convictions) up
to and including some quite horrific manslaughters and murders, by such said 'legitimate representatives' which have taken place, both
internationally and within Canada.
ALL FACTS INDISPUTABLE IN ANY CANADIAN OR INTERNATIONAL COURT OF LAW
Section B Part 52
As such, any governmental representative or employee whom would try to claim or assert otherwise, and as such, deliberately and
maliciously cause any delays in implimentation, and any waste of the courts time, and public taxpayer funds, in any attempted futile denials
of such... should be held personally financially liable for any such wrongful actions and/or tactics.
Section B Part 53
These are all facts, this is evidence-based and substantiated, and therefore, as a resul it must be understood quite clearly, and by all
evidence and rights:.. moral, legal and constitutional... that it cannot be demanded nor inferred, by or through order, duress nor
coercion... that any member of the public in Canada must 'in blind obedience' accept the presence, legitimacy... or any asserted or infered
authority... of any such individual(s), genuine or not, whom may present or identify themselves as law enforcement officers or officials, as
being legitimate, until that member of the public has personally substantiated such as factual to reasonable and unquestionably
substantiatable level, and to their satisfaction. As such, based on all facts and evidence, based on logical facts-based analysis, based on all
rights within the constitution, law (both national and international) and human rights, and the most basic and inalienable right of
self-preservation and life, every member of the public has the unquestionable right to question and clarify both identity and authority to the
absolute highest degree.
(Again, RCMP and Ottawa Police MUST FORTHWITH inform the public of these facts, and rights, as a matter of public safety)
The informations and concerns expressed herein, and by way of this document, and as such, clear evidence of your own notification and
awareness of such matters, suitable as evidence for provision to any courts in any relevant issues.
Section B Part 54
Based upon the massive worldwide levels of publicly documented (and as such, legally indisputable in any court) governmental and police
services wrong-doings, corruptions, dishonesties, legal and criminal violations, mis-representations and abusive actions, and furthermore...
it must additionally be accepted, that there can be cases of criminals or those with wrongful, nefarious, or criminal intent obtaining
authentic or reproduction police ID's, badges, even uniforms or vehicles.
Additionally, any such aforementioned individual(s) could in fact (and it is legally indisputable as 'realistic possibility') be some currently
employed rogue element, such as the monster who killed Sarah Everard in the UK, a Police Officer whom actually guarded politicians at
parliament... or perhaps some disgruntled former employee whom may additionally have psychological or other problems, and may or
might engage in such an activity or 'antics' for one or more of many possible reasons, logical or illogical... or a legitimate officer whom
might be engaging in (inarguable possibilities in legal terms) rogue action or intention, some 'favor to a friend or colleague', or some other
form of complicity in perhaps some unauthorized, wrongful or unapproved act... all, in such examples, being irrefutable and realistic
possibilities which would be, in reality... impossible to disprove in a court of law as such. Based upon the preceeding legally indisputable
facts and informations presented within this document, and the massive level of publicly accessible records of further substantiating facts in
relation to such.
It is therefore both logical and fully justifiable to expect forthwith and full compliance to the following requests.
Section B Part 55
In respect to clarifications and substantiations of an officers identity and/or authority... and bear in mind, this does not, in any way,
supersede nor negate the right of the member of the public not to be stopped in any questionable or remote circumstance. Sarah Everard
was stopped within the capital city of London, in the UK, on a quiet street by an actively employed police officer, whom used his 'warrant
card' (badge) in the commission of the offences...
No member of the public, as per your duties, obligations and responsibilities, should ever be exposed to such dangers, and such a
horrendous end to their life, and if any politician or law enforcement authority thinks otherwise... resign from your position immediately.
Section B Part 56
It is essential that the following is provided by any 'purported' officer(s), upon request, should a member of the public have any doubts as to
their legitimacy and or authority (including as per any particular acts or actions as being within that authority, and of the approval and
knowledge of their superiors) regardless of the number of such individuals present, and this means, each and every officer and/or official
present, and is based, in fairness and equity, upon the very same demands/requirements of 'proof of identity made by the Canadian
Government and/or its agencies upon the members of the public.
Section B Part 57
Prooof of identification:
1. Presentation for inspection (not simply flashing it in one's face) the purported officer's Police photo ID, and presentation of, upon
request, clear intelligible photocopy of same.
Additionally, and as per Canadian/Ontario governmental requirements upon members of the public, and in order to substantiate that
identity as authentic and legitimate to the individual presenting such, and in photo...
1. Valid Ontario Drivers licence (Photo)
2. At least one of the following types of original documents with their Ontario address as proof that they are living in Ontario: utility bills,
bank or credit card statements showing an Ontario address, residential lease agreement, mortgage document or land title. The documents
must contain your full name, address and have a date of less than 90 days prior to being presented.
3. Additionally, Canada residence documents: One of the following original / not-expired documents may be presented as proof that you are
a permanent or temporary resident of Canada in order to verify that the officer in question is actually legally able to be employed in such
capacity... many documented cases are on record of individuals who have worked in official capacities, even for decades... before being
caught: Canadian provincial birth certificate; valid Canadian passport, NEXUS or Permanent Resident card; Secure Certificate of Indian
Status; Canadian Citizenship Card dated before February 2012; a confirmation document, permit or resident visa issued by the Government
of Canada that gives you resident status in Canada for more than the next 90 days; refugee claimants with a Refugee Protection Claimant
Document and valid work or study permit.
4. Official letterhead document of confirmation of Ottawa/Ontario or applicable jurisdiction Police/RCMP employment, must be signed and
dated no more than 90 days prior to any such presentation and provision.
5. Presentation and provision of, upon request, clear intelligible photocopies of same specified within 1, 2, 3 and 4.
6. If any such officer/official is 'on loan' in any manner, and/or from any other agency, region, jurisdiction they must readily and in forthwith
manner, and without having to be questioned to such... identify and provide such facts and informations. .
Section B Part 58
Any refusal to provide such documents and/or substantiations needs to be clarified in writing, accompanied by clear explanation and
justification of any such said refusal, and must include the identity (accountability) and position of any individual(s) responsible for any such
refusal(s) in whole or in part.
Section B Part 59
It is as such, legally indisputable... and as per the right of every member of the Canadian public, in the interest and protection of their life,
health, well-being, safety and security... as has been previously stated and clarified... and as per and based upon incidents and evidence
which have occured and documented, and as such, are irrefutable in legal reasonings as realistic posibilities and threat to well-being,
security and even life... all well documented, and hereby on-the-record as to your knowledge and awareness... for your requested
immediate addressing and implimentation of remedy.
Section B Part 60
Exacting clarification is required from each of: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau / Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr. / Ottawa Police
Chief Peter John Sloly / Ottawa Mayor James Alexander Watson: Do you deny or dispute the validity of the threats and/or concerns of
and/or to the health & safety, public safety, professional conduct and expectations, and the public's legal and/or constitutional rights
expressed herein and by way of this formal submission of enquiry and notifications: Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002... YES or
NO?
If the response to this question is 'YES' you are requested to provide full clarifications, reasonings, justification and evidence for such
dispute. Compliance to this request should include the heading 'In reply to request/question B60
Section B Part 61 request/question B61
