You are on page 1of 101

The Political Reality of

Globalization and the


Open Practice of
Architecture in the
Philippines

Group 5A

Cantero Calonge Fernandez Libertad Licanda


 Globalization refers to all those processes by which
the peoples of the world are incorporated into a
single world society, global society
 Globalization involves states that are leaner but
they are also more active, and in some areas
assume greater responsibilities.
THE CONCEPT OF
GLOBALIZATION
 is an interdisciplinary concept that has not a
certain definition due to differences in views
and interpretations. By some it is considered
as creating a common global culture and
homogenizing identities and life styles, while
for others it may be interpreted as
highlighting differences and supporting
locality.
 Anthony Giddens describes globalization as a
homogenizing process, made possible by the
differentiation of time from space. In this way,
modernization establishes a network of global
relations between near-by and distant
communities
 Globalization can be thought of as a process (or set of
processes) which embodies a transformation in the spatial
organization of social relations and transactions - assessed in
terms of their extensity, intensity, velocity and impact -
generating transcontinental or interregional flows, and
networks of activity, interaction, and the exercise of power
 Globalization is often associated with economic
development, financial markets and international business. In
this context, the term globalization refers to the increasingly
free flow of goods, services, financial capital and labor across
national borders.
THE IMPACT OF
GLOBALIZATION ON
ARCHITECTURE -
ENVIRONMENT
RELATIONS: HOUSING
PROJECTS AND DESIGN
APPROACHES
 Media flow and technological breakthroughs such as
the TV, cinema, the internet and others are the most
important factors enabling us to interact with
remote communities which may be culturally
different from our own. By such contact a common
global culture is formed.
 The spread of a global culture and lifestyles is very
fast, compared to previous times, and it emanates
from an identifiable center (Taylan 2008).
 Due to new communication technologies and media,
culture has become a commodity, produced, offered
and marketed, and so it has become an image. The
world is becoming a single social space held
together by the cultural transportation of semantic
systems and symbolic forms (Hannerz 1998).
 ―the common culture created is the culture of those
dominating this market‖.
GLOBALIZATION
FORCES IN
ARCHITECTURE
 Cities and regions are facing great challenges
as a consequence of globalization.
 One force seeks to safeguard and promulgate
established indigenous architectural
traditions, forms, decorative motifs, and
technologies. It advocates historical
continuity, cultural diversity, and preservation
of identity, all symbolized by a particular
architectural vocabulary, just as spoken
languages and local dialects impart identity.
Trends

 Today, pressure to globalize architecture


primarily springs from
 Two sources to Globalize Architecture:
 1. the culture of commerce and
 2. the culture of design.
The Global Culture of
Commerce

 is driven by changing consumer expectations,


market opportunities, and business agendas.
Their architectural manifestations include
iconic, sky-scraping banking towers, chains of
standardized hotels, franchise restaurants,
and shopping malls full of all-too-familiar
name-brand stores.
The Global Culture of
Design

 is supported by architects who study what


other architects are creating, no matter
where. With fabulous photographs in slick
magazines and professional journals, trend-
conscious designers can scan and span the
globe, sharing high-style concepts rendered in
stylish materials. Glass, aluminum, stainless
steel, copper, titanium, and natural stone are
readily available. If they cannot be acquired
locally, they can be imported.
Technology
 Globalization is now an unstoppable historical
process led by technological change and
involving the dissemination of science and
new technologies. Rapid urbanization has only
been made possible by the introduction of
modern technology as a part of the
development process.
 In one of the oldest treatises on architecture,
Vitruvius proposed three essential
requirements for all good architecture:
firmitas, utilitas, and venustas.
 Complex construction and advanced building
design require a mastery of structures and
construction technology, and as
 Michelle Addington (2006:64) mentions,
“Technology is often considered the
handmaiden of design and, as such, is meant
to be subordinate: design is the why and the
what, whereas technology is the how-to.”
 NEW TECHNOLOGIES ARE CHANGING THE
NATURE OF WORK — WITH ITS
MULTIDIMENSIONAL EFFECTS —
 by creating new forms of leisure,
 - including the hyper-reality of cyberspace,
 - new virtual realities, and
 - new modes of information and
 - entertainment.
 Dramatic change and innovation have been part
of modernity for centuries, as has technological
development and expansion.
 A new global culture is emerging as a result of
computer and communications technologies.
 Transitional forms of architecture are traversing
national boundaries and becoming part of a new
world culture.
 The new wave of technologies in electronics,
robotics, telecommunications, new materials,
and biotechnology has given rise to a new
technology paradigm that accentuates the role of
the world cities (Lo and Yeung, 1998).
 Thus, the adoption of appropriate
technologies is a natural and unforced
consequence of appropriate architecture.
Together, they offer valid forms and images to
take the place of models offered by
industrialized nations, and as Shahin Vassigh
(2004:112) mentions,
 “The practice of architecture is a delicate
balance of art and science — a creative
endeavor which also requires that the
architect master a broad array of technical
skills, including engineering.”
THE OPEN PRACTICE
OF ARCHITECTURE
IN THE PHILIPPINES
"General Practice of Architecture" means
 the act of
 - planning and architectural designing,
 - structural conceptualization,
 - specifying, supervising and
 - giving general administration and responsible
direction to the erection, enlargement or alterations of
buildings and building environments and architectural
design in engineering structures or any part thereof;
 The scientific, aesthetic and orderly coordination of
all the processes which enter into the production of
a complete building or structure performed through
the medium of unbiased preliminary studies
Medium of Unbiased
Preliminary Studies of

