Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction and Preliminaries
Introduction and Preliminaries
MUBARIZ G. HAJIBAYOV
UV,W = {L ∈ C(K) : L ∩ V 6= ∅, L ⊂ W }
with V, W open in K.
3. There is an identity e ∈ K with δe ∗ δx = δx ∗ δe = δx for all x ∈ K.
4. There is a continuous involution ∼ on K such that
For the sake of simplicity, the letter C always denotes a positive constant which
may change from one step to the next.
90 MUBARIZ G. HAJIBAYOV
2. Main results
Let (K, ∗) be a commutative hypergroup, with quasi-metric ρ, Haar measure
λ. For 0 ≤ β < 1 define fractional maximal operator
1
Mβ f (x) = sup 1−β
|f | ∗ χB(e,r) (x).
r>0 λB(e, r)
Proof. Let r > 0 be arbitrary and split Iα |f (x)| in the standard way
Z
Iα |f (x)| = ρ(e, y)α−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
B(e,r)
Z
+ ρ(e, y)α−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
K\B(e,r)
= U1 (x, r) + U2 (x, r). (2.4)
For U1 (x, r) we have the estimate
Z
U1 (x, r) = ρ(e, y)α−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y).
B(e,r)
∞
X Z
= ρ(e, y)α−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
k=1 −k
2 r≤ρ(e,y)<2−k+1 r
∞
X α−N Z
−k
≤ 2 r T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
k=1
ρ(e,y)<2−k+1 r
∞
X α−N
= 2−k r λB(e, 2−k+1 r)×
k=1
Z
1
× T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
λB(e, 2−k+1 r)
B(e,2−k+1 r)
≤ Crα M0 f (x).
Therefore
U1 (x, r) ≤ Crα M0 f (x), (2.5)
where C > 0 does not depend f , x and r.
Estimating U2 (x, r) we obtain:
Z
U2 (x, r) = ρ(e, y)α−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
K\B(e,r)
∞
X Z
= ρ(e, y)α−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
k=0 k
2 r≤ρ(e,y)<2k+1 r
X∞ α−N 1−η
k
≤ 2 r λB(e, 2k+1 r) ×
k=0
Z
1
× η−1 T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
(λB(e, 2k+1 r))
ρ(e,y)<2k+1 r
∞
X α−N N −N η
≤C 2k r 2k+1 r Mη f (x)
k=0
≤ Crα−N η Mη f (x)
92 MUBARIZ G. HAJIBAYOV
K\B(e,r)
10
p
Z
(α−N )p0
× ρ(e, y) dλ(y) .
K\B(e,r)
Here
1
p
Z
|T x f (y ∼ )|p dλ(y)
K\B(e,r)
1
Z p
x ∼ p
≤ |T f (y )| dλ(y)
K
1
Z p
x p ∼
≤ |T f (y )|dλ(y)
K
1
Z p
p
= |f (y)| dλ(y)
K
and
10
p
Z
(α−N )p0
ρ(e, y) dλ(y)
K\B(e,r)
10
p
∞ Z
X (α−N )p0
= ρ(e, y) dλ(y)
k=0 k
2 r≤ρ(e,y)<2k+1 r
ESTIMATES FOR FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND FRACTIONAL . . . 93
10
p
∞ 0 Z
X k (α−N )p
≤ 2 r dλ(y)
k=0
ρ(e,y)<2k+1 r
∞
! 10
X (α−N )p0 N p
≤C 2k r 2k+1 r
k=0
α−N + pN0
≤ Cr
α− N
= Cr p .
Therefore
α− N
U2 (x, r) ≤ Cr p kf kLp (K,λ) (2.9)
From (2.5) and (2.9), we have
α− N
Iα |f (x)| ≤ C rα M0 f (x) + r p kf kLp (K,λ)
Np
kf kLp (K,λ)
Minimum of the right-hand side is attained at r = . So
M0 f (x)
αp αp
Iα |f (x)| ≤ C (M0 f (x))1− N kf kLNp (K,λ) .