TAKE NOTICE: Exacting clarification is required from each of: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau / Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr. /
Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly / Ottawa Mayor James Alexander Watson: Do you deny or dispute the validity of the fact that it is
legally indisputable, based on documented facts and evidence, that an individual, or individuals... whilst perhaps 'appearingly legitimate',
perhaps even dressed/presented in a police uniform, and driving an 'official in appearance' police vehicle, even showing an appearingly
'somewhat legitimate' police badge or ID... may not be legitimate at all... And as such, in the interest of health & safety and public safety,
and as is by way of your 'care of duty', and your professional and occupational duties, obligations and responsibilities, and additionally, to
'serve and protect:
That every member of the Canadian/Ontario/Ottawa public has every right, if they feel threatened, intimidated, or otherwise concerned for
their safety, security and/or well-being... to refuse to be stopped and/or delayed/detained in any way, shape or form... in any place or area
devoid of general public presence, light, clear visibility and other such safety/security parameters... whether they be in a vehicle, or
walking... until proceeding to a clearly visible and publicly populated/occupied place, in visibility (personal security) to other members of the
public., and sufficient in provision of safety and security to allay such concerns.
As has been expressed herein and by way of this formal submission of enquiry and notifications: Ref:
PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002... YES or NO?
TAKE NOTICE: If the response to this question is 'YES'... Any dispute to such needs to be fully substantiated and clarified in writing,
on-the-record, on official letterhead, and accompanied by clear explanation and justification of any such said dispute/denial, and must
include the identity (accountability) and position (as per authority of such statement) of any individual(s) responsible for any such dispute
and/or refusal(s) in whole or in part.
Compliance to this request should include/bear the heading 'In reply to request/question B61
Section B Part 62
TAKE NOTICE: Exacting clarification is required from each of: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau / Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr. /
Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly / Ottawa Mayor James Alexander Watson: It is legally indisputable, based on documented facts and
evidence, that an individual, or individuals... whilst perhaps 'appearingly legitimate', perhaps even dressed/presented in a police uniform,
and driving an 'official in appearance' police vehicle, even perhaps showing an appearingly 'somewhat legitimate' police badge or ID... may
not be legitimate at all. Based upon, and substantiated by, the informations and concerns provided by way of and within this document:
Every member of the Canadian/Ontario/Ottawa public, being stopped and/or delayed/detained for any reason, has every right, should they
feel any doubts or concerns in respect to the legitimacy of any such said 'officer(s)' and/or 'official(s)' and as such, perhaps, in addition, may
feel threatened, intimidated, or otherwise concerned for their safety, security and/or well-being... and as such... they have the right to
demand substantiation, and as such the compliant provision... as has been clarified herein and by way of this document... by any such said
'officer' and/or 'official' of their legitimacey and authority.
Without the provision of such requested substantiating clarifications, informations, documents and/or papers... as is the legal right of
any member of the public... any such addressed 'officer and/or official' may not be considered and/or trusted, as to holding and/or
possessing any real and substantiated level of legitimacy and/or authority. As has been expressed herein and by way of this formal
submission of enquiry and notifications: Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002
... YES or NO?
TAKE NOTICE: If the response to this question is 'YES'... Any dispute to such needs to be fully substantiated and clarified in writing,
on-the-record, on official letterhead, and accompanied by clear explanation and justification of any such said dispute/denial, and must
include the identity (accountability) and position (as per authority of such statement) of any individual(s) responsible for any such dispute
and/or refusal(s) in whole or in part.
Compliance to this request should include/bear the heading 'In reply to request/question B62
Section B Part 63
TAKE NOTICE: It would be strongly suggested that Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police
Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa Mayor James Alexander Watson consult with their legal department in respect to the preceeding
included notifications and enquiry.
Section B Part 64
Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa Mayor James
Alexander Watson, It should be additionally noted by any and all such Canadian/Ontario/Ottawa governmental and/or Police/RCMP
employee(s) and/or representative(s)... If any such addressed Canadian/Ontario/Ottawa governmental and/or Police/RCMP employee,
department, agency and/or representative is refusing provision of any answers, informations and/or data as to a formally submitted enquiry
in respect to health & safety, and public safety... they will clarify the fact of such refusal in writing and on official letterhead, clearly
identifying themselves by their name and position, with clear explanation and purported justifications for any such refusal. This will be done
as part and parcel of their accountability and full compliance by way of their obligations, responsibilities and duties.
Section B Part 65
Attempting to refuse or deny the right of any member of the Canadian/Ontario public to submit any such document of enquiry and
notifications would be a violation of rights and a deliberate attempt to restrict, refuse or manipulate legitimate concerns.
Refusing to read, wholely and completely, and in a manner to fully comprehend and understand (as opposed to 'skimming through') any
such submitted document, particularly in respect to health and safety, and public safety, must be considered as both a failure of duties,
obligations and responsibilities and, in itself, an act of refusing and denying the rights of such member of the public to submit such said
written statement... and such actions and/or behaviours may additionally fall afoul of applicable laws, statutes, requirements, duty of care,
and negligence in duty towards public safety.
Section B Part 66
Individuals and/or organisations, whom are in various levels of 'positions of power'... whereas their actions, behaviours, policies and
decision-making can affect the life, health & safety and well-being of another... whom might knowingly engage in any such
aforementioned and identified wrong-doings or failures, are in no way 'just doing their job' nor just 'following instruction, directive, and/or
policy', but might be viewed as abusing both position and authority. They are making conscious individual decisions each of which may carry
potential legal ramifications. They may be contributing 'inciting factors' which could lead to horrendous outcomes. Violators in any and all
such cases, must be held morally, legally and financially liable.
Section B Part 67
It has been the unjust and highly questionable impositions, heavy-handed censorships, discreditations and dismissals, biased and seemingly
agenda-oriented informational controls, human rights violations, forced by and through coercion, duress and mandates unwanted and
potentially harmful medical intrusions... and the subsequent resultant abuses, perpetrated by and as a result of the Canadian and its
provincial governments, and certainly their unacceptable hypocrisies, 'holier than thou' attitude and the continual demeaning and
inflamatory commentaries towards the Canadian public... which has caused the current situation, and dragged countless members of the
public into conflict and angst of which they do not desire... not the other way around.
The far greater issues at hand, you can be fully assured, will all be dealt with... all in due time. Patience being requisite.
The Canadian Government and its agencies would be well advised to bear in mind, the world is watching.
Section B Part 68
As such, I do hereby urge and compel all those whom are as such addressed/concerned in these matters, towards full, proper and expediant
compliance to all questions and concerns expressed herein .
Any refusal to do so might only contribute to the further suffering and deterioration of an already damaged nation, and as such, could be
looked upon as behaviour somewhat 'treasonous' both in spirit and nature, and could only serve to further contribute to an overall
increasingly corrosive atmosphere and environment so seriously at odds with the good spirit and better wishes of the Canadian people.
 FORMAL SUBMISSION OF ENQUIRY & NOTIFICATIONS TO: OTTAWA POLICE
RCMP ONTARIO & THE OTTAWA, ONTARIO & CANADIAN GOVERNMENT
RE: HEALTH & SAFETY / PUBLIC SAFETY
Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002

