Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Guide Ethicsdocx PDF Free
Course Guide Ethicsdocx PDF Free
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course is divided into two parts, the general ethics and the special ethics. The
general ethics introduces the principles of morality, the significance of moral actions to daily life
and to life’s ultimate meaning. Special ethics deals with the application of moral principles to
problems and issues confronting the individual.
Ethics deals with principles of ethical behavior in modern society at the level of the
person, society, and interaction with the environment and other shared resources. (CMO 20 s
2013) Morality pertains to the standards of the right and wrong that an individual originally
picks up from the community. The course discusses the context and principles of ethical
behavior in modern society at the level of individual, society, and in interaction with the
environment and other shared resources. The course also teaches students to make moral
decisions by using dominant moral frameworks and by applying a seven-step moral reasoning
model to analyze and solve moral dilemmas.
The course is organized according to the three (3) main elements of the moral
experience: (a) agent, including context-cultural, communal, and environmental; (b) the act, and
(c) reason or framework (for the act).
This course includes the mandatory topic on taxation.
COURSE OBJECTIVE:
a. Differentiate between moral and non-moral problems;
b. Describe what a moral experience is as it happens in different levels of human
existence;
c. Explain the influence of Filipino culture on the way students look at moral experience
and solve moral dilemmas;
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES:
a. Describe the elements of moral development and moral experience;
b. Use ethical frameworks or principles to analyze moral experiences;
c. Make sound ethical judgments based on principles, fact, and the stakeholders
affected;
d. Develop sensitivity to the common good; and
e. Understand and internalize the principles of ethical behavior in modern society
at the level of the person, society, and in interaction with the environment and
other shared resources. a. Differentiate between moral and non-moral
problems;
LEARNERS’ PROFILE:
Students enrolled in this course are education students (regular or irregular) who
can adapt to the remote learning mode as specified in this course. Delivery of
instructions are synchronous and asynchronous using digitized and non-digitized
methods in the delivery of learning materials.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION DETAILS:
Both formative and summative tests will be administered remotely using the
following modes:
a. Google classroom and other applications in Google suite such as google forms,
google meet etc. may be used for required assessment/evaluation activities. Note that
evaluation may include demonstration thru video.
b. Aside from the traditional mode of assessing, authentic assessment in the form of
reflective essays, reaction and term papers, and movie analysis and/or video critiquing
shall also be employed. In terms of rating, a rubric for each task will be provided.
MODE OF DELIVERY: Flexible learning using both face to face and remote learning modalities
will be used as follows:
a. Google meet for lectures, orientations, meetings, group activities.
b. etc.
RULES:
a. Synchronous meetings such as orientation, examinations etc. should be pre-scheduled
(it should be stated in the Course outline). Invitation to attend the meeting must be
provided a week before the schedule. Rescheduling shall not be allowed without the
approval of the head and the dean.
Live lectures (thru google meet) should be set (for the whole semester) and be strictly
followed. Hence, the said lecture will be recorded for the benefit of those who are not able
to participate in the live lecture.
b. Use of the messenger group to clarify lessons and instructions in the activities
including student interaction. This will allow exchange of information and practice critical
thinking among students. The professor shall set a particular schedule to respond to
all the queries posted in the group chat. Scheduled consultation meetings with the
professor are allowed through google meet.
d. The use of textbooks to support the learning process are encouraged. Students can
purchase the textbook in any available bookstore. Hence, a handout which will be sent
through email, the PowerPoint presentation will be made available for the students.
e. Changes in the schedule are not allowed unless approved by the head and the dean. A
communication letter bearing valid reason must be accomplished for approval.
STUDENT CONDUCT
A. During synchronous discussion: (via Google Meet)
a. Students are expected to join the live lecture and participate in the discussion via chat
forum. Students are expected to standby 10 minutes before the schedule of each live
discussion.
b. Mute your microphones while listening, unmute when the facilitator asks a question or
use the raise hand application or chatbox to ask questions.
c. Do not multi-tasks to focus and understand the lesson clearly.
d. Do not interfere either with your facilitator or any of your classmates to better
understand each other’s point of view.
e. Read all the lessons given prior to the scheduled synchronous discussion to ensure
active participation. TAKE DOWN NOTES.
f. Considering pre-requisite or lessons which should have been learned prior to the next
lessons, students are required to submit activities as scheduled through google
classroom(or any platform as appropriate). Be mindful of the instructions given for each
task such as deadlines, format including number of pages as required etc.
g. Be polite in expressing your concepts or ideas in any chat box available. Remember
to respect one’s idea. Bear in mind that individuals are unique thus, diversity will surely
arise in many aspects. Before posting your queries, kindly browse and check previous
posts to avoid duplication.
h. Manage your time in consideration of the other modules to be accomplished from
other courses. AVOID PROCRASTINATION. Remember to sustain quality education.