We now prove (2.7). Consider
Z
Iαθ |f (x)| = ρ(e, y)αθ−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
B(e,r)
Z
+ ρ(e, y)αθ−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
K\B(e,r)
= u1 (x, r) + u2 (x, r)
For u2 (x, r) we have the estimate
Z
αθ−α
u2 (x, r) ≤ r ρ(e, y)α−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
K\B(e,r)
≤ rαθ−α Iα |f (x)|
Thus
u2 (x, r) ≤ rαθ−α Iα |f (x)| (2.10)
From (2.5) and (2.10) we have
Iαθ |f (x)| ≤ Crαθ M0 f (x) + rαθ−α Iα |f (x)|.
1
Iα |f (x)| α
Minimum of the right-hand side is attained at r = . So
M0 f (x)
Iαθ |f (x)| ≤ C (Iα |f (x)|)θ (M0 f (x))1−θ .
94 MUBARIZ G. HAJIBAYOV
Turn to the proof of (2.7). For this purpuse we estimate u2 (x, r) by the different
way.
∞
X Z
u2 (x, r) = ρ(e, y)αθ−N T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
k=0 k
2 r≤ρ(e,y)<2k+1 r
∞
X αθ−N 1− α
N
≤ 2k r λB(e, 2k+1 r) ×
k=0
Z
1
× −1 α T x |f (y ∼ )|dλ(y)
(λB(e, 2k+1 r)) N
ρ(e,y)<2k+1 r
≤ Crαθ−α M Nα f (x).
Therefore,
u2 (x, r) ≤ Crαθ−α M Nα f (x). (2.11)
Using (2.5) and (2.11) we have
Iαθ |f (x)| ≤ rαθ M0 f (x) + Crαθ−α M Nα f (x).
1
Mα f (x) α
Minimum of the right-hand side is attained at r = . So
M0 f (x)
Iαθ |f (x)| ≤ C (Mα f (x))θ (M0 f (x))1−θ
Theorem 2.3 is proved.
Theorem 2.4. Let (K, ∗) be a commutative hypergroup, with quasi-metric ρ and
Haar measure λ, upper Ahlfors N -regular on an identity. Assume that
0 < α < N , 0 < p < ∞ and Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator (2.1) is bounded
on Lp (K, λ).
αp
1) If 1 < p < N 1 1 α
µ , 1 ≤ b ≤ ∞ and µb = q − p + µ then
αp
1− αp
kIα f kLq (K,λ) ≤ CkM µ f kLµb (K,λ) kf kLp (K,λ)
µ
(2.12)
Np
for all f ∈ Lp (K, λ) and all M µ ∈ Lb (K, λ), where C is a constant independent
Np
of f .
2)
1−θ
kIαθ f kLb (K,λ) ≤ CkIα f kθLq (K,λ) kf kLp (K,λ) , (2.13)
1−θ
kIαθ f kLb (K,λ) ≤ CkMα f kθLq (K,λ) kf kLp (K,λ) . (2.14)
1 θ 1−θ
where 0 < θ < 1, 0 < q ≤ ∞, b = q + p .
1
Mη f (x) Nη
Proof. Taking r = r(x) = in (2.3), we have
M0 f (x)
α
1− Nαη
|Iα f (x)| ≤ C (Mη f (x)) N η (M0 f (x)) .
µ
If η = Np , then
αp
1− αp
µ
|Iα f (x)| ≤ C M µ f (x) (M0 f (x)) µ (2.15)
Np
ESTIMATES FOR FRACTIONAL INTEGRALS AND FRACTIONAL . . . 95
Using the inequality (2.15) and applying Hölder’s inequality we can write
Z Z qαp
µ q− qαp
|Iα f (x)|q dλ(x) ≤ C M µ f (x) (M0 f (x)) µ dλ(x)
Np
K K
qαp
q− qαp
µ
≤ Ck M µ f kLζ 0 (K,λ) k (M0 f ) µ kLζ (K,λ) ,
Np
µp ζ µb αp
where ζ = µq−αpq , ζ0 = ζ−1 = αpq , µb = 1
q − 1
p + αµ . Therefore
αp
1− αp
kIα f kLq (K,λ) ≤ CkM µ f kLµb (K,λ) kM0 f kLp (K,λ)
µ
Np
αp
1− αp
≤ CkM µ f kLµb (K,λ) kf kLp (K,λ)
µ
.
