Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NATIONAL
STRUCTURAL
CODE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
2015
VOLUME I
Introduction
ASEP recognizes the need for an up-to-date structural code addressing the design and
installation of structural systems
through requirements emphasizing performance. The new National Structural Code of the
Philippines (NSCP Volume I) is
designed to meet these needs through various model codes/regulations, generally from
the United States, to safeguard the
public health and safety nationwide.
This' updated Structural Code establishes minimum requirements for structural systems
using prescriptive and
performance-based provisions. It is founded on broad-based principles that make
possible the use of new materials and
new building designs. Also, this code reflects the latest seismic design practice for
earthquake-resistant structures.
In its drive to upgrade and update the NSCP, the ASEP Codes and Standards Committee
initially wanted to adopt the latest
editions of American code counterparts. However, for cases where available local data
is limited to support the upgra e,
then some provisions and procedures of the NSCP 7'" edition were retained.
School buildings of more than one story, hospitals, designated evacuation centers,
structures
are under the essential facilities category. Section 104 - Design Requirements
Churches, Mosque and other related religious structures are under the special
occupancy
category Section 104-Design Requirements.
The provision for deflection of any structural member under the serviceability
requirement is
deleted. This requirement for concrete and steel is specified in Chapters 4 and 5
respectively.
iv
The load factors and load combinations are revised particularly the load combinations
including wind load.
Additional loads are incorporated in the table for minimum uniform and concentrated
loads
particularly the parking garage and ramp live load.
b.3 Section 207 - Wind Loads
Wind load provisions, which were previously based on ASCE7-05, are updated based on
ASCE7-10. In this edition, three different wind contour maps for the entire
Philippine
archipelago are generated and provided for determining the basic wind speeds for
different
categories of building occupancies as defined in Table 103-1. These maps provide
basic wind
speeds that are directly applicable for determining pressures for design strength.
Strength
design wind load factor is 1.0; whereas, allowable stress design wind load factor is
0.6.
Generally, basic wind speeds correspond to 3%, 7% and 15% probability of exceedance
in 50
years (MRI = 1700,700 and 300 years, respectively). Four (4) permitted procedures in
determining the design wind loads for main wind-force resisting systems (MWFRS), for
other
structures and building appurtenances and for components and cladding (C&C) are
provided
such as;
The ANSI EIA/TIA-222-G-2005 and ANSI EIA/TIA-222G-1-2007 are now fully referenced
for computing wind loads on steel antenna towers and antenna supporting structures.
c.6 The figure for cut slopes has been amended for clarity;
c.7 The figure for fill slopes has been amended for clarity and some provisions have
been
modified;
c.8 A table on the minimum required number of boreholes has been added to the section
on
foundation investigation;
c. 10 The section on excavations and fills has been amended to incorporate provisions
for scouring
and erosion protection as well as support of excavations and open cuts;
c.12 A Section on MSE Structures and Similar Reinforced Embankments and Fills has
been added.
Chapter 4 - Structural Concrete
General information regarding the scope and applicability of NSCP 2015, Vol. 1 is
provided. Additional sub-
section on interpretation is included to help users better understand Chapter 4,
Structural Concrete.
The definition for hoops has been modified because the use of interlocking headed
bars is a concern regarding
the possibility that it will not be adequately interlocked and because the heads
could become disengaged under
complex loadings well into the non-linear range of response. It is now defined as a
closed tie oi continuously
wound tie, made up of one or several reinforcement elements, each having seismic
hooks at both ends.
A definition for special seismic systems, a term used in Sections 418 and 419, has
been added.
* ASTM A370-14, Standard Test Methods and Definitions for Mechanical Testing of Steel
Products
© ASTM A 1085- 13, Standard Specification for Cold-Formed Welded Carbon Steel Hollow
Structural Sections (PISS)
o ASTM C173/C173M-14, Standard Test Method for Air- Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete
by
Volumetric Method
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines, Inc. (ASEP)
A new referenced specification from Australia and New Zealand, Section 403.2.6 is
added. These
standards were included as ACI 3 1 8 has no provisions related to Qualifications on
the Use of Quenched
Tempered QT/Thermo-Mechanically Treated Reinforcement, which are the type
manufactured, sold,
and commonly used for building construction in the Philippines:
© NZS 3101: 2006, Part 1 and Part 2, Concrete Structures Standard, and Design of
Concrete Structures
© ASTM Cl 92/Cl 92M-07, Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test
Specimens in the Laboratory
Several referenced standards and specifications have been updated, as in most cases
with every edition
of the NSCP. Note that the edition of every referenced standard is important. The
NSCP does not
necessarily adopt new editions of referenced standards unless they are vetted before
the publication of
each edition of the standard.
