IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.

           Civil Misc. Application No.    3618                          of 2004

                                  (Under Section 151 CPC) 
                                                  In                                                   
           Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.   .    3618                    of 2004
                          (Under Article 226 of constitution of India)
                                                                          (District – Agra)
 
             1. Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
                     S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
               Aundh, Pune – 411007
            2. P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill
                          Society,   Aundh, Pune - 411007 ,Founder President, Institute of Rewriting 
                       Indian History, Aundh, Pune – 4110071-------------Petitioner
 
 
VERSUS
 
1.     Union of India through Secretary,
Human Resources and Development (HRD),
Government of India, New Delhi.
 
2.     Secretary, Tourism and Archeological Department, Govt. of India,
                            New Delhi
                   
3.     Director General,
             Archaeological Survey of India,
             Government of India, Janapath, New Delhi.---------Respondents
 
To,
              The Hon’ble the Chief Justice and his Lordships other companion Judges of the
aforesaid Court.
               The humble writ petition of the abovenamed petitioner MOST RESPECTFULLY
SHOWETH AS UNDER;
 
1.     That the full facts and circumstance of the case are given in accompanied writ
petition, it is most respectively prayed that an ad-interiem-mandamus by appointing
a facts finding committee for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological department
regarding the historical blunder committed by them in respect of their purported
claim set-up in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other
ancient Hindu buildings/ monuments as Muslim monuments and truth may be
disclosed to the public/citizens and students in subject of history regarding their true
authorship prior to Mughal period  in furtherance of their fundamental rights
conferred to the Citizens under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with49 and 51-A(f)
(h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.
2.     That it is further prayed that an ad-interim-Mandamus directing the respondent
authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry report, the
respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India may Declare and Notify
 in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built by Shahajahan and thereby
directing the Archaeological Survey of India to remove the notices displayed by
them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting Shahjahan as its creator and to futher desist
from writing / publishing / proclaiming / propagating and teaching about Shahjahan
being the author of Taj Mahal and stop and discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal
premises on Fridays  in the week.
3.      That it is further prayed that an ad-interim mandamus directing the respondent
authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India 1)-to open the locks of upper
and lower portions of the 4 storeyed red stone building of Taj Mahal having numbers
of rooms, 2)-to remove all bricked up walls build later blocking such rooms therein,
3)-to investigate scientifically and certify that  which of those or both cenotaphs are
fake,4)-to look for a subterrance storey below the river bank ground level, 5)-to look
into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the basement cenotaph-
chamber.6)- by removing the brick and lime barricade flocking the doorway, 7)-to
look for important historical evidence such as idols and inscriptions hidden inside
there by the  Shahjahan’s orders as truth may not make us rich but the same will
make us free from superstitions and false propoganda.
4.      That it is further prayed that an ad-interim-mandamus may further be issued 
declaring  the provisions of The Ancient And Historical Monuments And
Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951
to the extend of declaring the ancient and historical monuments and other and
Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford ,
Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built by Mugal invaders allegedly  on the basis
of report submitted by Then Governor General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant
Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of “Divide and Rule”  and
thereby misusing the archaeological studies, be declared as ultravires to Article 19
(1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h)constitution of India and this Hon’ble Court may
futher declare  the provision of   Ancient and Historical Monuments and
Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951
(71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act,
1958  of declaring these ancient building/ monuments preserved with such false
graeyards identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as purported Mugal 
monuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void.
5.      That it is further prayed that an ad-interim mandamus on the basis of the Research
Conducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the different books written by him
as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal
is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers
Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World
History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land,
9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was
 Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12.
Islamic Havoc in Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B.
D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, and the
truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions and temperaments to the Citizen/
Students of history by conducting the research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu
monuments by the Central Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/
temple and other ancient archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like
demolition of disputed structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass
destruction of the public property shacking of public confidence under Rule Of Law
in the society; Or and Any other Direction, Which this Hon’ble Court May deem fit
in the circumstances of the case
                             Prayer

                          It is most respectively prayed that an ad-interiem-mandamus by

appointing a facts finding committee for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological
department regarding the historical blunder committed by them in respect of their
purported claim set-up in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other
ancient Hindu buildings/ monuments as Muslim monuments and truth may be disclosed
to the public/citizens and students in subject of history regarding their true authorship
prior to Mughal period  in furtherance of their fundamental rights conferred to the
Citizens under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with49 and 51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of
India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.
1.                        It is further prayed that an ad-interim-Mandamus directing the
respondent authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry
report, the respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India may Declare
and Notify in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built by Shahajahan
and restrain them from displaying the authorship of these buildings as constructed by
Sahajahan or by any mughal Invaders thereby directing the Archaeological Survey of
India to remove the notices displayed by them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting
Shahjahan as its creator and to futher desist from writing / publishing / proclaiming /
propagating and teaching about Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal and stop
and discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays  in the week.
2.                      It is further prayed that an ad-interim mandamus directing the respondent
authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India 1)-to open the locks of upper
and lower portions of the 4 storeyed red stone building of Taj Mahal having numbers
of rooms, 2)-to remove all bricked up walls build later blocking such rooms therein,
3)-to investigate scientifically and certify that which of those or both cenotaphs are
fake,4)-to look for a subterrance storey below the river bank ground level, 5)-to look
into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the basement cenotaph-
chamber.6)- by removing the brick and lime barricade flocking the doorway, 7)-to
 look for important historical evidence such as idols and inscriptions hidden inside
there by the  Shahjahan’s orders as truth may not make us rich but the same will
make us free from superstitions and false propoganda.
3.              It is further prayed that an ad-interim-mandamus may further be issued
declaring the provisions of The Ancient And Historical Monuments And
Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951
to the extend of declaring the ancient and historical monuments and other and
Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford,
Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built by Mugal invaders allegedly on the basis
of report submitted by Then Governor General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant
Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of “Divide and Rule”  and
thereby misusing the archaeological studies, be declared as ultravires to Article 19
(1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h)constitution of India and this Hon’ble Court may
futher declare  the provision of   Ancient and Historical Monuments and
Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951
(71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act,
1958  of declaring these ancient building/ monuments preserved with such false
graeyards identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as purported Mugal 
monuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void.
4.                  It is further prayed that an ad-interim mandamus on the basis of the Research
Conducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the different books written by him
as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal
is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers
Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World
History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land,
9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was
Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12.
Islamic Havoc in Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B.
D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, and the
truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions and temperaments to the Citizen/
Students of history by conducting the research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu
monuments by the Central Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/
temple and other ancient archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like
demolition of disputed structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass
destruction of the public property shacking of public confidence under Rule Of Law
in the society.
 5.                           Any other Direction, Which this Hon’ble Court May deem fit in the
circumstances of the case
 
Dated; 7th Sepetember ,2004
 
                                                                                        Yogesh Kumar Saxena
                                                                                                     Advocate, High Court
                                                                                         (Counsel for the Petitioner)
                                                                                                                       Chamber No.139,
High court, Allahabad

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.
                            
           Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.  3618                            of 2004
            (Under Article 226 of constitution of India)
                                                                          (District – Agra)
 
             1. Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
                     S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
               Aundh, Pune – 411007
            2. P. N. Oak. S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill
                    Society,   Aundh, Pune - 4110071. Founder President, Institute of Rewriting 
                       Indian History, Aundh, Pune - 4110071 -----------Petitioner
 
VERSUS
 
1.     Union of India through Secretary,
Human Resources and Development (HRD),
Government of India, New Delhi.
 
2.     Secretary, Tourism and Archeological Department, Govt. of India,
                            New Delhi
                   
3.     Director General,
             Archaeological Survey of India,
             Government of India, Janapath, New Delhi.----------Respondents
 
To,
                          The Hon’ble the Chief Justice and his lordships other companion Judges of the
aforesaid Court.
                            The humble petition of the abovenamed petitioner MOST RESPECTFULLY
SHOWETH AS UNDER;
 
1.              That, no other writ petition has been filed or pending on the same controversy involved in

the present writ petition before this Hon’ble Court, nor the petitioner’s institution, namely,   “

Institute for Re-writing Indian (and World) History” has received any notice of caveat

application so far in the present writ petition. The petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 are same

person, but they are impleaded in different capacity.

2.               That this writ petition is moved to re-establish the truth and cultural heritage of our

Country. This writ petition is pertaining to the world marvel, one of the Seven Wonders of the

World, namely, Taj Mahal, and other monuments authorship attributed to Hindu Rulers, much

prior to the period of Mugal Invaders. The ancient monuments and structure are part of our

tradition and culture and evidence of glorious-marvelous architectural achievement and further
 to that it is a part of our heritage. Fraud upon history should not be perpetuated as life is

evaluated in the perspective of history. For the sake of history of heritage, these monuments

should be identified, protected and preserved properly in the right perspective with right

historical records of creation and construction of truth and realities, which includes rectifying

and/ or correcting the wrong records, notions, motivated dis-information and mis- information.

3.            That this writ petition is moved in the Public Interest, for a National Cause, to establish the

truth there is no private interest or any other oblique motive, or any other personal gain. The

petitioner institution, known as Institute for Re-writing Indian History, Thane, having

registration no. F-1128 (T) is a public trust. The founder president of the trust is Shri P.N. Oak

S/o Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/o- Plot no. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune.411007,

who has written number of books namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a

Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5.

Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is a

Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva

Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and

Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian History. 

4.              That the petitioner No. 2 is the founder President of an Institution, namely, “ Institute for

Re-writing Indian (and World) History “. The aim and objective of that institution, which is a

registered society having register no. F-1128 (T) as the public trust under the provision of

Bombay Public Trust Act. Inter alia, is to re-discover the Indian history. The monumental

places of historical importance in their real and true perspective having of the heritage of India.

The true copy of memorandum of association of the aforesaid society / public trust having

fundamental objectives along with Income tax exemption certificate under section 80-G (5) of

I.T. Act, 1961 for period 1/4/2003 to 31/3/2006 are filed herewith as marked as Annexure No.

1 and 2  to the writ petition.

5.                                 That the founder-President of Petitioner’s Institution namely Shri P. N. Oak is a

National born Citizen of India. He resides permanently at the address given in case title. The

petitioner is a renowned author of 13 renowned books including the books, titled as,  “ The Taj

Mahal is a Temple Place”. This petition is related to Taj Mahal, Fatehpur- Sikiri, Red-fort at

Agra, Etamaudaula, Jama- Masjid at Agra and other so called other monuments. All his books

are the result of his long-standing research and unique rediscovery in the respective fields. The

titles of his books speak well about the contents of the subject. His Critical analysis,

dispassionate, scientific approach and reappraisal of facts and figures by using recognised tools

used in the field gave him distinction through out the world. The true copy of the title page of

book namely “The Taj Mahal is a Temple Palace” . written by Sri P. N. Oak, the author/

petitioner No. 2  is filed as Annexure –3 to this writ petition.

6.                    That the great “Kshatriya community” pride to defend their faith and the culture of

our country against foreign invasions in converting the monuments by the foreign invaders

requires a sacrificial magnanimity and moral purity in the exposure of the truth to the public

and thereby to safeguard their right of freedom of information couched under Article 19(1) (a)

is the theme behind the writing this Article and the present Petition .The serene beauty, majesty

and grandeur of the Taj Mahal, one of the seventh wonders of the world and other monuments

is still not so well known to the world regarding the true story of its origin. The magnificent

palace, which was built earlier got converted into the Tomb .The changeover has proved a

shroud deluding from lay visitors to the researchers and the great historian Sri P.N. Oak, a co-

worker of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose. The popular nostalgia of legendary love to get the

conversion of every Hindu Palace/Temple due to mythical attachment from fanatic raging fire

converting dazzle of leaping flames and blinding smoke should be discouraged into a cool

research regarding the origin. This is required to check a different form of terrorism prevalent

amongst the crusader of the death to the innocent victim on the psychological level. Let us

examine the scared truth about the origin of the monuments.The true copy of the title cover of
 books namely “Some Missing Chapters of World History” and “Some Blunder Of Indian

Historical Research” written by Sri P. N. Oak containing the Boigraphy sketch of identity of

great author are filed as Annexure No. 4 and 5

7.                  That the said book, which is the ‘ research paper’ of the author on the subject that the

so-called  “Taj Mahal “ is not a monument built by an Invader Emperor Shahajahan in memory

of his late wife but a Hindu Shiva Temple which was converted into a love-memorial by a

Invader Emperor. The true copy of the book was first published in 1968, 2nd edition on 1969,

3rd edition in 1974 namly THE TAJ MAHAL IS TEJO-MAHALAYA : A SHIVA TEMPLE is

filed herewith as Annexure No.6 and large 4th edition published in 1993 shall be produced is

being directed by this Hon’ble Court.

8.                     That the afforesaid book contaning 35 pages –booklet lists scrially numbeded 118

points of evidence with may be treated as the submission made before this Hon’ble Court for

making following demands (I) The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) be ordered to remove

forthwish its notices at the entrance to the Taj mahal in Agra attributting its creation to

Shahjahan, since those notice in English, Hindi and Urdu are false and baseless and quate no

authority.(II) Misuse of the left – flank building as a mosque be banned since the entire

premises constitute a pre-Shahjahan Tejomhalaya Shiv Temple complex. (III) Free entry on

Fridays be ordered to be discontinued since there being no geniune mosque in the premises

why should the Government lose a day’s revenue! (IV) If Free entry on Fridays is not

discontinued then Mondays should also be free-entey days because that is a day of special Shiv

worship. (V) The Tejmahal, its two flanking buildings and a well being all seven-storyed they

enclose over a thousand rooms which should all be thrown open to visitorssince they are

charged an entrance free. (VI) The A.S.I. be ordered to remove its locks from those storyed and

also pull down the crude unplastered walling-up by Shahjahan of staircases, ventillators and

doorways leading to those sealed rooms. (VII) The A.S.I. be directed to search for hidden

histirical evidence such as inscriptions, divine idols etc. in those sealed rooms and thick walls
 tampered with by Shahjahan. (VIII) The water in the seven-storyed wall be pumped out to look

for jettisoned valuable and inscription etc. at its bottom when Shahjahan’s Mogul troops

swooped to confiscate that temple palace complex and the bullion, gems, gold-pitcher, the

gem-studded gold-railing and the Peacock Throne inside, owned by Raja Jaisingh of Jaipur.

(IX) Beating of Nagaras (drums) at ausicious dawn and dusk hours be resumed as of yore in

the two Nagarkhanas in the premises. (X) Since the Taj has two cenotaphs each in the name of

Shahjahan and Mumtaz in two storeyes at least one each of those two pairs of cenotaphs must

be fake since Muslims don’t cut their dead into two pieces to be buried under two cenotahs it is

belived. Even the basement conotaphs could’s be genuine because they are two storeyed higher

than the Yamuna river bed ground level. Therefore the ASI be directed to investigate which of

those cenotaphs if any are genuine or whether both are fakes or whether there are any more

fake conotaphs upto the ground level ? (XI) The Koranic graft patched along the entrance

arches be ordered to be removed since those are illagel forged imposition to be Islamic

lettering desecrating the ancient sacred Shiv shrine. (XII) Extensive repairs to the hundreds of

sealed or locked rooms in the storeyes beneath and above the marble floor be ordered to be

undertaken immediately to prevent collapes of the Tajmahal from internal weakness. (XIII)

The A.S.I. should be directed to intestigate as to who stencilled the Arabic letter ‘Allah’ and

some Englishmen’s names on the mental pinnacle shift rooted in the dome, since no such

names exits on the full scale replica of the pinnacle shaft inlaid in the red stone courtyard on

the eastern flank of the Tajmahal. (XIV) The Muslim attendants squatting by the side of the

cenotaphs should be decommissioned and disbanded because the cenotaphs are fakes covering

the ancient Shivlings. (XV) Since the towering seven-storyed Tajmahal edifice must have been

raised over an underground basement the ASI should be directed to investigiate whether there

is any such hidden, buried basement as was the ancient Vedic practice.

9.                 That in 1155- 1158 A.D.It is said that  Raja Paramdardi dav, a Jat Ruler on his behalf

and on behalf of the Minister Salakahan who constructed Tejoji Mahal which came in
 occupation Of Raja  Man Singh and remain in possession of Raja Jai Singh when It was tken

for conversion to Taj Mahal, for the purposes of shifting the remains of Arjumand

Banu( Mumtaj )W/o Emperor Shahajahan Died In between 1629-1632 and buried at

Burhanpur and her body Exhumed after about 6 months (as disclosed in Shahajan

Badshahnama written by  MullaAbdul Hameed lahori).

10.                                   That, it is said that in 1629-1632 A.D. Arjumand Banu( Mumtaj )W/o

Emperor Shahajahan Died in between and  was buried at Burhanpur and her body may be

Exhumed after about 6 months.It is submitted that 1641-1668 A.D.is probable period of  the

shroud  deluding changeover of Hindu Palace/Temple as mughal Monument/ Graveyard. It is

submmited that in 1652 A.D. Aurangazab Letter showing his somsidern about need of

elaborate  repairs of Taj Mahal.. If Taj Mahal was constracted in 1641 to 1668, why Auranjab

sought for illobrate repair. It was nothing, except for changing the authoriship of building as

Mughal monument. In 1658 A.D. Emperor Shah jahan died. Their after his graveyard was also

placed in Taj Mahal near the graveyard of Arjumand Banu( Mumtaj )W/o Emperor

Shahajahan. It appear that koranic in graving dragged for camouflaging Hindu building with

Muslim Lattering as a hoary tredition, which is evidence Adhai- Din-Ka-opda at Ajmar which

was a part of vigragharaj Vishandeo’s palace an also at kutabminar with a legerdemain of

Islamik carinngs on it.

11.                             That in 1843 A.D., the Governer General Lord Auckland with his lieutenant

cunningham tempered entire historical data of the arcologicaly department by converning the 

authoriship of these Hindu palaces to Mughal monument for adoptding the policy of “Divide

and Rule”. A deep Conspiracy Committed By Lieutenant Alexander Cunningham in

1842-1847.

12.                      That in 1904 A.D., the provisons of  The Ancient Monuments Preservation Act,

1904,have further tempered the entire histrocial data of the arcologicaly department by
 converning the authoriship of these Hindu palaces/monuments to Mughal monument for

adoptding the   policy of “Divide and Rule”

13.                                That in 1951 A.D., the provision of “The Ancient And Historical Monuments

And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951”are

further intesified the falsehood of these Buildings by shifting the authership of these

monuments. Thus this Writ Petition is filed seeking declaration to the extend of declaring the

ancient and historical monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal.

Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Fort, Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built by Mugal invaders

allegedly  on the basis of report submitted by Then Governor General, Lord Auckland, and

young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of “Divide and

Rule”and thereby  misusing the archaeological studies, be declared as ultravires to Article 19

(1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h) Constitution of India.

14.                            That this Hon’ble Court may futher declare the provision of Ancient and

Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National

Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And

Remains Act, 1958 of declaring these ancient building/ monuments preserved with such false

mughal identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as purported Mughal

monuments / Graveyards as unconstitutional and void.

15.                            That in 1968 A.D Sri P.N.Oak written his first book titled as Taj Mahal is

TEJO-MAHALAYA : A SHIVA TEMPLE. In 1974 A.D. It is submitted that in the Carbon

dating test –14 conducted of the doors timber placed on the Northern side of  Taj Mahal

building now remooved from its location Towards Yamuna River at Dashahara Ghat and Basai

Ghat from where the public could have a glance towards Shiva Temple constructed at the top

of  Raja Mansingh Palace Which was in Occupation of his grand Son Raja Jai Singh, when it

was forciably taken by Emperor Sahajahan for burial of Arjumand Banu( Mumtaj )W/o
 Emperor Shahajahan Died in between  and buried at Burhanpur and her body Exhumed after

about  6 months

16.                                  That this book is being well accepted in India and abroad. The popular

nostalgia for legendary love has helped fan then flame of Shahajajahan’s mythical attachment

to Mumtaz into a raging fire, envoloping the taj in the dazzale of leaping flames and blinding

smoke of imaginary accounts, discouraging the cool, dispassionate research about its origion It

has raised no controversy. Since the reasons given therein supported with documented record

have proved conclusively the findings and conclusions of the author. Thus the objective of the

research conducted by the petitioner No.2 is not to cultivate any animosity or any thing to

invade the feeling of any citizen, except the exposure of the truth to the citizen, historians and

to the young generation, as they may not be mislead by falsehood, in order to swept away by

the impulse of terrorist oriented approach of the fundamentalist under our secular democratic

structural approach in the preamble of our constitution.

17.                                That Hindu Palace/Temple conversion in Invader Monuments like Taj

Mahal- Invasion of our Indian Heritage by Archaeological Dept under the garb of The Ancient

Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 ( Act No.24 of !958)- Indian 

Historical Blunders – A deep Conspiracy Committed By lieutenant  Alexander Cunningham in

1842-1847.Reference collected from the books of Sri P.N. Oak – The Taj Mahal Is A Temple

palace – Some Blunder of Indian Historical Research –Some Missing Chapters of World

History- AGRA RED FORT is a Hindu building. Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2,

B.D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005.

18.                              That the freedom of speech and expression is basic to indivisible from a

democratic polity .It includes right to impart and receive information. Restriction to the said

right could be only as provided in Article 19(2) to (6) of the constitution of India. The old

dictum let the people have the truth and the freedom to discuss it and all will go well with the

Government. It should prevail. The true test for deciding the validity is whether it takes away
 or abridges fundamental right of the citizens. If there were direct abridgement of the

fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression, the law would be invalid. If the

provisions of the law violate the constitutional provisions, they have to be struck down and

that is what is required to be done in the present case .It is made clear that no provision is

nullified on the ground, that the Court does not approve the underlying policy of the

enactment.