Np
Now we prove (2.13). Consider kIαθ f kLb (K,λ) . From (2.7) and Hölder’s in-
equality we obtain
kIαθ f kLb (K,λ) ≤ Ck (Iα f )θ (M0 f )1−θ kLb (K,λ)
Acknowledgements
The author would like to express his thanks to Academician Akif Gadjiev for
valuable remarks.
References
[1] D. Adams and L. Hedberg, Function spaces and potential theory, Grundlehren
der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sci-
ences], 314. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1996.
[2] W. R. Bloom and H. Heyer, Harmonic analysis of probability measures on hyper-
groups, de Gruyter Stud. Math., vol. 20, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 1995.
[3] A. D. Gadjiev and M. G. Hajibayov, Inequalities for B-convolution operators, TWMS
J. Pure Appl. Math., 1(1) (2010), 41–52.
[4] A. D. Gadjiev, V. S. Guliyev, A. Serbetci and E. V. Guliyev, The Stein-Weiss type
inequalities for the B-Riesz potentials. J. Math. Inequal., 5(1) (2011), 87-106.
[5] V. S. Guliyev and Y. Y. Mammadov, Some estimations for Riesz potentials in terms
maximal and fractional maximal functions associated with the Dunkl operator on the
real line. Trans. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. Ser. Phys.-Tech. Math. Sci. 27(7) (2007),
71-76.
[6] V. S. Guliev, N. N. Garakhanova and Y. Zeren, Pointwise and integral estimates for
the Riesz B-potential in terms of B-maximal and B-fractionally maximal functions
(Russian), Sibirsk. Mat. Zh.,49(6) (2008), 1263–1279.
96 MUBARIZ G. HAJIBAYOV
[7] V. S. Guliyev and Y. Y. Mammadov, Pointwise and integral estimates for the Riesz
potentials associated with the Dunkl operator on the real line, Indian J. Math. 51(2)
(2009), 239–254.
[8] M. G. Hajibayov, Generalized potentials on commutative hypergroups, arXiv
preprint arXiv:1307.4949, 2013, 1–9 to appear in Azerb. J. Math.
[9] M. G. Hajibayov, Inequalities for convolutions of functions on commutative hyper-
groups, Azerb. J. Math. 4(1) (2014), 92–107.
[10] R. L. Jewett, Spaces with an abstract convolution of measures, Adv. in Math., 18(1)
(1975), 1–101.
[11] M. Lashkarizadeh Bami, The semisimplicity of L1 (K, w) of a weighted commutative
hypergroup K, Acta Math. Sinica, 24 (4) (2008), 607–610.
[12] Y. Y. Mammadov, Analog theorems of Welland for the Riesz potentials associated
with the Dunkl operator on the real line. Proc. Inst. Math. Mech. Natl. Acad. Sci.
Azerb., 27 (2007), 47-56
[13] M. N. Omarova, Some properties of the fractional integrals on the Laguerre hy-
pergroup, Trans. Natl. Acad. Sci. Azerb. Ser. Phys.Tech. Math. Sci. Math. Mech.,
28(4) (2008), 83–90.
[14] R. Spector, Measures invariantes sur les hypergroupes(French), Trans. Amer. Math.
Soc., 239 (1978), 147–165.
Mubariz G. Hajibayov
Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, Baku, Azerbaijan.
National Aviation Academy, Baku, Azerbaijan.
E-mail address: hajibayovm@yahoo.com