You are on page 1of 11
REVISTA PESQUISA NAVAL CONTENTS | xumacr s1- 2018 FOREWORD 1 DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF NUCLEAR AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE NAVY Fleet Admiral Marcos Sampaia Olen HUMAN PERFORMANCE AND HEALTH 3 MARINE BIO-PROSPECTION: FROM MARINE BIOLOGY TO HEALTH ‘SEARCHING FOR NEW POTENTIAL ANTINEOPLASTIC BIOACTIVE COMPONENTS. Bioprospeccdo marina: das ciéncias do mar as ciéncias da satide em busca de novos compostes bicatives com potencial antineoplasico Giselle Pinto de Faria Lopes, label Virginia Gomes Stoa, Karina Lani Sloe, Raguel Coach Maia, Rivard Coutnb, Angelica Ribera Soars, Maria Helena Camper Baeta Neve SENSORS, ELECTRONIC WARFARE AND ACOUSTIC WARFARE 10 DEVELOPMENT OF A LOW-COST AUTONOMOUS UNDERWATER VEHICLE USING ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING Desenvolvimento de um veiculo submarino auténomo de balxo custo utlizando manufatura aditiva Emerson Coelbe Mendonga, Adams Soares Teles, Vlson Berlli Mendes HUMAN PERFORMANCE AND HEALTH 18 _ IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SUPPORT CENTER FOR COVID-19 DETECTION AND CLINICAL RESEARCH IN THE HOSPITAL NAVAL MARCILIO DIAS Implementagao do Nucleo de Apoio a Deteceao ¢ Pesquisa Clinica da COVID-19 no Hospital Naval Mareilio Dias Thais Chrispim de Souza Carvalho Giangiarulo, Jessica da Siloa Olieira, Raita Mirella dot da Pa, Eduard Siqueira, Marlon Daniel Lima Tonin, Tailab Bernardo de Almeida, Santor Cunha da Corta, Samia Natiane Ferreira, Juliana Aparecida Sos Marcelo Lal Gregério, Shana Priscila Coutinho Barroso NUCLEAR 26 SUBSIDIES FOR FORMULATION OF EXTERNAL EMERGENCY PLAN: A ‘STUDY TO ASSIST THE NAVAL COMPLEX OF ITAGUAI Subsidios para elaboracao de Plano de Emergéncia Externe: um estudo para atender 120 Complexo Naval de Itagual Kallen Stephany Batista Marques OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT 34 FORENSIC FINGERPRINTING OF OIL SPILLS: A STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF WEATHERING ON SOURCE IDENTIFICATION Icdentificagao forense de derramamentos de éleo: um estudo sobre a influéncia do Intemperisma na identiicarao de fontes Marcio Martins Lobo, Tanise Klein Rames, Fernanda Freyesleben Thomazelli DECISION-MAKING PROCESS, 42 DEVELOPING A COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOR HIGH-LEVEL MAKING DECISION: A CONTRIBUTION OF THE BRAZILIAN NAVY TO SELECTING AUTOCLAVES IN THE FIGHT AGAINST COVID-19 Desenvolvimento cle uma tecnologia computacional para tornada de decisio de alto n'vel: uma contribuiga0 da Marinha do Brasil para sele¢ao de autoclaves no combate & COVID-I9 Natalia Oliveira Barboea de Paula, Igor Pinbeire de Araiije Coste, Marco: lesandr inte de Castre Junior, Luie Frederice Hurtin de Souca de Barres Tecra, Carles Francisco Simses Gomes, Marcas des Santas INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY 51 TECHNOLOGY-BASED BUSINESS INCUBATORS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND DISSEMINATION OF SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES Incubadoras de Empresas de Base Tecnolégica: andlise comparativa ¢ disseminacdo de préticas sustentaveis Quintal Renate Sant NUCLEAR 59 REQUIREMENTS GATHERING OF INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR NUCLEAR SUBMARINES Levantamento de requisites de sistemas de gestéo integrado para submarines nucleares Antonelly sss Gregorio de Sousa José Gilberto Fernandes Junior, Eduardo Henrique Damascene da Gama, Luciano Carlo Beleza, Ricarde Kropf Santer Fermam 69 STUDY OF STRAIN-INDUCED PHASE TRANSFORMATION IN AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEELS APPLIED TO NUCLEAR FUEL COMPONENTS Fstuco da transformacdo de faces induzida por deformagso em acos inoxidave's austeniticos aplicados @ componentes de combustive's nucleares Jamil Martins Guimardes Junior =_ DECISION-MAKING PROCESS DEVELOPING A COMPUTATIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOR HIGH-LEVEL MAKING DECISION: A CONTRIBUTION OF THE BRAZILIAN NAVY TO SELECTING AUTOCLAVES IN THE FIGHT AGAINST COVID-19 Desenvolvimento de uma tecnologia computacional para tomada de decisdo de alto nivel: uma contribui¢éo da Marinha do Brasil para selecdo de