19.                             That the ambit and scope of “Right to Know “ along with right of conscience,

fath and Religion are conferred fundamental right under Article 19 (1)(a), 25, 26, 49, 51-A (f)

(h) of the Constitution of India; read with the provision of Freedom of Information Act,

2002 .The right to get information in democracy is recognized all throughout and it is a natural

right flowing from the concept of democracy itself. Freedom of expression may be necessarily

included in the right of information. There is no expression with out having an idea on the

subject, regarding which the expression of an individual may be given effect to change the

existing values of ideology, which are based on the notable extracts of certain facts. An

enlightening informed citizen would undoubtedly enhance democratic values. On one hand, we

are suffering from the past prejudice of caste predomination amongst the different section of

the citizen. This country called as Arya Varta in the ancient time was so excellent, as there was

no match equal to our country on this earth. The creation of the terminology of Aryan

considering themselves to be noble was earlier regarded the real philosopher’s touchstone to

eradicate the falsehood from its perception. However by the gradual deterioration in the

standard of the good behavior, righteousness, decency which were having the foundation of

impartiality, love and conscientiousness, there has been the complete absence of discrimination

in the social coordination. The true copy of the provision of Freedom of Information Act, 2002

is filed herewith and marked as Annexure No. 7.

20.                         That truth will not make us rich, but it will certainly make us free. The wrong

historical data leads to the horror, as we have seen during the period of demolition of the Babri
 Masjid. There has been number of concomitant given by the respective community

representing to the follower of two prominent religions, but the loss that we have suffered in

the shape of hatred between the two section of the society, cannot be compensated without

revealing the truth. Unfortunately, the term Hindu communalism is more exaggerated by the

fanaticism under the garb of secularism, while the Hindu community as a whole has always

been receptive to all the religion. The question, which is cropping its importance, is much more

in relations to the question pertaining to Invader contributions to Indian life and culture. Such

facts which have been geared to brainwash the subject of the pupil, with that of perverted

history under the long spell of foreign rule, may be distorted according to the command of the

ruler and as such till date the truth has not brought forward to the surface and is exclusively

aliens to the appeasement policy generated in order to rule the parliamentary democratic set up

in our country.

21.                         That the mentalities affect and paralyse the traditional heritage and provide a loss

to the integrity of our country. Our ancient ancestors namely Rana Pratap and Chattrapati

Shivaji Maharaj and Guru Govind Singh during the period of Mughal rulers have not conceded

with the terror and torture, they used in proselytization. It is very shameful for the independent

citizens to live under the false perception of character assassination. Thus in all fairness, we

may be bound to accept that although the Britishers may pose themselves more civilized, but

inspite of their so called great insight, there is the historical blunder committed by them, while

writing the Indian history in relations to the authorship of the monuments. Invader rulers,

without exception were sadist, yet they represent themselves as just, kind and patrons of

learning. The construction is seen with all Hindu traditions, while these foreigners, who were

either Invader or crusaders have done the destruction of these constructions. These persons

were stained with all wickedness and disgraceful conduct, which is still apparent in the society

and remain prevalent during a thousand year of rampant Invader communalism, then how we

can expect that they have not demolished all the Hindu Temple and converted them with slight
 modification as their monuments. The township of Ferozabad, Tuglaqabad, Ahmedabad, and

Hyderabad are falsely ascribed to that of Sultan, though the same was belonging to our ancient

Hindu Rulers. The country in which the milk was available to every citizen without investing

any money to the extent of his requirement and consumption has now been adulterd after

ruthless killings of our cattle’s by these invaders of the public confidence. Actually

“Hinduism” is nothing representing to religious foundations, but our belief, synonymous to

nationalism and sooner it may be understood and practiced in such a manner, we may seek the

protection of our integrity by saving the population of the innocent citizens.

22.                                That at Dilwara Jain temple in District Shirohi, Rajasthan having the white

Marvel and the Elephants statue, there are still the sign of the atrocities committed by these

Mugal invaders having the mass destruction of the construction on the upper portion of

structure. However, since the temple lying below the surface was filled up with the mud and

earth., this Dilwara Jain Temple having identical construction as that of Taj Mahal and other

Marvel buildings could have been saved from these invaders of Humanities. Thus the truth

may be exposed to the public that the invaders were never the Builders of monuments, but they

were rather the destroyer of our ancient cultural heritage, which was preserved by the 85% of

Hindu citizens from the time immortal. Let Hindu be now permitted to save their temple from

being converted to the Graveyards any more by our so-called guardians of society under the

appeasement policy of “Divide and Rule”.

23.                                    That the mankind must be satisfied with the reasonableness within reach

and the decision-making process may belong to the knowledge of the law. Thus the

reasonableness and the rationality, legality, as well as philosophically, provide colour to the

meaning of fundamental right .The concept of equality is not doctrinaire approach. It is a

binding threat, which runs through the entire constitutional text. Thus the affirmative action

may be constitutionally valid and the same cannot ignore the constitutional morality, which

embraces in itself the doctrine of inequality. It would be constitutionally immoral to perpetuate

 inequality among majority .The constitution is required to kept young energetic and alive. The

attempt be endured to expand the ambit of fundamental right. It is said that the dignity of the

ocean lies not in its fury capable of causing destruction, but in its vast extent and depth with

enormous tolerance. Thus the wider the power, the higher the need of caution and care, while

exercising the power.

24.                       That public education is essential for functioning of the process of popular

government and to assist the discovery of truth and strengthening the capacity of individual in

participating in decision making process .The decision making process include the right to

know also and pushing the protection beyond the primary level betrays the bigwigs desire to

keep the crippled more crippled forever. The education of spiritualism is the foundation for

value based survival of human being in a civilized society. The force and sanction hidden

behind civilized society depend upon moral value; and the morality cannot be cultivated

through the falsehood of ideological barrier. Thus the children may not be required to read

such facts, which are having the foundation of falsehood.

25.                                That our educational institutions are the foundation of the characteristics; on

the basis of which; the young generation will solve the problem of national solidatory and

integration. The children are taught to adhere with the truth for their existence in future; but the

alarming situation linked with the history written by the alien rule has not only nurtured the

myth amongst the independent citizens; but many monuments have been falsely credited to the

alien Invader rulers, who were driven across the Indian borders at sword point and continued

to rule our nation mercilessly without given any importance to the existing palace and the

temple built by the inhabitant ancestors of the rulers at the contemporary period.

26.                        That education is an investment made by the nation in its children for harvesting a

future crop of responsible adults productive of a well functioning society. However children

are vulnerable. They need to be valued, nurtured, caressed, and protected. Imparting of

education is State function. Thus since the human mind is not a tape recorder, it would make a
 perfect reproduction letter in the society .It is said that every State action must be informed by

reason. Thus the freedom of expression, which includes “Right to Know” may be allowed to

be enjoyed by the citizen to the fullest possible extent without putting shackles of avoidable

cobweb of rules and regulations putting restriction on such freedom. Justice has no favorite,

except the truth. A reason varies in its conclusion according to the idiosyncrasy of the

individual and the times and the circumstances, in which he thinks.

27.                         That the terminology of history is derived from Greek word ‘Historia’ meaning

there by an enquiry. Since the enquiry is nothing, but the same is attributed to the different

branch of knowledge. Thus the inquisitiveness is always generated in educated mind. The

history should not be guided solely on etymological terminology. The meaning of ‘Itihas’

which is derivated from a Sanskrit word, leads to three terminology .The first one namely ‘iti’

means such and such (a happening or event),’ha’ means indefinitely while ‘aas’ means

happened. Thus the history is chronological happening of the different event during the past

period

28.                         That the Student/children, the future citizens under taking the education of Indian

History  studying on the misconception/ pattern of Anglo Saxon teaching, which was meant for

division of Indian society on the policy of “Divide and Rule”. There is a important question

posed, as to whether we have actually gain our independence or we have to undertake another

journey full of animosity, aggressism on account of terrorism and fanatic ideology prevalent

throughout the World of some particular religion. Thus on account of being sentinel /Guardian

at large, this is the voice of the majority of Hindu Citizens to save our ancestral cultural

heritage and thereby to give protection to our future citizens. They have the threat of being

subjected to atrocities, if the drastic step to save the citizens from the oppression and exposure

of falsehood may not be done at an earliest time. Thus every nationalist, who has got a

slightest patriotic cult in his inhibition, has got a Fundamental Right and a Constitutional Duty

to safeguard our cultural heritage against the falsehood. Imparting of education is a State
 function. The State, however, having regard to its financial and other constraints is not always

in a position to perform its duties. The function of imparting education has been, to a large

extent, taken over by the citizens themselves. Some do it as pure charity; some do it for

protection of their Interests.

29.                            That Article 25 of the constitution in India secures to every person, subject of

course to public order, health and morality and other provisions of Part III, including Article 17

freedom to entertain and exhibit outward acts as well as to propagate and disseminate such

religious belief according to his judgement and conscience for edification of others. The right

of the State to impose such restrictions as are desired or found necessary on grounds of public

order, health, and morality is inbuilt in Arts. 25 and 26 itself. Article 25(2)(b) ensures the right

of the State to make a law providing for social welfare and reforms besides throwing open of

Religious institutions of a public character to classes and sections of Citizens and any such

rights of State or of the communities or classes of the society were also considered to need

with due regulation in the process of harmonizing the various rights. The vision of the

founding fathers of the Constitution to liberate the society from blind and ritualistic adherence

to mere traditional superstitious beliefs sans reason or rational basis has found expression in

the form of Art. 17 of Constitution of India. The protection under Arts. 25 and 26 extends a

guarantee for rituals and observances, ceremonies and modes of worship which are integral

parts of religion but as to what really constitutes an essential part of religion or religious

practice has to be decided by the courts with reference to the doctrine of a particular religion or

practices regarded as parts of religion

30.                         That a society, where there is no moral values, there would neither be social

order nor secularism. Bereft of moral values secular society or democracy may not survive.

Almighty alone is the dispenser of the absolute justice. Thus an independent and efficient

judicial system, belong the repository of omnipotent power is always consider as one of the

basic structure of our constitution. The pre-constitutional days cannot be countenanced as a

 source of law to claim any rights, when it is found to violate human rights, dignity social

equality amongst citizen. Democracy cannot survive and the constitution cannot work unless

Indian citizens are only learned and intelligent; and they are also of moral character and

imbibed the inherent virtue of human being such as truth, love and compassion. Duty of every

citizen of India is collective duty of the state.

31.                      That every citizen of India is fundamentally obligated to develop a scientific

temper and humanism .He is fundamentally duty bound to strive towards excellence, in all

sphere of individual and collective activity, so that the nation constantly rises to the higher

level of endeavor and achievements. Everyone, whether individually or collectively is

unquestionably under the supremacy of law. However it is true that exaggerated devotion to

the rule of benefit must not nurture fanciful doubts or lingering suspicion and thereby destroy

social defense, as the curiosity cannot be the subject matter of fair criticism. Thus the

conclusion derived that on one hand, every citizen is having the freedom of speech and

expression so far as they do not contravene the statutory limits and may prevail in the

atmosphere with out any hindrance. Fundamental duties and the obligation of the citizen may

yet provide a valuable guide and aid to interpretation of constitutional issues which not only

required for resolving the issues but also to provide guidance to the society. Giving a man his

due, one of the basics of justice finds reflected in right to equality .Law frowns upon such

conduct thus the court accords legitimacy to possession in due course of time.

32.                          That the concept of sovereignty was present from the ancient time but the

sovereignty was conferred upon an individual who is suppress the wicked and is recognized as

great resources in itself like the god of fire, air, sun, moon and religion. The religion in the

ancient time was considered as spiritualism and it was not dependent upon any ritual

ceremony, but it was considered s the knowledge in the darkness of ignorance and injustice.

The sovereignty was supposed to promote the cause of the religion, wealth and enjoyment of

life and those, who were voluptuous, malicious, mean and low-minded, were ruined by the
 retributive justice. Thus the sovereignty was considered as a destroyer of the wicked by fire; a

restrainer of the wicked by storm (Varun) and its controller. It was considered to be the

dispenser of ease to the best pupil like the moon and a replenisher of wealth. These qualities

were the quality of the sovereign power.

33.                        That now the sovereignty is attributed upon the three institution namely the

legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The combined effect of the three institutions makes

a democratic society. The legislature is creature like lord Brahma while the executives like lord

Vishnu may provide the welfare to the public. The judicial institutions like lord Shiva is the

dispenser of justice and is also the protector of all subjects. The law of retributive justice

wakes when the people sleep. Hence wise men regard the law or punishment as virtue or

religion.

34.                           That the sovereignty and the people should form three Councils, Educational,

Religious, and Administrative. One individual should not have the absolute power of

government, the sovereignty being the general president of the councils .The qualifications of

the president the presidents of separate councils are their interest in the welfare of the country,

their excellence of learning and character, and their influence over the people. A country

prospers as long as the people are righteous. Also their welfare requires the appointment of

learned educational officers, appointment of learned men as the dignitaries of the spiritual

council and of virtuous learned men as administrators. Obedience to law is required of all.

35.                              That the secularism is the basic structure of constitution and as such in

absence of study of religion for generating brotherhood amongst the fellow citizens as to

provide mutual coordination and the ideology of live and let live to other is the basic

education, which cannot be said as an attempt against the secular philosophy of the

constitution .The constitution as it stands does not proceed on the “melting pot theory” while it

represents a “salad bowls”, where there is homogeneity without any obliteration of identity .

The foundation of the religion is spiritualism, which is based on trust and confidence and an
 ability to strive for the good self of the other individual. The law must be enforceable to

preserve the society with out any derivation and hindrance and thus it may not resultantly face

the social catastrophe.

36.                             That the little Indian shall not be hijacked from the course of freedom by mob

muscle method and thereby to subtle perversion of discretion by other large Indian “dressed in

little, brief authority”. The people of our country has right to know every public Act and the

principle of finality may not be insisted upon as the maxim “interest reipublicae ut sit finis

litiun”. Wisdom and advisability of public policy may be demonstrated in order to given effect

to the statutory provisions under our constitution thus an inquiry and investigation may be

needed a complete with the opinion of the expertise to arrive a conclusion as to whether the

plurability in a society is not splited the very object of the law through appeasement to the

minority group of the citizen in order to provide a conducive political social and legal

framework with out destroying the very fabric on the basis of which the pillar and the

foundation were built in order to assimilate the minorities with the majority.

37.                      That the Hon’ble court may never venture to disown its jurisdiction when the

constitution is found to be at stake and the fundamental rights of the citizen are under fire of

falsehood and thereby usurpation of the power by terrorizing for personal leisure and pleasure

through self created dogmas and rituals of particular religion at the cost of other citizens. Thus

the exposure of the falsehood may become the right of the affected party to vanish the

assertion based on unpatriotic sentimental perversity.

38.                                 That in Bijoe Emmanuel Vs State of Kerala  (1986) 3 SCC 615, the question

raised in the aforesaid case, as to whether three children who were faithful to “Jehovah’s

witnesses” may refuse to sing our national anthem or salute the national flag of our country

despite being the student in the school, where during morning assembly, the national anthem is

sung by other children. The circular issued by the Director of Public Instruction, Kerala

provided obligation of school children to sing the National Anthem. Thus these children were
 expelled. The Hon’ble Supreme court while setting aside the aforesaid order of expulsion of

the children from the school was pleased to examine, as to whether the children faithful to

“Jehovah’s witnesses”, a worldwide sect of Christianity may be compelled against tenets of

their religious faith duly recognized and well established all over the world which was upheld

by the highest court in United States of America, Australia and Canada and find recognition in

Encyclopedia Britannica. It was held that the appellants truly and conscientiously believed that

their religion does not permit them to join any rituals except it them in their prayers to

Jehovah, their God. Though their religious beliefs may appear strange, the sincerity of their

beliefs is beyond question. They do not hold their beliefs idly and their conduct is not the

outcome of any perversity. The appellants have not asserted the beliefs for the first time or out

of any unpatriotic sentiments. Their objection to sing is not just against the National Anthem of

India. They have refused to sing other National Anthems elsewhere.  They are law abiding and

well-behaved children, who do stand respectfully and would continue to do so, when National

Anthem is sung. Their refusal, while so standing to join in the singing of the National Anthem

is neither disrespectful of it, nor inconsistent with the Fundamental Duty under Article 51 A

(a). Hence no action should have been taken against them.

39.                          That in a pluralistic society like India, which accepts secularism as the basic

ideology to govern its secular activities, education can include study based on “Religious

Pluralism”. Religious pluralism exclusivism and encourages inclusivism. Thus in pluralistic

society, it is necessary that there may not be any encroachment upon the follower of other

ideology. Value based education is likely to help the mission to fight against all the kinds of

prevailing fanaticism, ill will, violence, dishonesty, corruption and terrorism in the different

form Citizens by getting the protection to a certain degree of preference to the minority on the

cost of majority of citizen .The education is permissible only on the grounds of convenience,

suitability and familiarity with an educational environment but the same should not be
 excessive to the substantial departure of  tolerance and based on practically not existent

intolerable fanatic  ideological aggressism .

40.                               That the prevalent socio-economic system having the vast majority of the

people, ignorant uneducated and easily liable to be mislead may also be provided their due

legitimization in governance of their life as they repose tremendous faith in the secularism .It

is the constitutional obligation of the state to provide the justice by emancipation of the

falsehood as the commitment of Article 19 (1) (a), providing right of expression to an

individual. It may be unreasonable if we are unable to give the exact definition of

reasonableness to the people in a democratic institution .Law cannot afford any favorite other

than truth as the manifest injustice is curable in nature; rather than incurable mediocrity over

meritocracy, which cuts the root of justice. Protective push or prop by way of reservation or

classification must withstand any over generous approach to the section of the beneficiary, if it

handles the effect of destroying another’s right to education, more so, by pushing in a mediocre

over meritorious and thereby belies the hope of generating the social coordination.

41.                         That long slavery, paradoxically enough, makes the slave to look upon the very

change that bind him as his life support. This story was told to the convict in ancient time and

who was confined in the dingy cell for fifteen years. After fifteen year the detainee was set free

and he gingerly step out of the prison gate. His eyes, which were used to the dim light wilted at

the bright sunshine outside everything including traffic, the gazing eyes were the strange look

to the detainee and as such he felt terrified. He took a long look at the outside world and

thereafter he inhaled a deep breath and there after by a sudden dash he again reached to his

dog’s tether in the cell as his imprisonment has sapped his self-confidence. This is what has

happened in India.

42.                             That this feeling utter destitution, dejection, desperation and the loss of all

confidence is the result of our slavery, by which the Indians have forgotten their own past

history, lost freedom and obliviousness of the delights of an unfettered life thus it is necessary
 to keep the flame of the truth burning in the heart of every enlightened citizen as the majority

of the public is unaware of the truth.

43.                    That the glory of our country may only be restored when our traditional heritage

culture may revive, when every citizen may get the rid from adulterated history. The historical

concepts, which have been distorted during the long period of slavery, may become a task of

utmost importance and urgency. An inadequate understanding on impressionable citizen has

resulted in the further accessibility in implanting the misleading concepts and thereby breaking

the heads and idols of the fellow citizen due to the segmentation of the society in many

composition.

44.                             That the true history must atleast be written in the contemporary language and

it should remain independent from interpolation, otherwise the very existence of our cultural

heritage may be evaporated from the sight of the future generation. The Governor General,

Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous

scheme of misusing the archaeological studies. This young Cunnigham, an army engineer had

no training in the archaeological department, he wrote a lengthy letter dated September 15,

1842 suggesting archeological exploration in India. This letter is reproduced on page no 246

Volume 7 journal of Royal Asiatic Society, London, 1843 A. D. It discloses that the purpose of

archeological exploration in India is neither the study; nor preservation of historical

monuments, but to use archeology as the imperial tool to create mutual dissension and

resentment between Buddhists, Jains and other Hindu with Invaders by falsely crediting all

monuments to the authorship to alien invaders while few may be labeled as that of being

constructed by Buddhist or Jain, but not by Hindus.

45.                                That the indo-saranice theory of architecture is the existence of Hindu

patrons in all medieval monuments thus it is necessary that the credit must be given to such

Hindu artists who designed the monuments. It may not be given to medieval cruelty and

fanaticism adopted by chauvinistic Invader invaders. The infidel designs on each and every
 Invader mosque and tomb reveals the tolerance of Hindu citizens who were subjected to the

cruelty and terrorism from the last one thousand years. This article does not reflect any

animosity between the different section of the society but this is a description of sum of the

thought provocating a revelation in relations to the blunder committed by the Historian on the

foundation of sacrosanct concepts.

46.                          That the pioneer, In English daily newspaper of Lucknow it was observed that

“The Archeological survey of India reports (brought out under Alexander Cunningham) are

feeble, inane and all but useless and the Government has reasons to be ashamed of the majority

of the volume. It appears that Cunningham planted false Invader cenotaphs inside Hindu

building, inserted Koranic over writing on Hindu edifices and sponsored the fabrication of

documents to be given to Invader caretaker for conversion of the Hindu Building like Taj

Mahal, Red fort, Fatehpur Sikri, Sikandara, Etmadudullah built by Hindu rulers to the Invader

monuments. Let us begin with the dubious instance of 230-ft. high tower called as Qutub

Minar to which historian claims to have been built by Qutuubbdin Aibak from 1206-1210 A.D.

The other historian claims that it was built by his son- in- law and successor Iltmash, while

other claim it to be built by Allauddin Khilji. The fourth view is of Ferozshah Tuglaq, while

the fifth view is that all these rulers jointly or severely built the tower. Everyone knows that

there is no basis for the above assertion. But the public knows the truth by mere seeing the

sight of Qutub Minar that the same is having so many deity and temple adjoining to this

monument. The true copy of report published in Hindustan Times regarding the sign of maker

of Taj Mahal published on 6th July 2004 is filed as Annexure No. 8 .

47.                               That these historians may be impeached for gross dereliction of their duty

and for committing cheating upon the conscience of the public. The truth is not amenable to all

individual as no one could dare to become vigilant enough and to collect true version about the

mediaeval township of Hindu rulers. We therefore caution the world of history not to place any

faith in Anglo-Invader translations of Invader lettering or documents made hitherto.it is

 submited that The number of report regarding the authorship of Taj Mahal, Fatehpur-sikiri

published in Amar Ujala on the basis of the reserch condect by its Senior Sub-Editer Sri Bhanu

Pratap Singh Resident of Shastri-puram, Bodala Road, Sinkandra, Agra shell be produced at

the time of arguments.