 plans,
 consultations,
 specifications,
 conferences,
 evaluations,
 investigations,
 contract documents and
 oral advice and directions
 regardless of whether the persons engaged in such
practice are residents of the Philippines or have
their principal office or place of business in this
country or another territory, and regardless of
whether such persons are performing one or all
these duties, or whether such duties are performed
in person or as the directing head of an office or
organization performing them;
 "Scope of the Practice of Architecture" encompasses
the provision of professional services in connection
with site, physical and planning and the design,
construction, enlargement, conservation,
renovation, remodeling, restoration or alteration of a
building or group of buildings.
 Services may include, but are not limited to:
 (a) Planning, architectural designing and structural
conceptualization;
 (b) consultation, consultancy, giving oral or written
advice and directions, conferences, evaluations,
investigations, quality surveys, appraisals and
adjustments, architectural and operational planning, site
analysis and other pre-design services;
 (c) schematic design, design development, contract
documents and construction phases including
professional consultancies;
 (d) preparation of preliminary, technical, economic and
financial feasibility studies of plans, models and project
promotional services;
 (e) preparation of architectural plans, specifications, bill
of materials, cost estimates, general conditions and
bidding documents;
 (f) construction and project management, giving
general management, administration, supervision,
coordination and responsible direction or the planning,
architectural designing, construction, reconstruction,
erection, enlargement or demolition, renovation, repair,
orderly removal, remodeling, alteration, preservation or
restoration of buildings or structures or complex
buildings, including all their components, sites and
environs, intended for private or public use;
 (g) the planning, architectural lay-outing and utilization
of spaces within and surrounding such buildings or
structures, housing design and community architecture,
architectural interiors and space planning, architectural
detailing, architectural lighting, acoustics, architectural
lay-outing of mechanical, electrical, electronic, sanitary,
plumbing, communications and other utility systems,
equipment and fixtures;
 (h) building programming, building administration,
construction arbitration and architectural conservation
and restoration;
 (i) all works which relate to the scientific, aesthetic
and orderly coordination of all works and branches
of the work, systems and processes necessary for
the production of a complete building or structure,
whether for public or private use, in order to
enhance and safeguard life, health and property and
the promotion and enrichment of the quality of life,
the architectural design of engineering structures or
any part thereof; and
 (j) all other works, projects and activities which
require the professional competence of an architect,
including teaching of architectural subjects and
architectural computer-aided design
ISSUES OF THE
PRACTICES IN THE
GLOBAL CONTEXT
 The practice of these professions here is threatened to
extinction by the continued bias of clients against them,
the threat of illegal Filipino practitioners, the invasion of
foreign consultants and the exodus of Filipino designers to
better-paying jobs overseas.
 The bias against local practitioner s apparently stems from
the public’s misunderstanding of what architects and
related design professionals do. 
 Architecture is the art and science of designing buildings
and building complexes to house and support the functions
of clients and the public.
 As a service, it is like medicine and law where problems or
needs are addressed in a timely and direct manner but
with the additional facet of elegance, aesthetics and good
taste.
 Many Filipino architects are treated like suppliers
or contractors, valued only if fees charged are
cheap and if they are willing to be constantly on
call (unlike doctors or lawyers, clients refuse to pay
architects based on time spent at endless
meetings).
 It’s a matter of respect, which makes it all the
more aggravating for many locals practitioners
as they witness a whole different attitude given by
clients to foreign-schooled but unregistered or
licensed practitioners or foreign consultants.
 Of late, a number of Filipino or Fil-American
designers schooled or who have worked overseas
have set up practices without the necessary
licenses.
 Their success has been the product of good
marketing skills, individual packaging (foreign
accents, fashionable dress sense, and conspicuous
attendance in the cocktail circuit) as well as a
competent portfolio of work overseas. It is no
wonder then that local media find these
personalities good copy.
 Nevertheless they have been found not to be in the
roster of registered or licensed architects. The
United Architects of the Philippines (UAP) has
sent notices to editors in chief and writers of design
magazines and broadsheets to desist from referring
to these designers as “architects.”
  Similar incidents have been cited by the Philippine
Association of Landscape Architects and the
Philippine Institute of Interior Designers regarding
personalities featured in newspapers and magazines
and referred to as landscape architects or interior
designers. All three professions are regulated by the
government and require registration and licenses to
practice.
 On a show, architect Alli explained that the
Architecture Law RA9266 (there are similar ones for
landscape architecture, interior design and
environmental planning)protects the interest of the
public and ensures legal accountability for
malpractice or its results—collapsing buildings,
landslides in housing sites, exploding utilities
and the like.
 More worrying for the UAP, PALA and PIID is the
proliferation of foreign designers who are featured in
numerous press releases and ads by real estate
developers—complete with portraits and interviews
as to how they have designed this or that new
master planned community, world-class complexes
or trend-setting landscapes and urban design.
 The situation with architecture is a bit different but
malpractice in the art and science of designing
buildings could lead, like bad medicine or lawyering,
to loss of life or a sad existence in a structure that
looks and feels like a prison.
 Filipino architects are considered world-class
in every country except their own. Like many in
other design professions they are driven overseas
because they are unappreciated and underpaid yet
they possess the technical expertise and capacity
that could create all that public and private clients
are planning to build in support of a booming
economy without there course of foreign
consultants. 
 Architecture is a proud profession. Its practitioners
have to be respected for them to be able to produce
structures and settings that engender pride of place
and a national identity. Philippine architecture is
best created by Filipinos for Filipinos. If we aspire
instead to live in simulations of other lands and
cultures, then globalization will have shown
its ugliest façade, an illusion of modernity that hides
behind it a poverty of culture and purpose we can
never escape from.
APEC Architects
Manual
OVERVIEW

