Professional Documents
Culture Documents
De La Rosa
MKTMGT 2201
MGT 202- Good Governance and Social Responsibility
Internal board members are not usually monetarily compensated for their work, but
outside board members are paid. The board makes decisions concerning the hiring and firing of
personnel, dividend policies and payouts, and executive compensation. A board member is likely
to be removed if they break foundational rules, for example, engaging in a transaction that is a
conflict of interest or striking a deal with a third party to influence a board vote. A board of
directors is elected by shareholders but nominated by a nominations committee.
Every public company has a board of directors, and it is the board of directors that
governs the organization. The directors owe a fiduciary duty to the venture. The board must act
honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the venture. But good governance by a board
of directors is much more than governance. Often-stated references to good governance include
the following:
Much has been written on the subject of good governance. Essentially, a board provides
good governance when it is able and willing to ask the right questions at the right time and to
provide good advice while demonstrating confidence in the venture.
Creating dividend policies
Creating options policies
Hiring and firing of senior executives (especially the CEO)
Establishing compensation for executives
Supporting executives and their teams
Maintaining company resources
Setting general company goals
Making sure that the company is equipped with the tools it needs to be managed
well
In recent years, the concept of the board has become crucial for corporate governance
because of the incidence of several corporate scandals involving unethical conduct by the
management.
In some of these cases like the Enron scandal and the Satyam scandal in India, the board
was found to have played a major role in facilitating the scandal. This has led to the regulators
asking for greater oversight from the board and to make the board accountable to its
shareholders. Of course, there are many instances that prove the contrary where the board has
stepped in to stem the rot that the management has through its actions engendered. Prominent
among these are the actions of Reebok in recent months where the board asked the top leadership
to resign in the wake of corporate scandals involving them.
The concept of the board has been introduced explicitly to ensure that ethical and
normative rules of conduct of corporate governance are followed. The point here is that since the
buck stops with the board of directors, shareholders and regulators know who to turn to in case
they have queries or doubts about the decisions taken by the company. In many cases, the board
of directors acts as the ombudsman as well for shareholder complaints and grievance redressal.
Further, the board of directors is comprised of individuals with exemplary records of managing
companies and hence it is expected that the board of directors would provide technical and
managerial guidance to the way in which the company is run.
Finally, the concept of the board of directors is also important for the way in which it is
deemed to play a pivotal role in providing good corporate governance. In most cases, the way in
which the company is governed depends on the way in which the board directs the management
in its operation of the company. This is relevant to the contemporary times where the managerial
class has been found to enrich itself at the expense of the company and its shareholders. It is for
this reason that the board of directors is expected to steer the company away from agency
problems, conflicts of interest and asymmetries of information in the way shareholders are
briefed about the decisions taken by the company.
Executive directors are full-time employees of the company and, therefore, have two
relationships and sets of duties. They work for the company in a senior capacity, usually
concerned with policy matters or functional business areas of major strategic importance.
Large companies tend to have executive directors responsible for finance, IT/IS, marketing
and so on.
Non-executive directors (NEDs) are not employees of the company and are not involved in
its day-to-day running. They usually have full-time jobs elsewhere, or may sometimes be
prominent individuals from public life. The non-executive directors usually receive a flat fee
for their services, and are engaged under a contract for service (civil contract, similar to that
used to hire a consultant.
KEY POSITIONS
The chairman of the company is the leader of the board of directors. It is the Chairman's
responsibility to ensure that the board operates efficiently and effectively, get the best out of all
of its members. The chairman should, for example, promote regular attendance and full
involvement in discussions. The chairman decides the scope of each meeting and is responsible
for time management of Board meetings. ensuring all matters are discussed fully, but without
spending limitless time on individual agenda items. In most companies the chairman is a non-
executive director.
The chief executive officer (CEO) is the leader of the executive team and is responsible for the
day-to-day management of the organization. As such, this individual is nearly always an
executive director. As well as attending board meetings in his or her capacity as a director, the
CEO will usually chair the management committee or executive committee. While most
companies have monthly board meetings, it is common for management/executive committee
meetings to be weekly.