48.                          That the Later Percy Brown, James Ferguson, Sir Kenneth Clarke, Sir Bannister

Fletcher and Encyclopaedia Britannica orchestrated the same cunning tune of Cunnigham.

That resulted in firmly establishing and perpetuating a colossal archaeological fraud which is

being sedulously taught all over the world as profound academic truth and is echoed in

newspaper articles and telecasts for over a century. Cunningham’s suggestion was obviously

highly appreciated. Because when he retired from the army as a Major General he was

straightaway appointed the first archeological surveyor of India in 1861,as director from 1862

to 1865 and as Director General from 1871 to 1885.  Thus the historical data based on

archeological study conducted by Cunningham are scheming brain of notorious design

regarding their vagueness and deceptive notions. The archeological survey of India was

dramatically closed from 1861 to 1865 when the two assistant of Cunningham namely J D

Beglar and Carlleyle took over the charge and prepare the list of historical monuments with

fabricated historical records. Consequently persons working around the world as the expert

Invader known as Saracenic architecture in museum became the pseudo experts unwittingly

perpetuating the fraud with the people. T he historical cities were converted to Islam and the

pre Invader edifices built according to the Vedic architecture were vanished from existence.

49.                          That the ancient Indian history is remarkable from the time of the epic of

Ramayana and Mahabharata. There are the evidence that their exists the Hindu palaces having

the creation of it by the marble and other precious stone. In the ancient time there was

sculpture based on our ethical and religious concepts. The cultural heritage was in existence in

the form of iron pillars, the mandate of the ruler on copper scripts and the creation of the

artistic image indicating civilization on the different religious temple of the contemporary
 period. These were the valuable antiques, which were ruthlessly destructed by the foreign

invaders. The portraits of the ruler and their identification could be seen on the rocks and coins

of the relevant period, which are hidden inside the earth due to the barbaric destruction of our

Hindu heritage. The prominent place of these heritage found are at Mohinjaddeo, Harrapa

(Sind), Takshila (Punjab), Kaushambi, Sarnath, Mathura(Uttar Pradesh), Patilaputra ,

Nalanda(Bihar), Rajgiri , Sanchi, Burhotra (Madhya Bharat),Agadi, Vanvasi, Talkand and

Maski(south).

50.                        That there has been number of articles written by foreign visitors/delegates/

diplomat and ambassadors amongst whom Magastahenes from Domiscus (Syria) and

Deoneses (Egypt) are prominent .The descirption of the great ruler Sri Chandragupta Maurya

may be found in the writing of Magasthenes. The Chinese writer Faiyan left the glimpse of

Vikramaditya period thereafter Honchong came to India and remained here for about 15 years

who has described the period of Harshvardhan religious and social coordination. Harshvardhan

was the prominent ruler of our nation. At the last we may get some description from the article

of Alavruni who came along with Mohammed Ghaznavi and examined the traditions of Hindu

which are described in (Tahikate hind )

51.                      That thus the civilization at Sindh river at Harappa has got the enormous storing

capability of the food articles which were distribute by the Hindu rulers during their

‘Anusthan’ in the different part of our country .The discovery of  ‘Godam’ meant for storage of

the grains is still found in Harrapa civilization which has become a part of Pakistan after th

division of our country. It is evident that the people of the contemporary period were having

their expertise in molding the copper pots for storage of the valuable herbal extracts meant for

providing the cure from the ailments. All these cultural heritage of our Hindu civilization has

not been preserved by our archeological department.

52.                    That the period of destruction after reaching to the optimum heights after the

propagation of Jain religion and Buddhism, may be relate back from the period of Ajatshatru,
 Nand Samrajya when Sikander invaded our country in 267 B.C. at Peshawar. He fought a

battle from King Puru near Jhelum river and due to natural calamity of unprecedented rains,

the elephant could not provide any impact upon aggressors, who were fully equipped to fight

the Guerilla battle. The defeat of King Abhishad in Kashmir was the beginning of external

invasion by the foreign invaders.

53.                             That during the Maurya dynasty, the King Chandragupta Maurya, who was

getting instructions from great Chanakya had successfully defeated Celucus but subsequently

he entered with a compromise with Chandragupta Maurya as a result of which Chandragupta

got eastern part of Unan namely aria, archosia, gadrosia and paronishdi. Chandragupta Maurya

subsequently married with the daughter of King of Unan. Thus our country under the

domination of the dynasty of Chandragupta Maurya was extended up to Unan to Mysore in the

south. Thus except Kashmir and Kalinga the boundary our country was extended upto

Afghanistan and Baluchistan. But unfortunately the period of Chandragupta Maurya could not

remain intact. There was the revolt at tatshila which was suppressed during the reign of

Bindusar by great ruler of our nation namely Ashoka the great. King Ashoka fought a battle

with Kalinga and in this manner the dimension of the area, which was extended upto

Baluchistan was further extended from makaram, sindh, kutch, kyauli, swat ki vally, but

Kashmir Nepal and Assam remained in exclusion to the aforesaid domination.

54.                           That subsequently Great King Ashoka became the disciple of Lord Buddha and

he has started expansion to the percepts of the religion by having the affixation of the symbolic

predomination adhered with the aforesaid religion. He constructed the Ashoka pillars from

mono block of a rock. On the top of which, there was the symbolic resemblance of four lion,

while in midst, there was a chakra comprising of 24 arches and the Bull and the elephants

scriptures were carved out in the middle of the single rock, below which, there was the lotus in

the downward directions. The symbolic resemblance of the lotus became a tradition for

construction of the temple. Thus we may find out that wherever the lotus is evident on any
 monument with the scripture like the vegetable leafs, grapes, peacock and other religious

offering provided to the deity kept inside the temple.

55.                            That the foundations of Invader were based on the concepts of destruction of

the existing values prevalent amongst the Buddha and Hindu religion. Although, it is widely

accepted that prior to the creation of other Religion, every one was himself initially the

follower of Hindu religion. He was initially opposed to existence of other religious

adomination. There was the preaching, that whosoever he might be, he does not follow the

Islam, then, there may be the army of Invader followers, who may terrorise him for conversion

to them. In this process if there may be the use of terrorism by showing of it the follower of

other religion may loose the confrontation in the expansion of Invader fundamentalist then

even they use to profess the aforesaid crusade. Thus after the existence of such a drastic army

of the crusaders, there was no possibility that the other peace loving religion may still remain

in existence. Unfortunately Hindu, Jain, Buddh religion followers were dependent upon the

policy of non-violence, peace and tranquillity and under their religious philosophy i.e, the

entire world is likes a family of the different ideology.

56.                                 That the beginning of the Invader invasion in our country starting from the

time of Mohammed Bin Quasim in 712 A.D., there was the gruesome murder committed of

King Daher and thereafter his two daughters after outraging their modesty were handed over

by Mohammed Bin Quasim to his uncle namely Abdul Abbass of Oman. However the Invader

ruler after been instigated by the daughters of the King Daher got this Mohammed Bin Quasim

death by putting him alive inside the leather of the cow for invading the chastity of two girls

prior to their offering to Sultan. This was the beginning of destruction of our cultural heritage

by these ruthless invaders. The description of it may be seen in a book written by R. C.

Mazumdar namely the ‘Arab mission of India’.

57.                                 That Sultan Mohammed Ghaznavi robbed Somenath temple. Ultimately

after invading and defeating the different Rajput rulers for more than seventeen time from the
 year of 1000 to 1026 A.D. This man was the follower of Islamic fanatism, who destructed

many temples during his aggression. Abdul Fateh Daud,a Invader ruler of Sultan was so

terrified that he offered his apology to Mohammed Ghaznavi and at the same time Jaypal who

committed the suicide instead of being surrendered before Mohammed Ghaznavi, his son

Anand Pal was also defeated  near Peshawar. In the sixth attack committed upon our nation by

Mohammed Ghaznavi. Anand Pal thereafter associate of the King of Ujjain, Gwalior, kalingar,

kannuanj, Delhi and Ajmer, but due to the division in the army , Mohammed Ghaznaviu again

defeated him and thereafter the he attacked on the Palace of Nagarkot Kingdom. These

invasions started from the year of 1007 upto 1027 A.D. continued to remain near Sindhsagar

Navnandh, Yagesghwar, Barran, Mahram, Mathura, Kalinjar and ultimately at Katiabad due to

disintegrity of the Hindu rulers. Ultimaley Mohhamed Ghaznavi died on 30th April 1030.

58.                         That the journey of Shahabuddin Mohammed Gauri started from 1176 to 1178

for the victory of Multan and Kutch. He conducted so many attacks with the help of King of

Jammu upto 1186. He entered in Gujrat, but Mool Raj the King of Anhilavada got him

defeated. However in 1191, he conquered Malinga and Shar-Hind, which included the territory

of Delhi. Thus Delhi and Ajmer remained under his domination, while he attacked at Kannuaj,

Chandivada (near Etawah), Gwalior and Vijana. Gayasuddin Mohammed Gauri died in 1102.

59.                                That the reason for the defeat of Rajput rulers was on account of the fact,

which is exhibited by the recital of Turk aggressors that there is the survival of the fittest.

There was no morality in the Hindu army and as such the Invader rulers defeated them. The

main reasons for the defeat were the caste system and idol worships prevalent at the relevant

time. The intellectuals were side tracked and the society was divided into much segmentation

in which Kshatriya only were considered to be the fighting class amongst the Hindus. Hindu

Religion was based on diversity of different caste, Creed, Sects and Multiplicity of Religion

The citizens were having the orthodox feeling and they were very much living under the
 domination of superstitions. This was the reason that the Hindus were subjected to the cruelty

by the foreign invaders.

60.                      That the Kutubuddin Aibak appointed a Invader governor upon Ajmer. He

expanded the territory of Mohammed Guari to Meerut, Jhansi, Kol, and Runthambor. He

converted many temples into Invader Mosques at Gwalior and Anhilvada. Bakhtiyaruddin

Khilji invaded Bengal at the time of Kutubbuddin. There were many rulers namely Aalathmus,

Razia Sultana, Naseeruddin Mohammed, Tuglaq Khan, and ultimately Jalaluddin Khilji came

to the power. But his real nephew and son-in-law Allauddin Khilji trapped him and killed as a

traitor. He committed the murder of Jallaluddin’s sons namely Aktali khan and Rukunniddin.

This Allauddin after getting his enemy killed became the ruler to control the governance of the

occupied territory. There was the stability in respect of the price of food grains. The cow was

sold at one by third cost of the goat during his period. However Alluaddin died in the year of

1316 A.D.

61.                              That the starting of Gayasuddin Tuglaq and after his death one Mohammed

Tuqlaq who was called as a symbol of many contradictions at the same time he was intelligent

and cruel while on the other hand he was a religious and lunatic but he was called as

unfortunate idealistic who shifted his capital from Delhi to Devgiri at Daulatabad .The

successor of Mahmmaed Tuglaq was Feroz Tuglaq who developed the government farm and

made the invention for the rotation of the crops. He converted many Hindu monuments and all

these monument description is described at Fatauath- e-ferozshahi .The cities were known as

Feroza, Ferozabad, Hissar, Jaunpur and Fatehabad during his time period. He created a army of

the slaves comprising of about one lakh eighty thousand people belonging to the inhabitant of

the same place where he was the conqueror. After the end of Tuglaq dynasty the Taimur

dynasty completely vanished the remains of Tuglaq rluers. However soon the Taimur dynasty

appointed Khijr Khan as there representative who created Syed regime. It has been said by the

great German philosopher Gete that the success and the defeat are the part of the same coin as
 the joy and sorrow are reactionary and the unity is disintegrity are the reflections of the same

quality. This was also the reason that after Mohhamed tuglaq there was the extinction of

Invader dynasty and there was the beginning of Hindu rulers at Vijaynagar.

62.                        That the correspondent of BBC, London Times, Derspegel, New York

Times ,Washington Post ,Christian Science ,Monitor Times and ‘life’ weekly’s continue to

misrepresent these Hindu Building as that of Invader origin. The freedom of expression

continues to ruthlessly suppress the truth about these historical buildings belonging to the pre-

Invader origin. These Historian have meticulously calculatively kept their readership ignorant

regarding the truth of pre–existing palaces and temple prior to declare them the building as

Invader monuments.

63.                         That now our government has provided the restriction for taking even the

photograph of the prominent historical buildings in India under the guise of archeological

department as to maintain the status quo regarding the falsehood created by the historian and to

avoid the alleged animosity between the majority class of the Hindu with the minority Invader.

It has been revealed by Encyclopaedias Islamia that the Arabia itself obliterated all its past

history by destroying image before the foundation of Islam. The origin of Kaba which is the

central shrine is in itself a Hindu temple surrounded by huge shrine consisting of 360 HIndu

images belonging to Indian king Vikarmaaditya who founded them in 58 B.C. Even the word

‘Allah’ is a Sanskrit word signifies  “Mother or goddess“ while mekha (Makka) in Sanskrit

signifies a sacrificial fire of Vedic worship prevalent during the pre Islamic days. The

monuments have not only been destroyed in the peninsula of arvasthan belonging to King

Vikramaditya, which was captured by the Arabian during the Islamic invasion. The intriguing

aspect of regarding the existence of Shivalinga in Kaba shrine in Mecca is well known as sun-

gay aswad that is of black stone. It is still a misfortunate part on the majority of Hindu Citizens

that the income collected from the temples of Karnataka is distributed to about 80% of its
 share to the Haze piligrimage, where there is the slaughtering of the 2500 cows and camale as

that of the rituals.

64.                      That the poetic composition of pre Islamic Arabian poets kept in famous library

called as Makahtab-e-Sultania in Istambul in turkey contains the biographic details of these pre

Islamic construction while the second part embodies the period beginning just after prohphet

Mohammaed upto the end of Vanee- umaya dynasty resembling the Sanskrit name of

Krishnayya voice. There has been a big signboard few mile away from Mecca banning the

entry of any non Invader in the area. This signboard signifies the period shrine was stormed

and captured by the invader having their faith in Islam. The same position is visualized at

Azmer sharif where there is still the covering over the Shivalinga for which the Islamic

follower are strictly providing the vigilance as it may not be disclosed the existence of the

Temple of Lord Shiva. Thus it be go on searching the different historical facts with the open

eyes we will find that there are ample evidence to deflate the Indo- Saracenic architecture

theory bubble.

65.                      That there is thus a valid reason why Hindus are not in a position to produce any

documentary evidence with regard to the Hindu origin of fort. Even then we maintain that if a

systematic archaeological excavation is undertaken inside the fort and if its dingy cellars and

basements are opened and scoured they may still reveal Sanskrit inscriptions and idols

smashed and buried by Invader occupiers. In fact whatever little and excavation has been made

has resulted in the recovery of horse and elephant statues. Yet taking things as they stand any

court of law will uphold the plea that Hindus have a valid reason for not being able to produce

any documentary proof.

66.                           That the Hon’ble court will then ask the Anglo-Invader school to produce its

documents. That school too has not got even a shred of a document to prove that any one or

more Invader rulers built or rebuilt the fort. A hazy mention to that effect in a court flatterer’s
 chronicler is no documentary proof. It is like you or we noting in our diaries that we built the

Houses of Parliament in London.

67.                            That the Apex court held in Ram Sharan Autyanuprasi’s case 1989 (Supp.) (1)

SCC 251/AIR 1989 S. C. 549, that men’s life is inclusive of his tradition, culture and heritage

and protection of that heritage in its full measure would certainly come within the encompass

of an expanded concept of Article 21 of the Constitution. It is the life- mission of the petitioner

to re-establish the truth with regard to the National and Important monuments having heritage

of Indian culture and values of Indian life.

68.                         That as per the discovery of the author Sri P. N. Oak, (contrary to the assertions

by the Aechiological Survey of India, in short ASI), the Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya, a Shiva

Temple raised (500 years before Sahahjahana became the Mogul ruler) by Raja Paramar Dev’s

Chief Minister, Salakshan, as per the Bateswar inscription stocked in the Lucknow Museum.

69.                  That during the turbulent time of Invader invasions from 712 A. D. to 1761 A. D., the

edifice was raided plundered and desecrated a number of times. Ultimately it passed into the

hands of Raja Man Singh of Jaipur, who was a contemporary of the third generation Mogul

Emperor, Akbar. Man Singh’s grand son, Jai Singh was the ruler of Jaipur, when Akbar’s grand

son, Shahjahan ruled in Agra and Delhi.

70.                    That consequently, Shahjahan’s own Court Chronicler, the ‘Badshnama’, written by

his own paid Court Chronicler, Mulla Abdul Hamid Lahori, emphatically mentions (on page

403 of vol. I, now kept in National Archives, New Delhi) that  “ The mansion knows as Raja

Man Singh’s Manzil, at present owned by his grandson Jai Singh was selected for the burial of

Mumtaz and she was buried in it. The edifice kept with a dome is a spectacular wonder

monument.” The true copy of the admission in Shahjahan’s own Badshnama, the original

persion script and its english translation publish in book written by Sri P. N. Oak i,e, Taj Mahal

is a Temple Palace which is also kept with the National Archives, New Delhi, is made

Annexure –9 and 10 (The transcription of the Persian passages in Roman script and the
 corresponding English translation, of relevant pages only, which are record in chapter 2 of the

said book.)

71.                            That another contemporary document is Prince Aurangazab’s letter to his

father, emperor Shahjahana dtd. July-August 1652 A. D. pointing out how that “Illustrious

mausoleum complex being very ancient had cracks and leaks at several places needed

extensive repairs”. Prince Aurangazab’s letter (quoted above) reporting that the tomb-complex

being very ancient had cracks and leaks in 1652 A. D. itself gives a lie to the ASI’s notices

declaring that the Taj Mahal stood brand new 1652 A. D.   The true copy of the Prince

Aurangazab’s letter written in Persian Language to his father, emperor Shahjahana dtd. July-

August 1652 A. D. and english translation are marked as Annexure-11 and 12(The

transcription of the Persian passages in Roman script and the corresponding English

translation, of relevant pages only, which are record in chapter 2 of the said book.)

72.                             That besides the above two Invader Court records of Shahjahan’s time, the

said book of the author which runs into 360 pages with 86 photos and photocopies of above

two Invader documents another booklet titled The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya. A Siva Temple

presents 118 points of documentary as well as circumstantial photographic and other historic

evidences. Apart from the historical and documentary evidence, if there are some practical

considerations. Since it is claimed that Shahjahan’s great infatuation for Mumtaz impelled him

to raise a wonder edifice over her corpse the obvious cross-question would be? -Shahjahan’s

exclusive infatuation for Mumtaz is belied by the existence of his harem consisting over than

5000 women mentioned in authentic history books.

73.                    That another question would be that if Shahjahan loved Mumtaz so deeply what

explains the total absence of any book of Shahjahan-Mumtaz love stories unlike Laila-Maznu,

Romio-Juliet romances? The fact is that Mumtaz was buried at Burhanpur, a place 600 miles

south of Agra. After 6 months the corpse is stated to have been lifted from there and re-buried

in the Taj Mahal temple palace. The true copy of the documentary proof in support thereof
 forming part of the research work on Taj Mahal identity and authorship based on evidence

having direct proof of its authorshipwritten by Sri P.N. Oak having the discription of different

monuments regarding their authorship is filed as Annexure 13, 14 and 15.

74.                        That the truth hidden inside the four story building known as Taj Mahal is full of

mysterious circumstances as no where in the world. There may be the fourth floor of the

graveyards of Mumtaj and Sahajahan on the third and fourth floor of the alleged Muslim

monuments. Actually, even the archeological department, while diging the adjoining place

ment for Goushala, has found the crown of the deity worship by Hindus during pre-mughal

period, but in order to avoid the further repercussion resulting in to animosity by the Muslim

fundamentalist, this fact has been subsided again inside the earth. There has been the existence

of castle surrounding the building, which can not be there, except inside the palace ment for

the Rajputana Rulers. Since the entire treasury was given as endowment trust beneath the

foundation of the temple and Lord Shiva being the God of resembling to the sovereignty of the

judicial institution, was considered to have the over all superintendence of the expenditure

incurred by the rulers and as such the ingress and outgoes to the treasury was at the door step

below the feet of the temple. Thus while the upper story constructed through the marble stone

on the third and fourth floor was comprising of the temple of Lord Shiva, just beneath the

aforesaid temple where the visitors are allowed to reach there through the taress, was actually

the treasury chamber of Rajputana style living of Hindu Rulers.

75.                      That Ex- Maharaja of Jaipur has Kapad Dwara collection bearing Two orders

(FARMANS) from Sahajahan dated Dec.18, 1633 (bearing morden Numbers R.176 and 177)

having the requisitioning the Tejo- Mahallyan Building from Raja Jai Singh through blatant

reward to him for fighting against Maharan Pratap Singh ,Mewar ruler by his father and

thereby got the usurpation of this Building. Subsequently Rajasthan State archives at Bikaner

preserves three Farmans address by Sahajahan to Raja Jai Singh to supply the Marble used for

Koranic Grafts from his Markana Querries, and also the Stone cutter. The cost of the
 scaffolding was more than that of the cost of entire work. These farmans were issued after

about two years of death of  Mumtaz, who was buried at Burhanpur, a place 600 miles south of

Agra. After 6 months the corpse is stated to have been lifted and there after these Farmans

were issued from there and re-buried in the Taj Mahal temple palace. The grafting Koranic

superimposition lettering in the Taj- mahal is of inferior quality and is pale white shade while

rest of the existing building was of rich yellow tint.

76.                         That even the rulers were guided by their Raj Guru living inside the forest meant

for providing education to princes, before admonition of the power of the sovereignty in their

hand. Thus every Hindu ruler was God fearing person and he was regarding the Brahmins

superior on the intellectual and other sacrosanct functions. Thus the existence of the symbol

like Swastik, Stars, Hooklikemark, triangle, Damru shape mark, Flowers, Intersecting,

Triangles, Trident, Three Cojoined Fish, Ball with S-Shaped inside, Four Square, Fish, Goad,

Arrow, Axe, Geomatrical Flowers and the character written in Dev Nagri arrenged in the order

of frequency are the evidence available in support of the argument to the extend. The southest

corner of the Taj –Mahal corner of the Taj garden has an ancient royal- cattle house, from

where the AMLAKH- THE TOP GOLDEN COVERAGE TO THE DIETY has been

discovered to the supreintendent of archeaological dept. at Agra, but the matter has again

subsided under the instruction of the present Govt. officials. Even a cowshed is an incongruity

in an islamic tomb.

