This document discusses the arguments for and examples of regional integration between countries. The main economic argument is that regional integration allows countries to benefit from free trade of goods and services. The political arguments are that integration decreases the chances of conflict between countries and gives them greater power collectively. However, examples like the EU, NAFTA, ASEAN, and Mercosur show that while regional blocs achieve some goals like reduced trade barriers, they often fail to fully integrate and face challenges from national sovereignty concerns and internal political tensions. Overall, regional integration has benefits but countries remain hesitant to completely rely on each other or give up autonomy.
This document discusses the arguments for and examples of regional integration between countries. The main economic argument is that regional integration allows countries to benefit from free trade of goods and services. The political arguments are that integration decreases the chances of conflict between countries and gives them greater power collectively. However, examples like the EU, NAFTA, ASEAN, and Mercosur show that while regional blocs achieve some goals like reduced trade barriers, they often fail to fully integrate and face challenges from national sovereignty concerns and internal political tensions. Overall, regional integration has benefits but countries remain hesitant to completely rely on each other or give up autonomy.
This document discusses the arguments for and examples of regional integration between countries. The main economic argument is that regional integration allows countries to benefit from free trade of goods and services. The political arguments are that integration decreases the chances of conflict between countries and gives them greater power collectively. However, examples like the EU, NAFTA, ASEAN, and Mercosur show that while regional blocs achieve some goals like reduced trade barriers, they often fail to fully integrate and face challenges from national sovereignty concerns and internal political tensions. Overall, regional integration has benefits but countries remain hesitant to completely rely on each other or give up autonomy.
both economic and political reasons. The main economic argument for regional integration is that countries could benefit from the free trade of goods and services at least on a limited basis. The main reason would be exploiting the gains from investment and free trade. The free flow of trade among countries would also benefit consumers since they would have a wider choice of goods and services and they won’t have to pay very high prices for those goods. The political reason for integration has two main points: first it is better for countries to stick together and to be more dependent on each other because this way the chances of any violent conflicts and war are decreasing. Second point is that countries that form a bloc have greater power, better economic development and they are also stronger politically in case they have to deal with other countries, they act as a whole. Despite these arguments there are not many examples of regional integration in the world economy and there are some reasons for that. First, when it comes to economic integration, nations could benefit from it but it does not mean that all individuals benefit from it. For ex. the agreement between North America, Canada and Mexico better known as NAFTA is a free trade area and (increased production in Mexico, increased political stability in Mexico, Mexico benefits from more jobs as companies from Canada and USA shift production there in order to take advantage of the low cost labor, Americans changed the way they eat with the increased imports of avocados from Mexico in the USA which benefited both USA and Mexico etc), lots of individuals in the USA and Canada that worked in the textile industry lost their jobs as production was moved to Mexico.
Second reason why we do not see more
regional integration in the world economy is national sovereignty. Countries that are taking part in regional integration have to give up some of their nat. sovereignty, for ex. countries members of the EU which have adopted the euro as a currency, had to give up on their monetary policy and they gave it to the European Central Bank. This is why countries like Britain, Sweden and Denmark opted out of the euro zone, because they did not want to give their monetary policy to the European Central Bank because they did not want to lose and give up this autonomy. Another example given in Hill: ,,Internat. business competing in the global market place’’ (2014) is Mexico’s concern about not being able to control its oil interests and as a result it made an agreement with USA and Canada ( NAFTA) to exempt the Mex. oil industry from any liberalization of foreign investment regulations achieved under NAFTA. There are some more examples of blocs like EU, NAFTA and ASEAN that I will refer to, some of the achievements and losses that these blocs have had.
The EU is an imperfect example of an
economic union, which means that it has managed to achieve free flow of factors of production among member countries, common external trade policy but some members have not adopted the euro as a common currency and tax rates are not the same among all member countries, so we could not say that it has achieved all points. The EU policy shapes how internat. business can be done:
The single or common market has
managed to remove most internal trade barriers among members and achieve the four freedoms- free movement of people, capital goods and services. Even though the EU has made lots of efforts to accomplish this it has been a very complex political process among national or local regulations if they believe they could be more efficient without the EU. Also for the free flow of services it has been even more difficult since services/ sectors like banking, hotels or telecommunications demand more local presence and have harder regulatory regimes. Another example of regional integration is the ASEAN which includes Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand, Myanmar, Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines.
ASEAN just like most other blocs was
created to enable free flow of trade among members and also ASEAN is the world’s greatest labor force because of the huge number of population ASEAN’S population spend more time on the Internet than the rest of the world, which is why major tech players like Facebook and Google want share of ASEAN’S digital economy. Even though it was created to make progress in the free trade among its members it has made slow progress mostly because its main trading partners are the USA, Japan and China countries out of the bloc. Also ASEAN experiences more internal political tensions, religious and cultural diversity than other blocs.
Another example of regional integration
among countries is the Andean Community. Andean Community was created as a free trade area, determined to achieve free flow of trade among its member countries Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, Venezuela and Chile but it has failed to achieve any of its goals and in 2003 it signed an agreement with Mercusor to work towards achieving a free trade area among members. Mercusor began as a free trade agreement among Brazil and Argentina and afterwards Paraguay and Uruguay joined. Mercusor was often criticized that by putting high tariffs to outside countries it was actually diverting trade and companies in these industries could not compete in global markets. Also members of both trade blocs had a common problem, both were trading the most with the USA which is not a member, instead of trading with each other. Uruguay for instance decided to sign a separate trade deal with the USA despite being a member of Mercusor.
Cases like these that occurred among
blocs like the EU, NAFTA, ASEAN and others, are examples that these regional integration blocs have managed to achieve some goals but some of them have not managed to accomplish anything. The fear of losing national sovereignty and depending a lot on other countries, job losses, higher pollution are some of the main reasons why examples of regional integration are decreasing, countries may not be that prepared to completely rely on each other.