Section C
FOR YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND AWARNESS
Section C Part 1
RE: The Sarah Everard murder by an actively employed UK Police Constable, additionally enabled and empowered in the commission of
that heinous crime through use of his badge (UK- 'warrant card') and 'authority'.
A preventable death... the rape, murder, dismemberment and burning of her body... by an actively employed Police Officer... might have
been prevented if it had not been for both Governmental and Police Services negligence and incompetence, and their failures in their
duties, obligations and responsibilities. The details and issues being equally applicable, and equally of concern here in Canada, and
certainly, here in the provice of Ontario and the city/region of Ottawa.

<<<Relevant UK Informational content: Start>>>

Section C Part 2
From the April 7, 2021 formal submission (UK):
RE: SARAH EVERARD INQUEST, to the UK MID-KENT AND MEDWAY CORONERS; and to the (LONDON) METROPOLITAN POLICE; and as per
Paragraph 7 Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, and as per paragraph 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013, and as per all applicable duties, obligations and responsibilities. REF: FormEnq04072021-UKGOV-KCO/C-MP-SE-001b:
Section C Part 3
To Kent CCHM Coroner Mid Kent and Medway; Coroners Office/ Coroners Court/ Patricia Harding; Archbishop Palace, Mill Street,
Maidstone, ME15 6YE and...
To Metropolitan Police Headquarters/D. I. Lee Tullett/ M.C. Cressida Dick/ D.C. Steve House; New Scotland Yard 8-10
Broadway, London, SW1H 0AZ