77.                             That the Taj Mahal is a temple/palace of Kshatriya /Rajputana Rulers and was

built by some Jat courtier in 1155 A.D.. Lord Shiva is known as Tejo Ji by Jats still in the

western Utter Pradesh, which is resemble the nomenclature of Tejo Mahal converted in to Taj

Mahal by the efflux of time. The Bateshwar inscription originally installed in Taj

Gardens( currently preserved on the top floor in Lucknow Museum) refers to 1155 AD

costruction of Tejo- Mahalaya the raising of a “ CRYSTAL- WHITE SHIVA TEMPLE SO

ALLURING THAT LORD SHIVA ONCE ENSHRINED IN IT DECIDED NEVER TO

 RETURN TO MOUNT KAILASH PARVAT- HIS USUAL ABODE”. The eaight directional

shafts in a small central circle surrounded by other circles respectively are depicting 16

Cobras, 32 tridents and 64 lotus buds. All these motifs in multiples of 8 are of vedic

significances. Cobras , Lotuses and tridents are always associated with LORD SHIVA

TEMPLE.

78.                                 That this tempering by Sahajahan may be in the report of Archaeogical

Survey Of India Vol. IV pages 216-217 (published in 1874), stating that a “great square black

basaltic pillar which, with the base and capital of another similar pillar”. In 1959- 1962, when

sri S.R.Roa was the Archaeological Superintendent in Agra, there was a deep crack in the wall

of the central Octagonal chamber of Taj Mahal. There were two or three marble Hindu  idols

discovered but the matter was hushed up and the images were reburied and embedded at the

behest of govt..In the garden in 1973, another set of fountains were found about six feet  below

the present fountains.

79.                                   That an Englishman, Thomas Twining, records (page 191 of his book

(Travels in India- a Hundred years Ago)that in november 1794 “I arrived at the high walls

which encloses the Taj Mahal and its circumjacent buildins--. Ihave got out of the palanquine

and --- mounted a short flight of steps leading to a beautiful portal which formed the centre of

this side of the court of Elephants as the great area was called at that time. Where are these

missing Elephants standing outside the Hindu Palaces buildings. These are burried in side the

surface of this great Shiva Temple.

80.                       That the octagonal shape of the taj Mahal has a special Hindu significance.  Hindu

alone have special names for the eaight directions, and celestial guards assigned to them. The

Taj  Mahal has a trident pinnacle over the dome. The central shaft of the trident depicts a

Kalash (sacred pot) holding two bent mango leaves and the coconut. This is a scred Hindu

motif. Identical pinnacals may be seen over Hindu And Buddhist temples over the Himalayan

region.
81.                      That during the investigation conducted by the different journalists of daily news

papers “Amar Ujala” at Agra, as they have conducted the survey in which below the Red

stone building, there has been the stairs for taking the dip inside the holly Yamuna river as per

the Hindu tradition to offer the water to the rising sun rising from the eastern side of the

palace. These stairs are hidden inside the earth. The place was known as Dashhera and Basai

bathing Ghat for the pilgrimage coming for paying their respects to Lord Shiva, whose idol

was visible to the common men, even from outside the palace. The building proposed by

Rajputana Rulers to be constructed in black stones opposite to the Taj Mahal was also an

efforts to provide a glimpse of the temple of Lord Shiva to the common men, which could have

been seen also from the glass projecting Taj Mahal on the upper story.

82.                               That neither Shahjahan nor Mumtaz could have been buried here because this

chamber is on the 4th floor above the river surface. Corpses are invariably buried in mother-

earth and never on stone floors. Consequently this so-called Mumtaz’s cenotaph in this central

octagonal chamber either covers the sacred Hindu (Vedic) Shivling itself or the sacred spot

from which the Shivling was uprooted. Shahjahan and Mumtaz must be fake. Why should

there be even one pair of fake cenotaph? And since one pair of cenotaphs is fake the crucial

question is which is the fake one. The one in the lower chamber or upper chamber? Or does

each floor contain one fake and the genuine cenotaph alternating between Shahjahan and

Mumtaz?

83.                               That all doors which have been found more than 800 years old through the

carbon-dating process, which have now been closed without any cogent reasons. After

conducting the research for many years has disclosed that these doors were closed on 8th

February 1964. The true copy of the report regarding carbon-14 dating of  these wooden doors

having the details of 800 years old is filed herewith as Annexure No. 16 .

84.                           That search was made after reading the abstract of the book written by Mr. P.N.

Oak. To the greater astonishment, when these students asked the query from some officer of
 archaeological department, as to whether the three tunnels lying beneath the structure of Red

Fort, Agra are also connected with Taj Mahal below the ground floor of the structure

constructed in red stone. It was found that on the second Ground storey beneath surface of the

red building below the Taj Mahal, there are the sculpture carved out having the statute of Lord

Ganesh, and that of the other prominent God worshiped by the Hindus, but they have been

completely closed in derogation to the right conferred to the citizens. Actually from inside the

tunnels, an army having four horse ridden soldiers in the row can pass through these tunnels

from Agra Red Fort even to Fateh pur Sikri, Taj Mahal and some of the historian claims that

since at the site of Jama Masjid Agra, since there were the great palaces in existence, prior to

the pre-Mughal period, the ingress and outgoes of the soldier entering from Red Fort, Agra was

up to these palatial building comprising of the temple inside Jama Masjid, Agra , Etmaudaulla

and other historical places at Agra. The existence of three tunnels inside Red Fort Agra is a

truth as that of the broad day light, which is situated beneath Baradari, where the execution of

the death sentence by chopping the head of the culprit was done by the Mughal rulers.

85.                                  That this has got atleast more than 280-step downward from there. Actually,

while entering inside Red Fort , Agra one has to ride atleast about 50 meters above to the

ground situated near Yamuna river but since the surrounding having the coverage by the ditch

and by crossing the same one could get entrance inside the main building as such the existence

of the tunnels must be beneath the earth level and since Etmaudollah is situated across the

Yamuna river, while Sikandara and Fatehpur Sikri are at a very long distance and as such these

three tunnels firstly reaches to Jama Masjid  Agra , one to Taj Mahal but the existence of the

third tunnels, appears to adjoining to the road, Which is said to have been built by Sher Shah

Suri, while it was ever- remain in existence from the time, of these building constructed prior

to the pre-Mughal invaders aggression to our country by the Hindu contemporary rulers of the

relevant time.
86.                       That the contribution in the monuments known as Taj Mahal by these invaders is

only to the extend of construction of only four Meenars, the script of Quran and closing of the

door way of main apartment from where the public may offer their gratitude to the constructed

building known as Taj Mahal having the deity of Lord Shiva (Shiv-lingi), Nandi, Ganeshjee,

and Parvatiji. Where are the remains of the maker of these buildings . The spectator of the

pathetic situation resulting in the terrorist attack on the these cultural Haritage belonging to

Hindu citizens, who were settled in this country and were comprising of the people coming

from Purtagal, Spain, Partia, Saiberia, and other Scavandians country of the Eourope, China,

Russia. The news report Annexed here- in- after all are the glaring example of the atrocities

committed with the truth by the present ruling political setup, which is no other than the British

system based upon the theory upon “Divide and Rule” in our Country.  

87.                                 That the Central Government has provided the grant of forty million of

Rupees to archaeological department for renovation of the ancient structure. It has been

revealed that there has been number of the gates with the flank opening from the red stone

structure building below the marble monument of Taj Mahal. The bricks have been affixed to

close these doors, but these bricks do not appears to have been manufactured inside the brick

clin in the ancient time. Then who have closed these doors which could have been used by the

rulers either for entering inside the palace or for appearing to Yamuna River. Who are these

fundamentalists behind such racket as the falsehood may not be exposed regarding the

authorship of the monuments alleged to have been constructed by Shahajahan. Ex Vice

Chancellor Prof. Agam Prasad Mathur, the great Historian another Ex Vice- Chancellor of

Gorakhpur university Prof. Dr.Pramila Asthana have express their concern regarding the closer

of these gates by the brick work. If the impact is provided upon the red stone, then it is

revealed regarding the empty wall. Number of the people residing in the same vicinity, who

have seen the shooting of the film LEADER at Taj Mahal, in which Dilip Kumar And Vaijanti

Mala have participating the role of Actor and Actress, have seen these internal portion of
 building of taj Mahal. There has been 14 rooms constructed inside there, which were the living

apartment of the rulers. The entire building of Taj Mahal is eight dimention constructed

comprising of four storeys building in the first floor and there has been 22 rooms on the ground

floor. There has been multi-story “Kuayan”(Deep Well) available from all the building for

availability of drinking water through the rope carrying the buckets. Towards the northern side,

there is the existence of ventilators from where one may look towards Yamuna River.

88.                           That Fatehpur Sikri may actually be declared as the “HERITAGE CITY” in the

due course of time. There has been the existence of 2200 years old the ancient broken statue of

YAKSHA at Chrima-Shahpur. There has been the existence of 3 feet long SHIV-LINGI , while

at Sikri in village Imlabda, the old statue of Lord Vishnu more than 1100 years old has been

found after excavation. There has been number of the statue recovered, which are belonging to

the period of the expansion of the Jain religion. There has been the existence of Jain temple.

Near the Tank reservoir of the water, which was considered to be the big lake on the gateway

of Fatehpur-Sikiri. There is still the existence of Triran and Amlaka, which indicates that there

was hundred feet height temple. The broken statute of Lord Shiva having GALE KI KANTHI,

BAIJANTI MALA, SRI VATSA MARK ON THE CHEST AND YAGYAPABIT may be still

seen , while the head, hands and the portion below the chest has been broken by the invaders.

These all facts coupled together may convey the irrevocable conclusion regarding the existence

of the monuments of Fatehpur Sikri and associated building prior to the Mughal period, which

were ruthlessly broken by the invaders of the cultural heritage just to propagate and expend

their religion and by conversion of the weaker class of Hindu Citizens.

89.                          That the great Archaeologist Shri Dharam Veer Sharma, then Superintendent of

the archaeological Department at Agra has define the meaning of these antique for re writing

the Indian history on the basis of all these circumstantial evidence, as the entire world may

become conversant, that these monuments were not been constructed by these invaders to our

ancient spiritual heritage but the existence of Fatehpur Sikri is much prior to the period of the
 mughal emperors. Tuksal, Deewane-Aam, AnoopTalab, which may find place in the book

written by E.W. Smith, the great English Historian visiting Fatehpur Sikri in 1896 and 1898

A.D.. Actually Tuksal is the castle meant for the horse captivity, which has got the capability of

drinking water and the system of drainage, sewage may be seen to some remote place through

these Drainage.

90.                      That the Water supply system is unique at Fatehpur Sikri. Actually, the lakes,

which have the accumulation of water storage, were expanded in an area comprising of more

than 25 square mile, but by the passage of time, this was extinguished purposely as to abrogate

the existence of great scientific way of living style by the Hindu Rulers to the inhabitant at the

relevant period of Rajputana Rulers. The existence of the ancient building may also be seen in

the different faces. There has been a conspiracy hatched by the followers of  a particulars

dynasty, who invaded our country to get the extinction of all such evidence, which may be

helpful for the exposure of the truth as the foundation of the invaders are based on the false

hood.

91.                             That it has been disclosed during the High level Committee Meeting at Paris

during the convention of United Nation Education Science and Cultural Organisation

(UNESCO) that near Anoop Talab (Pond), there has been the ancient palatial building and the

ancient cultural activities remain in existence prior to the period of invasion by the Mughal

invaders. The historian have related them back to the existence of all such palatial building

during the period of Sikarwar, Rajput, which find support by the research were conducted Prof.

Ram Nathan historian of Rajasthan University, Jaipur and also by Dr. Prathima Asthana Ex

Vice Chancellor of Gorakhpur University.

92.                                 That it has been stated that then Central Education Minister Nural Husan

had stoped the excavation work conducted by Aligarh Muslim University at Fatehpur Sikri,

when the broken statute were found hidden behind the earth. Prof. Agam Prasad Mathur the

Ex. vice Chancellor and the Historian of Agra University has disclosed that Agra was the
 helmet, while Mathura was the real State prior to Mughal invasion. This fact may be taken

with the angle that Agra was the city surrounded by Shiva Temple of pre Mughal dynasty

period at Taj Mahal. All these facts are fully supported with the circumstantial evidence as well

as by the research work conducted by the great historian of post independence period. The

existence of Hanuman Temple may be seen at Kagarol near the well, while Chamunda temple

may remain in existence at Sultan Garhi, from where Amlak used in Kalash of the temple has

been discovered by the excavator. There has been a lot of wealth hidden beneath the surface of

the Kagarol near Fatehpur Sikri, which has been usurp by some greedy local people

constructing their residence, while digging the plinth inside the surface. However the recovery

of the antique and broken portion of the deity and the existence of the different religious

monuments are in itself a proof regarding the great heritage. The existence of Fatehpur Sikri is

on account of a long period consistent efforts by the different sculpture and name of the Sikri

was Sacrikya, which was the place of inhibition of Jain religion philosophy by its follower

during 1000 A.D. There has been number of the broken statue of Pasarva Nath at Veer

Chhabila on the working style of Chatya Basi procedure. The sculpture found there also relates

the expesion of Jain Swetambar from Sikri to Bharatpur, much more prior to the period of

Akbar. At Bilaspur number of the statue indicating the ancient culture of Rajput ruler, while at

village Sakalpur on Agra Jalesar Road, there has been the remains old Vishnu deity, where

Hindu are still worshipping their religious God. The Shiva Lingi has been installed at village

Sakalpur, which has been inspected by the officers of Archeological Department. All these

things may required the investigation by same of the agency and direction for the exposure of

the truth my be issued to the Aercheological Department by this Hon’ble Court.

93.                            That due to Superstition and the Orthodox tradition prevalent in Hindu religion,

all such more than 47 countries of the world, which remained under the domination and

expansion of Mughal period and the British period, their character assassination was the main

reason of the conquest upon these nations. If any religion is not capable to expose the
 falsehood, it will perish. It may be deemed that the followers of the Hindu religion are still

living under the period of slavery. The invaders of any country were never the builders of the

monuments. The main objective hidden behind such invasion was to snatch the wealth of the

people and thereafter convert them to their own religion. These people, who were taken from

these countries were sold in the market of slavery just to rule upon them by destroying their

cultural heritage and thereby eroding the very foundation, on the basis of the existence of

Hindu religion is dependent. If we are still unable to expose the falsehood, the existence of the

religion of the majority of citizen is at stake. It is the question of saving our future generation.

94.                            That no individual can tolerate the bondage of the slavery, than how does it

become possible to get them the acceptance of the falsehood. The exposure of the truth is not

only beneficial for the growth of the country and to encourage the like citizen to provide

further contribution to construct the still greater palatial structure like Taj Mahal, Fatehpur

Sikri, Red Fort, Jama Masjid by the followers of the Hindu religion. The construction of the

temple at Dayalbagh at Agra and J. K. Temple at Kanpur are the glaring example of the

traditions of Hindu Culture. Till these monuments will be deemed to have been constructed by

these invaders who are now declared as the bitter critics of the Hindu Ideology of the

humanity, no Hindu citizens can claim, that he is living in independent Nation.                             

95.                           That now the question arises, that if Hindu invites the animosity of the minority

by the exposure of the truth regarding the construction of these monuments by Hindu Rulers,

weather such Hindu citizens are really providing any contribution to their on existence or to

the existence of the followers of these invaders. There is no repudiation of the truth as a single

day- light may shallow the darkness by exposure of the brightness for harmonious way of

living. In case, one may feel offended by the exposure of the truth, then there shall be the

complete dis-association in the activity of these fundamentalists. The apathy is the answer of

every problem. If we start isolating these invaders in the general esteem of the business of

these fundamentalist citizens, they themselves become followers of the truth. Thus instead of
 providing any discouragement to these pious activities, every citizens, who has got the

responsibility for deep rooted integration of nation based upon our cultural heritage, every

patriotic citizens may be raising their voice against the modesty of their religion by exposing

aggressive trend of invaders, which ware based on the atrocities committed by them.  

96.                               That the claim that Akbar built the fort is also found to be baseless because

while he is said to have demolished the fort in 1565 A.D., a murderer Adham Khan being

thrown from the terrace of a palace-apartment inside the fort in 1566 A.D. is emphatic proof

that the claim made on behalf of Akbar is as fraudulent as those made on behalf of two other

Invader sultans earlier. In fact it is also pointed out that not a single building of Akbar’s time

exists in the fort.  Akbar’s son Jahangir is said to have perhaps built a palace inside the fort

here or there demolishing his own father’s palace but even that conjecture is found to be based

on mere fancy or on some idle engravings.

97.                          That the meticulous inquiry into the matter through the coherent and

authentic account .The exposure of the falsehood is always reconcilable with the

historical event and thus the burden of proof is always lying upon the individual denying

the existing facts. The onus will be shifted upon the authority when inconsistent

anomalous and contradictory versions about the origin of Taj Mahal may be scientifically

tested upon the yardstick of the truth. Let us begin with Badshahnama, a Shahjahan’s

chronicle which discloses that the cost of scaffolding exceeded that of the entire work

done regarding Mausoleun. Mr Narul Hasan Siddiqui books that a Hindu Palace was

commandeered to bury Mumtaz in which Shahjahan’s fifth generation ancestor Barbar

lived in Tejo Mahalaya. All these facts are to be examined through the scientific methods

in order to expose the false propaganda that the Mogul invaders have not given any

contribution for building the monuments.  We may further examine that the mythical

indo Saracen architecture medieval mosques and tombs in India were built or conquered

and misused by the invaders the number of such monuments may include Mohammed

Ghaus ‘s tomb in Gwalior, Salim Chisti mausoleun in Ftahepur Sikri, Nizzamuddin

 Kabar in Delhi, Moinuddin Chisti’s Makbara in Ajmer, Red fort Shicundera

Etamatudaula at Agra, Jama Masjid, Red fort Delhi, Kutub Minar in Delhi and

Sufdarjung. The disputed site of Lord Krishna temple Mathura and Vishwanath Temple

at Varanasi may also be examined not only to resolve the controversy but also to curve

out the animosity among the citizen in India on the ground of the religion.

98.                        That the extract of Badshahnama may be examined after getting them translated

form Persian passage in the English rendering. On page number 403 of Badshahnama it is

admitted in verse 26 to 33 that Huzurat Mumtazul Zamani whose sacred dead body was buried

in Burhanpur in a garden was brought from 600 miles after six months and transported to

Agra(Akbarabad). In the south of the great city there was a palace of Raja Maan Singh which

was owned by Raja Jay Singh known as Tejo Mahalaya (The temple of Lord Shiva /Teji ji)

And this place was selected burial of the Queen for which the great ancestral heritage,

religious sanctity was associated with Raja Jai Singh who was compensated by offering the

government land. Thus a palace was converted in a dome, handy readymade Mausoleum. The

authority of Badshahnama is the first proof regarding the existence of the temple at the time

when Huzurat Mumtazul Zamani was buried. The similar treatment were given to the different

Hindu palaces and temples by converting them at as Mausoleum of Akbar at Shicandara and

Humayun in Delhi and the Vishnu temple to Kutub Minar by overbearing Invader fanatic

potentate specially when these monuments were constructed by Hindu Rulers.

99.                          That in this connection we also want to alert visitors to mediaeval buildings and

students and scholars of history not to believe in translations of Arabic and Persian inscriptions

presented readymade to them through earlier books. We have found in very many instances

that they have been distorted in translation. For instance on the Taj Mahal the inscriber has

carved his name as Amanat Khan Shirazi (an insignificant slave of the emperor Shahjahan).

Anglo-Invader accounts have boosted this inscriber of letters as one of the great wonder

architects of the world. Similarly on Fatehpur Sikri where a building is said to have been
 graced (by his presence) by Salim Chisti it is merrily ascribed to him. The true copy of the

particulars of the different monuments regarding their false identity in respect of  authorship

attributed upon them as disclosed in the scholarly research Articles Contained in the Books

Written by Shri P. N. Oak  are filed herewith as marked as Annexure-No. 17 

100.                    That we therefore advise all students of history never to take for granted the

translation of Invader inscriptions provided heretofore but get them translated de novo

whenever one has to make use of them. The whole question of the translation and

interpretation of Invader inscriptions not only in India but throughout the world must be

reopened and gone through thoroughly, for much wishful thinking has gone into presenting

them in translations to non-Invaders. In fact it would be very educative to have an

encyclopaedia for all Invader inscriptions and the misleading translations and interpretations

they have been subjected to heretofore. As an instance of a great snare in the study of

mediaeval history such exposure will be of immense educative value in warning future

researchers and students of history.

101.                      That once the hurdle of a false Invader claim made on Akbar’s behalf is got over,

we find that the fort that we see today in Agra, is the same which was owned by ancient Hindu

kings like Ashok and Kanishka. After Akbar there is no serious claim made on behalf of any

Invader ruler as the author of the fort. That means that the fort that we see in Agra city today is

the ancient Hindu ochre fort a colour so dear to Hindus. In fact ochre is the colour of Hindu

flag- a colour for which and under which they have fought for their national and cultural

existence and identity –a colour which has inspired them to great deeds of valour, sacrifice,

bravery, chivalry, gallantry and glory. Can that ochre colour be ever owned by Invaders? It

goes against all history and tradition.

102.                                   That despite several centuries of Invader occupation and canards of

Invader authorship all the fort’s Hindu associations are intact. This is something remarkable. 

