Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name
Course
Tutor
Date
Introduction
Georges Bataille has been exposed to feminist criticism with a ferocity rivaled only by
feminists' disdain for de Sade. Eroticism, as well as Bataille's erotica, is frequently regarded as
man may be just as much the object of a woman's want as a woman is of a man's desire," Bataille
argues in Eroticism. Let's look at all of the "sexist" statements, sentence by sentence, with as
much nuance as possible. In this passage, Bataille acknowledges that males might also be the
"object" (of transgression?) in a sexual connection. As a result, there is no sexism, and all
feminist attacks of this section fail because of this essential acknowledgment that men and
Bataille isn't a woman fetishist. "It would be completely incorrect to argue that women
are more beautiful or even more desired than men," he continues. Many feminists would
consider what comes after Bataille's final comments to be sexist and misogynistic, but I disagree.
When Bataille says that "women try to bring about the conjunction that men achieve by pursuing
them" [emphasis mine], it's important to remember that he's working under the assumption that
"women have the power of exciting desire in men," and that he never claims this to be always
true, but usually true (at least, concerning the time he was living and the culture he was living
Surname 2
in). When Bataille writes that "shame, real or imagined, is a woman's way of accepting the taboo
that transforms her into a human being," there is a risk of radical misinterpretation. All humans,
male, female, other, etc., receive their humanity through taboo, according to Bataille. Humanity
distinguishes itself from animosity by prohibition (taboo). As a result, the taboo that defines
human humanity is not unique to women but rather applies to all people, regardless of sex or
gender.