Take note of the following relevant and pertinent informations from the aforementioned document....
Section C Part 4
This document serves as formal (as such, legal) notification regarding, and relevant to, the tragic death of Sarah Everard and any current
and/or subsequent inquest(s) and/or investigations into that matter.
This document serves as formal and legal notification of the request for, and necessity of, full compliance to all applicable duties,
responsibilities and obligations... which is not restricted to, but would certainly include... as per Paragraph 7 Schedule 5 of the Coroners
and Justice Act 2009, and as per paragraph(s) 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
Section C Part 5
This document is hereby clearly identified as a formal and official submission, and is in follow-up to the emailed submission "Re: Sarah
Everard, UK Govt, PUBLIC COPY" which was sent 31 Mar at 14:17 to 'kentandmedwaycoroners@kent(dot)gov(dot)uk', which stated "For
the information and attention of the Kent Coroners Office and Courts, and additionally, to the specific attention of Patricia Harding".
Section C Part 6
Please TAKE NOTICE (1), from CPS(dot)gov(dot)uk:
"The Coroner may also be involved in the assisting in the prevention of future deaths by reporting the findings and/ or making
recommendations to the relevant authority/ organisation involved in the deceased's death. These recomendations will usually be made by
a coroner under Prevent Future Deaths (PFD) Reports as defined by paragraph 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations
2013."
Section C Part 7
Also please, TAKE NOTICE (2):
Paragraph 7 Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 provides coroners with the duty to make reports to a person, organisation,
local authority or government department or agency where the coroner believes that action should be taken to prevent further deaths.
Section C Part 8
As had been made clear in the submitted document REF: FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a... It is extremely important to note,
that the inherent dangers described and presented, and indeed irrefutably connected to the tragic circumstances which had cost an
innocent young woman, Sarah Everard, her life... until such time as they are clearly identified and fully addressed formally and officially,
and to the UK public, by this UK Government... such clearly identified inherent dangers, and as such, the very real and indisputable
potential of further deaths involving similar circumstances will continue to exist.
Section C Part 9
The case and need for such actions... amongst other/additional issues with need to be addressed and/or corrected... is made exceptionally
clear within the body of the formally and officially submitted document: FORMAL LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO THE UK GOVERNMENT
(AND PUBLIC NOTICE THEREOF) REF: FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26, 2021, to the UK Government Home
Office:
 Re: 1. Failure/Refusal of Duties, Responsibilities and Obligations
2. Failure/Refusal of Duty of Care, the Abuse of Power, Malfeasance in Office, and
Official/Professional Misconduct including failures to care and protection of the UK Public.
Including but not limited to: The knowingly refused acknowledgements of irrefutable and immenent potential dangers, violation and/or
harm, to members of the UK Public. The refusal of requested clarifications, and the refused responsibilities and duties to ensure and
safeguard public safety by way of requested official public notice in respect to such said clarifications.
3. Gross Negligence and/or Criminal Negligence resultant in death.

With respect to preventable violation or harm to any member of the UK public.

Specifically in relation to the heinous and tragic murder of SARAH EVERARD

March 26, 2021

.............................................................................................................
Section C Part 10
Certainly for the Coroners Office/ Coroners Court/ Metropolitan Police, as for any and all appicable parties:
Section C Part 11
Please TAKE NOTICE (3):
It would not be in the best interest of any involved individuals/institutions to attempt to ignore, bury, or 'sweep under the carpet' any of
the clearly and irrefutably identified failures, refusals, violations, transgressions and issues... nor the clearly identified and requested need
for investigation(s).
Any such attempts, would in fact be an exercise in futility, and only serve to raise further questions**.

(**as stated in document REF: FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a: Truth, and that which is rightful, and that which is just, are
the very 'foundational pillars' of justice. As such, any attempts, or indications of attempts, to thwart or deny such, particularly as would
apply to, or in relation to, the tragic death of Sarah Everard and the surrounding and/or affecting circumstances... should be viewed as
nothing less than an attempt to dissuade from, or deny, whole and complete justice... and as such, should be viewed as an act, or
attempted act, of 'obstruction of justice'.)
Section C Part 12
That document, in addition to having been formally and officially submitted to the UK Government in physical document form, via Royal
Mail, to the offices of Prime Minister Johnson & Home Secretary Patel... has to date, also been provided as a PDF document, by direct
personal email with cover note... to a very significant (several hundred) number of UK MP's...

and additionally, from the same said document....