You are advised to read and understand the tasks given to you and settle with an output
which is of quality and high standard.
i. You can post your questions and clarifications in the Chat box. These will be
attended by the professor either during, as necessary, or after the lecture. The
participation of everyone during the discussion is highly encouraged.
B. You may request a consultation meeting with the professor thru google meet (for group
work/activities as necessary). It shall be set 1 week prior to schedule.
C. Any form of academic dishonesty, e.g. plagiarism and cheating shall not be tolerated. This
will be dealt accordingly based on the degree of the offense.
D. This course guide is intended only for students enrolled in this particular subject and
schedule. You are prohibited to share and post videos and learning materials related in this
course to any platform. Violators will be dealt accordingly.
Bulaong
, Oscar
G., Jr,
Calano,
Mark
Joseph
T, and
Lagliva
Albert
m, et.al
(2018),
“Ethics
Foundat
ions of
Moral
Valuatio
n,”: Rex
Book
Store
Dooley,
Mark
(1999),
“Questi
oning
Ethics:
Contem
porary
Debates
in
Philoso
phy”,
Cambrid
ge
Universi
ty Press
Glenn,
Paul J.
(1988),
Ethics:
A Class
Manual
in Moral
Philoso
phy
Grassin,
Victor
(1992),
“Moral
Reasoni
ng:
Ethical
Theory
and
Some
Contem
porary
Moral
problem
s, 2nd
ed.:
Jersey,
Prentice
Hall,
Kiddler,
Rushwo
rth
(2003).
“How
Good
people
make
Tough
Choices
:
Resolvi
ng the
Dilemm
as of
Ethical
Living:
New
York:
harper
Bulaong
, Oscar
G., Jr,
Calano,
Mark
Joseph
T, and
Lagliva
Albert
m, et.al
(2018),
“Ethics
Foundat
ions of
Moral
Valuatio
n,”: Rex
Book
Store
Glenn,
Paul J.
(1988),
Ethics:
A Class
Manual
in Moral
Philoso
phy
Grassin,
Victor
(1992),
“Moral
Reasoni
ng:
Ethical
Theory
and
Some
Contem
porary
Moral
problem
s, 2nd
ed.:
Jersey,
Prentice
Hall, pp-
11-47
Tomas
Aquinas
(2006)
Summa
Theolog
iae:
Critical
Essays
edited
by Brian
Davies
Week CHAPTER
6 3: Synchronous meeting Pasco, Finding news article about
DEONTOL 11:00-12:30 Marc categorical imperative of
OGICAL Oliver Kant. Share your views and
ETHICS: D. V. insights about it.
IMMANUE Activity: Fulluent
L KANT e Deadline:
1. Reading of short article on Suarez,
Autonomo Module 5 page 4 and A week after the meeting.
us Agustin
Reason, Martin mode of submission:
Goodwill, G. Google classroom
and Duty Rodrigu
2. ez, Objective type of test
Obligation Ph.D.
is (2018) Answer an objective and
Understoo Ethics C essay type of quiz on
d as “Man &E google form
as an End Publishi Deadline:
in ng Within the 3-hour
Himself/He Compan synchronous and
rself,” asynchronous learning
Autonomo y (pp.
us, and 59 - 68)
Universaliz
able Related
3. Kantian Reading
Ethics and s:
Religion
Agapay,
Ramon
R.”Ethic
s and
the
Filipino”,
2nd
Edition
(2008),
National
Book
Store,
Mandal
uyong
City.
Bulaong
, Oscar
G., Jr,
Calano,
Mark
Joseph
T, and
Lagliva
Albert
m, et.al
(2018),
“Ethics
Foundat
ions of
Moral
Valuatio
n,”: Rex
Book
Store
Grassin,
Victor
(1992),
“Moral
Reasoni
ng:
Ethical
Theory
and
Some
Contem
porary
Moral
problem
s, 2nd
ed.:
Jersey,
Prentice
Hall,
Imman
uel Kant
(2007)
Kant’s
Critique
of
Practica
l reason
and
other
Works
on the
Theory
of
Ethics
(Transla
ted by
Thomas
Kingsmil
l Abott)
Robert
Loude
(2000)
Kant’s
Impure
Ethics
John
Stuart
Mill
(1998)
Utilitaria
nism: In
Utilitaria
nism
and
Other
Essays
Week CHAPTER Conduct an online
8 5: Synchronous meeting Marc interview to a chinese
ASIAN 11:00-12:30 Oliver acquaintance or friend
ETHICAL D. about his/her practices of
TRADITIO Pasco, ancestor worship and ask
NS Other activities: V. about the conception of
1. The Share views regarding Fulluent good human behavior
Vegas and provided images about Asian e
Upanishad ethical traditions Suarez, Deadline:
s and A week after the meeting.