The two thousands year history of the fort that Keene traces turns out to be authentic. The
 slight hitch and doubt that he encounters gets explained away by his own very intelligent

footnote that the incident of a murderer having been flung from the terrace of the palace inside

the fort could not be possible if the fort had been destroyed a year earlier. The lack of any

coherence in the dates of starting the fort construction and its completion is proof of the fact

that the world has been buffed about the Invader origin of the fort.

103.                      That Invader accounts are unable to explain the name of any apartment, as to who

built it, when was it built, what for it was built, what its cost was and why it has an Hindu aura

about it? This is because the fort did not originally belong to the invaders from Arabia, Iran,

Turkey, Afghanistan, Khazasstan, and Uzbekstan. They were mere intruders, conquerors, and

usurpers. All this discussion should convince the reader that the Red Fort in Agra is of hoary

Hindu antiquity and is at least 2200 years old.   

104.               That one great tragedy of Indian history has been that while Indians remained subdued

and gagged under alien domination for over a millenium foreigners who wielded all power in

India played great havoc with Indian history merrily destroying or distorting it at will either

out of sheer cunning and cussedness or through their colossal ignorance and wanton barbarism.

105.       That In that process all mediaeval buildings which came under long Invader occupation

came to be misused as tombs or mosques. And in course of time, thanks to alien chauvinism,

court flattery and fanatic cunning, all ancient Hindu townships and building got ascribed to

Invader authorship. Thus with astounding historical naivete Ahmedabad was, by its sheer

name, assumed to have been founded by Ahmedshah, Tughlaqabad by Tughlaq Shah and

Ferozabad by Ferozshah.

106.                                             That If one is to be guided by such puerile logic and shallow historical

scholarship then one will have to conclude that the city of Allahabad in the state of Uttar

Pradesh must have been founded by the Invader God Allah himself. This is with regard to

mediaeval townships. But even for mediaeval buildings the same nonchalant, nondescript

method is followed. Thus it is blatantly stated that if a building is known as Salimgarh it must
 have been built by or for Sheikh Salim Chisti (emperor Akbar’s fancied spiritual preceptor) or

Prince Salim (Akbar’s heir apparent)or some other Salim. Likewise if a building is called

Jahangiri Mahal it is, by that very token insisted that it must have been built by Prince Salim

after ascending the throne as Jahangir. Such superficial derivations and conclusions about

authorship make nonsense of all historical research methodology.

107.                   That During nearly 1100 years of alien rule in India most of her history has been
distorted or destroyed. All massive, majestic and alluring historic Hindu constructions in India,
from Kashmir to Cape Comorin ,have got ascribed to alien Invader invaders such as Turks,
Afghans,Iranians ,Arabs, Abyssinians  and Moguls out of sheer usurpation  or conquest. Such
misappropriated constructions include forts, palaces, mansions, sera’s, roads, bridges, wells,
canals and even road- side mile-pillars. Misuse of a colossal number of Hindu temples, palaces
and mansions as tombs and mosque for several centuries has misled many generations of the
publics, tourists, students and scholars of history all over the world into believing that those
buildings were originally commissioned by the Invaders.
108.                   That the intelligentsia of Hindusthan has been somewhat slow in assimilating that

finding is a measure of the havoc that history causes in the minds of a subject people by

making it impervious even to logic and legal proof. While warrior  -patriots like Rana Pratap

and the great Chhatrapati Shivaji spill their purple blood to emancipate the land and its people

should it not be the patriotic duty of historians to spill at least some blue-black ink for an

academic re-conquest of occupied buildings falsely ascribed to alien conquerors?

109.                      That there was E. B. Havell, a great architect, and one endowed with deep insight.

Havell has debunked the claim that the Taj Mahal is the product of any non-Hindu architectural

style. In discussing the architecture of the Taj Mahal and the claim of some historians that an

Italian named Veroneo may have been its designer, Mr. Kanwar Lal quotes Mr.Havell thus: “So

if Veroneo was so deeply versed in Indian craft tradition that he could design a lotus dome

after the rules laid down in the Shilpa Shastras, the dome itself, built by Asiatic craftsmen

would not have been his. The dome of Taj at Agra and the dome of Ibrahim’s tomb (in Bijapur)

both are constructed on the same principles. They are nearly of the same dimensions, and a fact

unnoticed by Fergusson and his followers, the contours of both correspond exactly, except that
 the lotus crown of the Taj at Agra tapers more finely and the lotus petals at the springing of the

dome are inlaid instead of being sculptured. The Taj Mahal is, infact, exactly such a building as

one would expect to be created in India …by a group of master builders inheriting the

traditions of Buddhist and Hindu buildings. The plan which consists of a central dome

chamber surrounded by four small domed chambers, follows the plan of an Indian

pancharatna, or “five jewelled” temple. Its prototype as have shown elsewhere is found in the

Buddhist temple of Chandi Sewa in Java and in the sculptured stupa shrines of Ajanta. Neither

Shahjahan nor his court builders, much less an obscure Italian adventurer can claim the whole

merit of its achievements.

110.                  That now as such, Mr.Havell in his assertion is very clear that the Taj Mahal is built

in the ancient Indian, Hindu style and none of Shahjahan’s contemporaries could design or

conceive of it. We regret that Mr. Havell was unaware of the admission in Shahjahan’s own

official chronicle, The Badshahnama, that the Taj Mahal is an ancient Hindu mansion. Had that

confession come to light in his time he would have rejoiced to find his architectural conclusion

fully corroborated by history, and he would then have been acknowledged as an authority on

Indian architecture far superior to Percy Brown or Fergusson.

111.                   That Like all other so called Invader tombs i.e. Hindu buildings used by them first

as residences and later as burial places the Taj Mahal too is not a single tomb but an ancient

Hindu mansion reduced to an Islamic burial ground. Besides Mumtaz, Shahjahan himself lies

buried by her side. But that is not all. There are two other graves in the same precincts.

112.                        That Mr Kanwar lal (P. 69 The Taj by Kanwar Lal, ibid.) observes. “At the other

end of the Jilokhana, towards the east there are again two buildings These are the tombs of

Satunnisa (Khanam) who was a favourite attendant of Mumtaz Mahal and who was entrusted

with the task of looking after the temporary tomb of Mumtaz Mahal at Burhanpur. Similar is

the tomb of Sarhandi Begum, another of Shahjahan’s queens. The two structures are built

exactly the alike.”

113.                              That the Satunnisa Khanam’s tomb consists of a high octagonal plinth, round

a central octagonal mortuary chamber. That Taj is based on good authority, but the special

assignment to her of this particular tomb has no better foundation than popular belief. That

shows that like every other detail about the Taj Mahal legend even the Satunissa Khanam tomb

is a concoction. All such tomb like mounds were erected in usurped Hindu mansions so that

Hindus may not reclaim and re use those buildings. The Invaders knew of the Hindu weakness

of not disturbing or reclaiming sepulchral sites. So, erecting false oblong grave like mounds

was like posting a strong military contingent or planting a scarecrow, which cost practically

nothing. It was a simple device a strategic totem to claim Hindu buildings for Islam and it

worked admirably.

114.                              That It is sometimes innocently asked by history teachers that if the Taj

Mahal had existed centuries before Shahjahan, how is it there are no earlier references to it.

There are three answer to the question. Firstly, the Taj Mahal being then the palace and not the

monument open for public inspection as it now is, used to be closely guarded. It was accessible

only to the elite and then only on invitation or conquest. As such one cannot except the same

prolific references to it as a tourist attraction that one comes across in these days of publicity

and modern communications. The second answer is that ancient and mediaeval India teemed

with mansions, palaces and temples of bewildering and bewitching variety, so much so that

being all very spectacular, one could not be distinguished from another by mere description.

Despite such very good reasons for not expecting any identifiable details in earlier records of

what is at present known as Taj Mahal, luckily, Babur, the founder of the Mogul dynasty in

India, who was the great great grandfather of emperor Shahjahan, has left us a disarming and

unmistakable description of the Taj Mahal, if only we have the inclination and insight to grasp

it. So our third answer to the question why no mention is found in earlier chronicles of the Taj

Mahal and other buildings is that though many a time there is a clear mention of such
 buildings, our senses benumbed by traditional tutoring fail to grasp their significance. Such is

the case with the Taj Mahal.

115.                           That the rampant corruption was prevalent during the Mogul time and there

were large percentage of unauthorized profits of innumerable middle men thus there was no

money to raise a cenotaph in the ground floor in octagonal chamber by covering them with

costly mosaic stones to match with the palace flooring and barricading the hundred of rooms,

ventilators staircases, doorways, balconies and corridor. There exist a seven-storey marble Tejo

Mahalaya Hindu temple palace complex. The seven storey massive girth in its lofty gateways

and arches necessitates the removal of stone pitching and as such Badshahnama discloses the

expenditure incurred in scaffolding of these Hindu complexes and in engraving the Koran on

the walls of edifice. The great French merchant visitor tavernier testimony too fully

corroborates the aforesaid conclusion. Let us examine his testimony introduce in

Maharashtreeya Jnyankosh. “Jean Baptiste Tavernier, a French jeweler, toured India for trade

between 1641 and 1668 A.D. His travel account is mainly devoted to commerce. He used to

sojourn at Surat and Agra (while in India). He visited all parts of India, including Bengal,

Gujrat, Punjab, Madras, Karnatak, etc. He owned a vehicle .He had to spend Rs. 600 for the

cart and pair of bullocks. ‘The bullocks used to cover 40 miles a day for two months at a

stretch. Four days were enough for the journey from Surat to Agra or Golcunda and the

expense used to be between Rs. 40 and Rs.50. The roads were as good as Roman highways.

European traveler’s felt inconvenienced in Hindu territories for want of meat, which was freely

available in Invader dominions. A good postal system was in vogue. Both the town –folk and

the government used to provide protection against highway robbery’…is the kind of

information Travernier has recorded (in his book titled Travels in India). Not being learned, he

has not recorded much except where wealth and commerce was concerned.

116.                        That the other important piece of evidence arises from some chance digging

conducted in the Garden in front of the marble edifice early in the year 1973 A.D. It so
 happened that the fountains developed some defect .It was therefore thought advisable to

inspect the main pipe that lay imbedded underneath. When the ground was dug to that level

some hollows were noticed going down to another five feet. Therefore the ground was dug to

that depth. And to the utter surprise of all there lay at that depth another set of fountains

hitherto unknown. What appeared more significant was that those fountains are aligned to the

Taj Mahal, decisively indicating that the present building existed even before Shahjahan.

Those hidden fountains could have been installed neither by Shahjahan not his successors, the

British. Therefore they were of the pre-Shahjahan era. Since they were aligned to the Taj

Mahal building it followed ipso facto that the building too pre-dated Shahjahan. This piece of

evidence too therefore clinches the issue in favour of our conclusion that Shahjahan only

commandeered an ancient Hindu temple –palace for Mumtaz’s burial.

117.                      That the archaeology officer, who supervised that digging, was Mr. R. S. Verma, a

conservation assistant,  who made another chance discovery. Once while strolling staff-in-hand

on the terrace near the so-called mosque and the circular well on the western flank of the

marble edifice,  Mr. Verma detected a hollow sound coming from below the floor where his

staff hit the terrace. He had a slab covering that spot removed and to his surprise that was an

ancient opening, apparently sealed by Shahjahan, to a flight of about 50 steps reaching down

into a dark corridor. The broad wall under the terrace was apparently hollow. From this it is

clear that the corresponding spot on the eastern terrace also hides a similar staircase and

corridor, at its bottom. And God only knows how many more such walls, apartments and

stories lie sealed, hidden and unknown to the world. Thus also incidentally points to the sorry

state of research with respect to the Taj Mahal. Nobody seems to have done neither any

archaeological investigation in the grounds of the Taj Mahal nor conducted a diligent academic

study of the whole issue. Apparently extraneous political and communal considerations have

inhibited historians and archeologists from conducting any meaningful research into the origin

of Taj Mahal. Such Academic cowardice is highly reprehensible.            

118.                                       That Naturally when chance alien visitors like Peter Mundy visit such sites

undergoing extensive superficial changes his observing that “the building is begun…. …( and )

is prosecuted with extraordinary diligence “ is not wrong .He couldn’t visualise that some

generations after him posterity would be bluffed into believing that the Taj Mahal complex 

was raised by Shahjahan himself .Travernier and Peter Mundy could not possibly visualize

such a falsification of history and could not be more explicit. We ourselves visiting some

building as chance visitors wouldn’t be more explicit. For instance if we were to visit Bombay

or London at a time when somebody has acquired somebody else’s mansion and has enclosed

it in massive scaffolding to renovate it for his own purpose we won’t dare or care to ask him

how he acquired the building, for how much, from whom, what changes he proposed to make,

and spend how much over it .We would simply refer to it as his building. Such inquiries are all

the more impossible when a wide hiatus of language, race, culture authority, and wealth

separates the two. Peter Mundy also fortunately records the object of the leveling up of the

hillocks. The hillocks were removed, he says, ”because they might not hinder the prospect “ of

the mausoleum .The very fact that within a couple of years of Mumtaz’s death the hillocks

were leveled to afford a glimpse of the mausoleum clearly indicates that the Taj building

complex already existed .All that was necessary was to level some of the hillocks and make the

building visible from a distance. In fact the very object of the ancient Hindu builders of the Taj

raising those hillocks seems from Mundy’s noting, to prevent the tempting Taj to be the target

of a malicious enemy’s attack. Since Shahjahan was converting it into a tomb open to all and

sundry, he no longer had the need to keep it out of the gaze of enmical people.

119.                    That Waldemar Hansen notes on pages 181-182 of his book (titled “The Peacock
Throne”, published by Holt, Rhinehart and Winston) that “Even as early as 1632 on the first
anniversary of Mumtaz Mahal’s death, the courtyard of the mausoleum in progress had been
adorned with superb tents, with the entire court assembled to pay homage- princes of the royal
blood, grandees and an assemblage of religious scholars including sheikhs, ulemas and hafizes
who knew the whole Koran by heart. Shahjahan had graced the event with his presence, and as
the empress’s father Asaf Khan was present by imperial request, a great banquet was spread
before the then nascent tomb and guests partook of a variety of foods, sweetmeats, and fruits.
 Verses from the Koran filled the air, prayers were offered for the soul of the dead and a
hundred thousand rupees went into charity. In later years on other anniversary days, Shahjahan
attended memorials at the incomplete edifice whenever in Agra, formally accompanied by
Jahanara and the harem .The ladies always occupied a central platform set up for the occasion,
and remained concealed from the public gaze by kanats, screens of red cloth and velvet.
Noblemen gathered under pitched tents.
120.                         That the Taj Mahal originated as a temple -The inscription in Sanskrit has 34
stanzas of which stanzas 25,26 and 34 being relevant to our topic are reproduced as translation.
Translated, these means:”He (King Parmardi Dev or on his behalf his minister Salakshan)
raised a palace which had inside it the idol of Lord Vishnu whose feet the king used to touch
with his (bowed) head.
121.                   That “Similarly the King also had constructed this temple,(dedicated) to the God
who bears the crescent on His (fore)head, made of crystal white stone. Consecrated in that
(magnificent) temple the lord (was so pleased that He) never thought of repairing to His
(Himalayan) abode on mount Kailas. The inscription found at Mauja Bateshwar, near Agra is
at present in the Lucknow Museum.It is of the King Paramardi Dev dated Vikram Samvat
1212, Ashwin (month),5th day of the bright lunar fortnight. It has in all 34 stanzas which
describe the origin of the Chandratreya (regal) dynasty and its important rulers. The inscription
was found embedded in a mound at Bateshwar .It was later deposited in the Lucknow Museum
by General Cunnigham, where it still is. The two beautiful marble temples which King
Paramardi Dev had raised, one for Lord Vishnu and the other for Lord Shiva were
subsequently desecrated during Invader invasions. Some clever (farsighted) person has this
inscription ,concerning these temples,buried in a mound. It remained buried for many years
until1900 A.D. when during excavations it was discovered by General Cunnigham. The Shiva
(Chandramauleeshwar) temple is obviuosly the Taj Mahal for the following reasons:
                                 Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters of the Koran.
122.               That the age of the original stone of the Taj Mahal and the age of the Koran scrawled-
stone are certainly different and which could be ascertain scientifically. No where is there even
the slightest or remotest elusion in that Islamic overwriting stating Shahjahan’s authorship of
the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder of Taj Mahal, naturally some words would have been
scrawled there. When koranic lettering has been forged on the walls of Taj Mahal, then why
not the name of Mumtaz in whose memory it was stated to be built.
123.                    That it is mentioned by the inscriber, Amanat Khan Shirazi himself in an
inscription on the building that Shahjahan, far from building the marvel Tej, only disfigured it
with black lettering. A clue to that tampering by Shahjahan is found on pages 216-217, Vol. IV
of Archaeological Survey of India Reports, published in 1874, stating that a .“great square
black basaltic pillar which, with the base and capital of another similar………..now in the
grounds of the Museum at Agra……………….it is well known, one stood in the garden of Taj
Mahal.” The true copy of the photographs deplicting the different monument with tempered
 representation having deceptive indintity proclaiming as Mughal constriction as exhibited in
the photographs are Annexure no.18   
124.                     That there was also a Sanskrit inscription dated 1155 A. D. in the Taj Mahal which
speaks conclusively that it was a Hindu Temple, which was subsequently wrongly termed as
Bateshwar inscription, now preserved at the top floor of the Lucknow Museum.
 