Section C Part 13
That document serves as formal and official notification to the UK Government of the pressing and immediate need for the addressing,
investigating, and correcting of any and all such identified issues.
Without which, as is made clear, the stronger potential of future deaths would remain.
Section C Part 14
As such, it is hereby formally and officially requested on-the-record and by way of this document... that all applicable and/or relevant
parties within the Coroners Office/ Coroners Court/ Metropolitan Police, and/or all whom would be officially related to these matters
and/or any inquest(s) and/or investigation(s) with respect to the tragic death of Sarah Everard... do access, and read wholely and
attentively, that same said document FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26, 2021... as per the duties, obligations,
requirements and responsibilities congruent with their respective position(s).
Section C Part 15
Having watched this situation unfolding one could not help but be filled with both sorrow and outrage.
Having knowledge that the UK Government and its representative agencies/employees had repeatedly recieved clear warnings, clear
enquirey, clear instruction to consult their legal department, clear requests for formal and official clarifications, and clear indication of
their reponsibility towards public notification, well in advance of this unfortunate incident... only served to greatly magnify that outrage.
Section C Part 16
The UK Government, its agencies and employees and/or representatives had received exceptionally and irrefutabley clear and accurate
forewarnings, and clear requests, on multiple occasions going as far back as 20 months prior to Sarah Everard's tragic death... irrefutably
specific to the very circumstances (almost word for word)... and well prior to the tragic death of Sarah Everard unfolding within just such
circumstances.
Section C Part 17
It became very clear that the UK Public, the UK Media, and most importantly, the Everard family and their legal representatives were likely
to be completely unaware of (and perhaps deliberately denied) these very pertinent facts. In the name of Justice, that 'out of sight out of
mind' situation could not be allowed to continue.
Section C Part 18
Whilst it is absolutely essential to read wholely and attentively, the document FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26,
2021... from the body of that document it is certainly significant to draw to your attention (to serve as minimal example)...
Section C Part 19
The absolutely and indisputabley clear (presented here bolded and sized as it was in the original):
...........................
"FURTHERMORE, TAKE NOTICE:
............................................................................
LEGAL NOTIFICATION
AND OFFICIAL ENQUIREY"
............................
Section C Part 20
"Legal Notification and Official Enquirey"... unmistakable in context and intent, and which quite notably included (enlarged in this
document, REF: FormEnq04072021-UKGOV-KCO/C-MP-SE-001b, for EMPHASIS)... Almost word-for-word describing the very
scenario/circumstances by and within which Sarah Everard had lost her life... it had been very clearly stated....
Section C Part 21
"ICRMU-ISB-1892/20-1a-(ClarSub5-1b):
It is legally indisputable, based on documented facts and evidence, that an individual, or individuals... whilst perhaps 'appearingly
legitimate', perhaps even dressed/presented in a police uniform, and driving an 'official in appearance' police vehicle, even showing an
appearingly 'somewhat legitimate' police badge or ID... may not be legitimate at all."
"Every UK Citizen or Resident has every legal right, if they feel threatened, intimidated, or otherwise concerned for their safety, security
and/or well-being, to refuse to be stopped and/or delayed/detained in any way, shape or form... in any place or area devoid of general
public presence, light, clear visibility and other such safety/security parameters... whether they be in a vehicle, or walking... until
proceeding to a clearly visible and publicly populated/occupied place, in visibility (personal security) to other members of the public."

The GMP-ICRMU-ISB-1892/20-1a Document of July 23, 2020 also clearly stated, (critical to note)....
Section C Part 22
"Exacting clarification is required: Does Muzamil Shazad / Information Compliance & Records Management Unit / Information Services
Branch/ Greater Manchester Police deny or dispute the validity of this preceeding statement and assertion contained within
ICRMU-ISB-1892/20-1a-(ClarSub5-1b)'? Yes or No?
Any dispute to such needs to be clarified in writing, on-the-record, and accompanied by clear explanation and justification of any such said
dispute/denial, and must include the identity (accountability) and position (as per authority of such statement) of any individual(s)
responsible for any such refusal(s) in whole or in part.
Compliance to this request should include/bear the heading 'In reply to request ICRMU-ISB-1892/20-1a-(ClarSub5-1b)'."

Equally important to note from that GMP-ICRMU-ISB-1892/20-1a Document of July 23, 2020...
Section C Part 23
"I would strongly suggest that Muzamil Shazad / Information Compliance & Records Management Unit / Information Services Branch/
Greater Manchester Police consult with their legal department in respect to the preceeding included Legal Notification and Official
Enquirey."

Additionally....
Section C Part 24
"As such, I do hereby urge and compel all those whom are as such addressed/concerned in these matters, towards full, proper and
expediant compliance to all questions, requests and requirements brought forth in any and all aforementioned submitted
documents/enquiries/letters/submissions."
..........................................
Things really could not have been made much clearer
Section C Part 25
It should be abundantly clear to any who would read properly and attentively through that document, as is essential and is hereby clearly
requested... that the UK Government, its representative UK Governmental departments and agencies, its employees and/or
representatives, have all clearly and irrefutabley engaged in multiple violations/failures, and as such have seriously failed Sarah Everard,
her family & loved ones, have failed the UK Public, and as such, failed the nation.
Section C Part 26
It should be quite clear to all at this point, by and through that document, REF: FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, the
widespread and systemic extent of: 1. Failure/Refusal of Duties, Responsibilities and Obligations; 2. Failure/Refusal of Duty of Care, the
Abuse of Power, Malfeasance in Office and Official/Professional Misconduct including failures to care and protection of the UK Public.
Including but not limited to: The knowingly refused acknowledgements of irrefutable and immenent potential dangers, violation and/or
harm to members of the UK Public. The refusal of requested clarifications, and the refused responsibilities and duties to ensure and
safeguard public safety by way of requested official public notice in respect to such said clarifications. 3. Gross Negligence and/or Criminal
Negligence resultant in death.
Section C Part 27
It is quite relevent to note, and there is a multitude of documented evidence of such, that there exists blatant and systemic problems
within the UK, certainly including the UK Governmental departments, and their respective representatives, failing or refusing to respond
to, and/or act upon, enquirey and concerns by or from the UK public (amongst many other well-documented failings and/or violations).
Particularly notable, and undeniable, when any such enquirey, concerns, grievances and/or notifications are made in a manner clearly
identified as a formal and official documented submission(s).
Section C Part 28
That situation had been very specifically addressed, and irrefutably brought to the attention of both the UK Government and UK
Monarchy in July of 2019, and many additional and clearly identified parties since January 13 of 2020... and all the subsequently
provided/submitted multitude of further recipient parties... All clearly addressed within the body of that formally and officially submitted
document grievance:
'Formal Submission of Enquirey and Legal Notifications Section 4a Legal Notification, January 13, 2020'; The multiple recipients clearly
identified within the header of that document.
Section C Part 29
A formally and officially submitted document of January 13, 2020 which, it should be noted, included: (and as had been quoted numerous
times within multiple submissions, including within the document FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26, 2021)...
Section C Part 30
Section 4a part 18c LEGAL NOTIFICATION
"Any and all parties involved in creating and/or enforcing any such circumstance must be held fully accountable, and face all appicable
resultant liabilities, moral, legal, and financial.
By this document, and as of date of this document, these facts are all evidenced to be made clear and on the record, and to the full and
indisputable knowledge of any and all notified parties, and as such removes any and all legitimacy, opportunity or ability towards any
attempted claims of 'deniability' in any such circumstances.
This document is legal notification of such, as clarified further within this document, and can and will be provided for use as evidence in
any applicable cases involving any UK Citizens and/or residents within the United Kingdom."