This new Section has been added to Chapter 4 to introduce structural system
requirements.
This Section contains Sub-sections on Materials, Design Loads, Structural System and
Load
Paths, Structural Analysis, Strength, Serviceability, Durability, Sustainability,
Structural
Integrity, Fire Resistance, Requirements for Specific Types of Construction,
Construction and
Inspection, and Strength Evaluation of Existing Structures. Most of these Sub-
sections refer to
the other Sections in the NSCP. The Sub-section on construction and inspection, for
instance,
refers to Section 426. In the areas for Sustainability and Fire Resistance, the NSCP
does not
have specific requirements. This Sub-section on Sustainability allows the licensed
design
professional to specify in the construction documents, sustainability requirements in
addition
to the strength, serviceability, and durability requirements of the NSCP. The
strength,
serviceability, and durability requirements are required to take precedence over
sustainability
considerations, though these requirements are generally in harmony with sustainable
structures. In the Sub-section on Fire Resistance, the NSCP refers to the fire-
protection
requirements of the NSCP Chapter 4, Sub-section 420.6.1. However, if the National
Building
Code of the Philippines requires a greater concrete cover, such greater thickness
shall govern.
d,5 Section 405: Loads
The following modification has been made in the provision for live load reduction
because
there are still unincorporated areas where there may not be included in the previous
editions of
the NSCP. The 7 l)1 Edition, Sub-section 405.2.3 - Live load reductions shall be
permitted in
accordance with the National Building Code of the Philippines, or in its absence, in
accordance with ASCE/SEI 7.
For many Code revision cycles, ACI 318 retained provisions for service-level
earthquake
forces in the design load combinations. In 1993, ASCE/SEI 7 converted earthquake
forces to
strength-level forces and reduced the earthquake load factor to 1.0, and the model
building
vii
codes followed suit. In modern building codes around the world, earthquake loads are
now
strength-level forces. Any references to service-level earthquake forces have been
deleted.
Previous NSCP 6 th Edition has been silent on the use of finite element analysis
(FEA), though it is now
frequently used. Sub-section 406.9 now has provisions that are intended to explicitly
allow the use of
FEA and to provide a framework for the future expansion of FEA provisions, but not as
a guide toward
the selection and use of FEA software. The new Sub-section on diaphragms and
collectors makes
explicit reference to the use of FEA, which makes it imperative that the NSCP 7'”
Edition recognize the
acceptability of its use.
d.7 Section 408: Two-Way Slabs
It was also decided by the ACI 318 Committee, that if the same bonded reinforcement
were
required for both bonded and unbonded post-tensioned two-way systems, the structural
integrity requirements for both systems should also be the same. The structural
integrity
requirements in ACI 318M-11, Section 18.12.6 applied to two-way post-tensioned slab
systems with unbonded tendons only. The structural integrity requirements in ACI
318M-14
Section 8. 7.5.6 (corresponding to the NSCP 2015, Sub-section 408.7.5.6) now apply to
two-
way post-tensioned slab systems with bonded as well as unbonded tendons.
The use of open web reinforcement for torsion and shear in slender spandrel beams by
the
precast concrete industry as an alternative to the closed stirrups traditionally
mandated by this
Code. Eliminating closed stirrups is desirable because they cause reinforcement
congestion,
production costs also increase significantly because pre-tensioning strand must be
threaded
through the closed stirrups.
A new relevant Sub-section 409.5.4.7 for solid precast sections is added to the NSCP
7 ,h
Edition.
For the first time, a new Section 412, added design provisions for diaphragms in
buildings
constructed in areas of low seismicity (Zone 2) The new Section applies “to the
design of non-
prestressed and prestressed diaphragms, including:
(c) . Diaphragms that comprise precast elements with end strips formed by either a
cast-
in-place concrete topping slab or edge beams
Column confinement - The ability of the concrete core of a concrete reinforced column
to sustain compressive
strains tends to increase with confinement pressure. Confinement requirements for
columns of special moment
frames, and for columns not designated as part of the seismic-force-resisting system
in structures assigned to
seismic zone 4 (similar to ASCE 7-10 Seismic Design Categories D, E, and F), with
high axial load or high
concrete compressive strength are significantly different.
