Rendering the article

The article under the study comes from newspaper called Russian
newspaper. Its name is RAS President Alexander Sergeev: Russia with its natural
resources should win the climate dispute. Their Dirty games. It’s dated 24th of
November, 2021, so the article was written recently. Authors of the article are
Yury Medvedev and Sergei Tikhonov. They are very popular journalists of this
company, they write a lot of articles for this publishing office.
The authors are touching upon political problems of a new energy regime
and how politicians can achieve zero emissions, taking into account their specifics
and preserve the economy or living standards. There are several problems in the
article. The journalists ask such questions as: Why should Russia pay a carbon tax
of $ 5-8 billion annually on what it calls the "lungs of the planet" forests? How can
we fundamentally change approaches to the Green Agenda? How many wind and
solar power plants are needed to meet human energy needs? Authors talks about
this with the President of Russian Sciences Academy Alexander Sergeev.
The idea of the story describes the process of collecting votes about these
questions. The article cites the arguments of several representatives who attended
the meeting with A. Sergeev. Some of them were in favor or against the solution of
that problems. The article continues with a brief characterization of Alexander
Sergeev, his tenure as the head of the Academy, and the reasons why he can help
consider and solve these problems. The discussion does not have any conclusion as
a result of solving this issue. The arguments that were offered in support or against
the question did not come to their logical conclusion. Probably this issue is still
under discussion, and the solution of this problem will be covered in another article
of the newspaper.
In my personal opinion, authors managed to describe everything in an
understandable manner. They spoke about all the opinions in an accessible way.
They invited the reader to familiarize himself with both points of view, so that a
person has the opportunity to have his own thoughts on this issue.