You are on page 1of 3

Hindawi

Case Reports in Dentistry


Volume 2018, Article ID 9169208, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9169208

Case Report
Cheilitis Glandularis of Both Lips: Successful Treatment with
a Combination of an Intralesional Steroid Injection and
Tacrolimus Ointment

Norberto Sugaya and Dante Migliari


Division of Oral Medicine Clinic, Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

Correspondence should be addressed to Norberto Sugaya; nnsugaya@usp.br

Received 24 November 2017; Revised 4 February 2018; Accepted 1 March 2018; Published 18 March 2018

Academic Editor: Noam Yarom

Copyright © 2018 Norberto Sugaya and Dante Migliari. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.

Cheilitis glandularis (CG) is an inflammatory condition of unknown cause that predominantly affects the minor salivary glands of
the lips. Although a diagnosis of CG is not difficult, its treatment is a challenge. This article highlights the clinical presentation of
the disease together with a case of successful management of this disease using a combination of a steroid injection followed by
a topical immunosuppressor.

1. Introduction 2. Case Report


Cheilitis glandularis (CG) is a rare inflammatory condition A 16-year-old white male was referred to our oral medicine
that predominantly affects the minor salivary glands and clinic for investigation of an enlargement of the lower and
surrounding tissues of the lips. It affects adults (over 40 years upper lips ongoing for approximately one year. His primary
old) to a greater extent than young people and almost ex- complaint was yellowish crusts on the mucosa surface of both
clusively white individuals. The ratio of male/gender in- lips but particularly the lower one (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).
volvement is 3 : 1. To date, no specific factor or cause has been Despite removal, the crusts reappeared mostly in the morning.
associated with the disease onset [1]. He underwent previous treatments with topical corticosteroids
The clinical features of CG lend to its diagnosis. The to no avail. The patient was healthy with no history of sub-
labial mucosa exhibits dilation of the orifices of the minor stantive medical treatment.
salivary glands through which thick saliva (mucin-rich) Based on the aspect of the lesions, the diagnosis was
flows more intensely due to the inflammatory process in- cheilitis glandularis. The initial treatment was two intrale-
side the glandular parenchyma. This excessive salivary flow sional injections of 10 mg triamcinolone suspension in both
eventually dries out, leading to the development of yellowish lips with a one-month interval between the applications. Two
plaques (or crusts) that cover the labial mucosa surface. months following the second injection, an improvement was
These plaques are easily removed but form again, mainly noticed with a reduction in the enlargement and eversion of
during sleep. In addition to this main feature, the patient also the lips. Recurrent appearance of the crusts was also reduced
develops enlargement and eversion of the lips. The vermilion but not to the extent that the patient felt comfortable. Instead
border is typically not affected [2]. of administering another steroid injection, a topical immu-
Although a diagnosis of CG is not difficult, its treatment nosuppressor (0.1% tacrolimus ointment) was applied twice
is a challenge. The present article reports the successful daily for two weeks based on two effective management re-
management of a case treated with a combination of steroid ports on CG found in the literature [3, 4] Before application,
injection followed by a topical immunosuppressor. the patient was instructed to (1) wash his hands, (2) remove
2 Case Reports in Dentistry

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Figure 1: (a, b) Initial consultation with the patient exhibiting yellowish crusts on the labial mucosa. The lips (mainly the lower one) are also
swollen and everted, whereas the vermilion border appears unaffected. (c, d) After treatment, both lips regained normal contour and aspect.
A discreet redness of the lip mucosae remained unchanged throughout the follow-up.

the labial crusts and apply 2% chlorhexidine gluconate on lip Possible differential diagnoses of CG may include
surfaces for disinfection, (3) allow the mucosa surfaces to dry contact cheilitis and cheilitis granulomatosa [1, 2, 5]. The
and then apply the tacrolimus ointment, and (4) wash his first condition is attributed to irritants or allergic con-
hands again. This management procedure succeeded in tactants. In these cases, apart from disclosing the contactant
completely resolving the lesions with no recurrence after agent, the clinical features of contact cheilitis differ sub-
a one-year follow-up (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). stantially from those of CG. For example, in the former, the
lesions appear more prominent on the lip vermilion and are
3. Discussion characterized mostly by the presence of adherent scales.
Cheilitis granulomatosa shares some similarities to CG
CG is a rare disease but may occasionally be observed by concerning lip swelling and eversion but lacks inflammation
the clinician. The lesion appears mainly through a process in the labial salivary glands, which leads to an increase of the
of renewed yellowish-plaque formation that is puzzling to salivary secretion and subsequent crust formation, a feature
health professionals. It seems that topical corticosteroids commonly observed in CG cases.
alone are not effective. Intralesional steroid injection has In the event of a difficulty in making a differential
received some acceptance, but there is no consensus that diagnosis between CG and cheilitis granulomatosa, a bi-
it works in all cases. The mainstream treatment for CG opsy can be helpful as the latter can exhibit noncaseating
has been vermilionectomy, but this treatment pro- granulomas; however, this feature is only observed in 40 to
duces collateral effects, such as permanent itching and 50% of the cases. In either disease, the exact etiopatho-
paresthesia. genesis remains unknown. In a few cases of cheilitis
Our patient did not require a biopsy. Biopsy was judged granulomatosa, the development of this disease is poten-
unnecessary because there was no clear-cut evidence that tially associated with food allergy (mainly cinnamon and
a biopsy would constructively help diagnose CG. Based on benzoate compounds) [6].
two relevant studies [1, 2], the histopathological findings Although one case of CG is not sufficient to judge the
were nonspecific, consisting mainly of chronic inflammation performance of a therapy, the treatment used in the present
with various degrees of nonspecific sialadenitis and ductal case appears to be effective. Tacrolimus was instrumental in
ectasia of the minor salivary glands and fibrosis within the preventing crust formation, possibly due to its effective
glands. action in controlling glandular inflammation by curbing the
Case Reports in Dentistry 3

production of proinflammatory cytokines inside the minor


salivary glands.

Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References
[1] S. Reiter, M. Vered, N. Yarom, C. Goldsmith, and M. Gorsky,
“Cheilitis glandularis: clinico-histopathological diagnostic
criteria,” Oral Diseases, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 335–339, 2011.
[2] M. M. Nico, J. Nakano de Melo, and S. V. Lourenço, “Cheilitis
glandularis: a clinicopathological study in 22 patients,” Journal
of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 62, no. 2,
pp. 233–238, 2010.
[3] E. Erkek, S. Sahin, R. Kilic, and S. Erdogan, “A case of cheilitis
glandularis superimposed on oral lichen planus: successful
palliative treatment with topical tacrolimus and pimecroli-
mus,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and
Venereology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 999-1000, 2007.
[4] H. J. Bovenschen, “Novel treatment for cheilitis glandularis,”
Acta Dermato Venereologica, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 99-100, 2009.
[5] P. R. Carrington and T. D. Horn, “Cheilitis glandularis:
a clinical marker for both malignancy and/or severe in-
flammatory disease of the oral cavity,” Journal of the American
Academy of Dermatology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 336-337, 2006.
[6] K. A. Al Johani, D. R. Moles, T. A. Hodgson, S. R. Porter, and
S. Fedele, “Oralfacial granulomatosis: clinical features and
long-term outcome of therapy,” Journal of the American
Academy of Dermatology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 611–620, 2010.

You might also like