Transverse reinforcement - One important new requirement for special moment frame
columns are included in
Sub-sections 418.7.5.2 and 418.7.5.4. There are new restrictions on the use of headed
reinforcement to make up
hoops.
Special moment frame beam-column joints - For beam-column joints of special moment
frames, clarification of
the development length of the beam longitudinal reinforcement that is hooked,
requirements for joints with
headed longitudinal reinforcement, and restrictions on joint aspect ratio are new.
For beam-column joints of
special moment frames, clarification of development length of beam longitudinal
reinforcement that is hooked,
requirements for joints with headed longitudinal reinforcement, and restrictions on
joint aspect ratio are new.
Special shear walls - Subsection 418.10 (equivalent to AC1 31S-14M-14 Section 18.10,
previously
ACI 318M-11 Section 21.9), has been extensively revised in view of the performance of
buildings in the Chile
earthquake of 2010 and the Christchurch, New Zealand, earthquakes of 201 1, as wells
as full-scale reinforced
concrete building tests. In these earthquakes and laboratory tests, concrete spalling
and vertical reinforcement
buckling were at times observed at wall boundaries.
For ASTM A615 Grade 420 bars used as longitudinal reinforcement in special moment
frames and special shear
wails, the NSCP 7 lh Edition now requires the same minimum elongation as ASTM A706
reinforcement.
Quite a few changes have been made in concrete durability requirements, which are now
located in this Section.
The definition of yield strength of high-strength reinforcement for Grade 420 (Grade
60) in this Section is now,
for the first time, the same as that in ASTM specifications, except for bars with
less than 420 MPa, the yield
strength shall be taken as the stress corresponding to a strain of 0.35 percent.
Delormed and plain stainless steel wire and welded wire conforming to ASTM A 1 022 is
now permitted to be
used as concrete reinforcement.
Sub-section 420.2.2.5 requires “Deformed non-prestressed longitudinal reinforcement
resisting earthquake
moment, axial force, or both, in special moment frames, special structural walls, and
all the components of
special structural walls including coupling beams and wall piers” to be ASTM A706
Grade 420 (Grade 60),
ASTM 615 Grade 275 (Grade 40) or Grade 420 (Grade 60) reinforcement is permitted if
two supplementary
requirements are met, which are already part of the ASTM A706 specification. A third
supplementary
requirement is now added for ASTM A615 (Grade 60) reinforcement to be permitted for
use in special moment
frames, special structural walls. The minimum elongation in 200 mm (8”) must now be
the same as that ASTM
A615 (Grade 60) reinforcement.
One aspect of the Code compliance that the Association of Structural Engineers of the
Philippines is cautioning
Designers and Constructors alike, is the introduction of ASTM 615 Grade 520 (Grade
75) in the Philippine
ix
market. Since this was not covered by previous editions of the NSCP Vol. 1, it
creates an impression of an
unregulated use of a new high-strength reinforcement grade. NSCP 7 1 Ed.t.on,
There was no mention that ASTM A615M, Grade 520, was allowed, although the use of
micro-alloyed
high-strength reinforcement may be allowed in the future through the issuance of a
new ASTM or
updated standard, and with proper validation by the Department of Trade and Industry
s Bureau ot
Standards. It will be premature to allow its use for special moment frames, special
structural walls, and
all components of special structural walls, including coupling beams, and wall piers
tor Buildings
located in areas of high seismicity (zone 4). The same restrictions indicated in Sub-
section 420.7.6, on
the use of quenched-tempered thermo-mechanically treated (QT/TMT) reinforcing bars in
structures
located in seismic zone 4 for Grade 420 reinforcement, shall also be applied to Grade
520, unless
proven in subsequent studies and tests.
For prestressed members, a new equation for the nominal axial strength at zero
eccentricity has been
introduced in Sub-section 422.4*2.3.
New Sub-section 422.4.3*1, which requires that the nominal axial tensile strength of
a non-prestressed,
composite, or prestressed member, not to be taken greater than the maximum nominal
axial tensile
strength of member.
d.14 Section 425: Reinforcement Details
Two changes shown in Table 7 (part of Table 425. 3.2) are made to eliminate the
differences between
the required tail extension of a 90-degree or 135- degree standard hook, subject to a
minimum of 75
mm (3”).
Mechanical or welded splices with strengths below 125% of the yield strength ol the
spliced reinfoicing
bars are no longer permitted. The associated stagger requirements have been deleted.
Thus there is no
longer a need to specify “full” mechanical or “full’ welded splices.