and...
Section C Part 31
Section 4a part 20
"By-way-of and through this formally submitted document there is hereby undoubtable and undisputable very clear notification to all
addressed parties, and now quite clearly, as a result, undeniable awareness."
Section C Part 32
Section 4a part 22 TAKE NOTICE
"It is the duty and obligation of the informed parties to ensure awareness of these facts and issues to any and all co-working and/or
subordinate governmental bodies, peers, subordinates, associates, agencies, contractors, sub-contractors, employees and/or
representatives."
Section C Part 33
Those Sections and Parts of the 'Formal Submission of Enquirey and Legal Notifications Section 4a Legal Notification, January 13,2020'
were irrefutably clear in wording, content and meaning.
And as has been unacceptably typical for far too many years, and to date..., no response, no answers, no actions, and certainly notable in
a legal sense***... no dispute ever having been presented nor claimed, as per clear requests, to the validity of the content of any
section/part of the document (nor, in fact, any other such formal submissions).
***As had been clearly stated in:
Section 4a part 43
"TAKE NOTICE: The abscence or lack of reciept of any such formal 'dispute of validity' of any particular part or section of this formally
submitted document by that generous and sufficient time limit will be duly noted, and will be accepted as, by way of default, clearly
indicative of 'not in dispute' to the validity of any such same-said (each and every) specific non-disputed section/part."

.................................................................
Section C Part 34
Certainly, it is critical to note the following summation-oriented TO BE NOTED (1) to (5) from the document, FORMAL LETTER OF
NOTIFICATION TO THE UK GOVERNMENT (AND PUBLIC NOTICE THEREOF) REF: FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26,
2021...
Section C Part 35
TO BE NOTED (1): Had the UK Government, its representative UK Governmental departments and agencies, employees and/or
representatives properly engaged in, and complied with: their duties, responsibilities and obligations... this would have resulted in
'irrefutable official clarifications' as (should have been) provided by the directly involved authorities... clarifications, specifically to rights,
which would have been, as and by such official clarifications, 'unquestionable'.
Section C Part 36
TO BE NOTED (2): Had the UK Government, its representative UK Governmental departments and agencies, employees and/or
representatives properly engaged in, and complied with: their duties, responsibilities and obligations... this would have resulted in a UK
public clearly and officially informed: not only of such dangers, but most importantly, of their own individual rights in any such a potential
scenario.
It would have also, rightly, resulted in all public employees, most particularly those employed and/or engaged in duties for and/or related
to,the UK Police Services, being clearly informed of all the pertinent facts, and clearly instructed as to the necessity of respecting the
rights of the UK public in any such scenario or environment, as 'should have been' (sadly, not done) unquestionably clarified by the
authoritive governing bodies.
Section C Part 37
TO BE NOTED (3): Had the UK Government, its representative UK Governmental departments and agencies, employees and/or
representatives properly engaged in, and complied with: their duties, responsibilities and obligations... there is unquestionably high
probability that any properly and officially informed member of the public, with knowledge of their unquestionable rights (as per such
requested OFFICIAL clarifications), and in this particular case, Sarah Everard, would have and could have politely but firmly refused to
comply with any orders, instructions or otherwise coercion, including any potential 'state of duress' (as identified within this document)
which would certainly include, but not be restricted to, getting into a vehicle, or indeed any form of undue delay and/or detainment, in
any such scenario where they might feel personal safety concerns or unease.
Unquestionably high probability Sarah Everard might have politely but firmly refused any undue delay, and any orders, direct, implied, or
otherwise, and made every attempt to 'press on' unfettered.
Unquestionably high possibility Sarah Everard might have survived her tragic and fatal encounter with MET Officer Wayne Couzens, a
criminal murderer empowered and emboldened by and through governmentally granted 'authority' inherent with any such position.
Section C Part 38
TO BE NOTED (4): Additionally, had the UK Government, its representative UK Governmental departments and agencies, employees
and/or representatives properly engaged in, and complied with, as had been so clearly and persistently requested (yet refused): their
duties, responsibilities and obligations... then any 'purported' official or representative whom might press, pressure or attempt to act in
violation of such requested clear and official notifications and clarifications, in fact, would immediately 'raise up a red warning flag' by
such actions and/or behaviour... particularly to any properly and officially informed (as had been clearly requested) member of the UK
Public, prompting them to be particularly cautionary.
In this tragic case, Sarah Everard, was clearly deprived of any such informations, knowledge and official notifications, and as such,
deprived of such ability, and possibility, of having survived that fatal encounter.
Section C Part 39
TO BE NOTED (5): In fact, had the UK Government, its representative UK Governmental departments and agencies, employees and/or
representatives paid due attention to the document 'Formal Submission of Enquirey and Legal Notifications Section 4a Legal Notification,
January 13, 2020' and taken appropriate steps and actions, at that time, to address and correct the systemic issues and wrongdoings
clearly identified within that submitted document, in a timely and appropriate manner... there is every possibility the subsequent
"Failure/Refusal of Duties, Responsibilities and Obligations" might not have occured.
.......................................................................................
Section C Part 40
What needed to be done at this point by the UK Government, and the imperative nature of such actions, was made very clear within the
document, FORMAL LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO THE UK GOVERNMENT (AND PUBLIC NOTICE THEREOF) REF:
FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26, 2021...
which clearly stated:
Section C Part 41
"At this point, and certainly with due respect to the informations hereby brought to light by and within this document. Informations
brought directly to the attention of the highest offices of UK Government, UK MP's, UK media, appropriate UK and International parties,
and certainly, the UK public... The following actions and undertakings should be immediate and forthright:"
Section C Part 42
Actions and undertakings which were described very clearly within the bullet points of the clearly indexed/identified "TAKE NOTICE
(03262021-UKGOV-PM) (1)", all of which it seems, to date, are being ignored, refused and/or denied.
Section C Part 43
It should not be considered anything short of absolutely essential (****below) that the Kent CCHM Coroner, Mid Kent and Medway
Coroners Office/ Coroners Court/ Patricia Harding, and the Metropolitan Police Headquarters/ Detective Inspector Lee Tullett/ M.C.
Cressida Dick/ D.C. Steve House...
Section C Part 44
(KCCHMC-1) All must endeavour to ensure that the informations, violations and failures brought forth and clearly identified within the
document, FORMAL LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO THE UK GOVERNMENT (AND PUBLIC NOTICE THEREOF) REF:
FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26, 2021... and subsequently brought to their own knowledge and attention... are
duly noted, and appropriately documented, within any Coroner's (and any MET Police) Inquest, Investigation, Enquiries, Reports and/or
Findings with respect to... and as clearly indicated, how they they do directly relate to... the circumstances relating to the tragic (and in
unquestionably high probability, preventable) death of Sarah Everard.
Section C Part 45
(KCCHMC-2) All must endeavour to officially, and 'on-the-record' for public transparency... urge the UK Government, by way of the UK
Prime Minister's Office, and/or the UK Home Office... to diligently and meaningfully engage in thorough investigation and
addressing/correcting of the clearly identified failures and violations brought clearly to their attention by, and within, the document,
FORMAL LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO THE UK GOVERNMENT (AND PUBLIC NOTICE THEREOF) REF:
FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26, 2021.
Section C Part 46
(KCCHMC-3) All must endeavour to oblige by, and as per, all applicable duties, obligations and responsibilities, and as per Paragraph 7
Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, and as per paragraph 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013... and
ensure recomendations reflecting KCCHMC-1&2 are made by a coroner within an official Prevent Future Deaths (PFD) Report .
Section C Part 47
(****Failure of, or to, KCCHMC-1, 2 and/or 3 could be potentially construed as indications of possible complicity, whether intended or
otherwise, to an environment, or intentions, of governmental cover-up.)
Section C Part 48
Certainly to be likewise noted, as had been clearly expressed within the document, FORMAL LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO THE UK
GOVERNMENT (AND PUBLIC NOTICE THEREOF) REF: FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26, 2021...
.....................................................................