125.                        That despite such staggering evidence the respondent authorities have been
guilty of Tomin the Taj Mahal as a marble creation of Shahjahan and thereby creating and
misleading the world for over a century. All of them have also been making illegal gains
through their deceitful activities by being paid huge sums for their books, articles, news
reports, broadcasts, and telecasts.
126.                              That Archaeological Survey of India is guilty of charging high entrance fee
from thousands of visitors every day from all over the world for over a century purveying
through its licensed guides concocted details about Shahjahan’s take authorship of the Taj
Mahal and through Archaeological Survey of India notices in Hindi, Urdu and English on three
stone plaques displayed at the Tajmahal entrance declaring that Shahjahan raised the
monument from 1631 to 1653 A. D.
127.                      That the authorities are guilty of giving mis-information and dis-information all
over the world for over a century. The enormity of that academic crime affecting the whole
world has caused a deep injury and prejudice to the human population of the world. The
national motto of our country is “Satyameva Jayate“ (Truth alone triumphs). That In that
context the blatant lie that the Archaeological Survey of India has been propagating to the
entire academic and tourist world is a matter of national sham and a serious concern to all.
128.            That there is no valid reason why Anglo-Invader school should not be able to produce
even a single document pertaining to the Invader claims to the fort. Had the claims been true
such documents should have been available in plenty because when the British deposed the
Mogul emperor they preserved and carefully classified all the documents they seized form the
mogul archives. Those records contain hardly anything but letters. That when the Anglo-
Invader school is unable to produce even a single document in support of its claim any law
court would draw an a priori adverse inference.
129.             That even then we claim no special advantage form this fundamental weakness in the
case of the respondent Anglo-Invader school. In ordinary life, there are very many occasions
when documents are not available on either side and yet there is overwhelming circumstantial
evidence on the basis of which the court can come to a clear judgement over the rival claims. It
is such circumstantial evidence which we propose to lay before the bar and bench of learned
public opinion:
130.            That according to the British historian Keene, Agra fort has been in existence from the
pre-Christian era. Ancient Hindu kings like Ashok (3rd Century B.C.) and Kanishka (1st
Century B.C.) had lived in that fort. That same fort is again referred to by the Persian poet-
historian Salman, in the 11th century A.D.. Early in that century when the Hindu king Jaipal
 ruled over Agra. The fort suffered its first Invader raid under the invader Mahmud of
Ghazni.Thereafter some chauvinistic Islamic accounts vaguely claim that the Invader sultan
Sikandar Lodi demolished the Hindu fort. That claim has been found to be baseless. A few
years later another vague claim is made by some other mediaeval Invader faltterers that sultan
Salim Shah Sur either destroyed the Hindu fort or Sikandar Lodi’s fort and built his own fort at
exactly the same place or some other place. Even the claim has been found to be fraudulent
because no trace is found of the fort that Salim Shah Suri is said to have built. Invader history
is replete with such fraudulent claims, according to the late British historian Sir H.M. Elliot.
131.          That an English visitor, Peter Mundy who was in India only for about a year after
Mumtaz’s death mentions the Taj Mahal as one of the most spectacular buildings. Thus
Shahjahan’s sacrilege of the Hindu Taj temple-palace by misusing it as an Islamic graveyard
ought to be rectified by removing Arjumand Banu’s remains,if they really are in the Taj Mahal,
to her original grave, still  existing in Burhanpur. The garden pavilion of an Hindu mansion in
Burhanpur (about 600 miles south west of Agra) where Mumtaz was buried in 1631 A.D. after
her death in her 14th delivery during 18 years of married life. Shahjahan Mumtaz had
encamped in the adjoining Hindu palace during a north south journey when Mumtaz died.
132.       That the ground plan of the orthodox Vedic octagonal Tejomahalaya shrine in Agra where
Mumtaz’s exhumed body is supposed to have been interred again. Why this sacrilege? An
aerial view. The white marble Tejomahalaya framed by four towers at its plinth-corners on the
south bank of the sacred Yamuna river. Two identical red stone buildings (each with three
marble domes) facing the marble edifice from the east and west were meant to be reception
pavilions for royal or religious congregations. The central marble building and the flanking red
stone buildings are all seven storied with octagonal features, which is a Vedic specialty. Seven
storied octagonal buildings are mentioned even in Ramayanic description of Ayodhya. A
meticulous count will reveal 33 arches in the marble plinth seen in front in between the two
towers on the left and the right. Since the marble platform is a square the breadth too has 33
arches consequently the marble plinth itself encloses 33x 33=1089 rooms That is the ground
floor. Above it on either side of the lofty entrance arch may be seen vaulted arches on two
levels one above the other, which constitutes two more stories in marble.
133.       That the outer western gateway leading to the spacious parking area for visitors’ vehicles
lined by arcaded red stone verandahs with rooms for shopkeepers selling their wares. The
entire parking area is lined by such shopping arcades which Tavernier describes as bazar of six
courts. The western gateway has assumed importance in modern times because the main bus
depot and railway stations of the populace, bustling Agra city lies in that direction. In olden
days it was the elevated gateway at the left which used, to be the main entrance of the Tajganj
alias Tajganj township. The Tejomahalaya shopping arcade has had at its outer eastern and
western corners, flanking the Shree gate, two other subsidiary sentinel-temples. This octagonal
pavilion with a white dome in the southwest corner bearing the inverted lotus cap and straight
Vedic pinnacle pitcher shaft is one of them. But alas, since Shahjahan’s time the sacred
sanctum has an Islamic cenotaph attributed to an harem-maid Satunnisa Khanam. But since no
 name is inscribed on it that seems to be an inspired canard explaining away the desecration of
the Hindu shrine.
134.         That the interior of the multi-storied vaulted entrance gate leading first to the rectangular
garden and then to the wonder marble edifice at the far end. The temple palace management
staff used to work on both floors on various assigned duties. The carved decorative red stone
bunting around the interior and exterior of this gateway, about knee-high from the floor, if
minutely observed turns out to be an ingenious running chain of three-in-one Ganesh images,
two in profile on the flanks and one with a frontal facing in the middle. The marble Taj Mahal
has identical vaulted lofty archways in all the four directions. Their temple décor was chiseled
away and Koranic extracts were improvised to fill the cavities. Close look at the marble stone
frames around the vertical and horizontal Koranic passages to notice the patches of dissimilar
shapes and tints of marble used. Cobras lined up above a string of inlaid temple bells pattern
form the upper border of the Taj Mahal. Both cobras and bells have sacred associations in
Vedic spiritual lore.
135.          That the gateway at which entry tickets are issued, is decorated both inside and out, at the
knee level with a bunting depicting such ingeneous three-in-one Ganesh caricatures; two in
profile on the flanks enclosing a frontal one in the middle. The arches in the marble plinth and
the rectangular ventilator above each one of them,(allowing light and air to the 1089 chambers
inside the plinth)may be minutely observed to have been sealed with marble slabs.
136.           That the seven arches at the bottom enclose the stairs, which lead to the top of the
marble plinth symmetrically from the right and left. The Nandi (Lord Shiva ‘s Bull) occupied
the spot where the person clad in white robes is seen standing facing the entrance, before it
was uprooted at Shahjahan’s orders. That spot was patched up later with inferior reddish slabs.
There is trident shaped designs in inlay filigree at the two upper corners of the entrance and the
trident shaped red lotus bud at the apex of the arch.
137.          That the Koranic stones fixed vertically and horizontally along such lofty arches on all
four sides were improvised to fill up gaping cavities left after digging out idols of Vedic deities
and Sanskrit extracts. We arrive at the above conclusion because (1) a close inspection of the
marble frames enclosing the Koranic extracts reveal patches of marble of different shapes and
tints (2) The Koranic extracts are random, haphazard out of sequence and incomplete (3) On
hot days with the visitor’s feet burning on the marble plinth a fierce sun beating down on the
head and the eyes burning with intense sunlight radiated by the white marble sheen even a
devout Invader knowing Arabic won’t have the heart or even the steady head or patience to
crane and strain his eyes and neck alternately vertically and horizontally to make any head or
tail of that message of Allah. A close-up of the upper part of a minaret. The galleries rest on
snake-shape brackets, which is a distinct Hindu architectural trait. Mumtaz’s tomb in the crypt
(basement). The pavement patched up with marble slabs of varying sizes and tints indicating
that the Shivling here has either been replaced by the cenotaph or is covered up by it.
138.            That after one enters the lofty arch from the marble platform one-steps onto spacious
halls which form a perambulatory passage all around the central octagonal sanctum. That
 sanctum too has entrances on all four sides. But only the south entrance has been kept open
since Shahjahan’s time. All these outer and inner entrances had silver doors, which are
common to all renowned Hindu (Vedic) shrines. Those were uprooted and ranged on the outer
marble plinth before being spirited away to Shahjahan’s Mogul treasury. European visitors to
the shrine around 1631 A.D. noticing the uprooted costly fixtures such as silver doors ranged
on the marble platform misunderstood them to have been ordered by Shahjahan to be used in
the building. Contrarily the thousands of labourers rounded up from the by lanes of Agra city
under threats of dire consequences were forced to toil gratis to uproot all the costly fixtures
such as the gem studded gold railings (around the Shivaling), silver doors, precious stones
stuffed in the marble lattices and the golden pitcher dripping water on the Shivlinga, and
transport them to the mogul treasury. Notice the framed decorative panels to the left and right
of the doorway. They depict embossed OM shaped Dhatura flowers and conchshell- type
foliage. The panel at the left has the sacred conchshell design. The right side panel depicts a
plant with flowers shaped like the sacred Vedic chant (OM).
139.            That Mumtaz’s cenotaph in the foreground and subsequent Shahjahan’s cenotaph
besides it in the upper marble octagonal chamber. Notice that both the cenotaphs are highly
decorated with inlay work. Science have been so somnolent for the last 350 and odd years as to
allow the preposterous Shahjahan and Mumtaz legend, stained with carnal love  to pass muster
in spite of being riddled with a myriad loopholes disclosed .Around the hook  (from which
hangs the chain) is a sketch in concentric circles. In the smallest innermost circle are arrows
symbolizing the eight surface directions. Around it is another circle of 16 serpents looking
down on the Shivling underneath. Around it is a wider circle of 32 tridents. Surrounding it is a
bigger circle depicting 64 lotus buds. Even this mathematical progression of multiples of 8 i.e.
8x2=16x2=32x2=64 is of esoteric Vedic significance and has no relation with Islam.The
preponderating significance of 8 in Vedic tradition may be judged from terms such as
Ashtapailu, Ashtavadhani, Ashtaputra, Ashtadhatu, Ashtang Ayurved, Mangalashtak and
Sastang namaskar.
140.             That the octagonal lattice around the cenotaph of Mumtaz (which has replaced or
covered the sacred Shivling) has in its upper border a total of 108 pitchers, some rotund and
striped and some oblong like vases. The rotund striped pitcher is seen bathing the Shivaling
underneath with a stream of milk. The decorative flora on the vase and other parts of the Taj
Mahal alias Tejomahalaya is all native to India. Such decoration in the orange, Vedic colour
behooves a Hindu temple or palace but never a somber Islamic sepulchre.
141.           That a close-up of the gilded pinnacle rising from the inverted lotus cap of the marble
dome .The pinnacle is known as Kalash in Vedic parlance because of the stack of pitchers
which constitute it. The curvy shaft seen in the upper portion represents the crescent on Lord
Shiva’s forehead. Above it is an oblong pitcher, two mango leaves curving on either side with a
coconut balanced on top. Such a coconut –topped pitcher represents divinity in Vedic tradition.
142.             That the three domes of the so-called mosque are a misfit in Islam. Since Islam has
only one Allah and one prophet for who is the third dome? Moreover the qibla (i.e. the prayer
 niche) is not aligned to the Kaba in Mecca, as it should be in a genuine mosque. Also when
there are three qiblas instead of one they couldn’t all be aligned to the Kaba at the same time.
And since the twin buildings on the eastern flank is a non-mosque it automatically follows that
its counterpart to the west is also a non-mosque. Only buildings with the same function and
purpose can have an identical design.
143.          That there is staircase and another symmetrical one at the other end lead down to the
storey beneath the marble platform Tow such staircases (one each at the eastern and western
ends) behind the marble plinth take one to the nether chambers. Visitors may go to the back of
the marble plinth at the eastern or western end and descend down the staircase because it is
open to sky. But at the foot the archaeology department has set up an iron grill door, which it
keeps, locked. Yet one may peep inside from the iron grill in the upper part of the door.
Shahjahan had sealed even these two staircases. It was the British who opened them. But from
Shahjahan’s time the stories below and above the marble ground floor have been barred to
visitors. We are still following Mogul dictates and Invader secrecy though long free from
Mogul Islamic rule.
144.                That One of the 22 locked rooms in the secret storey beneath the marble platform of
the Taj Mahal, which the archaeological Survey of India keeps conspiratorially locked to
hoodwink the public. Therefore the public must pressurized the government to open all locked
and sealed chambers in all monuments including the Taj.
145.                   That the strips of ancient Hindu paint are seen on the wall flanking the doorway.
The niches above had paintings of Hindu gods, obviously rubbed off by Invader desecrators.
One of the 22 riverside rooms in a secret storey of the Taj Mahal unknown to the public.
Shahjahan far from building the shining marble Taj wantonly disfigured it. Here he has crudely
walled up a doorway. Such imperial Mogul vandalism lies hidden from the public. This room
is in the red stone storey immediately below the marble platform. Indian history has been
turned topsy- in lauding destroyers as great builders. Therefore Shahjahan should be referred to
not as the creator of Taj but as a plunderer of its costly fixtures and disfigurer of the sublime,
serene beauty of the holy Tejomahalaya.
146.                      That many such doorways of chambers in secret stories underneath the Taj Mahal
have been sealed with brick and lime. Concealed inside could be valuable evidence such as
Sanskrit inscriptions, Hindu idols, the original Hindu model of Taj, the desecrated Shiva Linga,
Hindu scriptures and temple equipment .The Government is deliberately refraining from
opening hundreds of such sealed chambers. Inside the Taj Mahal for fear of enraging Invaders
and exposing the incompetence of historians worldwide.
147.                      That there was the traditional treasury well of the Hindu temple palace. Treasure
chests used to be stacked in the lower stories. Accountants, cashiers, and treasurers sat in the
upper stories. On being besieged if the building had to be surrendered to the enemy the
treasure chests used to be pushed into the water for salvage later after recapture. For real
research, water should be pumped out of this well to reveal the evidence that lies at the bottom.
 This well is inside a tower near the socalled mosque to the west of the marble Taj. Had the Taj
been a mausoleum this octagonal multi storied well would have been superfluous.
148.                    That it has come to the notice of the petitioner’s institute that there has been the
digging of the place where “gowshala” cow protection shelter was situated .It was revealed
that there are the remains of the temple dig inside the earth and the upper portion of the temple
called as “Amlak” was found to have been hidden inside there. The official sought the
instructions from the officials of the archaeological department but the matter was subsided on
the instructions of the authority as it may annoy the fundamentalist as a result of which the
appeasement policy adopted by the government for getting the vote of the minority may be
adversely affected. Thus the spot inspections by appointing the team of survey commissioner
to submit Its report may kindly be ordered by this Hon’ble Court
149.               That Visitors to the Taj may notice the letter “om” woven in bold relief in embossed
flower –designs on the interior marble walls. As one stands poised at the top of the stairs
leading to the basement (to se what they call the ‘real graves’) one may see on the walls
around the upper marble cenotaph chamber, at chest level, the esoteric sacred Hindu letter
‘om’ woven into embossed marble flower pattern. Pink lotus patterns on the border of the
grilled panels that enclose the cenotaph may also be noticed.
150.             That a peacock Throne could never have been ordered by fanatic mediaeval Invader
rulers surrounded by even more fanatic maulvis. Throughout their millennium long rule in
India their one penchant was to break images not to make them. The peacock Throne could
only be a piece of Hindu Palace furniture because traditionally a Hindu throne must have the
effigy of some bird or animal known for its splendor or valour. In Hindu terminology the very
term for a throne is a “Lion Seat (Simhasan).”Hardly had the project begun, than we are told
that by 1635 Shahjahan had amassed such a plethora of gems and bullion, within seven years
of his accession that he did not know what to do with them. He therefore had a fabulous
Peacock Throne ordered.
151.                  That According to Shahjahan’s court chronicler (PP. 45-46,ibid.), it appears that the
peacock Throne was “three yards long, two and a half yards broad, yards high and set with
jewels worth 86 lakh rupees. The canopy had 12 emerald columns. On top of each pillar were
two peacocks thick –set with rubies, diamonds, emeralds, and pearls. The throne cost ten
million Rupees.” “The marble screen enclosing an octagonal area in the centre of the cenotaph
chamber was, according to the Badshahnama placed here in 1642 by Shahjahan …According,
however, to competent authority the screen was placed here by Aurangzeb after he laid his
father’s remains there.
152.                  That “The basement rooms are centrally situated as a line of 14 rooms along the
face of the Great Basement, under its terrace; and each of them is connected by a doorway with
as inner lobby running east and west along their entire length. From each end of the lobby a
staircase ascends to the terrace of the Great Basement, where its entrance closed by red
sandstone slabs, lay unsuspected until discovered a few years ago, the clue being given by a
small window overlooking the river in each of the two easternmost rooms. The rooms, once
 frescoed and otherwise decorated being now in darkness and infested by bats, cannot be
explored without a torch or lamp. Whether they originally opened on to a ghat and gave
admittance to the Taj from the river; or being provided with windows, were used as cool
resorts during the heat of the day, cannot now be decided”.
153.                That in the Agra Fort gallery, facing the Taj, is a tiny glass piece embedded in the
wall to mirror the Taj Mahal. Originators of the Taj legend have conveniently annexed the
device to add to the mesmeric effect of the myth. Embedding tiny, round glass reflectors by
their thousands in arched recesses of palaces and in women’s dresses is a very common and
widespread Rajput practice. Such glass reflectors can still be seen fixed in numerous ancient
palaces in Rajasthan, and continue to be used for decoration in Rajput women’s dresses.
Saracenic architecture, if there be any such should rather believe in “purdah “ i.e. shrouding or
hiding and would never think of glass reflectors. Mirror –pieces decorated the royal apartments
in Agra fort because it was a Hindu fort. Moreover Shahjahan was never permitted access
during interment to that part of the fort which overlooks the Taj. It is, therefore absurd to argue
that during detention he consoled himself by catching glimpses of the Taj in the tiny glass
piece.
154.                  That a further absurdity and inconsistency is; would an old monarch, bent with age,
stand up all the time to strain his bedimmed vision, and peer into a tiny glass piece with his
back to the Taj to catch a fleeting, reflected glimpse of the Taj when he could as well have a
clear, full, straight and direct view of it seated comfortably facing the monument? And would
not such a stance give him a pain in the neck? This is yet another instance of how students of
history, archaeologists and lay visitors have never bothered or cared to take stock of the loose
bits of the Taj legend, and tried to rearrange them to find out whether they add up to at least a
coherent and cogent account, even if fictitious.
155.                 That in addition to its sculptural splendor, the Taj is also believed to have had gem
studded marble screens, gold railing, and silver doors. Readers can well add up to the cost of
all these. It will amount to a fabulous, astronomical sum. Perhaps even all the Mogul emperors
together could not have invested that much on a single monument.  Had the Taj been an
original tomb, Shahjahan would never have allowed Indian flora to form the dominant feature
of the tapestry design inside the mausoleum of his wife. It is idle to argue that because the
workmen employed on the Taj happened to be Hindus their motifs got incorporated in the Taj
design. It must be remembered that it is the person who pays the piper that calls the tune.
Moreover when it is a question of the peace of departed soul, symbols and motifs of a detested
religion would never have been allowed to be incorporated in the ornamental patterns of the
Taj. In fact the whole idea of having such a luxurious tomb built and having decorative
patterns made inside it is frowned upon in Islamic religion and tradition. But Shahjahan had no
alternative, but to put up with them, since he had taken over a ready-made “heathen”
monument.
156.                  That under these circumstances, it is expedient in the interest of justice that a facts
finding committee may be appointed for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological
 department in respect of their purported claim set-up regarding the historical blunder
committed by them in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other ancient
buildings as Muslim monuments and truth may be disclose to the public/citizens and students
of subject of history regarding their true authorship prior to Mughal period  in furtherance of
their fundamental rights conferred under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with 49 and 51-A(f)
(h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.
157.           That it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court May graciously be pleased to declare the

provisions of The Ancient And Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains

(Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951 to the extend of declaring the ancient and

historical monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri,

Agra Red Ford, Ethmadualla and other Monuments built by Mugal invaders on the basis of

report submitted by The Governor General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander

Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of misusing the archaeological studies as ultravires

to Article 19 (1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h) of constitution of India and may futher declare

the provision of Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains

(Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And

Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958  of declaring these ancient building/ monuments

preserved with such identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as Muslim

monuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void. The true copy of THE ANCIENT

MONUMENTS PRESERVATION ACT, 1904, The Ancient And Historical Monuments And

Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951 and The

Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 ( Act No.24 of !958)

and other relevant Acts are filed herewith and marked as Annexure No.  19, 20 and 21

158.              That it is further prayed that on the basis of the Research Conducted by the petitioner
No.-2 as published in the different books written by him as referred in earlier paragraphs
namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of
Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing
Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu
Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11.
Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian
History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B. D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road,
 Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, the truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions and
temperaments to the General Citizen/ Students of history by conducting the research/
excavations of the remains of Hindu monuments by the Central Government surroundings to
all such Hindu Palace/ temple and other ancient archaeological building/ Monuments as the
incidents like demolition of disputed structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in
mass destruction of the public property shacking of public confidence in Rule Of Law in the
society. The true copy of the representation submitted to the respondent No. 1 on the basis of
the reserch work conducted by Sri P. N. Oak having legal interpretation to the legal right
conffered to the citizen having scientific and analytcial approach regarding Hindu authorship
of monuments is filed as Annexure No. 22
159.                  That it is further prayed that A writ , order, directions in the nature of mandamus
directing the respondent authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry
report, the respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India to Declare and Notify
in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built by Shahalahan and thereby directing
the Archaeological Survey of India to remove the notices displayed by them in the Taj Mahal
premises crediting Shahjahan as its creator to desist from writing / publishing / proclaiming /
propagating and teaching about Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal and stop and
discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays or any other day in the week.
160.                  That it is further prayed that a writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus
directing the respondent authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India to open the
locked-up upper and lower portions of the 4 storeyed building of Taj Mahal with numbers of
rooms, to remove all bricked up walls build later and look into room therein, to investigate
scientifically and certify which of those or both cenotaphs are fake to look for a subterrance
storey below the river bank ground level, to look into after removing the room-entrance
directly beneath the basement cenotaph-chamber. by removing the brick and lime barricade
flocking the doorway, to look for important historical evidence such as idols and inscriptions
hidden inside the Shahjahan’s orders.Recitiation of name in the west-flank building be banned
because that building is part of a temple complex.The water in the 7 storeyed well, inside the
tower near the so-called mosque, be drained to for drained to look for historical evidence (such
as Court jewels idols and inscription jettisoned when Shahjahan’s troops stormed the premises
to plunder the Shiv Shrine).Free entry on Fridays should be discontinued to prevent loss of
revenue to the Government .If free entry on Friday is allowed to continue then free entry on
Mondays should be ordered because Mondays are Shiv worship days.
161.                That the petitioners has no other efficacious remedy , expect to file the present Writ
Petition on the following and other grounds:- 
 
