Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 14 — WALLS
CODE COMMENTARY
14.1 — Scope R14.1 — Scope
14.1.1 — Provisions of Chapter 14 shall apply for Chapter 14 applies generally to walls as vertical load-
design of walls subjected to axial load, with or without carrying members. Cantilever retaining walls are designed
flexure. according to the flexural design provisions of Chapter 10.
Walls designed to resist shear forces, such as shear walls,
14.1.2 — Cantilever retaining walls are designed should be designed in accordance with Chapter 14 and 11.9
according to flexural design provisions of Chapter 10 as applicable.
with minimum horizontal reinforcement according to
14.3.3. In the 1977 Code, walls could be designed according to
Chapter 14 or 10.15. In the 1983 Code, these two were
combined in Chapter 14.
14.2.1 — Walls shall be designed for eccentric loads Walls should be designed to resist all loads to which they
and any lateral or other loads to which they are are subjected, including eccentric axial loads and lateral
subjected. forces. Design is to be carried out in accordance with 14.4
unless the wall meets the requirements of 14.5.1.
14.2.2 — Walls subject to axial loads shall be
designed in accordance with 14.2, 14.3, and either
14.4, 14.5, or 14.8. 14
14.2.3 — Design for shear shall be in accordance with
11.9.
CODE COMMENTARY
14.3 — Minimum reinforcement R14.3 — Minimum reinforcement
14.3.1 — Minimum vertical and horizontal reinforce- The requirements of 14.3 are similar to those in previous
ment shall be in accordance with 14.3.2 and 14.3.3 codes. These apply to walls designed according to 14.4,
unless a greater amount is required for shear by 14.5, or 14.8. For walls resisting horizontal shear forces in
11.9.8 and 11.9.9. the plane of the wall, reinforcement designed according to
11.9.9.2 and 11.9.9.4 may exceed the minimum reinforcement
14.3.2 — Minimum ratio of vertical reinforcement area in 14.3.
to gross concrete area, ρl, shall be:
The notation used to identify the direction of the distributed
(a) 0.0012 for deformed bars not larger than No. 16 reinforcement in walls was updated in 2005 to eliminate
with fy not less than 420 MPa; or conflicts between the notation used for ordinary structural
walls in Chapters 11 and 14 and the notation used for
(b) 0.0015 for other deformed bars; or special structural walls in Chapter 21. The distributed rein-
(c) 0.0012 for welded wire reinforcement not larger forcement is now identified as being oriented parallel to
than MW200 or MD200. either the longitudinal or transverse axis of the wall. There-
fore, for vertical wall segments, the notation used to
14.3.3 — Minimum ratio of horizontal reinforcement describe the horizontal distributed reinforcement ratio is ρt,
area to gross concrete area, ρt , shall be: and the notation used to describe the vertical distributed
reinforcement ratio is ρl.
(a) 0.0020 for deformed bars not larger than No. 16
with fy not less than 420 MPa; or
CODE COMMENTARY
and one No. 16 bar in walls having a single layer of
reinforcement in both directions shall be provided
around window, door, and similar sized openings.
Such bars shall be anchored to develop fy in tension at
the corners of the openings.
14.5.1 — Walls of solid rectangular cross section shall The empirical design method applies only to solid rectangular
be permitted to be designed by the empirical provisions cross sections. All other shapes should be designed
of 14.5 if the resultant of all factored loads is located according to 14.4.
within the middle third of the overall thickness of the
wall and all limits of 14.2 and 14.3 are satisfied. Eccentric loads and lateral forces are used to determine the
total eccentricity of the factored axial force Pu. When the
14.5.2 — Design axial strength φPn of a wall satisfying resultant load for all applicable load combinations falls
limitations of 14.5.1 shall be computed by Eq. (14-1) within the middle third of the wall thickness (eccentricity
unless designed in accordance with 14.4. not greater than h/6) at all sections along the length of the 14
undeformed wall, the empirical design method may be
kl c 2 used. The design is then carried out considering Pu as the
φ P n = 0.55φf c′ A g 1 – ---------- (14-1) concentric load. The factored axial force Pu should be less
32h
than or equal to the design axial strength φPn computed by
Eq. (14-1), Pu ≤ φPn.
where φ shall correspond to compression-controlled
sections in accordance with 9.3.2.2 and effective
With the 1980 Code supplement, Eq. (14-1) was revised to
length factor k shall be:
reflect the general range of end conditions encountered in
wall designs. The wall strength equation in the 1977 Code
For walls braced top and bottom against lateral
was based on the assumption of a wall with top and bottom
translation and
fixed against lateral movement, and with moment restraint
at one end corresponding to an effective length factor
(a) Restrained against rotation at one or both ends
between 0.8 and 0.9. Axial strength values determined from
(top, bottom, or both)............................................0.8
the original equation were unconservative when compared
(b) Unrestrained against rotation at both ends.....1.0 to test results14.1 for walls with pinned conditions at both
ends, as occurs with some precast and tilt-up applications,
For walls not braced against lateral translation ....... 2.0 or when the top of the wall is not effectively braced against
translation, as occurs with free-standing walls or in large
structures where significant roof diaphragm deflections
occur due to wind and seismic loads. Equation (14-1) gives
the same results as the 1977 Code for walls braced against
translation and with reasonable base restraint against
rotation.14.2 Values of effective length factors k are given for
commonly occurring wall end conditions. The end condition
“restrained against rotation” required for a k of 0.8 implies
attachment to a member having flexural stiffness EI/l at
least as large as that of the wall.