In this section, the user will probably require some time to get used to, it starts
with the following:
(a) Design information that the licensed design professional shall specify in the
construction
documents,
(b) Compliance requirements that the licensed design professional shall specify in
the
construction documents,
(c) Inspection requirements that the licensed design professional shall specify in
the
construction documents.
Thus, construction and inspection requirements have been consolidated, and they are
now related to
construction documents. The construction requirements are designated either as
“design information” or
“compliance requirements.” These are largely existing material that has been
rearranged. The
inspection requirements in Sub-section 426.13 are taken from Chapter 17 of the 2015
International
Building Code (IBC) and were previously not part of ACI 318.
Provisions in ACI 318-11 and earlier editions, which explained basic statistical
considerations
in mixture proportioning, are no longer found in ACI 318-14. Instead, ACI 301-10,
Specifications for Structural Concrete , is referenced.
These are some other changes in the makeup of NSCP 2016 7 th Edition that should be
noted:
1 . There are two new Sections: Section 404, Structural System Requirements and
Section 412, Diaphragms.
8. Section 424, Alternative Design Method, now Section 429, is adapted from
earlier editions of the NSCP.
10. On the other hand. Section 416, Precast Concrete, and Section 418, Prestressed
Concrete, no longer exist as separate entities. The provisions of these Sections
are now spread over several of the new Sections.
Sub-section 418.18, Requirements for post-tensioning ducts and grouting have also
been removed as
being outdated. The Commentary now provides specification guidance.
ASEP adapted the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 14th Edition in this
updated
Structural Steel code. The revisions made in this chapter are the following:
e.l The entire Structural Steel chapters are streamlined placing all chapter
definitions under one
Definition heading, tables are immediately shown where they are first mentioned,
figures drawn
larger, equation are all in boldface, extraneous user notes are removed, essential
in-text definitions
italicized and in-text equation terms are written in boldface for easy reference.
501.3.5 Filler Metal and Flux for Welding to 501.3.5 Consumables for Welding
510.10.3 Web Crippling to Web Local Crippling
557.5 Special Fabrication Requirements. Weld tabs changed to Run-off tabs under
Exception.
APPENDIX A -4
xi
f.
STRUCTURAL FIRE f
Temperatures
APPENDIX A-6
2010- n c =2.5(/(SD)
2010 :
Q s =r l
1 +
0 , 24 /"
•frH * 1
(5M.2-7) Q z
; 2015:
0.24 Y 12 \
c IV-v’hJ
(5H>7)
2010: 4 ; 2015:
Chapter 6: Wood.
f.l Section 616 - Design Provisions and Equations: The NDS 2015 Chapter 3 is adopted
almost in its entirety;
f.2 Section 6 1 7 - Sawn Lumber: The NDS 20 1 5 Chapter 4 is adopted almost in its
entirety;
f.3 Section 618 - Structural Glued Laminated Timber: The NDS 2015 Chapter 5 is
adopted
Chapter 7: Masonry
g. 1 The specified yield strength of steel reinforcement is 420MPa instead of 413 MPa
/ 415 MPa;
xii
3. Acknowledgment
The ASEP Codes and Standards Committee are indebted to Philippine Institute of
Volcanology and Seismology
(PHIVOLCS) and to Dir. Renato V. Solidum, Ph. D. for his unselfish contribution
specifically on Section 208 of
this code.
ASEP acknowledges the contribution of Dr. Teresito C. Bacolcol and Ms. Madeline
Cabologan of PHIVOLCS for
the seismic maps used in this code.
ASEP acknowledges the contribution of Engr. Carlos M. Villaraza for his unselfish
contribution on Chapter 2
Seismic/Earthquake Chapter.
The contributions of ASEP members and other users of this code who have suggested
improvements, identified
errors and recommended items are recognized.
ASEP also acknowledges the contribution of the industry partners, companies and
individuals, who continue to
support ASEP’s numerous undertakings.
The ASEP Codes and Standards Committee also acknowledge Arch. Avigaile Genota Riola
who designs the covers
of the NSCP Volume 1, 2010 Edition and NSCP Volume 1, 2015 Edition.
xiii
Table of Contents
SECTION 101
101.2 Purpose 2
101.3 Scope
SECTION 102
DEFINITIONS
SECTION 103
CLASSIFICATION
OF STRUCTURES
SECTION 104
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
104.3 Analysis 7
SECTION 105
1 06. 1 General * 9
106.2 Specifications * „ . 9
SECTION 107
107.1 General jq
107.2 Definitions jq
APPENDICES
LA - Recommended Guidelines on Structural Design Peer Review of Structures 2015 IA-1
101.2 Purpose
ac option of this code, oi one for which a legal between expected and observed
performance. This
2009
OCCUPANCY
OCCUPANCY OR FUNCTION OF
CATEGORY
STRUCTURE
treatment areas.
emergency aircraft,
1 Essential
response.
