Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter Three
Organization: Structure and Culture
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–2
1
08-Mar-21
Learning Objectives
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–3
Chapter Outline
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–4
2
08-Mar-21
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–5
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–6
3
08-Mar-21
Functional Organizations
FIGURE 3.1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–7
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–8
4
08-Mar-21
FIGURE 3.2
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–9
FIGURE 3.3
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–10
5
08-Mar-21
Functional Organization
• Advantages • Disadvantages
1. No structural 1. Lack of focus
change
2. Poor integration
2. Flexibility
3. Slow
3. In-depth expertise
4. Lack of ownership
4. Easy post-project
transition
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–11
• Advantages • Disadvantages
1. Simple 1. Expensive
2. Fast 2. Internal strife
3. Cohesive 3. Limited technological
expertise
4. Cross-functional
integration 4. Difficult post-project
transition
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–12
6
08-Mar-21
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–13
FIGURE 3.4
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–14
7
08-Mar-21
What has to be done? Who will do the task? How will it be done?
When should the task be done? Where will the task be done?
How much money is available Why will the task be done? How will the project involvement
to do the task? impact normal functional activities?
How well has the total project Is the task satisfactorily How well has the functional
been done? completed? input been integrated?
TABLE 3.1
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–15
• Weak Form
– The authority of the functional manager predominates
and the project manager has indirect authority.
• Balanced Form
– The project manager sets the overall plan and the
functional manager determines how work to be done.
• Strong Form
– The project manager has broader control and
functional departments act as subcontractors
to the project.
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–16
8
08-Mar-21
• Advantages • Disadvantages
1. Efficient 1. Dysfunctional conflict
2. Strong project focus 2. Infighting
3. Easier post-project 3. Stressful
transition
4. Slow
4. Flexible
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–17
• Organization Considerations
– How important is the project to the firm’s success?
– What percentage of core work involves projects?
– What level of resources (human and physical)
are available?
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–18
9
08-Mar-21
• Project Considerations
– Size of project
– Strategic importance
– Novelty and need for innovation
– Need for integration (number of departments involved)
– Environmental complexity (number of external
interfaces)
– Budget and time constraints
– Stability of resource requirements
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–19
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
10
08-Mar-21
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3-21
Organizational Culture
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–22
11
08-Mar-21
23
• FIGURE 3.5
24
12
08-Mar-21
25
• FIGURE 3.6
26
13
08-Mar-21
27
• FIGURE 3.7
Class Exercise
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
14
08-Mar-21
Key Terms
Balanced matrix
Dedicated project team
Organizational culture
Projectized organization
Project Office (PO)
Strong matrix
Weak matrix
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education. 3–29
15