 An APEC Architect is a person who is registered,


licensed or otherwise professionally recognized as
an architect in a participating economy, and whose
name is enrolled on a section of the APEC Architect
Register maintained by that economy.
 The criteria adopted by the Central Council for
admission to the APEC Architect Register, and use of
the description ‘APEC Architect’, are based on
identification of a common sequence and elements
in the education, training and assessment of
architects as qualified to provide professional
architectural services in the home economy. These
consist of:
 an accreditation or recognition procedure for
education programs in architecture;
 a minimum period of post-graduate practical
experience, with specified requisites;
 fulfillment of registration, licensing or other
requirements for full professional recognition,
 a minimum period of professional practice as a
registered or licensed architect, with
 specified requisites.
 Architects deemed by the Central Council to fulfil
these requirements are eligible for registration as an
APEC Architect. To retain their registration, APEC
Architects must comply with obligations imposed by
their home economies for maintaining professional
competence and observing codes of professional
conduct. Host economies may choose to impose
special requirements for the recognition of APEC
Architects for practice in their economies, but any
such requirements must be fully transparent.
Monitoring Committees

 Each participating economy is required to establish


a Monitoring Committee to take responsibility for
administration of the APEC Architect framework in
that economy, after receiving authorization by the
Central Council to do so. Monitoring Committees act
with delegated authority from the Central Council to
implement its policies and carry out it duties.
 The primary duty of a Monitoring Committee is to
operate a section of the APEC Architect Register for
the enrolment of APEC Architects registered/licensed
in that economy.
Authorization of
Monitoring Committees
 Newly formed Monitoring Committees wishing to
establish a section of the APEC Architect Register
must first be authorized by the Central Council to do
so. Applications for authorization must be
accompanied by information on the professional
recognition/ accreditation systems in place in the
economy and details of its proposals for assessment
of APEC Architect criteria, and any other information
the Council deems necessary.
Central Council