'1
Facilities
■;
Hospitals,
j
Designated evacuation centers and
II Hazardous
Facilities
substances.
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines, Inc. (ASEP)
OCCUPANCY
CATEGORY
OCCUPANCY OR FUNCTION OF
STRUCTURE
III Special
Occupancy
Structures
IV Standard
Occupancy
Structures
V Miscellaneous
Structures
Privategarages,carports,shedsandfences
over 1 .Smhigh.
MUM
DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
104.3.3 Anchorage
105.2.1 General
105.2.2 Location
105.2.3 Maintenance
(SECTIONS
iSPECIFICATI*
fcALCilATlONSlil
106.1 General
106.2 Specifications
106.3.1 General
107.1 General
Exception:
107.2 Definitions
1 07.3.1 Qualifications
107.5.1 Concrete
Exceptions:
Exception:
Exceptions:
1-12
Exception:
Exception:
Exception:
107.5.12 Shotcrete
| ^cepti<m:fev,
hazard exists.
107.7.1 General
107.7.1.1 Purpose
107.7.1.2 Scope
107.7.1.3 Definition
107.7.4 Connections
107.7.6.2 Certificate
107.8.1 General
Exceptions :
L When approved , the non-destructive testing rate for an
individual welder or welding operator may be reduced
to 25 percent , provided the reject rate is demonstrated
to be 5 percent or less of the welds tested for the
welder or welding operator. A sampling of at least 40
completed welds for a job shall be made for such
reduction evaluation. Reject rate is defined as the
number of welds containing rejectable defects divided
by the number of welds completed \ For evaluating the
reject rate of continuous welds over 900 mm in length
where the effective throat thickness is 25 mm or less ,
each 300 mm increment or fraction thereof shall be
considered as one weld. For evaluating the reject rate
on continuous welds over 900 mm in length where the
effective throat thickness is greater than 25 mm, each
150 mm of length or fraction thereof shall he
considered one weld.
107.8.3 Others
107.9.1 General
IA-1
Copyright© 2015
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines, Inc. (ASEP)
Suite 713 Future Point Plaza Condominium 1,
1100 Philippines
Telephone Nos.
Facsimile
E-mail Address
Website
+63 (2)410-0483
+63 (2)411-8606
aseponline@gmail.com
http://www.aseponline.org
About ASEP
Print History
2000
2015
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines, Inc. (ASEP)
IA-5
CONTENTS
ABBREVIATIONS
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
STRUCTURES TO BE REVIEWED
REVIEWER’S QUALIFICATION
SCOPE OF REVIEW
ITEMS TO BE REVIEWED n
Foundation Review j ^
Content I-A16
REFERENCES
1A-6
Abbreviations
A&D
ACI
AISC
ASCE
ASEP
BIM
CE
CTBUH
DPWH
Civil Engineer
IA-7
Introduction
Design review is incorporated in most building codes to provide the means for
professional discussion and evaluation of
structural design ot projects. Thus, these reviews are the eye openers for the
resolution of problems encountered before a critical
phase of the construction project. Design review truly enhances the ideas for public
safety overall and quality assurance.
Furthermore, it disseminates innovation through sharing of information.
Earthquake for instance is a phenomenon that man has been trying to study for
centuries but up to present time is still
unpredictable. We, as structural engineers, are faced with the greatest challenge of
formulating procedures on how to lessen if
not eliminate destruction and casualties due to this. We want to make sure that the
intent of our design is carefully followed
and carried out in the most professional manner. The burden o f setting up and
observing rules on how to achieve what has been
planned rest upon our shoulders. Design review can be a valuable tool faced with this
challenge.
This document establishes the guidelines for peer review. Since protecting lives and
properties are the paramount goals of the
Association of Structural Engineers of the Philippines (ASEP), the only way perhaps
to realise these goals is to establish ground
rules for all our practicing civil engineers, structural engineers and consultants to
follow strictly the Code provisions and
standards parameters.
