Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 2 Static Stability
Lecture 2 Static Stability
333: Lecture #2
Static Stability
Wing/Tail contributions
0
Fall 2004 16.333 2–1
Static Stability
• Classic analysis:
– Eq at point B
– A/C 1 is statically stable
Basic Aerodynamics
Lw
c.g.
Macw
iw Zcg
Dw
�w �FRL
Fuselage Reference
Line (FRL)
Xac
Wing mean chord
Xcg
– Assuming that αF RL � 1,
Mcg ≈ (Lw + Dw αAF RL)(xcg − xac)
+(Lw αF RL − Dw )(zcg ) + Macw
– But the second term contributes very little (drop)
1 The aerodynamic center (AC) is the point on the wing about which the coefficient of pitching moment is constant. On all airfoils
the ac very close to the 25% chord point (+/ 2%) in subsonic flow.
Fall 2004 16.333 2–4
• Nondimensionalize:
L M
CL = 1
2
CM =
1
2
2
ρV S
2
ρV Sc̄
• Gives:
xcg xac
CMcg = (CLw + CDw αF RL)( − ) + CMac
c̄ c̄
• Define:
– xcg = hc̄ (leading edge to c.g.)
– xac = h
n̄
c̄ (leading edge to AC)
• Then
CMcg = (CLw + CDw αF RL)(h − hn¯ ) + CMac
≈ (CLw )(h − hn¯ ) + CMac
= CLαw (αw − αw0 )(h − hn¯ ) + CMac
• Result is interesting, but the key part is how this helps us analyze the
static stability:
∂CMcg
= (h − hn̄
) > 0
∂CLw
since c.g. typically further back that AC
– Why most planes have a second lifting surface (front or back)
Fall 2004 16.333 2–5
Contribution of the Tail
lt
Lw
Lt
c.g.
Macw Mact
Zcgw Zcgt
iw Dw Dt
it
FRL
FRL
�W �FRL
V
V �
V'
St
CL = CLw + η CLt
S
η = (1/2ρVt2)/(1/2ρVw2) ≈0.8–1.2 depending on location of tail
Mt lt 12 ρVt2StCLt
CMt = 1 2 =−
2 ρV Sc̄
c̄ 21 ρV 2S
ltSt
= − ηCLt
Sc̄
lt St
• Define the horizontal tail volume ratio VH = Sc̄ , so that
CMt = −VH ηCLt
• So that
CMt = −VH ηCLαt (αw − iw + it − (�0 + �α αw ))
= VH ηCLαt (�0 + iw − it − αw (1 − �α ))
Fall 2004 16.333 2–7
⇒ CMαt
= −VH ηCLαt (1 − �α )
• For CMα < 0, consider setup for case that makes CMα = 0
– Note that this is a discussion of the aircraft cg location (“find h”)
– But tail location currently given relative to c.g. (lt behind it),
which is buried in VH ⇒ need to define it differently
• Define lt = c̄(ht − h); ht measured from the wing leading edge, then
ltSt St
VH = = (ht − h)
c̄S S
which gives
St
CMα = CLαw (h − hn¯ ) − (ht − h)ηCLαt (1 − �α )
S
St St
= h(CLαw + η CLαt (1 − �α )) − CLαw hn̄ − htη CLαt (1 − �α )
S S
¯ − ht η CL (1 − �α )
S
αt
CLα
• Note that with γ = CLαw
T
≈ 1, then
hn¯ + (γ − 1)ht
h= ≡ hN P
γ
which is called the stick fixed neutral point
• Can rewrite as
� � � �
CLαw St CLαt
CMα = CLαT h − hn̄
−η ht (1 − �α )
CLαT S CLαT
= CLαT (h − hN P )
which gives the pitching moment about the c.g. as a function of the
location of the c.g. with respect to the stick fixed neutral point
– For static stability, c.g. must be in front of NP (hN P > h)
Fall 2004 16.333 2–10
Cm
h > hn
CG aft
Cm = Cm + a(h - hn)�
0
Cm
0
h = hn
0 �
h < hn
CG forward
• Observations:
– If c.g. at hN P , then CMα = 0
– If c.g. aft of hN P , then CMα > 0 (statically unstable)
– What is the problem with the c.g. being too far forward?
Fall 2004 16.333 2–11
Control Effects
�e
Cm
�e = 0
Original trim �
0
�Cm
Final trim �
�e > 0
dCm
ΔCm = dδe δe = Cmδe δe, with Cmδe < 0
CL
�e > 0
�e = 0
�CL
0 �
Fall 2004 16.333 2–12