autoclaves no combate a COVID-19 Natalia Oliveira Barbosa de Paula’, Igor Pinheiro de Araujo Costa’, Marcos Alexandre Pinto de Castro Junior’, Luiz Frederico Horacio de Souza de Barros Teixeira‘, Carlos Francisco Simées Gomes’, Marcos dos Santos* ‘Abstract: This paper aimed to propose and present to the scien tific community and to soci Decision Support (MDS) - ELECTRE-MOr The method eon- sists of a proposal for classification of multiple criteria with input of ordinal weights, which includes mubiple alternative decision makers and distribution in predefined categories. In order to faci- Iitate the dissemination and use by society in general, the axio- matics of ELECTRE-MOr was implemented in a simple and {intuitive online computational tool, which is aleo presented in thie article. To illustrate the application, areal case «rudy was conduc ted with public health experte for the selection of autoclaves to be used in the production of the vaccine against the new coronavin. ‘Asa renul, the Finnaqua mode! was selected asthe one with the highest cost-benefit among the analyzed alternatives. This article seeks to solve a problem of extreme relevance to academia and society, a8 it proposes the application of a new MDS method to contribute to the solution of « problem that affects millions of peo- pile in Brazil and worldwide, Tis emphasized that the model pre~ sented can be expanded and applied in several types of tactical, ‘operational and strategic problem in the civil and military envi ronments, this being a great method focused on the contribution of high-level decision-making Keywords: Brazilian Navy. ELECTRE-MOr COVID-19. Autoclave. Vaccine. 4 new method of Multcrteria [Resumo: Este artigo tee por objetivo propor e apresentar 3 comuni= dade ientfia e soiedade um novo metodo de Apoio Makicrtxio MOr.0 metodo consiste em uma os critéros com entrada de pesos lizagio pela sociedade em geral, x axiomitica do ELEC fo implementada em wma ferramenta computaional n-fne simples « intuitiva, a qual também ¢ apresentada neste artigo, Para iustear 2 aplicaso, fo realizado, com especialstas em said piblica,um estado de caso real para selego de astoclaves a seem utilizadae na produsio in hle tember of profiler ond laze. by =al(h + 1m) +1) @ Where, “The aSb, statement means that “alternative a does not perform worse than the b, profile”. In validating the aSb, statement, a credibility index o (a,b) is ealeulated, which expresses the degree of confidence of the statement a is not worse than b,”. To define the overclassification ratio, the cut~ -off level Ais adopted (Equation 3). 8b, 6 (a,b) 2% @ Distribution is carried out through two procedures: » Optimistic: consists of comparing the alternative suc- cessively to alternative b, based on the last profile (cat- gory, class). » Pessimistic: consists of comparing alternative a successively to alternative b, starting from the first profile (category, class), which is the most demanding classification Type of problem ci Choice True Yes Choice Psoudo Yos Ranking Tue Yes Ranking Pseudo Yes Ranking Pseudo No Distribution Pseudo Yes Distribution Psoudo Yes Distribution Pseudo es Data mining* Pseudo Yes Choice/Ranking Pseudo yes “The ELECTRE-CBR methods a hybrid model that uses the properties of the ELECTRE family to solve data mining problems. 14g | rm Revista Pesquisa Naval Alo de Jone Rn. $2,7020,p. 42-49 Natila Olvera Barbora de Paul, gor Prine de vavjo Cort, Mares Alexandre Pinto de Cato Junior, ‘With the implementation of the two ways of obtaining the thresholds of predefined clases (b, andb,), ELECTRE-MOr covers several types of distributions of values of alternatives in a given criterion, since b, divides the interval between the ‘maximum and minimum values a equal intervals taking into account the number of classes defined by the decision makes, while the , form allocates equal numbers of alternatives in each class ofa given criterion. These two forms aim to pro- vide greater reliability to the distribution of alternatives in predefined classes. In addition, the result presents two order- ings of alternatives in the pessimistic and optimistic distribu- tions, which, according to Souza, Gomes and Barros (2018), allows