CODE COMMENTARY
14
14.5.3 — Minimum thickness of walls designed by R14.5.3 — Minimum thickness of walls designed by
empirical design method empirical design method
14.5.3.1 — Thickness of bearing walls shall not be The minimum thickness requirements need not be applied
less than 1/25 the supported height or length, which- to walls designed according to 14.4.
ever is shorter, nor less than 100 mm.
CODE COMMENTARY
14.8 — Alternative design of slender walls R14.8 — Alternative design of slender walls
14.8.1 — When flexural tension controls the out-of- Section 14.8 was introduced in the 1999 edition and the
plane design of a wall, the requirements of 14.8 are provisions are based on requirements in the 1997 Uniform
considered to satisfy 10.10. Building Code (UBC)14.3 and experimental research.14.4
Changes were included in the 2008 edition to reduce
14.8.2 — Walls designed by the provisions of 14.8 differences in the serviceability provisions and ensure that
shall satisfy 14.8.2.1 through 14.8.2.6. the intent of the UBC provisions is included in future
editions of the International Building Code.
14.8.2.1 — The wall panel shall be designed as a
simply supported, axially loaded member subjected to The procedure is presented as an alternative to the require-
an out-of-plane uniform lateral load, with maximum ments of 10.10 for the out-of-plane design of slender wall
moments and deflections occurring at midspan. panels, where the panels are restrained against overturning
at the top.
14.8.2.2 — The cross section shall be constant over
the height of the panel. Panels that have windows or other large openings are not
considered to have constant cross section over the height of
the panel. Such walls are to be designed taking into account
the effects of openings.
14.8.2.3 — The wall shall be tension-controlled. R14.8.2.3 — This section was updated in the 2005 Code
to reflect the change in design approach that was introduced
in 10.3 of the 2002 Code. The previous requirement that the 14
reinforcement ratio should not exceed 0.6ρbal was replaced
by the requirement that the wall be tension-controlled,
leading to approximately the same reinforcement ratio.
CODE COMMENTARY
14.8.3 — Design moment strength φMn for combined R14.8.3 — Before the 2008 edition, the effective area of
flexure and axial loads at midheight shall be longitudinal reinforcement in a slender wall for obtaining an
approximate cracked moment of inertia was calculated
φM n ≥ M u (14-3) using an effective area of tension reinforcement defined as
where Pu
A se, w = A s + ------
fy
Mu = Mua + PuΔu (14-4)
Mua is the maximum factored moment at midheight of However, this term overestimated the contribution of axial
wall due to lateral and eccentric vertical loads, not load in many cases where two layers of reinforcement were
including PΔ effects, and Δu is used in the slender wall. Therefore, the effective area of
longitudinal reinforcement was modified in 2008
2
5M u l c P h/2
Δ u = -------------------------------------
( 0.75 )48E c I cr
(14-5) A se, w = A s + -----u- --------
f d y
Mu shall be obtained by iteration of deflections, or by The neutral axis depth, c, in Eq. (14-7) corresponds to this
Eq. (14-6). effective area of longitudinal reinforcement.
M ua
M u = ----------------------------------------------- (14-6)
2
5P u l c
1 – -------------------------------------
( 0.75 )48E c I cr
14
where
3
Es Pu h 2 lw c
I cr = ------ A s + ------- ------- ( d – c ) + ------------ (14-7)
Ec f y 2d 3
14.8.4 — Maximum out-of-plane deflection, Δs , due to R14.8.4 — Before the 2008 edition, out-of-plane deflections
service loads, including PΔ effects, shall not exceed in wall panels were calculated using the procedures in
lc /150. Section 9.5.2.3. However, re-evaluation of the original test
data14.4 demonstrated that out-of-plane deflections increase
rapidly when the service-level moment exceeds 2/3Mcr . A
If Ma , maximum moment at midheight of wall due to
linear interpolation between Δcr and Δn is used to determine
service lateral and eccentric vertical loads, including
Δs to simplify the design of slender walls if Ma > 2/3Mcr .
PΔ effects, exceeds (2/3)Mcr , Δs shall be calculated by
Eq. (14-8)
Service-level load combinations are not defined in Chapter 9 of
ACI 318, but they are discussed in Appendix C of ASCE/
( M a – ( 2/3 )M cr ) SEI 7-10.14.7 Unlike ACI 318, however, appendixes to
Δ s = ( 2/3 )Δ cr + ------------------------------------------ ( Δ n – ( 2/3 )Δ cr ) (14-8)
( M n – ( 2/3 )M cr ) ASCE/SEI 7 are not considered to be mandatory parts of the
standard. For calculating service-level lateral deflections of
If Ma does not exceed (2/3)Mcr , Δs shall be calculated structures, Appendix C of ASCE/SEI 7-10 recommends
by Eq. (14-9) using the following load combination
Ma D + 0.5L + Wa
Δ s = ---------- Δ cr (14-9)
M cr
in which Wa is wind load based on serviceability wind speeds
provided in the commentary to Appendix C of ASCE/SEI
American Concrete Institute Copyrighted Material—www.concrete.org
STRUCTURAL CONCRETE BUILDING CODE (ACI 318M-11) AND COMMENTARY 265
CODE COMMENTARY
where 7-10. If the slender wall is designed to resist earthquake
effects, E, and E is based on strength-level earthquake effects,
2 the following load combination is considered to be appropriate
5M cr l c
Δ cr = ------------------- (14-10) for evaluating the service-level lateral deflections
48E c I g
D + 0.5L + 0.7E
2
5M n l c
Δ n = --------------------- (14-11)
48E c I cr
14
Notes
CODE COMMENTARY
14