The secretary the chief administrative officer of the company. The secretary provides the agenda
and supporting papers for board meetings, and often for executive committee meetings also. He
or she takes. minutes of meetings and provides advice on procedural matters, such as terms of
reference. The secretary usually has responsibilities for liaison with shareholders and the
government registration body. As such, the notice of general meetings will be signed by the
secretary on behalf of the board of directors. The secretary may be a member of the board of
directors, though some smaller companies use this position as a means of involving a high
potential individual at board level prior to being appointed as a director.
Independent or outside directors are not involved in the day-to-day inner workings of the
company. These board members are reimbursed and usually receive additional pay for attending
meetings. Ideally, an outside director brings an objective, independent view to goal-setting and
settling any company disputes. When putting together a board, It is considered critical to strike
a balance of internal and external directors.
While members of the board of directors are elected by shareholders, which individuals
are nominated is decided by a nomination committee. In 2002, the NYSE and NASDAQ
required independent directors to compose a nomination committee. Ideally, directors’ terms are
staggered to ensure only a few directors are elected in a given year. 1
Removal of a member by resolution in a general meeting can present challenges. Most
bylaws allow a director to review a copy of a removal proposal and then respond to it in an open
meeting, increasing the possibility of a rancorous split. Many directors’ contracts include a
disincentive for firing—a golden parachute clause that requires the corporation to pay the
director a bonus if they are let go.
Breaking foundational rules can lead to the expulsion of a director. These infractions
include but are not limited to the following:
Using directorial powers for something other than the financial benefit of the
corporation
Using proprietary information for personal profit
Making deals with third parties to sway a vote at a board meeting
Engaging in transactions with the corporation that result in a conflict of interest
The board of directors must ensure that the company's corporate governance policies
incorporate the corporate strategy, risk management, accountability, transparency, and ethical
business practices. Corporate governance refers to how a board directs and manages the
corporation, taking into account the impact of decisions on employees, customers, suppliers,
communities and shareholders.
The board oversees the conduct of the business and supervises management. Corporate
statutes allow directors to delegate certain powers to the officers of the corporation such as the
CEO or CFO. The board delegates responsibility for the company’s day-to-day affairs to the
executives.
The board may also have audit and compensation sub-committees. The members of the
committee will be subsets of the board and report back to the board of directors on specific
issues.
What Is the Appropriate Board Composition?
Boards tend to look differently in the early stages of development. Early-stage boards
usually include one or more founders. Boards are typically smaller in the early stages, with five
to seven board directors having various areas of expertise. Odd numbers prevent tie votes. Each
board director gets one vote.
The size of boards typically increases with growth and is often related to the needs of the
corporation and the normal practices for the industry. As boards acquire investors, they usually
offer the CEO a board seat. Some investors will also insist that they get a board seat, so they can
visibly oversee their investments. Investors also often have influence on recruiting independent
board directors, who have increasing influence on the board and the corporation as the company
grows.
Best practices for corporate governance encourage boards to offer the majority of board
seats to independent directors. A well-composed board brings a diverse range of expertise,
perspectives and knowledge into the boardroom. Regulators, investors and others are also
making a big push for boards to consider diversity in a multitude of realms, including age,
gender, experience, ethnicity, race, religion, skills and experiences.
Enabling better strategic planning. With more rapid access to information and good
communication with management, boards are able to formulate more successful strategies. This
includes more efficient allocation of resources and capital. The strong governance framework
will further assist the board in some of the following ways – understanding the regulatory
environment governing the business; leveraging technology from a production, distribution and
communications point of view; and identifying and managing the reasonable interests of all
stakeholders in the business. All these components are essential elements of a robust strategic
plan.
REFERENCES:
https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/careers/jobs/board-of-directors/
https://www.managementstudyguide.com/board-of-directors.htm
https://www.myaccountingcourse.com/accounting-dictionary/board-of-directors
https://investinganswers.com/dictionary/b/board-directors
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/corporategovernance.asp
https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/resources/all-sectors/the-benefits-of-a-board
https://www.curasoftware.com/the-benefits-of-good-corporate-governance-2/
https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/lexicons/what-is-a-board-of-directors/