2. Agustin mode of submission:
Buddhism Martin Google classroom
3. Chinese G.
Philosophy Rodrigu
and ez, Answer a quiz on google
Confucian Ph.D. form
Ethics (2018)
Ethics C Deadline:
&E Within the 3-hour
Publishi synchronous and
ng asynchronous learning.
Compan
y (pp.
88 –
105)
Manuel
B. Dy Jr.
A Short
Note on
Integrati
ng
Confuci
an
Ethics
in
Busines
s Ethics
(unpubli
shed
manuscr
ipt)
Roque
J.
Ferriols
(1966)
The
Psychic
Entity in
Aurobin
do’s The
Life
Divine
Philip J.
Ivanhoe
and
Bryan
W. Van
Norden
(2001)
Reading
s in
Classica
l
Chinese
Philosop
hy
Donald
S.
Lopez
(2017)
Eightfol
d Path
Patrick
Olivelle
(2008)
The
Upanish
ads
Louis
Ed
Renou
(1962)
Hinduis
m
Week CHAPTER Study a pressing issue in
9 6: Marc your community or school.
DISCOUR Synchronous meeting Oliver D. Choose a situation where
SE 11:00-12:30 Pasco, discourse ethics can be
V.
Fulluent
e
Suarez,
and
Agustin
Martin
G.
Rodrigu
ez,
Ph.D. applied. Answer questions
ETHICS
(2018) written on module 8, pages
1.
Ethics C 7-8.
Competing
&E
Conceptio
Publishi Deadline:
ns of the
ng
Good Other activities: Compan A week after the meeting.
2.
y (pp. mode of submission:
“Legislatin
Name 3 acceptable and 106 – Google classroom
g” for
unacceptable behaviors in: 127)
Autonomo
a. library
us, Answer a quiz on google
b. church
Rational form.
c. theater
Beings Jurgen
3. Shared Haberm Deadline:
Opinion
as Within the 3-hour
and Will- (1998) synchronous and
Informatio Between asynchronous learning.
n Facts
and
Norms:
Contribu
tions to
a
Discours
e Theory
of Law
and
Democr
acy
Week
MIDTERM EXAMINATION
10
Week PART 2: Marc
11 SPECIAL Oliver
TOPICS Synchronous meeting D. Watch videos on the
IN ETHICS 11:00-12:30 Pasco, different special ethics:
V.
Fulluent Environmental Ethics:
Enumerate at least two e https://www.youtube.com/w
Suarez,
and atch?v=ZiVIV67fclc
Agustin
Martin Business Ethics:
G. https://www.youtube.com/w
Rodrigu atch?v=IEmUag1ri6U
ez,
Ph.D. Feminist Ethics:
(2018) https://www.youtube.com/w
Ethics C atch?v=4iaCpAFypq8
&E
Publishi Biomedical Ethics:
ng https://www.youtube.com/w
Compan atch?v=cY-7gwnWESk
y (pp.
129 – Create a Venn Diagram of
131 the 4 special ethics.
general facts, acceptable
considerations, behaviors or Deadline:
act in the following fields or
professions. Share your view Within the 3-hour
and perspective towards it in synchronous and
a concise manner. asynchronous learning.
Deadline:
A week after the meeting.
mode of submission:
Google classroom
Erazim
Kohak
(1984) A
Human’
s Place
in
Nature
R. Eric
Reidenb
ach and
Donald
P. Robin
(1991) A
Concept
ual
Model of
Corpora
te Moral
Develop
ment
(pp. 273
– 284)
Manuel
Velasqu
ez
(2012)
Busines
s Ethics:
Concept
s and
Cases
Marc
CHAPTER
Oliver Search and watch a movie
9:
D. in which women’s rights,
THE
Pasco, characters and careers are
QUESTIO
V. exemplified and answer the
N OF
Fulluent questions on Module 12,
WOMEN
e pages 6-7
AND Synchronous meeting
Suarez,
THEIR 11:00-12:30
and
EMANCIP Deadline:
Agustin
ATION A week after the meeting.
Week Martin
1. Why Other activities: mode of submission:
s 15 G.
Feminist Google classroom
and Rodrigu
Ethics? Observe three pictures and
16 ez,
a. Equality share your views and Ph.D.
and perspectives about their Answer a quiz on google
(2018)
Discriminat advocacies and stand to form
Ethics C
ion women’s rights &E
b. How We Deadline:
Publishi
Can Work Within the 3-hour
ng
Toward synchronous and
Compan
Emancipati asynchronous learning.
y (pp.
on
170 –
191
Week CHAPTER Marc Watch the movie
18 10: Oliver Unplanned and create a
BIOMEDI Synchronous meeting: D. reaction paper based on
CAL 11:00-12:30 Pasco, the format on Module 13,
ETHICS V. pages 6-7
1. Fulluent Deadline:
Personalist Other activities: e A week after the meeting.
