Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Saman et al, (2012), stated that the records management was the key success
hinder the misuse of power or corruption, case postponement and delayed decision.
It also reflected that the good image of judiciary system and upholds the right of
individual and society at large. The paper unfolded the implementation of the
that the literature review, background in Malaysian judiciary system and eCourt as
sia_A_case_study p.25
The public can access eCourts through the Public Kiosk Inquiry System, a
The user can look for cases by entering the case number, case title, or name
into the search bar and clicking “Find”. The results will show the case number, case
title, status of the case, branch handling the case, and the dates of the next hearing.
On another tab is a calendar that allows the public to see the scheduled hearings on
a given month or day of different court branches. For the judges and personnel, the
eCourt interface is a dashboard with widgets. Judges will be able to see their pending
and overdue tasks, court statistics, ageing cases, and overstaying detainees.
branches immediately after they are filed. With the Automated Hearing System
component of the eCourt, ready templates for court issuances can be printed on the
congestion in courts. And as of March 23, OCA said that there are 635 decongestion
officers deployed nationwide. According to the call for applications OCA released last
year, court decongestion officers are expected to be Bachelor of Laws or Juris Doctor
graduates. They were listed to be employed on a contractual bases for two years and
under the direct supervion of the judge of the branch or court where they are
assigned. They are short term, term, effectively, project employees with a budget to
look at particular courts and to help them determine which cases need to be decided
immediately. Those are part of the efforts to streamline and make resolutions faster.
P.24
Cabato (2017) expressed that the eCourt was first launched in year 2013
through Hon. Camile Ting, the Court Attorney at the office of the Court Administrator.
Currently there are 212 operational eCourt System in most cities including Quezon
City, Lapu-Lapu City, Angeles City, Cebu City, Davao City, Tacloban City, Pasig City,
Makati City, and Mandaluyong City. The government goal is in open 297 eCourt
system by the end of 2017. The Supreme Court is looking at launch the eCourt
program in Region IV-A, Region III, and the rest of the National Capital Judicial
The eCourt system is part of the Philippine Supreme Courts initiative to increase
and providing lawyers and litigants easy access to case information. Chief Justice
Sereno said that the eCourt would speed up court processes, eliminate possible
sources of corruption and ensure greater transparency. It will remove doubt that
money is leaking in the court system, she added, as the system will automatically
assign cases and determine fees, replacing the time-consuming manual process.
The chief justice also demonstrated how the system which she said would put the
As soon as a case is filed, lawyers and litigants know which court and judge their
case has been assigned to. The system also generates barcodes that allow tracking
can access case information at one of the kiosks in the courts lobbies.
https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/rule_of_law/where_we_work/asia/philippines/news/
news_philippines_ecourt_0813/ p. 21
Caliwan (2013) explained that the eCourts will not only help in the speedy
resolution of cases but also make the courts less prone to corruption since it provides
for random electronic sampling and raffling of cases, the continuous trial system and
the use of judicial affidavits in lieu of taking of direct testimony of witnesses. The
Enterprise Information Systems Plan or EISP is the Judiciary’s IT Master Plan would
be also paved the way for a modern, efficient and transparent court system. Its key
component, the eCourt system, is a path to a future when layers could be filed
pleadings by uploading them online while in their offices. It also notified the judges of
deliverables and deadlines, and provides them with templates for orders and
decisions to fast-track their orders immediately after the hearing, target aged cases,
Mateo (2013) claimed that the Supreme Court (SC) administrator, Jose Midas
Marquez has ordered Quezon City court employees to conduct a month-long dry run
of the electronic court (eCourt) system to evaluate its accuracy, security and integrity.
He issued a circular ordering both the trial courts and the offices of the clerks of court
to use the the eCourt system to record, docket, process, monitor and report case
information in all active cases of the affected courts. He said majority of trial courts
had encoded more than 80 percent of the cases for the system, which seeks to give
the public easier access to the cases being heard at the local courts. During the trial
run, the courts were still required to maintain a parallel paper based recording system
involving incoming and outgoing case information. Marquez said this would be
discounted only after the evaluation of the results of the trial run. The Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is perceived as a lumbering giant: slow to act and react,
slow to adjust and slow to adapt. The Supreme Court has embarked on a program
designed to improve, with the help of the latest technology. Its aim is to transform the
entire courtroom into an automated trial room. Its aim is to transform the entire
courtroom into an automated trial room. This means that during trial, every activity is
appraised electronically including orders issued by the judge, minutes of the hearing
(just) conducted, the judges notes on the testimonies taken, markings of evidence
and issuances of writs and other processes. Also, information on cases will be
encoded upon filing, together with subsequent orders are instantly released and
immediately encoded.
Chief Justice Ma. Lourdes Sereno gave the name eCourt to the package of
reformist changes that the High Court has begun to introduce into the practices and
procedures of the nation’s courts and legal profession. The eCourt program is
technologies can support different areas of court operations. Such technologies have
been used for the automation of administrative tasks like case tracking, case
management system, and office automation. On the other hand, ICT has been
designed to offer to lawyers and citizens’ access to statutes, regulations and case
information. This advancement must be used for all practical purposes like recording
unnecessary delay that is generally caused in bringing the accused to the court. P.17
https://www.enterpriseconnect.com/orlando?_mc=sem_x_3pvr_le_tsnr_ecor_x_goog_x-
ec20nbinfocom&gclid=CjwKCAjwo9rtBRAdEiwA_WXcFoJ0PBbN6Gz3SDluFY2p3prCz15alwcKS1ObKk
oSMMIKDE7uWXKbexoCo7IQAvD_BwE