fora sensitivity analysis ofthe result, providing greater transparency and robustness to the decision-making process 2.2. ELECTRE-MOR SOFTWARE. “To facilitate the use ofthe method by society in general, the computational implementation of the method was performed. “The ELECTRE-MOr software (COSTA et al.,20205) was developed ftom a partnership between the technical staf of the ‘Center for Naval Systems Analysis (Centra de Andlive de Sistemas ‘Novais~CASNAV),a research group feom the Postgraduate Program in Production Engineering at Universidade Federal Fluminense (UEF) and a reseatch group fiom the Graduate Program in Systems and Computing Engineering at Instituts Militar de Engenbaria (IME). The software wil be registered at the National Institute of Industrial Property (Institute ‘Nacional da Propriedade Industrial— INPI) via the Navy's ‘Technological Innovation Nucleus, headquartered in the Navy's General Directorate for Nuclear and Technological Development (Dircoria-Geral de Desenvolvimente Nusear ¢ ‘Teenolégico da Marinba~ DGDNTM), 3. METHOD “To make this study feasible, opinion surveys and data col- lection were carried out with three specialists from Institute de Tecnologia em Imuncbielégicos (Bio-Manguinhos), a unit of Fundaydo Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ) responsible for the technological development of vaccines and drugs, linked to the Ministry of Health, regarding the types of autoclaves used, their use, importance and form of acquisition, and equipment maintenance. Autoclaves for this type of activity require a robust size and differ from common equipment that are easly accessible fon the market due to the need for customization through a construction project that lasts an average of two to three years. ‘The standard capacity of 800 L. forall alternatives presented and the warranty time after commissioning of two years for all brands were taken into account. The values of the other criteria were based on equipment with similar characteris- tics in the institution for the purpose of developing vaccines in the laboratories. » Quantitative criteria: 1. Cost: Total value for project acquisition and equipment installation, I. Drying time: Average time to complete the entire steril- ination eyele. Il, Maintenance cost: Average annual cost of technical labor, purchase of spare parts and consumables for preventive and corrective maintenance. » Qualitative criteria: |. Technical Assistance: Evaluates the easiness of obtaining replacement parts, as well as location and cost assessed by «bias in terms of time distance, and number of suppliers I, Data Integration: Applicability of the equipment that allows integration with computers to record data from activities carried out digitally and programmed, to comply with a legal requirement for auditing purposes, I. Quality/durability of materials: Aecording to the percep tion of maintenance specialists and laboratory research- crs, this eriterion denotes the best performance in rela- tion to the length of wear of the composite materials and the number of times the equipment has failed or order were defected, 3.1. APPLICATION OF THE ELECTRE-MOR METHOD For the application of the method, the use of the ELECTRE-MOR software will beillustrated. First, the proj- cect, decision makers criteria and alternatives that make up the problem must be registered (Figure 1) Then, the pair-wise analysis ofthe criteria for each deci- sion maker is carried out, using the seroll bar shown in Figure 2. The bar must be slid in the direction of the most important criterion, 451 Revista Pesquisa Naval Rae Jane 32,2020, p. 42-49 Natils Olvera Barbosa de Paul, Igor Pinna oe Arado Costa, Mateos Alexandre Prt ae Caro Juno, “Then, strong preference (p), weak preference (q),and veto (@) thresholds ae inserted, which were obtained by consensus among decision makers (FIOCRUZ, specialists) (Figure 3). ‘Table 2 lists the alternative models, criteria, classes, and weights of criteria. It is noteworthy that the weights were obtained after parity analysis illustrated in Figure 2, while b, and b, class thresholds were obtained by applying Equations 1 and 2, with ealeulations performed automatically by the