Section C Part 49
"As such, and by way of this document, all addressed members or representatives of the UK Government are hereby cautioned:
Section C Part 50
The response and actions in these matters... of and by the UK Government, its UK Governmental departments and agencies, employees
and/or representatives... will be duly observed and noted.
Any indications of deviation from full and proper compliance, absolute transparency and honesty... or any indications and/or appearances
of any attempted denials or refusals of any level or nature... will be viewed as nothing short of attempts to deny, cover-up and/or
dissuade from truth, attempts to deny or refuse that which is rightful and/or just.
Section C Part 51
Truth, and that which is rightful, and that which is just, are the very 'foundational pillars' of justice.
As such, any attempts, or indications of attempts, to thwart or deny such, particularly as would apply to, or in relation to, the tragic death
of Sarah Everard and the surrounding and/or affecting circumstances...
should be viewed as nothing less than an attempt to dissuade from, or deny, whole and complete justice... and as such, should be viewed
as an act, or attempted act, of 'obstruction of justice'.
Any parties perceived or identified as potentially acting or engaging in any such manner should be subject to full investigation."
.........................................................................
Section C Part 52
TAKE NOTICE: Just as had been requested within the body and content of the emailed submission "Re: Sarah Everard, UK Govt, PUBLIC
COPY" which was sent 31st of March, at 14:17 by way of email address: 'kentandmedwaycoroners@kent(dot)gov(dot)uk' ... I would
hereby (and do so officially and formally by way of this document) request that the Kent and Medway Coroners Office, officials, courts,
and additionally, the MET Metropolitan Police, ensure all requisite effort and due attention to these informations.
Section C Part 53
Additionally, and as is hereby clearly requested, ensure that copy of both this communication, REF:
FormEnq04072021-UKGOV-KCO/C-MP-SE-001b, and that of the document FORMAL LETTER OF NOTIFICATION TO THE UK
GOVERNMENT (AND PUBLIC NOTICE THEREOF) REF: FormEnq03262021-UKGOV-PM-HO-SE-001a, of March 26, 2021 are provided, as
should be by and within their rights, in a forthwith manner, to:
Section C Part 54
1. Legal representative(s) for the Everard family.
2. A member, or members, of the Everard family.
3. Josh Lowth, boyfriend of the deceased, Sarah Everard.
Section C Part 55
If any such clearly requested provision is to be refused, denied, or delayed in any manner, then formal (by letter, on official letterhead,
clearly indicating the individual, their position, reason(s), and as such, authority for any such refusal, denial or delay) notification of such,
including clear explanations and justifications for any such refusal, denial or delay is hereby clearly requested.
Section C Part 56
There are expectations and trust that the Kent and Medway Coroners Office, officials, courts... and additionally, the MET Metropolitan
Police... will accordingly ensure to fulfil all obligations by and through both conduct and compliance, as would be expected by and within
all applicable and expected duties and responsibilities... and certainly as would be expected by the UK Public.