IA-8
Background _
To accomplish the objectives of ASEP, the Board of Directors for 1 999-2000 has
continued the program of the ASEP Board
of Directors for 1998-1999 by creating several committees as shown below. These
objectives, as stated in its by-laws, shall be
the protection of the public welfare and the welfare of its constituents through the:
o Technical Advancement
One of the committees created for the Codes and Standards is the Committee on Design
Peer Review. The National Structural
Code of the Philippines (NSCP) 1992 Edition touches on independent design review
under the section “A Design and
Construction Review", which defines the structures required for the review
considering seismic zones and occupancy
categories. However, the scope, procedures and documentation of the review process
are not mentioned. Thus, this paper will
include guidelines on the implementation of the design peer review.
The same committee was revived by the President of the Board of Directors tor 2009-
2010, Adam C. Abinales, from the point
of view of engineering practitioners, to improve and expand the guidelines to
incorporate additional parameters and ethical
rules as well as enhance the practice of peer review. The committee's acti vities
have continued under the administiation of the
following ASEP Presidents:
Chairman
Ernesto F. Cruz
Co-Chairman
Gabriel Ursus L, Eusebio
Members
Alden C. Ong
Marie Christine G. Danao
Edmondo D. San Jose
The current trend in the local construction industry is the development of many high-
rise buildings* On account of this, it is the
objective of this peer review to improve section 104*5 of NSCP 2010, to ensure the
aim for life safety, to observe economy in
design and to protect the investment of clients.
The Peer Review aims to carry out positive results in the following areas:
© To promote exchange of information and innovative ideas between the designers and
reviewers;
© To inform the Owner-Client on the benefits of this exercise and any possible cost
implications resulting from the review;
© To define implementing matrix of all structures subject to practical independent
review; and
As stipulated in NSCP Section 104.5, Design Review is required for the following:
For structures covered by the mandatory Design Review, all related works shall be
deemed as included in the Engineer-of
Record’s scope of works, unless explicitly excluded in his work agreement.
For structures not included above but which are to be subjected to a Design Review as
an additional requirement by the Owner,
the coverage, extent, and procedures shall be as mutually agreed upon by the
Owner/Peer Reviewer, and the Engineer-of-
Record (EOR) and may not be as recommended in these Guidelines. Additionally, since
works connected or related to such
Design Review are not covered by the basic structural services of the EOR, these
shall be subject to a separate scope and
compensation for the EOR.
IA-10
Expected Results of Design Review: _
o As professionals, independent design reviewers and EOR shall not engage in unfair
practices. Both shall
observe fairness and professionalism in the practice of independent review. This
shall not by any means be a
channel to conduct criticism nor be a means to discredit the reviewer or the EOR, and
disenfranchise them of
the contract service they are awarded.
, There will be good understanding of the structures and relationships between the
Owner-Client and the
structural engineering community resulting to enhanced programs of future
developments and projects.
• There will be good relationships between designers and reviewers by improving the
design through constructive
reporting.
, The review will be conducted smoothly in the light of fairness and professionalism,
without unfair practice and
criticism to neither discredit nor disenfranchise any of the reviewer or EOR.
® The review will bring assurance to the Owner-Client of compliance to codes and
standards, assurance of bettei
engineering of the proposed structure, the improvement in design and safety as well
as improvement in
construction implementation and program, elimination of unsafe design and possible
work delays fiom
unwanted and costly repairs, among others.
Structures to be Reviewed —
Structures to be reviewed shall consist of all proposed new structures and addition
to structures which shall be deemed crucial
to life safety and/or health of the public and peace if such structures or buildings
would incur damage or failure or both.
1 . All structures more than 75-meter high (whichever is higher) from the exterior
ground level.
3. Structures designed under alternative system (as per section 101.4 NSCP VI
Edition) that intends to use other structural
materials, design approach and construction methodology not prescribed by the latest;
existing structural Code ( S
Edition, 20 1 0) or by other recognized international codes and standards.
4. Buildings, towers and other structures with undefined structural system not listed
in Table 208-11 of NSCP VI Edition.
5. Essential facilities such as hospitals fire & police stations, emergency vehicle
and equipment shelters and garages,
structures and equipment in communication center, aviation control towers, private
and public school buildings, water
supported structures and designated evacuation center, also buildings and structures
for national defense.
IA-11
Reviewer’s Qualification
The PR must review all items agreed to be reviewed with the Owner-Client and EOR per
relevant/recommended items listed
in this Guide. The PR shall refer regularly to check for completeness of the review
per applicable items listed in these guidelines.
The quantity of elements to be reviewed shall be in accordance with the second
paragraph of the subsection Methodology of
Review below.
