路 ｌ

鹿 不迷
　 ｌ麋
The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and
ｌ ｉ
ｂ ｉ
ｂｉｌｉ
2008.

路 ｌ
鹿 不迷
　 ｌ 麋
ｌ ｉ ｂｉｌｉ ｌ
ｂ ｉ 路
迷路
ｌ 鹿 不迷
不 ｌ麋
麋鹿 ｂ ｉｌｉ　
ｂｉｌｉ
迷路ｌ
鹿不
ｉ　 ｌ 麋
ｂ ｉｌ
ｂｉｌｉ 路 ｌ
迷路
ｌ 鹿 不迷
不 ｌ麋
ｉ　ｌ麋
鹿 ｂ ｉｌｉ　
ｂｉｌｉ
迷 路ｌ
麋 鹿不
ｉｌ ｉ 　ｌ
ｂｉ ｌｉｂ
路ｌ 不 迷
鹿不迷 ｌ麋鹿
ｌ ｉ　
ｌ麋 ｂ ｉ
　
ｂｉｌｉ The pie charts compare five categories of household expenditure in the UK andｂNew ｉｌｉZealand in
the years 1980 and 2008.
迷 路ｌ
不fell in both countries over the 28-
鹿drink
It is noticeable that the proportion of spending on food ｌ 麋 and
　 UK residents spent a significantly larger
ｉAlso,
year period, while spending on utility bills rose.
ｂ ｉ ｌ
percentage of their household budgets
ｂ ｉｌｉon leisure than their New Zealand counterparts.
In 1980, 29% of an 迷 路ｌNew Zealand household budget went on food and drink, while the
average 麋 鹿
不
鹿 for a UK home was 23%. By 2008, expenditure on food and drink had fallen byｂｉｌｉ 　 ｌ
equivalent
ｉ 　 ｌ 麋 figure
ｌｉin
ｂ ｉｌ4% in New Zealand, ｉ
and by a full 10% in the UK. By contrast, both countries saw an increase
ｂ
ｂｉｌｉ expenditure
to 28% in the UK.
on utility bills for the average home, from 27% to 31% in New Zealand
迷 路ｌ and from 26%
ｌ 麋 鹿不
Leisure activities accounted for the highest proportionｌof
ｂ ｉ ｉ　UK household spending in both years, but
only the third highest proportion in New Zealand.
ｂ ｉｌasｉ InUKfact, in 2008, New Zealanders spent only half
as much in relative terms on recreation
路 ｌ15% and 10% of household (34%).
(17%) residents In both countries, transport
costs and other costs took roughly
不 迷 budgets respectively.

ｌ 麋 鹿 ｂ ｉ ｌ ｉ　
(206 words,
Note:ｂ ｉ ｌ ｉ　 band 9)
ｂ ｉ ｌｉ
ｂｉｌｉ
word count includes all numbers

迷 路ｌ
ｌ 麋 鹿不
ｂ ｉ ｌ ｉ　
ｂ ｉｌｉ
迷 路ｌ
ｌ 麋 鹿不
ｂ ｉ ｌ ｉ　
ｂｉｌｉ