 The Central Council has ultimate responsibility for


all matters relating to the APEC Architect
framework. The Council comprises at least one
representative appointed by the Monitoring
Committee of each economy authorized to operate
a section of the Register. Non-authorized economies
may also be invited to attend Council meetings as
non-voting observers.
 The Central Council’s primary duty is to decide the
standards and criteria required for registration as an
APEC Architect and to establish operational
procedures for management of the APEC Architect
Register.
Administrative
Provisions
 Responsibility for providing administrative services
for the APEC Architect Central Council and acting as
the project Secretariat is undertaken in rotation by
participating economies. The economy performing
this role at any time may share its duties with other
economies or it may be exempted from them on
request.
 During its term of office, the Secretariat is required
to administer all Council business, manage its
meetings and coordinate the activities of the
independent Monitoring Committees. It acts as a
centre of information for the project and maintains
the APEC Architect website.
Termination

 The APEC Architect Central Council will operate for


so long as it is acceptable and desirable to
participating economies.
REGISTRATION AS
AN APEC
ARCHITECT
APEC ARCHITECT
REGISTRATION CRITERIA
 The following set of principles satisfies Central
Council criteria for admission to the APEC Architect
Register and the right to use the description ‘APEC
Architect’.
 1. Architectural Education
 Educational Benchmark Statement
 Education as an architect shall comprise at least four years of full
time study. The education
 must be of university level, with architecture the principal
component.
Common Elements of Architectural Education
Programs
 The core subject areas in an accredited/recognized
program of architectural education are:
 Design, as the predominant subject category
 Technology and Environmental Science
 Social, Cultural & Environmental Studies, and
 Professional Studies.
Other subject areas within architectural
 educational programs may include:
 Related Studies
 General Education
Accreditation /
Recognition Procedure for
Educational Programs in
Architecture
Processes incorporating the following principles of
good governance will satisfy the
accreditation/recognition criteria for educational
programs for an APEC Architect.

 1. Fulfilment of Period of Pre-registration or


Pre-licensing Experience for Recognition as an
Architect in a Home Economy
 2. Fulfilment of Registration / Licensing
Requirements for Recognition as an Architect
in a
 Home Economy
 3. Professional Practice as a Registered /
Licensed Architect
ENTITLEMENT TO
REGISTRATION
 1.Admission to the APEC Architect Register
APEC Architects must also agree to be bound by the
code of professional conduct of their home economy
and of any jurisdiction in which they practice.

Particulars of APEC Architects to be recorded on the


Register include:
 name and business address;
 home economy or jurisdiction in which the architect
is registered/licensed; and
 any other economy in which the architect is
registered/licensed.
 2.Maintaining APEC Architect Registration
 APEC Architect registration is to be renewed on
payment of an administration fee to a Monitoring
Committee at intervals no greater than two years.
Registration details are to be reviewed and renewed on
application to practice in a host economy.
 Renewal of registration is subject to compliance with
home economy regulatory authority or Monitoring
Committee requirements to undertake programs of
continuing professional development, or fulfil other
tests of current competence.
 The registration of an APEC Architect will be cancelled if
the architect ceases to be registered/licensed in the
designated home economy. The registration of APEC
Architects found, subject to due process, to be in
breach of the code of professional conduct of either
their home economy, or a host economy, may be
suspended by their home economy Monitoring
THE COMPETENCE OF AN
APEC ARCHITECT
The skills and knowledge required for admission to the
APEC Architect Register
 An APEC Architect must be competent to
create architectural designs.
 An APEC Architect must be competent to
translate a design concept into built form.
 An APEC Architect must be competent in the
practice of architecture.
THE APEC
ARCHITECT
REGISTER
APEC Architect Register

 The APEC Architect Register is the means by which


the names of architects who have achieved common
standards of professional competence are made
publicly available.
 To ensure that the information it contains is
accurate and current, the APEC Architect Register is
divided into independent sections established in
each participating economy for the enrolment of
architects who are registered/licensed in that
economy. It consists of a series of decentralized,
linked electronic databases, constructed and
operated by the Monitoring Committee of each
economy. The Monitoring Committee is responsible
for maintaining and regularly updating the section
of the Register it administers.
 The participating economy acting as Secretariat
maintains the central APEC Architect domain with
hyperlinks to the individual APEC Architect database
websites. Each website contains an introductory
statement on the APEC Architect framework,
information on APEC Architect registration
requirements, access to the list of APEC Architects
registered in its economy, and to relevant
publications and forms for down-loading.
 Monitoring Committees publish on their websites
any special requirements that the home economy
places on APEC Architects from other economies.
The Reciprocal
Recognition Framework
 The Central Council has established a Reciprocal
Recognition Framework which identifies
participating economies that have adopted the
same registration / certification requirements for
APEC Architects from foreign economies, thereby
establishing a reciprocal basis for the professional
recognition of APEC Architects from those
economies.
 In assessing APEC Architects from economies with
more restrictive categories of requirements, host
economies may impose similar requirements to
those of the applicant’s economy.
MONITORING
COMMITTEES
Composition