                                           Grounds
A.                                        Because truth will not make us rich, but it will certainly make us free.
The wrong historical data leads to the horror, as we have seen during the period of
demolition of the Babri Masjid. There has been number of concomitant given by the
 respective community representing to the follower of two prominent religions, but the
loss that we have suffered in the shape of hatred between the two section of the society,
cannot be compensated without revealing the truth. Unfortunately, the term Hindu
communalism is more exaggerated by the fanaticism under the garb of secularism,
while the Hindu community as a whole has always been receptive to all the religion.
B.                                     Because Article 25 of the constitution in India secures to every person,
subject of course to public order, health and morality and other provisions of Part III,
including Article 17 freedom to entertain and exhibit outward acts as well as propagate
and disseminate such religious belief according to his judgement and conscience for
edification of others. The right of the State to impose such restrictions as are desired or
found necessary on grounds of public order, health, and morality is inbuilt in Arts. 25
and 26 itself. Article 25(2)(b) ensures the right of the State to make a law providing for
social welfare and reforms besides throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of a
public character to classes and sections of Hindus and any such rights of State or of the
communities or classes of the society were also considered to need due regulation in
the process of harmonizing the various rights.
C.                                         Because every citizen of India is fundamentally obligated to develop a
scientific temper and humanism .He is fundamentally duty bound to strive towards
excellence, in all sphere of individual and collective activity, so that the nation
constantly rises to the higher level of endeavor and achievements. Everyone, whether
individually or collectively is unquestionably under the supremacy of law. However it
is true that exaggerated devotion to the rule of benefit must not nurture fanciful doubts
or lingering suspicion and thereby destroy social defense, as the curiosity cannot be the
subject matter of fair criticism. Thus the conclusion derived that on one hand, every
citizen is having the freedom of speech and expression so far as they do not contravene
the statutory limits and may prevail in the atmosphere with out any hindrance.
D.                                      Because public education is essential for functioning of the process of
popular government and to assist the discovery of truth and strengthening the capacity
of individual in participating in decision making process .The decision making process
include the right to know also and pushing the protection beyond the primary level
betrays the bigwigs desire to keep the crippled more crippled forever. The education of
spritualism is the foundation for value based survival of human being in a civilized
society. The force and section behind civilized society depend upon moral value; and
the morality cannot be cultivated through the falsehood of ideological barrier. Thus the
children may not be required to read such facts, which are having the foundation of
falsehood.
E.                                      Because in Bijoe Emmanuel vs State of Kerala  (1986) 3 SCC 615, the
question raised in the aforesaid case, as to whether three children who were faithful to
“Jehovah’s witnesses” may refuse to sing our national anthem or salute the national
flag of our country despite being the student in the school, where during morning
 assembly, the national anthem is sung by other children. The circular issued by the
Director of Public Instruction, Kerala provided obligation of school children to sing the
National Anthem. Thus these children were expelled. The Hon’ble Supreme court
while setting aside the aforesaid order of expulsion of the children from the school was
pleased to examine, as to whether the children faithful to “Jehovah’s witnesses”, a
worldwide sect of Christianity may be compelled against tenets of their religious faith
duly recognized and well established all over the world which was upheld by the
highest court in United States of America, Australia and Canada and find recognition in
Encyclopedia Britannica. It was held that the appellants truly and conscientiously
believed that their religion does not permit them to join any rituals except it them in
their prayers to Jehovah, their God. Though their religious beliefs may appear strange,
the sincerity of their beliefs is beyond question. They do not hold their beliefs idly and
their conduct is not the outcome of any perversity. The appellants have not asserted the
beliefs for the first time or out of any unpatriotic sentiments. Their objection to sing is
not just against the National Anthem of India. They have refused to sing other National
Anthems elsewhere. They are law abiding and well-behaved children, who do stand
respectfully and would continue to do so, when National Anthem is sung. Their refusal,
while so standing to join in the singing of the National Anthem is neither disrespectful
of it, nor inconsistent with the Fundamental Duty under Article 51 A (a). Hence no
action should have been taken against them.
F.                                       Because the concept of sovereignty was present from the ancient time but
the sovereignty was conferred upon an individual who is suppress the wicked and is
recognized as great resources in itself like the god of fire, air, sun, moon and religion.
The religion in the ancient time was considered as spiritualism and it was not
dependent upon any ritual ceremony, but it was considered s the knowledge in the
darkness of ignorance and injustice. The sovereignty was supposed to promote the
cause of the religion, wealth and enjoyment of life and those, who were voluptuous,
malicious, mean, and low-minded, were ruined by the retributive justice.
G.                                    Because the apex court held in RamSharan Autyanuprasi’s case 1989
(Supp.) (1) SCC 251/AIR 1989 S.C 549 , that men’s life is inclusive of his tradition ,
culture and heritage and protection of that heritage in its full measure would certainly
come within the encompass of an expanded concept of Article 21 of the Constitution
H.                                   Because the mankind must be satisfied with the reasonableness within
reach and the decision-making process may belong to the knowledge of the law. Thus
the reasonableness and the rationality, legality, as well as philosophically, provide
colour to the meaning of fundamental right .The concept of equality is not doctrinaire
approach. It is a binding threat, which runs through the entire constitutional text thus
the affirmative action may be constitutionally valid and the same cannot ignore the
constitutional morality, which embraces in-itself the doctrine of inequality. It would be
constitutionally immoral to perpetuate inequality among majority .The constitution is
 required to kept young energetic and alive. The attempt be endure to expand the ambit
of fundamental right. It is said that the dignity of the ocean lies not in its fury capable
of causing destruction, but in its vast extent and depth with enormous tolerance. Thus
the wider the power, the higher the need of caution and care while exercising the
power.
I.                                          Because the Student/children, the future citizens under taking the
education of Indian History on the misconception/ pattern of Anglo Saxon teaching
meant for division of Indian society on the policy of “Divide and Rule”. There is a
important question posed as to whether we have actually gain our independence or we
have to under take another journey full of animosity, aggressism on account of
terrorism and fanatic ideology a prevalent throughout the World of a particular
religion.
J.                                 Because this writ petition is moved in the Public Interest, for a National
Cause, to establish the truth there is no private interest or any other oblique motive, or
any other personal gain. The petitioner institution, known as Institute for Re-writing
Indian History, Thane, having registration no.F-1128 (T) is a public trust. The founder
president of the trust is Shri P.N. Oak S/o Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/o- Plot no.
10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune.411007, who has written number of books namely
1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of
Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some
Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great
Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who
Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and
Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian History.
K.                           Because the petitioner No. 2 is the founder President of an Institution, namely, “
Institute for Re-writing Indian (and World) History “. The aim and objective of that
institution, which is a registered society having register no. F-1128 (T) as the public
trust under the provision of Bombay Public Trust Act. Inter alia, is to re-discover the
Indian history. The monumental places of historical importance in their real and true
perspective having of the heritage of India.
L.                                      Because the ‘ research paper’ of the author on the subject that the so-
called  “Taj Mahal “ is not a monument built by an Invader Emperor in memory of his
late wife but a Hindu Shiva Temple which was converted into a love-memorial by a
Invader Emperor.
M.                        Because the freedom of speech and expression is basic to indivisible from a
democratic polity .It includes right to impart and receive information. Restriction to the
said right could be only as provided in article 19(2). The old dictum let the people have
the truth and the freedom to discuss it and all will go well with the Government. It
should prevail. The true test for deciding the validity is whether it takes away or
 abridges fundamental right of the citizens. If there were direct abridgement of the
fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression, the law would be invalid.
N.                       the ambit and scope of “Right to Know “ is conferred fundamental right under
Article 19 (1)(a),25 and26 read with Article 49 and 51-A(f) (h) of the Constitution of
India; read with the provision of Freedom of Information Act, 2002 .The right to get
information in democracy is recognized all throughout and it is a natural right flowing
from the concept of democracy itself. Freedom of expression may be necessarily
included in the right of information. There is no expression with out having an idea on
the subject, regarding which the expression of an individual may be given effect to
change the existing values of ideology, which are based on the notable extracts of
certain facts. An enlightening informed citizen would undoubtedly enhance democratic
values.
O.                         Because the Governor General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant
Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of misusing the archaeological
studies. This young Cunnigham, an army engineer had no training in the
archaeological department, he wrote a lengthy letter dated September 15, 1842
suggesting archeological exploration in India. This letter is reproduced on page no 246
Volume 7 journal of Royal Asiatic Society, London, and 1843 A.D. It discloses that the
purpose of archeological exploration in India is neither the study; nor preservation of
historical monuments, but to use archeology as the imperial tool to create mutual
dissension and resentment between Buddhists, Jains and other Hindu with Invaders by
falsely crediting all monuments to the authorship to alien invaders while few may be
labeled as that of being constructed by Buddhist or Jain, but not by Hindus.
P.                               Because it has been disclosed during the High level Committee Meeting at
Paris during the convention of United Nation Education Science and Cultural
Organisation (UNESCO) that near Anoop Talab (Pond), there has been the ancient
palatial building and the ancient cultural activities remain in existance prior to the
period of invasion by the Mughal invaders. The historian have related them back to the
existence of all such palatial building during the period of Sikarwar, Rajput, which find
support by the research were conducted Prof. Ram Nathan historian of Rajasthan
University, Jaipur and also by Dr. Pratima Asthana, Ex Vice Chancellor of Gorakhpur
University.
Q.                         Because one great tragedy of Indian history has been that while Indians remained
subdued and gagged under alien domination for over a millenium foreigners, who
wielded all power in India played great havoc with Indian history merrily destroying or
distorting it at their sweetwill either out of sheer cunning and cussedness or through
their colossal ignorance and wanton barbarism.
R.                                   Because that life includes all the meaning given to a man’s life including
his tradition, culture and hertiage and protection of that heritage in its full measure
 squarely comes within the encompass of the extended concept of Article 21 of the
Constitution of India.
S.                            Because that the Taj Mahal, is a mark of history of hertiage and the glorious
achievement of Indian Art and Archaeology, and has to be named and recognised in its
true perspective and origin as a monument of world important must not be allowed to
be the victim subject of an “Historical fraud” as an infringement of Indian tradition and
heritage if the said monument is wrongly and falsely indentifing and reconized as a
mausoleum giving a go bye to its origin and actual creation as a Palace/Temple in
redemption of fact and restoration of history.
T.                                Because the history of one’s heritage has to be rewritten to give a true and
correct account of the facts and figures, achievements and failures, conquest end the
defeat.as the Taj Mahal was not built by the fifth generation Mugal emperor, namely,
Shahjahan which is evidently proved.
                                                                 PRAYER
                             It is, therefore, MOST RESPECTFULLY, prayed that this Hon’ble Court May
graciously be pleased to
1.             Issue a Writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus by appointing a facts

finding committee for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological department

regarding the historical blunder committed by them in respect of their purported

claim set-up in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other

ancient Hindu buildings/ monuments as Muslim monuments and restrain them from

displaying the authorship of these buildings as constructed by Sahajahan or by any

mughal Invaders as truth may be disclosed to the public/citizens and Students in

Subject of History regarding their true authorship prior to Mughal period  in

furtherance of their fundamental rights conferred to the Citizens under Article 19 (1)

(a), 25 and 26 read with49 and 51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of

Information Act, 2002.

2.                  Issue a writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus  declaring  the

provisions of The Ancient And Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And

Remains (Declaration Of National Importance) Act, 1951 to the extend of declaring

 the ancient and historical monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj

Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford , Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built

by Mugal invaders on the basis of report submitted by Then Governor General, Lord

Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous

scheme of “Divide and Rule”  and thereby misusing the archaeological studies, as

ultravires to Article 19 (1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h)constitution of India and this

Hon’ble Court may futher declare  the provision of   Ancient and Historical

Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National

Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological

Sites And Remains Act, 1958  of declaring these ancient building/ monuments

preserved with such false identity with out any scientific inquiry/ investigation as

purported Muslim monuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void.

3.                  Issue a writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus on the basis of the

Research Conducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the different books

written by him as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2.

The Tajmahal is a Temple Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4.

Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World

History, 7. Agra red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9.

The Taj Mahal is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11.

Vedic Guide to Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in

Indian History Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B. D. Chambers, 10/54

D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, the truth may be exposed

through Scientific inventions and temperaments to the Citizen/ Students of history by

conducting the research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu monuments by the

 Central Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/ temple and other ancient

archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like demolition of disputed

structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass destruction of the public

property shacking of public confidence under Rule Of Law in the society.

4.        Issue a writ, order, directions in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent

authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry report, the

respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India may Declare and Notify

in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built by Shahajahan and thereby

directing the Archaeological Survey of India to remove the notices displayed by

them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting Shahjahan as its creator and  to futher

desist from writing / publishing / proclaiming / propagating and teaching about

Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal and stop and discontinue the free entry in

Taj Mahal premises on Fridays  in the week.

5.                Issue a writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus directing the

respondent authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India 1)-to open the

locks of upper and lower portions of the 4 storeyed building of Taj Mahal having

numbers of rooms, 2)-to remove all bricked up walls build later blocking such rooms

therein, 3)-to investigate scientifically and certify that  which of those or both

cenotaphs are fake,4)-to look for a subterrance storey below the river bank ground

level, 5)-to look into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the basement

cenotaph-chamber.6)- by removing the brick and lime barricade flocking the

doorway, 7)-to look for important historical evidence such as idols and inscriptions

hidden inside there by the  Shahjahan’s orders as truth may not make us rich but the
 same will make us free from superstitions and false propoganda of some of

fundamentalists.

6.                Any other Writ , Order or Direction, Which this Hon’ble Court May deem fit

in the circumstances of the case

            Dated-7th September ,2004                         Yogesh Kumar Saxena

                                                                                                     Advocate, High Court
                                                                                                  (Counsel for the Petitioner)
                                                                           Chamber No.139, High court, Allahabad
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.
                                    
                                                   Annexure No.
 
   Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.                                   of 2004
       (Under Article 226 of constitution of India)
                                                                          (District – Agra)
 
             Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
                     S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
               Aundh, Pune – 411007 and another…………..Pettioners
 
 
VERSUS
 
Union of India through Secretary,
Human Resources and Development (HRD),
Government of India, New Delhi. ……………….Respondents
 
 
 
Signs of Taj- makers found
                    
                     H.T.   6th July 2004  
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has discovered[yks1][yks2][yks3] 671 symbols and
signatures claimedTo pertain to workers who snapped the Taj Mahal more than 350 years ago.
The inscription, etched on the sandstone facing the boundary wall near the Yamuna, also includes
symbols like the swastika, the trishul, cymbals, stars
and flowers, superintending archaeologist of the zone D Dayalan said.
Some of the names are etched in Arabic and Persian, while others are in Devanagri, he said, adding
some names occur at many places.
Other boundary walls of the monuments would also be scanned for the names of workmen, Dayalan
said.
                                                                       PTI, Agra

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.
(Under Article 226 of constitution of India)                                     

                                                   Annexure No.

 
 
   Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.                                   of 2004
             
 
                                                                          (District – Agra)
 
             Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
                     S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
               Aundh, Pune – 411007 and another…………..Pettioners
 
VERSUS
 
Union of India through Secretary,
Human Resources and Development (HRD),
Government of India, New Delhi. ……………….Respondents
 
ADMISSION IN SHAHJAHAN’S OWN BADSHAHNAMA
 
A CLEAR, unequivocal and disarming admission that the Taj Mahal is a Hindu palace
commandeered for use as a Invader tomb is contained in Shahjahan’s own court chronicle written
by a paid courtier named Mulla Hamid Lahori.
 
          In Elliot and Dowson we are told, “Badshahnama of Abdul Hamid Lahori is a history of the
first twenty years of the reign of Shahjahan…. Abdul Hamid himself says in his preface, that the
Emperor desired to find an author who could write the memories of his reign in the style of Abdul
Fazl’s I Akbarnama. He was recommended to the Emperor for the work, and was called from Patna,
where he was living in retirement, to undertake the composition.” From this passage it is clear that
Mulla Abdul Hamid Lahori wrote the Badshahnama (in Persian) as an official chronicle at Emperor
Shahjahan’s own command. The Persian text in its original from is published by the Asiatic Society
of Bengal. Reproduced elsewhere in this book are pages 403 and 403 of Vol. 1 of this
Badshahnama.
 
          There are 22 lines on page 402 and 19 on 403. We have numbered them serially so that those
who cannot read the
 
1.     P. 3 The History of India as Told by its Own Historians. Vol. VII, The Posthumous Paper of the
late Sir H. M. Elliot, K. C. B. edited by Professor John Dowson, M. R. A. S., published by
Kitab Mahal (Private) Ltd. 56-A Zero Road, Allahabad.
 
2.     Persian text of Mulla Abdul Hamid’s Badshahnama, in two volumes, published by the Asiatic
Society of Bengal in the Bibliotheca Indian series. I obtained the Photostat from the copy in
the National Archives, Government of India, in December 1965. Copies of that publication are
available in all-important institutional libraries throughout the world, dealing with Indian
Mediaeval history.
Persian script may follow the line-by-line transcript in the Roman script and later the line-
by-line rendering in English.
 
 
 
 
 

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.

                               (Under Article 226 of constitution of India)
       
                                                   Annexure No.
 
 
   Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.                                   of 2004
                                                                          (District – Agra)
 
             Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
                     S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
               Aundh, Pune – 411007 and another…………..Pettioners
 
 
VERSUS
 
Union of India through Secretary,
Human Resources and Development (HRD),
Government of India, New Delhi. ……………….Respondents
 
A TRANSCRIPT OF THE PERSIAN PASSAGE IN ROMAN CHARACTERS  (PAGE 402)
 
1.     Har do ra az ham huda mee sakht wa hamin zorhae’ beja beemar shudah
 
2.     Pas az chande dar zindagi e pidar sipare shud, saabiqa chun Fateh Khan
 
3.     Pisare Ambar ba wa seelae Yaminuddoulah Asif Khan arzah dasht mehtawe bar
 
4.     Dowlat khwahi wa hawa jooee firistadah maarooz dashta bood keh ein
 
5.     Khidmatguzar ikhlas shiaar benizammra keh az kotah bini wa shaqawat
 
6.     Guzeenee bad sagaali wa mukhalifate awliya-e-dowlat-e-abad meeaad mee namood
 
7.     Muqavyad sakhteh ummidwari-I marahmi-I badshahi ast, wa dar jawabe aan farman
 
8.     Qazah jiriyan (sic) izze sudoor yafteh bawad keh agar guftar-e-oo farooghe rastee darad
 
9.     Jahan ra az aalaaishe wajoode besawaad-e-oo pak gardaanad chun Fateh Khan
 
10.            Baad az waroode hukme jahan-mutah burhane-be-nizam bad farjam ra khufah namoodeh
 
11.            Shoarat daad keh ba ajalle tabeeyee dar guzasht, wa Hussein nam pisare Darsalae
 
12.            Oora janashin-e-aan badaayeengurdaa need. Wa arzh dashtee mebnee az
 
13.            Haqiqat-e-ein waqueh ba dast-e-Muhammad Ibrahim keh az nowkarane moatamade oo
 
14.            Bood, ba dargahe salateen panah firistad misalelazimul imtisal sabir shud keh
 
15.            Lqbale ra ke ba daroone hisare Dowlatabaad burdeh az quillat-e-azzooqah (supplies)
zaayai khwahand
 
16.            Shud aan ra ba nafais jawahar wa murasseh alat-e-be-nizam hamrahe-pisare
 
17.            Kalane Khood ba rasme peshkash usaal numayad ta multimassate oo, izze qubul yadab
 
18.            Wa ba nanshoore nawazish kahpoh murassah wa da yake Iraqui ba Zin-tila’
 
19.            Deeagare Turkee rah waar ba zin-e-mutalaa’ mashoobe Shukrullah Arab wa Fateh Khan
 
20.            Ba Dow latabaad farishtadand. Oodajiram ba benam-e-chihal hazar roopiah sarfaraz
gardeedeh
 
21.            Rooze-juma’ hafdahum Jamadil awal naashe muqaddase musafire aqleeme
 
22.            Tareeqae hazarat mehd alia Mumtazuzzamaneera keh ba tareeqae a amaanat mudafoon
 
(PAGE 403):
 
23.            Bood masahoobe Badshehzadae namadaar Muhammad Shah Shuja Bahadur a Wazir
Khan.
 
24.            Wa Sati (sic) Unnisa Khanum keh ba mijaz shanasi wa kaardaanee ba darise aolaee pesh
 
25.            Dastee we waqaalat elaan Maalike Jahan malikae Jahaaniyaan raseeh bood, rawane-e
 
26.            Darul khalafae Akbarabad namoodand wahukm shud keh har roz dar rah aash e bisiyar
 
27.            Wa darahim wa dananeere be shumar ba fuqra wa nayazmadaan bibihand, wa zamine dar
 
28.            Nihayat rifaat wa nizaahat keh junoobrooe aan misr jaana astwa
 
29.            Peah az ein Manzil-e Rajah Mansigh bood wadaree waqt ba Rajah Jaisingh
 
30.            Nabirae talluq dasht bara-e-madfan e ann bashist muwaattan bar guzeedand
 
31.            Agarcheh Raja Jaisingh husule ein dawlatra foze azeem danishtanmab
 
32.            Az rooe ahatiyaat keh dar jameeye shewan khususan umoore diniyeh naguzir ast
 
33.            Dar awaz aan aali manzil-e az khalisa e sharfah badoo marahmat farmoodand
 
34.            Baad az raisdane naash be aan shahar-e karamat bahar panz dahun Jamadi Ussanieh
 
35.            Sale aayandane paikare nooranee-e ba aan aamaanee jowhar ba khake pak sipurdeh
aamad
 
36.            Wa mutasaddiyan-e darul khilafah ba hukme muallae ajaalatul waqt turbat-e-falak
martabate
 
37.            Aan jahan iffatra az nazar poshidand. wa Imaarate-e-aalee shaan wa gumbaze
 
38.            Rafi bunyan keh ta rastakheez dar balandee yadgare himmate gardoon rifaat
 
39.            Hazrate Sahib Qarah-e-saani bashed wa dar ustuwaree namoodare istigamat
 
40.            Azayam banee tarah afganddand wa muhandisane doorbeen wa meamaran-e-saanat
 
41.            Aafreen chihal lakh roopiahi akharajate ein imaarat bar aawurd anmoodand
 

HERE UNDER IS THE LINE-BY-LINE ENGLISH RENDERING (PAGE 402)

 
1.     Both were separated from one another and with those unjust atrocities fell ill
 
2.     After some time during his father’s time (he) passed away. Prior to this since Fatehkhan
 
3.     Son of Ambar through Yaminuddaulah Asafkhan had submitted a petition
 
4.     Declaring his allegiance and loyalty and praying that this
 
5.     Loyal servant full of sincerity requests that because the shortsightedness and cruelty
 
6.     Ill will and opposition of the royal official came into play.
 
7.     And putting me under rigorous imprisonment – and I hope to receive Royal mercy and in
validity of that death-inflicting
 
8.     Royal order…. has had the honour of being issued and if that statement has any truth in it
 
9.     Then this world should be relieved of the existence of such a person since Fatehkhan
 
10.            After reciving the royal order – obeyed by the world – be advanced arguments and
excuses for his bad administration
 
11.            And publicised it to appear as a natural death Hussain named son of Darsaleh was…
 
12.            Made successor illegally and a petition far from the
 
13.      Reality of this event (was) sent through Mohammad Ibrahim – one of his trusted employees
 
14.            And the court of the Protector of Kings – issued an order which had to be strictly
complied with
 
15.            That the confessor be taken inside Daulatabad fort and starves to death
 
16.            And he with all the splendour and glory and fanfare accompanied by his son
 
17.            Eldest (son) as per tradition be given a send off, so that his requests were accepted
 
18.            And equipped with the gracious charter (order) and with two horses – one Iraqui with
golden saddle
 
19.            The other – Turkish with an ornamental golden saddle through Shukurullah Arab and
Fatehkhan
 
20.            Were sent to Daulatabad – and Udajahan was honoured with a reward of 40,000 rupees –
 
21.            Friday – 15th jamadi-ul-awwal the sacred dead body of the traveller to the kingdom of
heaven, Her
 
22.            Holiness, hazrat Mumtazul Zamani – who was buried temporarily, was sent –
 
(PAGE 403)
 
23.            Accompanied by prince Mohammad Shah Shuja Bahadur, Wazir Khan –
 
24.            And Satium Nisa Khanam – who knew the temperament of the (deceased) so intimately
 
25.            And was well versed in the job and represented the views of the queen of queens etc.
 
26.            Was brought to the capital Akbarabad (Agra) and an order was issued that very day
 
27.            During the journey countless coins be distributed among the fakirs and needy, The site
 
28.            Covered with a majestic magnificent lush garden, to the south of the great city and
 
29.            Amidst which (garden) the building known as the palace (Manzil) of Raja Mansingh, at
present owned by Raja Jaisingh,
 
30.            Grandson (of Mansingh), was selected for the burial of the Queen whose abode is in
heaven
 
31.            Although Raja Jaisingh valued it greatly as his ancestral heritage and property, yet he
would have been agreeable to part with it gratis for the Emperor Shahjahan
 
32.            (Still) out of sheer scrupulousness so essential in matter of bereavement and religious
(thinking it improper to take his palace gratis)
 
33.            in exchange of that (aali Manzil) grand palace, he (Jaisingh) was granted a piece of
government land
 
34.            After the arrival of the dead body in that great city (Agra) on 15th Jamadul Saniya
 
35.            Next year that illustrious body of the heavenly Queen was laid to rest
 
36.            The officials of the capital, according to the royal order of the day, under the sky-high
lofty mausoleum
 
37.            Hid (the body of) that pious lady from the eyes of the world, and this Palace (Imarat-e-
Aalishan) so majestic and (capped) with a dome
 
38.            So lofty that in its stature (it) is a memorial to the courage of sky-dimensions
 
39.            (of) Sahib Qarani SANI – (the king) and in strength so might
 
40.            In his resolution so firm – the foundation was laid and geometricians with far sight and
archietects of talent
 
41.            Incurred an expenditure of Rs. 40 lakhs on this building
 
 
 
 
 
 

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.