And certainly to be noted from that document...

Section C Part 57
TAKE NOTICE: By way of this formal submission I hereby notify, as of April 7, 2021 <and hereby claim as 'legally admissable evidence of
such notifications', and the right of provision/submission/testimony of such as evidence: to be used within any formal, bureaucratic,
and/or legal proceedings involving any or all related or relevant matters, both within the United Kingdom, and Internationally>, that any
and all herein addressed UK Governmental parties, as of April 7, 2021 must engage in full, logical, effective and immediate complaince to
their duties, responsibilities and obligations... and to do so specifically in the best interests of the UK public... and specifically to any and
all issues and concerns as may have been addressed and/or identified withinin this formally and officially submitted legal notification and
document.
Section C Part 58
TAKE NOTICE: The informations are essential as a whole, and unaltered, for clear understanding of the implications, and the
relationships of each part, issue and section, to the whole and such said implications. It is hereby clearly expressed as not permissible to
alter, edit or otherwise change the content and/or context as has been presented. Thank you.
Section C Part 59
Copy of such letters and requests may and will be provided to various relevent parties, both within the UK and internationally, for their
information and awareness, as might be deemed appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------
 <<<Relevant UK Informational content: End>>>

Section C Part 60
TAKE NOTICE: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa
Mayor James Alexander Watson:
Section C Part 61
These matters, by way of the informations and concerns expressed herein and by way of this document, and any and all associated
documents and/or informations which may be submitted in relation to such... bring clear, irrefutable, and undeniable awareness of these
matters and concerns to your attention, 'on the record' and as such, and as this document is in relation and respect to Health and Safety,
Public Safety, Security, Legal and/or Human Rights issues...
and additionally, and as per any and all applicable moral and/or legal duties, obligations, responsibilities, statutes, regulations and/or
requirements concerning any such communications, enquiry and expressed concerns:
1. It is hereby clearly and formally requested by way of this document, that the addressees ensure this formal submission of enquirey
and notification: Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002 be officially kept on record.
2. It is hereby clearly and formally requested by way of this document that all response is accurate, truthful, complete, and undertaken in
a forthwith manner free of any undue delay or attempted tactical dissuasions. Such response clearly identifying individual, position, and
authority.
3. It is hereby clearly and formally requested by way of this document that the addressee, ensures full compliance to all applicable moral,
professional and/or legal: duties, obligations, responsibilities, statutes, regulations and requirements commensurate to, and in respect of,
your position and/or influence, and additionally, in accordance with and respect to The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms... and
ensure likewise behaviours and or engagement by any and all whom may be, or act, under your authority and/or instruction and/or by
delegation, or otherwise influence.
Section C Part 62
TAKE NOTICE: Assistant Commissioner Jodie Boudreau, Premier Douglas Robert Ford Jr., Ottawa Police Chief Peter John Sloly, and Ottawa
Mayor James Alexander Watson:
1. By way of this formal submission Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002 you are hereby notified, as of February 7, 2022 <and
this document hereby claimed as 'legally admissable evidence of such notifications', and the right of provision/submission/testimony of
such as evidence: to be used within any formal, bureaucratic, and/or legal proceedings involving any or all related or relevant matters,
both within Canada, and Internationally>, that any and all herein identified and/or addressed Canadian Governmental appointees,
agencies and/or representatives, as of February 7, 2022, must engage in full, logical, effective and immediate complaince to their duties,
responsibilities and obligations... and to do so specifically in the best interests of the Canadian public and the upholding of The Canadian
Charter of Rights and Freedoms... and specifically to any and all issues and concerns as may have been addressed and/or identified
withinin and/or by this formally and officially submitted, to your attentions, document of enquiry and notifications.
2. Copy of this document Ref: PWA-SOB4-UBUN2-4Ae-LS1-CDN-OTTW-002 may, and in instances will, be provided to various relevent parties,
both within Canada, and Internationally, for their information, monitoring and awareness... as may be deemed appropriate.
Section C Part 63
TAKE NOTICE: This document, is in no way 'wholely inclusive', but rather only a 'small tip of a very big iceberg', and as such, the
right is reserved, and that right is hereby clearly expressed, to introduce any additional reasonings and/or materials, as and/or
when may be deemed necessary, in relation or respect to any and all matters expressed or contained herein, and hereby do give
formal notice of such, by way of this document.
Section C Part 64
You are respectfully urged and compelled to read all presented informations and concerns attentively, and carefully.
Both to garner the full meaning and relationships of all contents, and as to several of the many potential legal ramifications with
respect to the current situation and crisis... of which you, by your own position and responsibilities, must ensure personal awareness.
Forthwith response with requested answers/clarifications hereby clearly requested and expressed.

I shall thank you in advance, in anticipation of your full and forthwith compliance, and clarifications, in these matters.

Name:

Address:
.
.
.