The review documents should be checked for completeness and timeliness of the design
documents submitted per relevant
items recommended in this guide. The PR should assess the review documents received
and report immediately to the Owner-
° If any of the design documents submitted are not sufficient for him to proceed with
the review such that an entire document
is missing, for example the design criteria document is not included and the drawings
do not reflect the design
parameters/information completely; or
9 documents given and received may enable him to start and work immediately but the
PR have to stop soon for some
IA-12
© The PR shall also report if the items received were not delivered in good condition
that may not enable him to pioceed at
all; e.g. the documents are wet due to improper handling, incomplete or inadequate
protection from packaging materials,
among others.
others);
□ Analysis models including User’s Guide of software used by EOR (e.g. STAAD, ETABS,
SAP, SAFE and midasGen).
It is recommended to include also interoperable files such as .SET, .ANL, .S2K
and .F2K to facilitate conversion of
data.;
□ Design basis;
□ Design criteria;
□ Structural systems design narrative (including wind and seismic design parameters);
□ Structural specifications.
Item
Specific Design Checks to be Carried Out
Design
Basis/Criteria
Item
Design
Methods,
Standards and
Specifications
Analysis
models
Input and output data including geometry, material constants, properties, loadings,
assignments and
parameters used in software used.
Foundation
|Loads
Column loads have been appropriately computed and compared to results of analysis
model.
Effects of wind and notional loads on the building or structure have been checked.
Piles
Pile capacities have been designed for compressive axial load by applicable skin
friction and end bearing
capacities.
Review if the type of pile reactions used in the analysis models are
appropriate/applicable.
Piles have been designed for lateral loads and bending moment.
Pile joints have been designed for anchorage and embedment length of reinforcements,
for concrete pile.
Socketing has been designed for piles with short penetration depths.
Piles have been designed for negative skin friction.
Isolated Pads/
Combined
Footings/
Tied Footings
Raft
Appropriate modulus of sub-grade reaction of the soil has been assumed in design.
The raft has been designed to resist punching shear from columns.
The building or structure has been designed to cater for probable differential and
total settlement.
Lateral Load
Resisting
Framing
Systems as
assumed in the
Design Basis/
Criteria
The presence in the structural framing of any plan and/or vertical irregularities
mentioned in NSCP or
governing codes.
Slender
Columns
Columns
supporting
transfer beams
Designed for bending moment due to frame action including effects of special load
combination per code.
Recommended Guidelines on Structural Design
Peer Review of Structures 2015
1A-14
Item
Columns
supporting long
cmn herttriS
Columns
supporting
cantilever
Uvuli lo
f’nliimnQ in fl
Designed for horizontal load and moment acting on columns due to arched or pitched
tool.
v^uiuinuo in u _
two column
Designed for bending moment and shear at the column base including connections.
frame system
Cantilever
Cantilever support has been designed to resist bending moment and shear including
minimum uplift loads
from wind and seismic loads. — - —
Designed to meet allowable span depth ratio; else deflection against allowable limit
per code including long-
term effects.
Long span
beams
Transfer beams
Designed for all relevant upper floor loads on the beam including effects of special
load combinations pet
code. — —
Flat slabs/plates
Adequacy of top and bottom reinforcement throughout slab panel has been checked. — —
Engineering
drawings
Clarity and consistency with the design intent of the architect and consultants,
design bases and calculations,
site surveys and investigations. — — —
Consistency of the revisions and/or amendments to the design basis and criteria and
their compliance with
the design intent and Client requirement.
Structural
calculations
Consistency of design loading with the criteria and the equipment supplier/vendors
data, finishes, plus the
possible construction method requirements, effects of foreseen temporary works and
activities during
construction, among others. —
Usa«e of correct wind/seismic load parameters for analysis and design with regards to
the structures lateral
load resisting framing system, seismic zone, material type and structural framing
plan or vertical ii regularity^
Seismic load analysis if requiring P-delta effects and/or dynamic method as to height
limitations and
irregularities. — — —
Load combinations and special load combinations as required and prescribed by the
code. __
Structural geometric model for completeness of the structures vertical load carrying
elements and for
consistency with the basis and criteria. _ — _ — —
IA-15
Item
Member and element checks such as minimum reinforcements and details, strength
requirements,
slenderness effects, joints forces checks and connection requirements.
Structural
deformation
and
displacement
checks
Stability/factors
of safety check
Earth retaining
structures
Structure has been designed to resist overturning, sliding and bearing capacity
failure.