                               (Under Article 226 of constitution of India)
       
                                                   Annexure No.
 
 
   Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.                                   of 2004
                                                                          (District – Agra)
 
             Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
                     S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
               Aundh, Pune – 411007 and another…………..Pettioners
 
 
VERSUS
 
Union of India through Secretary,
Human Resources and Development (HRD),
Government of India, New Delhi. ……………….Respondents
Paying due compliments and respects to his father Emperor Shahjahan, Aurangzeb states
in the letter, it was a written in 1652 A. D. stating therein that the repair is needed to the old
building complex. Had the Taj Mahal been a building completed in 1653 it would not have fallen to
the lot of a chance, lone visitor like Aurangzeb to notice the defects and order repairs in 1652.
I reached (Akbarabad, i.e. Agra) on Thursday, 3rd of Moharam Mukram. On arrival I
called on Badshahzada Jahanbani (i.e. the elder Prince Dara) in the garden of Jahanara. In that
splendourous house surrounded by springing verdure I enjoyed their company and inquired about
everybody’s well-being. I stayed in the garden of Mahabat Khan.
Next day it being a Friday. I went to pay my homage to the sacred grave which had been
laid in Your Majesty’s presence. Those (i.e. cenotaph, grave etc.) are in good shape, strong and solid
but the dome over the grave leaks at two or three places during the rainy – season on the northern
side. Similarly several royal rooms on the second storey, and jamposh of the bigger dome have all
asborbed water through seepage and drip water during the current monsoon season at several
places. All these I have got temporarily repaired.
But I wonder what will happen to the various domes, the mosque, the community hall,
etc. during subsequent rainy seasons. They all need more elaborate repairs. I feel that the second
storey roof needs to be opened up and re-dome with mortar, brick and stone. Repairs to the smaller
and bigger domes would save these palatial building from decadence. It is hoped that Your Majesty
will look into the matter and order necessary action.
The Mehtab garden is innundated and looks desolate. Its scenic beauty will reappear only
when the floods recede.
That the rear portion of the building complex remains safe is a mistery. The stream
keeping away from the rear wall has prevented damage.
“On Saturday too I visited the spot and then I called on the Prince (Dara) who also paid
me a return visit. Then taking leave of all I resumed my journey (to take charge as governor of the
Deccan) on Sunday and today the 8th instant I am in the vicinity of Dholpur….”
 
 

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD.

                              (Under Article 226 of constitution of India)
        
                                                   Annexure No.
 
 
   Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.                                   of 2004
                                                                          (District – Agra)
 
             Institute of Rewriting Indian History Through its Founder President, P. N. Oak.
                     S/O Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/O - Plot No. 10, Goodwill Society,
               Aundh, Pune – 411007 and another…………..Pettioners
 
 
VERSUS
 
Union of India through Secretary,
Human Resources and Development (HRD),
Government of India, New Delhi. ……………….Respondents
 
Details in respect of the  Hindu Identity of Different Buildings/Monuments
 
Agra the Taj Mahal
            That this symphony in marble was a royal Hindu palace. Its very name Taj Mahal signifies
nothing more or less. Its octagonal shape and the cupolas and four towers at the plinth corners
are all Hindu features. Havell, the English architect has all along stressed that the Taj is an
entirely Hindu structure in design and execution. The four towers used to sport multi-coloured
lights. The Taj precincts are a huge building complex encompassing over three hundred rooms.
The locality was known as Jaisinghpur. This ornate marble trelliswork entirely in the Hindu
style now encloses tow tombs believed to be those of Mumtaz and Shahjahan .The network
was stuffed with rare gems. Traditional accounts tell us that this enclosure had silver doors and
gold railings to boot. Even Shahjahan’s and Mumtaz’s palaces never boasted of such fabulous
fixtures when the pair was alive and kicking from the imperial throne. How come then that
when Mumtaz died (1630 A.D.) all this wealth descended on earth all of a sudden. Far from
that this expensive and resplendent enclosure was made to house the dazzling Hindu peacock
throne that throne, wrongly credited to Shahjahan, came to his possession when he
dispossessed the Taj Mahal’s last Rajput owner Jai Singh of this fabulous ancient Hindu
palace.
The Marble Screen at the Taj -The Gateway of Taj
            That the gateway leading to the Taj garden is like any other Hindu gateway tallying in every
detail with those of other forts and palaces depicted. The tiny domes over these gateways in a
row invariably make an odd figure like 5,7,9, or 11,since in Hindu tradition the odd figure is
preferred to the even. For instance donors give away 101,501,1001 rupees but never an even
figure.
 
That Jahangir’s son Shahjahan is said to have demolished 500 buildings inside the fort
and erected 500 others. On the very face of it this claim is absurd. No one will merely for fun of it
destroy 500 palatial mansions built by one’s father or grandfather. Such demolition itself will
occupy a lifetime. Moreover it must also be remembered that Shahjahan is credited with building
the fabulous Taj Mahal in Agra, a whole new township of Delhi, also the Red fort in Delhi, The
Jama Masjid in Delhi and perhaps many other buildings. Not only are there no court records of any
building activity but even inscriptions do not substantiate any building claim. We wish to alert
visitors not to be misled by the appearance of Arabic or Persian lettering on mediaeval buildings.
All such lettering is mostly of Koranic extracts or the name of Allah. Those inscriptions are seldom
temporal. In a few instances where there are temporal inscriptions they usually bear the name of the
engraver or of the person buried and some irrelevant matter. For instance nowhere on the Taj Mahal
has it been mentioned that the Taj Mahal was built by Shahjahan.We therefore wonder how the
whole world had been duped for 300 long years into believing that the Taj Mahal was built by
Shahjahan. Similar is the case with Red fort in Agra. No where is it said that Akbar or his son
Jahangir or the latter’s son Shahjahan built anything there.
Delhi Gate, Agra Fort, Anguri Bagh, Agra fort
            That this gateway of the Red Fort Agra is entirely in the traditional Rajput styles. Like many
other Rajput forts this too had elephant images flanking it. Emperors Kanishka and Ashok
made use of this fort in the pre-Christian era. All its interior apartments too are of the exclusive
Rajput variety. The version which ascribes authorship of this fort to Akbar, is a piece of court
flattery. All its gateways have Hindu names. In addition to elephant images this fort had images
of Rajput horses. The Anguri bagh pavilion inside Agra fort proves that the geometrical pattern
garden has Rajput origins. Note the arches, the pillars, the brackets, the cupola at the right, the
curved ceiling partly visible adjoining the cupola, which are all Rajput characteristics.
Golden Pavilion, Agra fort
            That the cupola in the top left-hand corner, the curved roof, and the spikes on it vividly
depicts that this Golden Pavilion in Agra’s Red Fort was built by the Rajputs for the Rajputs. 
Diwan-I-Aam, Agra fort
            That the so-called Diwan-I-Aam or hall of public audience inside Agar fort has neither
domes nor minarets. Its graceful arches and slender pillars is still the pattern for Hindu pandals
raised for auspicious ceremonies. Invader tradition has always avoided such Hindu, ‘infidel’
patterns. Theirs are grotesque, tortuous shapes. The Red Fort in Delhi too has an identical
pavilion.
Statue of Akbar’s Horse
            That this replica believed to be of Akbar’s horse is in fact an earlier Rajput horse. Akbar, a
Invader ordered no statues. Rajputs were known to erect elephant and horse statues. Those
slyly attributing the construction of Agra Fort to Akbar had Willy nilly also to thrust upon him
the erection of ‘infidel’ statues.
Statue of Amar Singh’s Horse Outside Agra Fort
            That this horse head belongs to pre Invader times. It commemorates a brave steed. There
were ever so many Amar Singhs in Rajput history. The invented story that this replica is
Moghul wrought and is of the horse on which Amar Singh galloped away in a huff from the
Moghul court takes for granted that the lay visitor has hardly the time or the necessary
grounding in history to debunk such canards. 
Tomb of Sadiq Khan
            That this truncated corner tower cum-bastion of a demolished Rajput palace standing in
splendid isolation was later used to shelter Sadiq Khan’s corpse. That should not, however
blind visitors to the fact that this monument was part of a Rajput palace. Its niches, the arched
entrances and the upper floor all show that it was meant to be a place for the living.
Jahangiri Mahal, Agra fort
            That the entrance to the so-called Jahangiri Mahal inside Agra fort is of the typical Rajput
design and workmanship. Usurpation and centuries of occupation resulted in Moghul names
being given to earlier captured Rajput buildings. Gullible Western Scholarsm lacking
indigenous insight perpetuated the myth of Invader authorship of buildings misled by their
names and latest associations. They hardly cared whether a building was attributed to a
Fakirchand or a Fakir Mohammad.
 
Jama Masjid, Agra
            That all so called mediaeval Jama Masjids in India were earlier main (Jama) temples of the
town. This so-called Jama Masjid in the centre of Agra was a Rajput citadel with ladies
apartments and an underground passage to the fort. It has a huge basement too. The inscription
crediting its construction to Jahanara Begum is an interpolation. Jahanara an unmarried lady
who spent her sorrowing life in the smothering confines of the Invaders purdah nursing her
imprisoned and deposed father Shahjahan, had hardly any money left with her. Even for two
square meals a day she was at the mercy of her wily and hardhearted brother Aurangzeb.
 Salim Chisti Tomb, Fatehpur Sikri
            That this so-called Salim Chisti tomb in Fatehpur Sikri is clearly an ornate Rajput temple.
Note the two round stone flower emblems on either side of the arch, and the curving brackets.
In the right background is the typical Rajput gateway capped by cupolas. The lotus shaped
fountain base in the foreground tank is also reminiscent of Rajput ownership. This ornamental
pillar Pillar supporting Akbar’s Throne in Diwan-I-Khas with a narrow circular perch on top
approached by four stone-slab bridges in Fatehpur Sikri could as well have been a royal Rajput
bathroom while concocted Akbar legends claim it to be a throne room. But throne rooms in
Akbar’s time were not as tiny as a Pigeon house.
Hiran Minar, Fatehpur Sikri
            That this so called Hiran Minar infront of the Hathi Pol gate of Fatehpur Sikri is falsely
claimed to mark the burial of a pet deer (Hiran) of Akbar .We ask whether the deer had
whispered a dying wish in Akbar’s ear to be commemorated with a fat Hindu temple lamp
post? The bristles were used to support oil lamps Such pillars are common infront of Hindu
Temples and palaces. The spiraling staircase inside leading to the cupola on top remins one of
the so called Kutub Minar in Delhi which have proved to be of Hindu origin. This tower was
known as ‘Hiranmaya’ since it sparkled like gold when it bristled with flames of hundreds of
lamps hung on it. That Sanskrit word has been deftly twisted to be stuffed into the concocted
Akbar legend.
Buland Darwaza, Fatehpur Sikri
            That this towering gateway in Fatehpur Sikri is currently known to us as Buland Darwaza.It
is a typical Rajput Township. The stone flower emblems flanking the arch are an unmistakable
sign of its Hindu origin. The three big cupolas and the 13 tiny ones in front in a row on the
terrace front are of the exclusive Rajput design. The slender pillars spiked at the top were used
for hoisting flags. Such pillars are a part of almost all-mediaeval Rajput monuments. The stone
flower emblems are invariably present on all Hindu homes and temples of the orthodox design,
while they never exist on genuine mosques.
 
Itmad-ud-Daulah’s Tomb
            That this interior mural decoration in the so called Itmad-ud-Daulah tomb ,Agra is no
different from that found the  pre-Invader Ambar palace in Jaipur,which proves that the
building was an earlier Rajput palace.
So-called Akbar’s Mausoleum at Sikandra
            That every arch, supporting brackets and capping cupola of this mansion consisting of pile
upon pile of pavilions proves to the hilt that it was a Rajput palace. Euphemistically called
Sikandra ever since Sikandar Lodi a Pathan ruler lived in it, this mansion six miles to the north
of Agra is known to posterity as Akbar’s tomb. Akbar lay ill and died here.
Gateway Sikandra
            That this is the majestic gateway to Sikandra Palace. The mansion inside was turned into a
tomb after Akbar’s death. It was built by the Rajputs centuries before Invader invaders
launched on a career of vandalism and usurpation. The four towers rising above the gateway
are replicas of the Taj Mahal towers. The mosaic flooring of the mansion has the esoteric
Hindu Shakti-Chakra (interlocked triangles) inlaid in it by the dozen. Invader funeral rites
admit of no such design.
Salabat Khan’s Mausoleum, Agra
            That this Salabat Khan’s mausoleum is a truncated Rajput pavilion allotted to Khan for his
residence. On his death he was buried there.
Ganesh Pol Ambar Palace, Jaipur
            That it was built around 984 A.D.,it had obviously no Invader influence. The gates of all
extant mediaeval monuments in India are similar to the Ganesh Pol. Gates of Mosques and
tombs in west Asian countries are also of identical design. This proves that far from Indian
mediaeval monuments having being designed or ordered by Invader potentates and craftsmen,
 it was West Asian monuments, which were designed and executed by Indian technicians as
recorded by Mohammed Ghazni and Taimurlang. That incidentally it may also be pointed out
that the recorded fact of Mohammed Ghazni having been buried in his own palace in Ghazni
(1030 A.D.) also proves that all so called Invader tombs whether in India or in West Asian
countries are usurped palaces which they occupied during their life times. That this Shish
Mahal inside the Ambar fortress in Jaipur was built (about 984. A.D.) Centuries before the
founding of Invader Kingdoms in India. Its ornate inlay work is no different from that in what
are believed to be mediaeval Invader mosques and tombs. It proves two things; firstly that the
so-called tombs and mosques were of Rajput origin and secondly that they were intended for
the living not for the dead.
Palace Garden Ambar
            That this pavilion and the garden in the Ambar Palace with its spiked and curved roof, the
graceful Hindu arch and the geometrical design in the foreground is typical of all mediaeval
buildings. Ambar which lies three miles away from modern Jaipur, was founded not later than
984 A.D. That was much before alien Invaders established their principalities in India. 
            Thatreaders not acquainted with legal procedure might then ask as to whether there is any
documentary evidence available to prove that the fort was built by the Hindus in the pre-
christian era. The answer to this is that the immense Hindu evidence that existed in the form of
Hindu idols, inscriptions and documents in the archives of ancient Hindu kings was all looted
and destroyed when Mohammad Ghazni first raided the red fort in the early part of the 11th
century and again when the fort remained under continued Invader occupation from 1526 to
about  1760 A.D. If the owner of a building is forced out of his mansion and the aggressor
remains in occupation for several centuries will the owner find his record intact on obtaining
possession of his mansion after several centuries?
Iron Pillar near the Qutub Tower
            That the iron pillar bearing a Hindu inscription has been standing un-rusted through rain and
shine for milleniums beside the so–called Qutub Minar amidst the surrounding temples
battered by Invader hordes. Qutubuddin could never have brought piles of material and dug a
sprawling foundation for the stone tower called (Qutub) inside the narrow confines of
surrounding temples and other building work. Dislodged stones bearing Hindu images on one
side and Arab lettering on the other found the so called Qutub Tower also prove that Invader
conquerors staked false claim to Hindu monuments through sculptural forgeries.
Qutub Minar
            That this 238 ft. tall tower euphemistically called Kutub Minar was erected by King
Vikramaditya for astronomical observation centuries before Islam was even founded. The
adjoining township called Mehrauli is the corrupt form the Sanskrit term Mihira-Awali
meaning the Mihira Township. Mihira was Vikramaditya’s royal mathematician-cum-
astronomer-cum meteorologist. Even the Arabic term Kutub Minar signifies an astronomical
tower. Kutub and Kutubuddin was a subsequent unwitting mix-up. Around the tower were 27
constellation temples which Kutubuddin’s inscription vaunts to have destroyed. The tower too
has 27 flutings. Near the first storey ceiling are 27 holes one in each is likely. True to the
significance of the term Kutub, this Tower’s entrance faces due north.
Quwat-ul-Islam Mosque
            That turned into a mosque called Quwat-ul-Islam the rows of ornamental pillars of this
monument by the side of the so-called Qutub Tower are a clear proof of its having been a
Hindu temple. No genuine mosque has ever such pillars lest reciters of Namaz standing and
bending with half-closed eyes inadvertently break their heads against them.
Nizam-ud-din Tomb
            That the ornamental Hindu style pillars in the white marble structure turned into
Nizamuddin Tomb. The arch on the right and parts of arches visible on either side of the dome
are clear proof that this haphazard conglomerate of heterogeneous buildings was a part of an
ancient Hindu township stormed by invading Invader armies. Fakirs like Nizamuddin
 following in their wake used to take up residence in the ruins of battered buildings for
preaching Islam to terrorize ‘infidels’. On their death they used to be buried in the ruins where
they lived. That is why tombs like those of Nizamuddin and Bakhtiar Kaki in Delhi, Salim
Chisti in Fatehpur Sikri and of Moinuddin Chisti in Ajmer present a mix-up of Hindu structure
devoid of any coherent plan. Around the Nizamuddin tomb in Delhi are fanciful halls  called
Chausath Khamba, crumbling walls, bastions, towers, decadent graves, cellars ,plinths and
cornices which are remnants of the stormed Hindu township still remembered by the term
Keel-Ukhri(Kilokri). Keel used to be the central pillar erected when a Hindu township was
planned. Since it got up-rooted in the Invader assault that area came to be known as Kilokri.
So called Humayun’s Tomb
            That just about half a mile away from this building known as Humayun Tomb is the narrow
staircase from which Humayun the second generation Moghul emperor fell, in Delhi. He was
carried to his palace say contemporary chronicles. This was the palace he was carried to and it
was there that he died a few days later. He was buried in the central chamber where he lay ill
as has happened throughout Invader history in India. This solves the tantalizing riddle why we
have tombs but apparently no palaces of luxury-steeped pleasure-seeking alien potentates. This
monument still forms part of Jaipur Estate in Delhi. It is surrounded by ruined walls, annexes,
guesthouses, and guardrooms. An arcade of arches leads to it. Close-by is a huge annexes
euphemistically called Arab-ki-Serai deriving its name from the times that invading Arab
hordes encamped in it .The entire grounds are littered with graves of invading Invader soldiers
slain by Hindu defenders. Before being turned into a tomb Humayun as a usurper lived in this
sprawling Hindu captured palace which was the focal point of the ruined township since
known as Kilokri. The nearby ruins in which Fakir Nizamuddin lies buried were a part of this
huge Hindu citadel.
Roshanara Garden
            That this is believed to be the tomb of Roshanara, the daughter of the last powerful Moghul
emperor Aurangzeb. Note that it has neither domes nor minarets. Instead it has ornamental
pillars, Hindu arches and cupolas. Very parsimonious and hardhearted as the Hindu-baiter
Aurangzeb was he would hardly spend any money on a Hindu style resting-place for his
daughter’s corpse. Obviously, therefore, this is a usurped Hindu garden palace commandeered
to serve as a tomb as was usual in those times.
Fatehpuri Mosque
            That this so called Fatehpuri Mosque at one end of Delhi’s crowded Chandni Chowk
highway was a pre-Invader Rajput temple of the city’s guardian and royal deity Lord Shankara
alias Eklingaji. Its entrance arches have the Hindu stone flower emblems on either side of the
apex. The word ‘Fatehpuri’ means a conquered (Hindu) township. The marble slab on the red-
stone entrance proclaiming it to be a mosque is evidently as interpolation. The monuments,
arches and pillars and cupolas are entirely of Hindu Rajput style. The so-called mosque’s rental
revenue is all derived exclusively from Hindu shops swarming its fringes. This proves that
while the stalls remained with the Hindu their temples fell a victim to conquest and
conversion.
Mausoleum of Safdar Jang
            That this so called Safdarjang tomb in Delhi was an ancient Rajput palace which devolved
on the Invader aristocracy through conquest .It has an ornamental Rajput style gateway and a
protective wall with watch-towers and bastions which are superfluous for a genuine tomb.
Safdarjang, an ex-chief Minister of the Nawab of Oudh had been disgraced and dismissed prior
to his death. Who would foot the bill to build a palace for an unemployed deceased nobleman’s
corpse? A little prodding with two sharp questions brings down the entire illusory structure of
tall Invader claims to Hindu building-work. We ask that if Safdarjang’s corpse could afford
such a stupendous palace he should have had at least ten palaces when living. But there is
none. The other question is that if his heir and successor built this palace for the corpse of the
deceased Safdarjang the former must himself have had tens of palaces in  Delhi. But he too
 had none. Our answer to this riddle is that Safdarjang and in fact all alien Invader rulers and
noblemen were buried in their own palaces.
Diwan-I-Khas, Red Fort, Delhi
            That contrary to popular belief the Red Fort in Delhi is a very ancient structure. Prithviraj
used to stay in this Lalkot (red palace). Saffron and ochre are colours sacred to the Hindus, but
avoided by Invaders The main highway of Delhi known as Chandni Chowk connects the Red
Fort with the royal and guardian deity’ temple now turned into Fatehpuri Mosque. Around this
axis was built Old Delhi protected by a massive wall. According to Akbarnama and the Agni
Purana, Delhi was built by the Hindu King Anagpal around 372 A.D. before founding of Islam.
Imambadas in Lucknow
            The so called Imambadas in Lucknow for instance are ancient Hindu places which are being
merrily ascribed to this or that alien Invader nawab who subjugated that part of Hindusthan.