them with insufficient profit to invest in new technology.
Further, the panels that the European Commission has
assembled to provide expertise on 5G tend to be very heavily
composed of the current key players.
Outlandish Claims
As part of the escalating rhetoric, companies and countries
have competed to be the first to deploy 5G. Hence, there have
been claims such as the 2018 deployment at the Winter
Olympics (discussed above). It seems unlikely that the standard
will be completed before 2018 and that the equipment will be
available by 2019. In practice, the standard decade-long cycle
suggests that first equipment availability is more likely to be
2020, with significant rollout by 2022. This aligns with the
thoughts of the GSMA reported in Chapter 5. For some elements,
such as mmWave, some commentators believe that there is so
much research to do that 2025 is a more realistic date for
implementation.
Yet many appear to believe, because a major company has
announced that it will deploy 5G in 2018, that therefore this
must happen. Somehow the cycles of the industry will be
speeded up. This has never happened and is unlikely to happen
with a standard as uncertain as 5G. Standards take time to
develop, and efforts to put pressure on standards bodies tend to
backfire as key players stop collaborating and conflicts slow
progress. The only way a system can be deployed in 2018 is if it
is nonstandard, based on developments within the R&D centerof the associated companies. Such an outcome would be
harmful to the industry, resulting in nonstandard equipment
appearing in different parts of the world; confusing the
ecosystem as to what “real” 5G is; and fragmenting the
economies of scale. It might result in various players claiming
that whatever they deployed in 2018 was 5G.
Such outlandish claims risk making the situation worse by
confusing and fragmenting the market.
The Major Players Cannot Be Wrong
The manufacturers and operators are powerful companies.
Collectively, they employ millions and account for about $960
billion of annual revenue—about 1.5 percent of the world’s
GDP. Many believe that if such large companies state they are
going to pursue a particular vision or objective, then it is
certain to occur. History suggests otherwise. MNOs have in the
past declared strong support for:
— Video calling
— Picture messaging
— Location-based services
— Femtocells
— Internet/walled gardens/wireless application protocol
— Widgets/own-brand app stores
— eHealth
— Mobile payment
None of these came to be provided by the MNO. Video calling
was delivered over the top (OTT) by Skype. Picture messaging