com= putational tool, Table 2 establishes the relationship between alternative models currently used in the Institution, criteria, classes, and weights of the criteria, ‘The criteria “cost”, “drying time”, and “maintenance cost” were considered as monotonic of loss or cost, that is the lower the better, For this reason, they are represented by negative values 4. RESULTS After applying all ELECTRE-MOr steps, pessimistic and optimistie orderings are generated in both scenarios (using b, and b,), with a cut-off level of & = 0.75 (Table 3). Analyzing Table 3, it can be observed that the Finnaqua alternative presents an A rating (best assessment) in both ‘ways of obtaining classes (b, and b,) and, also, in both sce- narios — optimistic and pessimistic. As a secondary option, the Hogner alternative ranks well in both ordering and ways of obtaining class thresholds. Likewise, using the eriteria and data collected for this evaluation, the Subtilerepeux and ‘Tatinauer options presented the worst ratings compared to the other alternatives. “The following groups of alternatives and thei ist of pref erences may be observed: » Group 1 = Finnaqua » Group 2 = Hogner. » Group 3 = Getinge, Getinge Projeto Autoclaves Avaliar Critérios Decisor 1 Custo VS Tempo de secagem Custo VS Custo de manutencao | Custo VS Assisténcia técnica | Custo VS Integracao de dados ! Custo VS Qualidade | Tempo de secagem VS Custo de manutengao | Tempo de secagem VS Assisténcia técnica —: Figure 2. Peer evaluation of the criteria Projeto Autoclaves Critérios «cp ters Cadastrar Decisor nemeicate pee Noe Enns Decisores eave fuss —— Nome [Deckert } cow tseeanes tenes | arenco’ soo [Bese } i alae Nose newest nate Figure J. Interface of the ELECTRE-MOr software. 146] Revista Pesquisa Naval Alo de Jone Rn 32,7020, p. 42-49 Nati Olvera Barbora de Paul, Igor Pinner de Arab Cort, Maras Alexandra Pint de Cato Junior » Group 4 = Fedegar. » Group 5 = Subtilerepeus, Tutinaver. Based on the results presented, the Finnaqua model can be considered the most suitable to be acquired, as it was the only autoclave with an A rating in all evaluated scenarios. ‘The factors that lead this alternative to be classified as the best among the evaluated models ae the good performances in the criteria of drying time, ease of data integration, and quality: This model also stood out for its regularity inthe eri~ teria, which justifies its choice. The other models stand out in certain criteria, but do not present good performances in the other evaluated attributes, ‘An important feature of the method is the possibilty of carrying out a sensitivity analysis to verify the robustness of the solution found. This analysis is recommended for cases where more than one alternative are classified in the highest class, aiming to increase the level of demand in search of a smaller number of indicated alternatives. 5. CONCLUSION “The objective of this study was achieved, since it was possible to obtain an analysis for the choice of autoclave models based on the qualitative and quantitative evalu- ation of realistic and coherent data with the current sce~ nario. Although the alternatives that presented the best rating do not have a better purchase cost, they present a better evaluation in other important criteria, which result in better efficiency, durability, and savings in maintenance costs (indirect costs) Parametros do projeto Criterio PB Qa v (custo ¥ [20000 |[r2000 [500000 ] 7 (Gijon ee iteno [iste de manutangao~ [20000 |[r00 0000 | slat A @ v [Asati tenia v2 i Ik | Criterio P Q v [Regio de dados Iz lf lls J Criterio P Q v [Quatidace vii les | | CASNAV [ Avaiar Pojeto oR & Figure 3. Entering the project parameters. 147) Revista Pesquisa Naval Ro de Janet = Rn. 32,2020, p. 42-49 ‘Table 2. Decision matrix. ea aa Rt oer er veces “0000 onan “s0000 sane “0000 venue “nooo “e000 Weights I 0.064935065 0194805195 | 0142857143 I 0.207792208 Tr ‘OISS844156 — 0.233766234 bs I -742,500, “35.0 | “18,500 23 Tr 30 35 b, b, -935,000 “400 ---29000~«~*é‘“‘ S:S:*:*Ci‘«‘ 3.0 b, 127800 450 395008 25 bs / ~650,000 -30,0 -10,000 / 3.0, y 3.0 40 b, b, -864000 “3330000 2 2 4 b, -860,000 -40——-40.000 1 2 4 Deis a 80 5 20002=**sé—

You might also like