 Whilst the composition of Monitoring Committees is


a matter for each economy to decide, the size and
balance of its membership will be dictated by the
functions it must perform, particularly with regard to
evaluation of the qualifications and professional
experience of candidates applying for admission to
the section of the APEC Architect Register it
maintains.
Functions

 Monitoring Committees, when authorized, carry out


the following functions and manage the section of
the APEC Architect Register, with delegated
authority of the Central Council, for which they are
responsible, in accordance with Central Council
policy, guidelines and rules of procedure.
 Constituent Bodies of the Central Council
 Maintaining Standards
 APEC Architect Register
 Information and Communication
 Assessment of Candidates for Registration
AUTHORISATION OF
MONITORING
COMMITTEES
 An APEC economy seeking to operate a section of
the APEC Architect Register must first constitute a
Monitoring Committee to submit an application to
the APEC Architect Central Council, through the
Secretariat, for authorization to do so.

 (Note: In economies with multiple domestic


jurisdictions, where applicable, the professional
standards and criteria established by national
organizations acting as councils of individual
regulatory authorities are those to be evaluated for
the authorization of Monitoring Committees.)
Application for
Authorization
 To promote consistency and transparency of
process, the Central Council has prepared guidelines
on the information to be provided by Monitoring
Committees in support of their applications for
authorization to show conformance with APEC
Architect criteria. It will require advice on:
 education and practical experience/training
requirements for registration/licensure as an architect
in that economy;
 the accreditation/ recognition procedures employed to
assess them;
 procedures adopted to assess compliance with the
required professional practice experience as a
registered/licensed architect.
Continued Authorization

