1. Discriminatory laws and practices, including pathologization, can
legitimize such violence and create a climate in which perpetrators go unpunished.
2. When lodging complaints of violence by third parties, LGBT people
have reportedly been subject to further victimization by the police, including verbal, physical and sexual assault, including rape
3. Silencing through shame or threat by law enforcement officials may
keep a considerable number of victims from reporting abuses. Laws on sexual violence that only consider women victims, or that restrict the definition of sexual violence only to penile penetration, can leave survivors of other forms of sexual violence, as well as victims who are not women or who are not legally recognized as women, with no access to recourse.
4. “[s]ince homosexuality is not a medical condition, any purported
medical test applied to determine an applicant’s sexual orientation could not, in my view, be considered to be consistent with [the right to the integrity of the person]. It would also fail the proportionality requirement […] in relation to a violation of the right to privacy and family life because, by definition, such a test cannot achieve the objective of establishing an individual’s sexual orientation. It follows that medical tests cannot be used for the purpose of establishing an applicant’s credibility, as they infringe Articles 3 [the right to the integrity of the person] and 7 [the right to respect for private and family life] of the Charter [of Fundamental Rights of the European Union]
5. Reports of the Special Rapporteur on Torture (A/HRC/22/53), 2013,
paras. 76, 79
The practice of subjecting cisgender men and transgender women who
are arrested on homosexuality-related charges to anal examinations that are intended to obtain physical evidence for prosecution has been condemned by the Committee against Torture, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, and the Special Rapporteur on torture, who has also criticized it as “medically worthless”.
The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has concluded that
homophobic illtreatment on the part of health professionals is unacceptable and should be proscribed and denounced.103 There is an abundance of accounts and testimonies of persons being denied medical treatment, subjected to verbal abuse and public humiliation, psychiatric evaluation, a variety of forced procedures such as sterilization, State-sponsored forcible anal examinations for the prosecution of suspected homosexual activities, and invasive virginity examinations conducted by health-care providers,104 hormone therapy and genital normalizing surgeries under the guise of so called “reparative therapies”. 105 These procedures are rarely medically necessary,106 can cause scarring, loss of sexual sensation, pain, incontinence and lifelong depression and have also been criticized as being unscientific, potentially harmful and contributing to stigma (A/HRC/14/20, para. 23). The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women expressed concern about lesbian, bisexual, transgender and intersex women as “victims of abuses and mistreatment by health service providers”
6. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment
No. 22 (E/C.12/GC/22), 2016, para. 58; Report of the Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (A/73/152), para. 28; Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on discrimination and violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity (A/HRC/29/23), 2015, para. 70; Human Rights Committee, Concluding Observations on Ukraine (CCPR/C/UKR/CO/7), para. 10; Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture (A/HRC/22/53), 2013, para. 88; and the joint statement by OHCHR, UN-Women, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF and WHO, “Eliminating forced, coercive and otherwise involuntary sterilization”, 2014
Transgender people are often forced or coerced to undergo
sterilization, gender reassignment surgery, other medical procedures and medical certification in violation of international human rights standards, including as abusive requirements for recognition of gender identity.
7. The Committee against Torture and the Special Rapporteur on
torture have expressed concern about forced treatment to change sexual orientation or gender identity, including through involuntary confinement in psychiatric and other institutions, the administration of electroshocks, and other “aversion therapy”, which could result in physical and psychological harm.
8.Conversion therapies and surgeries
The aim of the provisions of article 7 of the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights is to protect both the dignity and the physical and mental integrity of the individual. It is the duty of the State party to afford everyone protection through legislative and other measures as may be necessary against the acts prohibited by article 7, whether inflicted by people acting in their official capacity, outside their official capacity or in a private capacity. The prohibition in article 7 is complemented by the positive requirements of article 10, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, which stipulates that “All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person.”
The Committee also reaffirms that, even in situations of public
emergency such as those referred to in article 4 of the Covenant, no derogation from the provision of article 7 is allowed and its provisions must remain in force
Article 7 expressly prohibits medical or scientific experimentation