Biomedical Suarez, mode of submission:
Care Read an article entitled and Google classroom
2. Ethics of “Organ Trafficking and Agustin
“Prenatal Human Needs” found on Martin Answer a quiz on google
Personhoo Module 13, pages 2-3 G. form
d” Rodrigu
3. Ectopic ez, Deadline:
Pregnancy Ph.D. Within the 3-hour
and the (2018) synchronous and
Principle of Ethics C asynchronous learning.
Double &E
Effect Publishi
4. Child- ng
Bearing Compan
Enhancem y (pp.
ents, Self- 192 -
Improvem 203)
ent, and
General Oscar
Well-being G.
5. Bulaong
Extraordin Jr, Mark
ary Means, Joesph
Euthanasi T.
a, and the Calano,
Significanc Albert
e of a M.
Living Will Lagliva
et. al.
(2018)
Ethics:
Foundat
ions of
Moral
Valuatio
n Rex
Book
Store
(pp. 129
- 136)
Edmund
Edmund
Pellegri
no and
A.I.
Faden
(1999)
Jewish
and
Catholic
Bioethic
s
Lisa
Sowle
Cahill
(2005)
Theologi
cal
Bioethic
s:
Particip
ation,
Justice,
and
Change
Week
FINAL EXAMINATION
19
R. COURSE REQUIREMENTS:
Research Paper
Reaction/Reflection Papers
Video Advertisement
Quizzes
MIdterm Exam
Final Exam
S. GRADING SYSTEM:
Midterm and Final Grades:
Class Standing 50%
Major Examinations 50%
TOTAL 100%
U. RUBRIC FOR EVALUATION: Rubrics for all activities should be indicated below.
GENERIC RUBRIC FOR REFLECTIVE ESSAY, REACTION AND TERM PAPERS, VENN
DIAGARAM
SCOR
RUBRIC FOR EVALUATION
E
3 – The 2 – The 1 – The 0.5 – The 0–
explanation explanation explanation explanation Has no
is directly is relevant is quite is not clear explanatio
relevant to to the topic. relevant to and has a n
the topic. Most of the the topic. very rough
Every detail details Only a few transition of
RELEVAN
points contribute of the idea. The
CE
toward the to the details details are
topic. developme contribute not relevant
nt of the to the to the topic.
topic. developme
nt of the
topic.
EVIDENCE/ 3 – The 2 – The 1 – The 0.5 – The 0–
explanation explanation explanation explanation Has no
shows at shows at shows 3 to shows at explanatio
least 9 least 6 to 8 5 most 2 n
ARGUMEN correct/vali correct/vali correct/vali correct/vali
T d evidences d evidences d evidences d evidences
to support to support to support to support
his/her his/her his/her his/her
answer. answer. answer. answer.
2 – The 1.5 – The 1 – The 0.5 – The 0–
explanation explanation explanation explanation Has no
is clear, has is clear, has is is not clear explanatio
a very good a good somewhat and has a n
flow of transition, clear and very rough
CLARITY discussion, most of the has a rough transition of
every detail details are transition ideas.
is connected from one
connected to each idea to
to each other. another.
other.
2 – The 1.5 – The 1 – The 1.5 – The 0–
explanation explanation explanation explanation Has no
has no has 1 to 2 has 3 to 4 has at least explanatio
error in errors in errors in 5 errors in n
TECHNI-
grammar, grammar, grammar, grammar,
CALITY
spelling, spelling, spelling, spelling,
and and and and
punctuation punctuation punctuation punctuation
s. s. s. s.
OVERALL SCORE:
5 4 3 2 COMMENTS
Focus Topic and title Most of the Topic and title Topic and
are clear and topic and title are difficult to titles are not
can be easily are clear and identify, the clearly
identified, the can easily be main idea is identified,
main idea is identified, the not clearly there is no
also clear and main idea is stated, and main idea
is appropriate appropriate few identified, and
to the topic, to the topic, illustrations illustrations do
and all and most compliment not
illustrations illustrations the purpose of complement
compliment compliment the visual the purpose of
the purpose of the purpose the visual
the visual of the visual
REFERENCES:
Example:
Marc Oliver D. Pasc o, V. Fulluente Suarez, and Agustin Martin G. Rodriguez, Ph.D. (2018)
Ethics C & E Publishing Company
Oscar G. Bulaong Jr, Mark Joesph T. Calano, Albert M. Lagliva et. al. (2018) Ethics:
Foundations of Moral Valuation Rex Book Store
Robert C. Barlett and Susan D. Collins (2011) Aristotle. Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics
Tomas Aquinas (2006) Summa Theologiae: Critical Essays edited by Brian Davies