 Authorized Monitoring Committees, and the procedures


they adopt, are subject to periodic review by the
Central Council to ensure that they continue to comply
with agreed standards. They must immediately notify
the Central Council of any material changes in
education provision, accreditation/recognition systems
and registration/licensure requirements to those which
were approved for initial authorization, or of any other
significant developments concerning the professional
recognition of architects in their economies that might
conflict with Council policy.
 A Monitoring Committee whose authorization has been
suspended by the Central Council because it no longer
conforms with APEC Architect criteria may, with reason,
request an independent review of the decision.
THE APEC
ARCHITECT
CENTRAL COUNCIL
Constitution of the
Central Council
 The Central Council acts as the joint governing body for
the APEC Architect framework and is composed of at least
one representative from the Monitoring Committee of each
economy authorized to operate a section of the Register.
There is no limit to the number of members appointed to
the Council by Monitoring Committees but each authorized
economy is entitled to only one vote.
 To promote the project and extend its benefits, economies
that have not yet received authorization to maintain a
section of the APEC Architect Register are also invited by
the Council to appoint representatives to attend its
meetings as non-voting observers. Although observers are
not entitled to take part in the decision making process,
this provides an opportunity for them to familiarize
themselves with the APEC Architect framework with a view
to establishing a Monitoring Committee in their own
Duties of the Central
Council
 The Central Council has ultimate responsibility for
the operation of each aspect of the APEC Architect
framework. Its duties include the following:
 Maintenance of the APEC Architect Register:
 Establishment of Monitoring Committees:
 Oversight of the Reciprocal Recognition
Framework
 Administration of the APEC Architect Project
Standards and Criteria for
Registration as an APEC
Architect
 The purpose of the APEC Architect Register is to
establish authoritative and reliable evidence of the
achievement of common standards of professional
competence by the architects enrolled on it.
Registration is reserved for experienced practitioners to
provide an additional level of assurance to consumers.
 The criteria adopted for registration as an APEC
Architect are based on a dynamic set of principles that
identify common elements of professional recognition
in APEC economies and reflect current practice norms.
These standards and criteria are incorporated in
Council guidelines periodically reviewed by the Central
Council to ensure that they remain relevant to
international best practice within the profession.
ADMINISTRATIVE
ARRANGEMENTS –
THE SECRETARIAT
 To provide an equitable system for sharing the
provision of administrative services among
economies, Central Council business is conducted
by participating economies, which take on the role
of Secretariat on a rotational basis. The minimum
period for economies to act in this capacity is two
years and they may reapply to continue for a
subsequent term of office.
Mechanism, Documents and
Procedures to Hand Over The
Secretariat To Following
Economy
 The Following procedures must be complied
whenever there is a change of Economy to act
as Secretariat for the Central Council in order
to have continuity on the administrative
duties and responsibilities.
MECHANISM AND
PROCEDURE
 Establishment of a meeting date and venue
between outgoing and incoming Secretariats.
 The meeting to take place where documents and
information is handed out
 To have a written document to be signed by both
Secretariats stating information handed over and
received, with official date for incoming Secretariat.
 An official communication should be sent to
organizations APEC Architect has contact with,
 By outgoing Secretariat announcing the handover of
Secretariat with
 presentation of Economy to act as new Secretariat as well
as its officials.
 By incoming Secretariat, with contact information.
 An official communication should be sent to APEC
Secretariat and Lead Shepherd of HRDWG by Both
Secretariats as above.
APEC ARCHITECTS
IN THE
PHILIPPINES
 As of July 1, 2017, there are 54 Filipino architects
that are registered as an APEC Architect. They are:
ARCHITECT YOLANDA D. ARCHITECT PROSPERIDAD
REYES C. LUIS
ARCHITECT EUGENE G. ARCHITECT EDILBERTO F.
GAN FLORENTINO
ARCHITECT FROILAN L. ARCHITECT PHILIP H.
HONG RECTO
ARCHITECT EDRIC MARCO ARCHITECT ROMULO L.
C. FLORENTINO REYES
ARCHITECT MIGUEL C. ARCHITECT ANA S.
GUERRERO III MANGALINO-LING
ARCHITECT JOSE SIAO ARCHITECT MICHAEL T.
LING ANG
ARCHITECT CESAR V. ARCHITECT MANUEL T.
CANCHELA MAÑOSA JR.
ARCHITECT ANGEL ARCHITECT FRANCISCO T.
LAZARO JR. MAÑOSA
ARCHITECT GERONIMO V. ARCHITECT REMUS P.
MANAHAN ANCHETA
ARCHITECT JOSE MARI A. ARCHITECT JONATHAN O.
CAÑIZARES GAN
ARCHITECT DANIEL C. GO ARCHITECT NESTOR S.
MANGIO
ARCHITECT ROLANDO ARCHITECT WELLINGTON
D.L. MIRANDA P. ONG
ARCHITECT EDWARD C. ARCHITECT TEOFILO I.
TAN VASQUEZ
ARCHITECT ARMANDO N. ARCHITECT FELINO A.
ALLI PALAFOX JR.
ARCHITECT FLORDELIZA ARCHITECT SEVERINO P.
S. LAPERAL PEREZ
ARCHITECT ANGELINE T. ARCHITECT NORBERTO M.
CHUA-CHIACO NUKE
ARCHITECT ERNESTO ARCHITECT GUILLERMO
ANTONINO D. NASOL H. HISANCHA
ARCHITECT DANILO M. ARCHITECT ERIBERTO V.
FUENTEBELLA AGUIRRE
ARCHITECT EDGAR S. ARCHITECT KA KUEN T.
CALMA CHUA
ARCHITECT CARLOS F. ARCHITECT ROMMEL A.
LACUNA AGULTO
ARCHITECT MA. NINA ARCHITECT MARIANO S.
BAILON-ARCE ARCE JR.
ARCHITECT ROLANDO L. ARCHITECT MICHAEL G.
CORDERO DE CASTRO
ARCHITECT FILNA ARCHITECT OMAR
DAPHNE P. ESPINA MAXWELL P. ESPINA
ARCHITECT JOSEPH ARCHITECT ANNETTE F.
MICHAEL P. ESPINA GADDI-LIGANOR
ARCHITECT ROBERT M. ARCHITECT MA. LOURDES
MIRAFUENTE M. ONOZAWA
ARCHITECT BENJAMIN K. ARCHITECT RUNDDY D.
PANGANIBAN JR. RAMILO
ARCHITECT JAIME G. SILVA ARCHITECT ABELARDO M.
TOLENTINO JR.

You might also like