16.

It is true that some exceptions have been carved out by Hon'ble the Apex Court in a catena of
decisions one of which is violation of principles of justice. However, in U.P. State Spinning Co. Ltd.
(supra), Hon'ble the Supreme Court after relying upon a catena of Constitution Bench decisions has
cautioned that High Court should interfere in writ jurisdiction only when a very very strong case has
been made out for not availing of alternative remedy and approaching the High Court bypassing
hierarchy of the Courts. No such case as to why alternative remedy available to the petitioner is not
efficacious has been made out by the petitioner in the instant petition, what to say of a very very
strong case for interference in writ jurisdiction. It is not a case where pure question of law is to be
determined. This is a case where questions of facts are to be determined on the basis of evidence.
The controversy involved in the instant case require findings of fact by adjudication/determination
of the controversy on the basis of evidence, which is not feasible under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, as such the petitioner may approach High Court only after exhausting
alternative remedy. The petitioner has an alternate and efficacious remedy of raising an industrial
dispute. This Court is not required to enter into the controversy which requires findings of fact on
the basis of evidence as such the petition is dismissed on ground of alternate remedy.