Embedment into ground for stability has been designed for in cantilevered structures.
Frame
Check for type limitations if dual system, SMRF, etc. against height and materials.
The PR should agree with the Owner-Client and the BOR on the methodology of review.
The review shall cover for
completeness and timeliness of the design documents submitted per relevant items
listed in this Guide.
The PR should assess the review documents with regards to the agreed number of
elements to be checked with the Owner-
Client and/or his representative, if at random, selected or full review of the
structure and any limited procedure.
Review may be agreed also for each phase or entirely on the final detailed design
phase of the structure for review. While a
final detailed design review is basically economical, a phased review from the
beginning may be better in order to avoid the
errors from the beginning and save also valuable time in re-work.
3. Review the proposed frame system/s and load path for vertical load-carrying
elements.
Foundation Review
1 Review structural framing connections which are part of the primary system
including shear connections, braced frame
Section "irienu-esfsting connections, among others. When connections are not detaded
on the design drawmgs,
verify adequacy of the cited connection design loads/procedures.
Prior to the issuance of the final peer review report, the PR is encouraged to
exchange review comments with the EOR in the
presence of the Owner and/or his representative in order to resolve as many issues as
possib e.
Content
The following items shall be included in the final peer review report:
Building Codes and Standards on which the peer review was based;
Methodology and assumptions of the review;
1 .
2 .
3.
I A- 1 7
The review analysis and design criteria must meet the requirement of the Owner-Client
as defined in his design brief including
any applicable item in the Terms of Reference which form part of their agreement with
the EOR.
Preferably, the PR shall use the same design criteria and standards specified by the
EOR. Deviations from the said criteria and
standards must be done only with the permission of the EOR.
Software to be used in the review should preferably be the same software used by the
EOR (e.g. the same editions or versions).
The difference of versions should be agreed upon but a difference of one level may be
considered acceptable unless the more
recent versions employ a different analysis procedures or features that are almost
entirely different to the EOR’s software
procedures or features.
Language to be Used
The manner of reporting shall always be factual. Numerical values and status to be
presented must be taken purely from the
final design review documents submitted and from the results of the independent
review’s analysis and assessments per
applicable codes and standards.
The terms and phrases to be included in reporting any issue arising from the design
review must be written carefully and reflect
professionalism. The PR must not use offensive nor malicious words or phrases. Thus,
the report must be factual and
enlightening for the EOR and PR.
The assessment of each part of the report should avoid terms like erroneous, in error
and misses, among others. Reporting
should preferably be neutral, for example, statement for bars needing additional
quantity may be stated “underestimated” and
bars in element with quantities that maybe reduced may be stated that “bars are
overestimated by as much as 25%”.
The PR shall make comments that are clear, legible and complete so that the EOR will
easily understand it. Clear comments
will eliminate confusion and reduce time spent in back-check.
When the PR makes the same specific comments at many different details, the comments
should be identified by either creating
a standard, numbered list of comments with the comment numbers referenced at each
detail, or by marking the comments on
each detail.
The PR may use 'paste-on 1 comments where applicable to save time and to maintain
uniformity of comments.
IA-18
© Use specific comments such as: “ Show complete details In accordance with your
calculation in pages 17 to 24.
© Avoid personalized wording such as: “Your calculations for this connection is in
error.
© Provide code references for comments whenever possible: Provide additional lath
support at horizontal soffits pet . . .
© The PR can make independent calculations when portions of the design professional’s
calculations are difficult to follow
or interpret: “Shear wall is overstressed along Gridline- A, wall shears is in excess
to allowable by 13 kN/m. "
© If the PR does extensive independent calculations, then he or she must number the
calculations in sequence and mark the
calculation page number on the comment to facilitate the back-check: Composite beam
overstressed \ recheck design loads .
See page 28 . "
References
American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE 7 (2005), Minimum Design Loads for
Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI
7-05).
American Society of Civil Engineers, Ethics : Guidelines for Professional Conduct for
Civil Engineers. January 2008
Autodesk, Inc., Revit Structure 2011 Users Guide .
CTBUH 8 lh World Congress 2008, The Role of PR in the Foundation Design of the
World’s Tallest Buildings , Baker, Kiefer,
Nicoson and Fahoum.
IPENZ Practice Note 02, Peer Review - Reviewing the work of another Engineer.
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No. 2010/05, Guidelines for
Performance-Based Seismic Design of
Tall Buildings , Version 1.0, November 2010.