PEOPLE V. DE DIOS (G.R. NO. 234018; 6 JUNE 2018)Facts: In an entrapment operation, the accused was caughtpeddling a minor for sexual trade, hence, an information for aviolation of Section 4 (a), in relation to Sections 3 (a) and 6 (a) ofR.A. No. 9208 was filed against the accused. The court found theaccused guilty of qualified trafficking and was affirmed by theCourt of Appeals.Issue: Whether accused may be held liable for R.A. No. 9208.Ruling: Yes.AAA, then still a minor, was among the girls of
PEOPLE V. DE DIOS (G.R. NO. 234018; 6 JUNE 2018)Facts: In an entrapment operation, the accused was caughtpeddling a minor for sexual trade, hence, an information for aviolation of Section 4 (a), in relation to Sections 3 (a) and 6 (a) ofR.A. No. 9208 was filed against the accused. The court found theaccused guilty of qualified trafficking and was affirmed by theCourt of Appeals.Issue: Whether accused may be held liable for R.A. No. 9208.Ruling: Yes.AAA, then still a minor, was among the girls of
PEOPLE V. DE DIOS (G.R. NO. 234018; 6 JUNE 2018)Facts: In an entrapment operation, the accused was caughtpeddling a minor for sexual trade, hence, an information for aviolation of Section 4 (a), in relation to Sections 3 (a) and 6 (a) ofR.A. No. 9208 was filed against the accused. The court found theaccused guilty of qualified trafficking and was affirmed by theCourt of Appeals.Issue: Whether accused may be held liable for R.A. No. 9208.Ruling: Yes.AAA, then still a minor, was among the girls of