What are the roles of Ethics in Resource Allocation? Why it Matters?
Resource allocation in health and elsewhere should satisfy two main ethical criteria. First, it should be cost-effective—limited resources for health should be allocated to maximize the health benefits for the population served. A cost- effectiveness analysis (CEA) of alternative health interventions measures their respective costs and benefits to determine their relative efficiency in the production of health. Second, the allocation should be equitable or just; equity is concerned with the distribution of benefits and costs to distinct individuals or groups. The maximization of benefits, which is associated with the general philosophical moral theory of utilitarianism or consequentialism, however, is routinely criticized for ignoring those considerations. Equity in health care distribution is complex and embodies several distinct moral concerns or issues that this chapter delineates. Efficiency and equity can sometimes coincide. In some of the world's poorest countries, for example, health budgets support tertiary care and travel to clinics abroad for the elite and the well connected, even as the poor are denied effective, low-cost prevention or treatment for life-threatening diseases.
If healthcare resources are scarce, how should they be distributed?
Distribution choices will benefit some and not others. How should choices be made? What values should guide these choices? Ethical decisions must be always involved in scarce of resource in healthcare. Health care workers the most priority for the resources so that they can help other people and those responsible for educating and caring for the patients. Also, other health care professionals must use to make a fair decision when allocating a resource in times of scarce. The most important is making a fair and ethical choices is to assure that all the decisions are made through and impartial process to make all the people fair with the resources.